Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Dear Ramesh, Sorry, no. May Jupiter's light shine on us,, Narasimha > Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat > > Dear Shri Narasimhaji, > > " JHora latest version has a feature which can show any > special longitude you enter in all charts. Robert was talking about > that. " > > Is the above option available in the latest free version too? I shall > appreciate guidance to use it. > > Best Regards > Ramesh > > > > pvr108 [pvr@c...] > Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:23 PM > varahamihira > |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of > life > > > Dear Anna, > > Check out > > varahamihira/message/10739 > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > > > Dear Narasimha, > > Would you please explain " that the exact > > longitude of " bhukta tithi sphuta " can be worked out and > > its placement in various divisions can be examined to > > clearly understand the purpose of one's creation.' > > > > In all examples I've seen rasi only, irrespectively of points? > > How would exact points in various vargas add new quality of > interpretation- other than rashi placement alone? Do you > assume 'potential aspects' or.. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > Dear Jay, > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > whether we are really serving the science by this. > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > Shiva's form only ? > Regards, > Chandrashekhar.. I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of words in response. The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of life is to get moksha. But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind each incarnation. Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free. Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and various jyotirlingas. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Dear Narasimha, You wrote: " >The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > each incarnation. " . I fully agree to the part following 'But..', but do you mean to imply that ALL living souls were/are/will be " past sinners " ? That leaves us with no good souls here on earth... Warm regards Jay Weiss - " pvr108 " <pvr <varahamihira > Monday, October 27, 2003 12:50 AM |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > Dear Jay, > > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is > fetching > > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka > might be > > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > > whether we are really serving the science by this. > > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's > knowledge nor > > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of > life to > > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and > Punya ? > > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and > Ishta > > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > > Shiva's form only ? > > Regards, > > Chandrashekhar.. > > I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of > words in response. > > The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of > life is to get moksha. > > But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their > energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that > the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > each incarnation. > > Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of > the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free. > > Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another > religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we > understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand > the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and > various jyotirlingas. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > > > > > |Om Tat Sat| > http://www.varahamihira > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Hare Rama Krsna Yes, the Jyotirlinga are not a simple way to see the life purpose, the whole chart is the reason for incarnating. They are showing a higher purpose in life beyond what we are incarnating for. We still need to see a person’s dharma, artha, kama, moksa, and everything associated with that in the chart. The Ishta guides our Atman to moksa (as it is seen from the 12th to karakamsa- jivanmuktamsa). The Ishta is to be worshiped everyday (esp. in the mornings), no matter the rupa it is connected to Visnu. The Jyotirlinga is the light inside us always, and we can be aware of it always, it is connected to the AK, the light that illuminates the individual atmam. It is connected to Shiva. External worship of the Jyotirlinga for the average person can be done on Mondays. Namah Shivaya Freedom -----Original Message----- Chandrashekhar Sharma [boxdel] Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:11 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Jay, I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think whether we are really serving the science by this. Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to Shiva's form only ? Regards, Chandrashekhar.. J. Weiss wrote: Dear Narasimha, Sarajit and members, Indeed another fascinating topic of Jyotish but doesn't that 'simply' leave us (again?) with only 12 groups of " purpose of this life " ? Please enlighten me/us. Kindest regards Jay Weiss ----- Original Message ----- Ramesh Gangaramani varahamihira Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:30 AM RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat Dear Sarajitji, I would like to know my purpose of life too. My tithi left is 2.78%, hence spent is 97.22%. As per this my Jyotirlingam will be indicated by 12th sign which is Pisces! I am a Leo lagna and Pisces is my 8th house. What would be the purpose of my life? One of the earlier mails indicated Triyambekshwara as my Jyotirlinga that I should pray. Is that right? Thank you for your help and kind regards Ramesh -----Original Message----- Sarajit Poddar [sarajit] Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:27 AM varahamihira RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life || Jaya Jagannath || Dear Dilipda, The percentage of Tithi already spent is 86.23% according to your calculation. Just find what is 86.23% of 12 and you have 10.34 as the reminder. Round up and you have 11 as the Jyotirlingam indicating sign. This is kedarnath as you said and represent 5th house. The mission is knowledge and mantra. What else? See what else is indicated by placement of the planets there and the aspects! Best Wishes Sarajit -----Original Message----- drdilip [drdilip] Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:35 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life II NAMAH SHIVAAYA II Dear Narasimha ji Namaste, Any topic of jyotish gets a new dimension and a higher meaning when you explain. Thanks for explaining so nicely! In my chart, JHL 5 shows krishna saptami and 13.77 % of it is left. This is subtracted from 100 , and we get 86.23. 86.23*3= 258.69. Dividing it by 25 , we get 10 and some fraction, rounding it up, we get 11. Thus the sign in my case is aquarius. The jyotirlinga is kedarnath. Aquarius is my 5th house in rasi chart. What is the purpose then of my creation? Mantra sadhana ? Devotion to Lord ? Please explain. Warm regards Dilip Banerjee. ----- Original Message ----- pvr108 varahamihira Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:07 AM |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Namashshivaayai Cha Namashshivaaya Dear Karen, Namaste. As the mantra I wrote at the beginning says, Moon and Sun symbolize Shivaa (Parvati) and Shiva respectively. It is their union that produces us all, for various purposes. Your mail captured it well and you remembered Sanjay's teaching so well. BTW, there is an easier way to compute this, if you have JHLite. In JHora or JHoraLite, look at the % of tithi left (both give it). Subtract the number from 100. Multiply the result with 3. Divide the resulting number by 25 and round it up to get an integer. That gives the index to the sign (1=Ar, 2=Ta and so on). Example: In my chart, JHoraLite shows Krishna Chaturdasi and shows the % of tithi left as 85.99%. Now, subtracting 85.99 from 100, I get 100-85.99=14.01. Multiplying with 3, I get 14.01x3=42.03. Dividing 42.03 by 25, I get (1+some fraction). Rounding it *up*, the integer I get is 2. So the sign in my case is Taurus (2nd sign). This sign shows the purpose of one's creation. In my case, Taurus is my 9th house as well as Lagnamsaka. It shows dharma as the purpose of my creation by my parents. Sanjay spoke on this in great detail last year at the west coast seminar too. Get those CDs from Lakshmi! There is one more thing. I don't remember if this was recorded in any of the CD's or not, but Sanjay mentioned using AK and AmK instead of Sun and Moon too (I remember that the first time Sanjay mentioned it was when we were all driving to Lakshmi's house one evening for dinner, but he may have mentioned it in a subsequent class too. I am not sure). Sun and Moon show the natural (naisargika/viswa/universal) atma and mana. They are relevant as far as creation (nisarga) is concerned. Naisargika karakatwas are lorded by Brahma, while chara karakwas are ruled by Vishnu. The individual atma and mana are shown by AK and AmK. They are more relevant as far as one's activities and spiritual progress are concerned (which are a Vishnu thing and not a Brahma thing)!! Sanjay mentioned doing similar calculations based on AK and AmK too. I leave it to you to interpret this... May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > II OM NAMAH SHIVAAYA II > > Dear Dr. Dilip, > > I heard Sanjay-ji speak of this in this year's East Coast conference briefly. This is what I remember and I hope any errors will be corrected. > > One tithi is defined as 12 degrees of movement of the Moon with respect to the Sun. Each of the 12 degrees that make up a single tithi can be assigned to each of the 12 rasi depending on the portion of the tithi that has passed. The sign of the derived rasi will determine the jyotirlinga. > > Sanjay-ji used his own chart as an example. The chart is attached for reference in .jhd format. > > Moon 19 Aq 58= 319.81 degrees > Sun 21Cn 05= 111.07 > > moon-sun= 208.8/ 12 degrees= > > 17.408 > > So 17 tithis have passed and is currently in 18 tithi. Or in other words, 3rd day of the dark half subtracting 15. Most software will do this part.. > > 17 tithis x 12 degree/tithi = 204 > 208.8- 204= 4.4 degrees into the tithi > Converting this to signs starting from Aries. Fours have passed and the correct sign based on janma tithi is 5 sign i.e Leo. > > The jyotirlinga for Leo, as given in VRA is Dhusaneswar. > > This is my understanding of how the jyotirlinga of the tithi is computed. You helped me by writing that this jyotirlinga is the giver of sacred knowledge. I'm wondering if there is also a benefit to one's health as well. > > Best Wishes, > Karen > > > Dear Gurus and learned members, > > Often we get confused about our purpose in life,- why we have come here, what was the intension of the Supreme Being to send us in this lovely and terrible world! No amount of knowledge found in the books of philosophy can give us satisfaction. A revelation, a spiritual understanding can only quench our thirst for this secrete knowledge. > > In last year's West Coast Conference, Guruji Pt. Sanjay Rath had revealed the way to this sacred knowledge. He told that , the Jyotirlinga associated with the tithi of a person, is the giver of this knowledge. If one constantly does the " Japa " of the Mantra associated with the Jyotirlinga , this knowledge comes easily. > > ......I confused in understanding this. Would anyone please make me understand what Guruji wanted to say i.e. how to find out the Jyotirlinga associated with the Janma Tithi. > > Warm regards > Dilip Banerjee. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 Hare Rama Krsna Yes to be born in Bhu loka, you have to have some sin. It is said that Shani and Gulika are the main causes of our birth here in Bhu loka. Look at Ista and Kasta phala of each planet to get a bigger picture on this. Namah Sivaya J. Weiss [jayhw] Monday, October 27, 2003 2:44 AM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Narasimha, You wrote: " >The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > each incarnation. " . I fully agree to the part following 'But..', but do you mean to imply that ALL living souls were/are/will be " past sinners " ? That leaves us with no good souls here on earth... Warm regards Jay Weiss - " pvr108 " <pvr <varahamihira > Monday, October 27, 2003 12:50 AM |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > Dear Jay, > > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is > fetching > > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka > might be > > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > > whether we are really serving the science by this. > > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's > knowledge nor > > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of > life to > > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and > Punya ? > > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and > Ishta > > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > > Shiva's form only ? > > Regards, > > Chandrashekhar.. > > I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of > words in response. > > The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of > life is to get moksha. > > But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their > energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that > the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > each incarnation. > > Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of > the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free. > > Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another > religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we > understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand > the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and > various jyotirlingas. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > > > > > |Om Tat Sat| > http://www.varahamihira > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 hamsassoham Unless one is born as a jivan-mukta (librated soul), who is not moved by the dualities of this world, we are indeed sinners. Unless one is unmoved by the pain of childbirth and the pangs of hunger felt by a child, there is still some karma that the " atma " must face. ajit - " J. Weiss " <jayhw <varahamihira > Sunday, October 26, 2003 11:43 PM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life > Dear Narasimha, > You wrote: > " >The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > > each incarnation. " . > > I fully agree to the part following 'But..', but do you mean to imply that > ALL living souls were/are/will be " past sinners " ? > That leaves us with no good souls here on earth... > > Warm regards > Jay Weiss > > > > > - > " pvr108 " <pvr > <varahamihira > > Monday, October 27, 2003 12:50 AM > |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > Dear Jay, > > > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is > > fetching > > > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka > > might be > > > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > > > whether we are really serving the science by this. > > > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's > > knowledge nor > > > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of > > life to > > > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and > > Punya ? > > > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and > > Ishta > > > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > > > Shiva's form only ? > > > Regards, > > > Chandrashekhar.. > > > > I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of > > words in response. > > > > The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of > > life is to get moksha. > > > > But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their > > energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that > > the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > > each incarnation. > > > > Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of > > the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free. > > > > Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another > > religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we > > understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand > > the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and > > various jyotirlingas. > > > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > > |Om Tat Sat| > > http://www.varahamihira > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Jaya Jagannath Dear Freedom, Practically, I was stick in to following rules for rebirth. 1.Strong 7th house. 2. 3rd from AK 3. Position of the Moon( Mind) I can guess about Saturn. But why Gulika ? Coulkd you kindly explain it ? Thanks for the new dimensions of Ishta and Kasta pala. Karu > Hare Rama Krsna> Yes to be born in Bhu loka, you have to have some sin.> It is said that Shani and Gulika are the main causes of our birth here in> Bhu loka. Look at Ista and Kasta phala of each planet to get a bigger> picture on this.> Namah Sivaya> > > > J. Weiss [jayhw]> Monday, October 27, 2003 2:44 AM> varahamihira > Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of> life> > Dear Narasimha,> You wrote:> ">The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back> > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and> > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind> > each incarnation.".> > I fully agree to the part following 'But..', but do you mean to imply that> ALL living souls were/are/will be "past sinners" ?> That leaves us with no good souls here on earth...> > Warm regards> Jay Weiss> > > > > -> "pvr108" <pvr> <varahamihira >> Monday, October 27, 2003 12:50 AM> |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji,> >> > > Dear Jay,> > > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is> > fetching> > > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka> > might be> > > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think> > > whether we are really serving the science by this.> > > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's> > knowledge nor> > > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of> > life to> > > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and> > Punya ?> > > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and> > Ishta> > > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to> > > Shiva's form only ?> > > Regards,> > > Chandrashekhar..> >> > I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of> > words in response.> >> > The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of> > life is to get moksha.> >> > But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their> > energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that> > the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back> > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and> > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind> > each incarnation.> >> > Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of> > the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free.> >> > Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another> > religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we> > understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand> > the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and> > various jyotirlingas.> >> > May Jupiter's light shine on us,> > Narasimha> >> >> >> >> > |Om Tat Sat|> > http://www.varahamihira> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Dear Narasimhaji, As I indicated in my mail, I did not dispute the knowledge of those who proposed the theory. Nor do I dispute that Shiva is the Guru of the Universe. I am of the opinion that the Guru Tatwa originated from Shiva. So no confusion about multiplicity of Gods in Hindu religion for me. They are only forms of the Niraamaya and Niraakaara or the Alingi (Shiva). The concept of Purusha and prakriti is also clear to me. I was referring to the fact that every one is credited with a lofty purpose for the life in the analysis so far seen. No body appears to have come to the human form to trouble another so that, that other person completes his bhoga. This appears statistically improbable. As you know I am neither atheist nor a non Hindu, but merely seeker of knowledge. Again speaking dispassionately, does it not appear strange that everybody is able to fulfill his purpose of life by worshipping one of the 12 forms of Shiva ? Does this mean that every body is able to obtain final emancipation irrespective of the planetary position in his chart? Please do not misunderstand me, these questions I am raising to get better understanding of principles of Jyotish vis-a-vis wiping off of dhrudhamula karma bhoga by worships of whether Jyotirlingas, Ishta devata, Palana Devata, Guru Devata or any other form as is being suggested. I would readily agree if it is suggested that the worships can lessen hardships and help one on path of emancipation, but not a blanket wipe off. Kindly correct me if I am wrong. Regards, Chandrashekhar. pvr108 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > Dear Jay, > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > whether we are really serving the science by this. > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > Shiva's form only ? > Regards, > Chandrashekhar.. I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of words in response. The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of life is to get moksha. But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind each incarnation. Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free. Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and various jyotirlingas. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Dear Freedom, In so far as I understand, Jyotirlingas are situate at specific places , which number 12 in all. Worship of Shiva Linga and Jyotirlingas in photographs, could not be equated with worshipping the Jyotirlingas at the place that they are situate. Lord Shiva is supposed to reside in those places in Jyoti form. Are we not using the term worshipping Jyotirlinga very loosely, without reference to the Sthana Mahatmya ? Regards, Chandrashekhar. Freedom wrote: Hare Rama Krsna Hare Rama Krsna Yes, the Jyotirlinga are not a simple way to see the life purpose, the whole chart is the reason for incarnating. They are showing a higher purpose in life beyond what we are incarnating for. We still need to see a person’s dharma, artha, kama, moksa, and everything associated with that in the chart. The Ishta guides our Atman to moksa (as it is seen from the 12th to karakamsa- jivanmuktamsa). The Ishta is to be worshiped everyday (esp. in the mornings), no matter the rupa it is connected to Visnu. The Jyotirlinga is the light inside us always, and we can be aware of it always, it is connected to the AK, the light that illuminates the individual atmam. It is connected to Shiva. External worship of the Jyotirlinga for the average person can be done on Mondays. Namah Shivaya Freedom -----Original Message----- Chandrashekhar Sharma [boxdel] Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:11 PM To: varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Jay, I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think whether we are really serving the science by this. Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to Shiva's form only ? Regards, Chandrashekhar.. J. Weiss wrote: Dear Narasimha, Sarajit and members, Indeed another fascinating topic of Jyotish but doesn't that 'simply' leave us (again?) with only 12 groups of "purpose of this life" ? Please enlighten me/us. Kindest regards Jay Weiss ----- Original Message ----- Ramesh Gangaramani varahamihira Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:30 AM RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat Dear Sarajitji, I would like to know my purpose of life too. My tithi left is 2.78%, hence spent is 97.22%. As per this my Jyotirlingam will be indicated by 12th sign which is Pisces! I am a Leo lagna and Pisces is my 8th house. What would be the purpose of my life? One of the earlier mails indicated Triyambekshwara as my Jyotirlinga that I should pray. Is that right? Thank you for your help and kind regards Ramesh -----Original Message----- Sarajit Poddar [sarajit] Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:27 AM varahamihira RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life || Jaya Jagannath || Dear Dilipda, The percentage of Tithi already spent is 86.23% according to your calculation. Just find what is 86.23% of 12 and you have 10.34 as the reminder. Round up and you have 11 as the Jyotirlingam indicating sign. This is kedarnath as you said and represent 5th house. The mission is knowledge and mantra. What else? See what else is indicated by placement of the planets there and the aspects! Best Wishes Sarajit -----Original Message----- drdilip [drdilip] Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:35 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life II NAMAH SHIVAAYA II Dear Narasimha ji Namaste, Any topic of jyotish gets a new dimension and a higher meaning when you explain. Thanks for explaining so nicely! In my chart, JHL 5 shows krishna saptami and 13.77 % of it is left. This is subtracted from 100 , and we get 86.23. 86.23*3= 258.69. Dividing it by 25 , we get 10 and some fraction, rounding it up, we get 11. Thus the sign in my case is aquarius. The jyotirlinga is kedarnath. Aquarius is my 5th house in rasi chart. What is the purpose then of my creation? Mantra sadhana ? Devotion to Lord ? Please explain. Warm regards Dilip Banerjee. ----- Original Message ----- pvr108 varahamihira Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:07 AM |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Namashshivaayai Cha Namashshivaaya Dear Karen, Namaste. As the mantra I wrote at the beginning says, Moon and Sun symbolize Shivaa (Parvati) and Shiva respectively. It is their union that produces us all, for various purposes. Your mail captured it well and you remembered Sanjay's teaching so well. BTW, there is an easier way to compute this, if you have JHLite. In JHora or JHoraLite, look at the % of tithi left (both give it). Subtract the number from 100. Multiply the result with 3. Divide the resulting number by 25 and round it up to get an integer. That gives the index to the sign (1=Ar, 2=Ta and so on). Example: In my chart, JHoraLite shows Krishna Chaturdasi and shows the % of tithi left as 85.99%. Now, subtracting 85.99 from 100, I get 100-85.99=14.01. Multiplying with 3, I get 14.01x3=42.03. Dividing 42.03 by 25, I get (1+some fraction). Rounding it *up*, the integer I get is 2. So the sign in my case is Taurus (2nd sign). This sign shows the purpose of one's creation. In my case, Taurus is my 9th house as well as Lagnamsaka. It shows dharma as the purpose of my creation by my parents. Sanjay spoke on this in great detail last year at the west coast seminar too. Get those CDs from Lakshmi! There is one more thing. I don't remember if this was recorded in any of the CD's or not, but Sanjay mentioned using AK and AmK instead of Sun and Moon too (I remember that the first time Sanjay mentioned it was when we were all driving to Lakshmi's house one evening for dinner, but he may have mentioned it in a subsequent class too. I am not sure). Sun and Moon show the natural (naisargika/viswa/universal) atma and mana. They are relevant as far as creation (nisarga) is concerned. Naisargika karakatwas are lorded by Brahma, while chara karakwas are ruled by Vishnu. The individual atma and mana are shown by AK and AmK. They are more relevant as far as one's activities and spiritual progress are concerned (which are a Vishnu thing and not a Brahma thing)!! Sanjay mentioned doing similar calculations based on AK and AmK too. I leave it to you to interpret this... May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > II OM NAMAH SHIVAAYA II > > Dear Dr. Dilip, > > I heard Sanjay-ji speak of this in this year's East Coast conference briefly. This is what I remember and I hope any errors will be corrected. > > One tithi is defined as 12 degrees of movement of the Moon with respect to the Sun. Each of the 12 degrees that make up a single tithi can be assigned to each of the 12 rasi depending on the portion of the tithi that has passed. The sign of the derived rasi will determine the jyotirlinga. > > Sanjay-ji used his own chart as an example. The chart is attached for reference in .jhd format. > > Moon 19 Aq 58= 319.81 degrees > Sun 21Cn 05= 111.07 > > moon-sun= 208.8/ 12 degrees= > > 17.408 > > So 17 tithis have passed and is currently in 18 tithi. Or in other words, 3rd day of the dark half subtracting 15. Most software will do this part.. > > 17 tithis x 12 degree/tithi = 204 > 208.8- 204= 4.4 degrees into the tithi > Converting this to signs starting from Aries. Fours have passed and the correct sign based on janma tithi is 5 sign i.e Leo. > > The jyotirlinga for Leo, as given in VRA is Dhusaneswar. > > This is my understanding of how the jyotirlinga of the tithi is computed. You helped me by writing that this jyotirlinga is the giver of sacred knowledge. I'm wondering if there is also a benefit to one's health as well. > > Best Wishes, > Karen > > > Dear Gurus and learned members, > > Often we get confused about our purpose in life,- why we have come here, what was the intension of the Supreme Being to send us in this lovely and terrible world! No amount of knowledge found in the books of philosophy can give us satisfaction. A revelation, a spiritual understanding can only quench our thirst for this secrete knowledge. > > In last year's West Coast Conference, Guruji Pt. Sanjay Rath had revealed the way to this sacred knowledge. He told that , the Jyotirlinga associated with the tithi of a person, is the giver of this knowledge. If one constantly does the " Japa" of the Mantra associated with the Jyotirlinga , this knowledge comes easily. > > ......I confused in understanding this. Would anyone please make me understand what Guruji wanted to say i.e. how to find out the Jyotirlinga associated with the Janma Tithi. > > Warm regards > Dilip Banerjee. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release 10/16/03 |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Dear Chandrashekharji, As I have learnt, each particular jyotirlinga calculated individually for the natal charts show the specific beeja that created us. It is the seed that manifested each individual soul. And the nature of the seed from whence we came is seen from the different jyotirlingas. So if we worship that specific jyotirlinga, that very beeja which created us, we will be able to embark upon the path of the highest knowledge of enlightenment. This is the crux behind worshipping our respective natal jyotirlingas. Best regards, Sarbani Chandrashekhar Sharma [boxdel]Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:03 PMvarahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of lifeDear Narasimhaji,As I indicated in my mail, I did not dispute the knowledge of those who proposed the theory. Nor do I dispute that Shiva is the Guru of the Universe. I am of the opinion that the Guru Tatwa originated from Shiva. So no confusion about multiplicity of Gods in Hindu religion for me. They are only forms of the Niraamaya and Niraakaara or the Alingi (Shiva). The concept of Purusha and prakriti is also clear to me. I was referring to the fact that every one is credited with a lofty purpose for the life in the analysis so far seen. No body appears to have come to the human form to trouble another so that, that other person completes his bhoga. This appears statistically improbable. As you know I am neither atheist nor a non Hindu, but merely seeker of knowledge. Again speaking dispassionately, does it not appear strange that everybody is able to fulfill his purpose of life by worshipping one of the 12 forms of Shiva ? Does this mean that every body is able to obtain final emancipation irrespective of the planetary position in his chart?Please do not misunderstand me, these questions I am raising to get better understanding of principles of Jyotish vis-a-vis wiping off of dhrudhamula karma bhoga by worships of whether Jyotirlingas, Ishta devata, Palana Devata, Guru Devata or any other form as is being suggested. I would readily agree if it is suggested that the worships can lessen hardships and help one on path of emancipation, but not a blanket wipe off. Kindly correct me if I am wrong.Regards,Chandrashekhar. pvr108 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar ji,> Dear Jay,> I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > whether we are really serving the science by this.> Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > Shiva's form only ?> Regards,> Chandrashekhar..I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of words in response.The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of life is to get moksha.But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind each incarnation.Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free.Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and various jyotirlingas.May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2003 Report Share Posted October 29, 2003 Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya Namaste Listmembers, Dear Narasimha, Chandrashekhar makes a valid point. My 'desire' is to leave this hell-hole, so I had no qualms in rounding off the 11.99 to reach Pisces. But that .01 of a degree actually keeps me in 7th house Aquarius, which has an entirely different complexion, significance, interpretation and outcome. Om Shanti, Love, Ann. - Chandrashekhar Sharma varahamihira Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:02 AM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Narasimhaji,As I indicated in my mail, I did not dispute the knowledge of those who proposed the theory. Nor do I dispute that Shiva is the Guru of the Universe. I am of the opinion that the Guru Tatwa originated from Shiva. So no confusion about multiplicity of Gods in Hindu religion for me. They are only forms of the Niraamaya and Niraakaara or the Alingi (Shiva). The concept of Purusha and prakriti is also clear to me. I was referring to the fact that every one is credited with a lofty purpose for the life in the analysis so far seen. No body appears to have come to the human form to trouble another so that, that other person completes his bhoga. This appears statistically improbable. As you know I am neither atheist nor a non Hindu, but merely seeker of knowledge. Again speaking dispassionately, does it not appear strange that everybody is able to fulfill his purpose of life by worshipping one of the 12 forms of Shiva ? Does this mean that every body is able to obtain final emancipation irrespective of the planetary position in his chart?Please do not misunderstand me, these questions I am raising to get better understanding of principles of Jyotish vis-a-vis wiping off of dhrudhamula karma bhoga by worships of whether Jyotirlingas, Ishta devata, Palana Devata, Guru Devata or any other form as is being suggested. I would readily agree if it is suggested that the worships can lessen hardships and help one on path of emancipation, but not a blanket wipe off. Kindly correct me if I am wrong.Regards,Chandrashekhar. pvr108 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar ji,> Dear Jay,> I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > whether we are really serving the science by this.> Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > Shiva's form only ?> Regards,> Chandrashekhar..I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of words in response.The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of life is to get moksha.But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind each incarnation.Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free.Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and various jyotirlingas.May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2003 Report Share Posted October 29, 2003 |Hare Rama Krishna| Dear Ann, Mind your english. The Jyotirlinga doesn't show your desire - think harder. What is Paksha? What does Jyotir linga mean? Best wishes, Visti. - Ann Murphy varahamihira Cc: Ann Murphy Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:04 AM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya Namaste Listmembers, Dear Narasimha, Chandrashekhar makes a valid point. My 'desire' is to leave this hell-hole, so I had no qualms in rounding off the 11.99 to reach Pisces. But that .01 of a degree actually keeps me in 7th house Aquarius, which has an entirely different complexion, significance, interpretation and outcome. Om Shanti, Love, Ann. - Chandrashekhar Sharma varahamihira Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:02 AM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Narasimhaji,As I indicated in my mail, I did not dispute the knowledge of those who proposed the theory. Nor do I dispute that Shiva is the Guru of the Universe. I am of the opinion that the Guru Tatwa originated from Shiva. So no confusion about multiplicity of Gods in Hindu religion for me. They are only forms of the Niraamaya and Niraakaara or the Alingi (Shiva). The concept of Purusha and prakriti is also clear to me. I was referring to the fact that every one is credited with a lofty purpose for the life in the analysis so far seen. No body appears to have come to the human form to trouble another so that, that other person completes his bhoga. This appears statistically improbable. As you know I am neither atheist nor a non Hindu, but merely seeker of knowledge. Again speaking dispassionately, does it not appear strange that everybody is able to fulfill his purpose of life by worshipping one of the 12 forms of Shiva ? Does this mean that every body is able to obtain final emancipation irrespective of the planetary position in his chart?Please do not misunderstand me, these questions I am raising to get better understanding of principles of Jyotish vis-a-vis wiping off of dhrudhamula karma bhoga by worships of whether Jyotirlingas, Ishta devata, Palana Devata, Guru Devata or any other form as is being suggested. I would readily agree if it is suggested that the worships can lessen hardships and help one on path of emancipation, but not a blanket wipe off. Kindly correct me if I am wrong.Regards,Chandrashekhar. pvr108 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar ji,> Dear Jay,> I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > whether we are really serving the science by this.> Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > Shiva's form only ?> Regards,> Chandrashekhar..I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of words in response.The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of life is to get moksha.But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind each incarnation.Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free.Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and various jyotirlingas.May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2003 Report Share Posted October 29, 2003 Dear Ann,a We all have been in a similar situation, but fortunately our desires /and sufferings/ change- purpose of life is relatively constant, as per my understanding/of my own, 'perceived' purpose of life, at least. Desires may or may not be satisfied, little that affects our 'life purpose'. If motherhood is your l.purpose, who cares whether you'll have that nice red shoes, red house, etc.., the major issue is totally unaffected- it's ingrained somewhere deeply within us, and gives you strength even in the darkest days of the soul. I am just sharing my 'experience'. When I pray for my son, I always pray that he find that life purpose deeply buried in his heart, to become more aware of the fact how much his life counts! And 'moksha' as a final "purposegoal", has also little to do with this, our level of existence- we are here "to do the job". That's what I believe in, and also that no matter how long our life is meant to be, I believe we all have enough time to fulfill our major 'life purpose'. I cannot say that YL issue advanced my knowledge of life purpose so far, as stated above, as conceived by me early in life, and I wish to achieve better understanding and be more in sync with life purpose, which has been my goal all my life, too. LOve, Anna - Visti Larsen varahamihira Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:37 AM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life |Hare Rama Krishna| Dear Ann, Mind your english. The Jyotirlinga doesn't show your desire - think harder. What is Paksha? What does Jyotir linga mean? Best wishes, Visti. - Ann Murphy varahamihira Cc: Ann Murphy Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:04 AM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya Namaste Listmembers, Dear Narasimha, Chandrashekhar makes a valid point. My 'desire' is to leave this hell-hole, so I had no qualms in rounding off the 11.99 to reach Pisces. But that .01 of a degree actually keeps me in 7th house Aquarius, which has an entirely different complexion, significance, interpretation and outcome. Om Shanti, Love, Ann. - Chandrashekhar Sharma varahamihira Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:02 AM Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Narasimhaji,As I indicated in my mail, I did not dispute the knowledge of those who proposed the theory. Nor do I dispute that Shiva is the Guru of the Universe. I am of the opinion that the Guru Tatwa originated from Shiva. So no confusion about multiplicity of Gods in Hindu religion for me. They are only forms of the Niraamaya and Niraakaara or the Alingi (Shiva). The concept of Purusha and prakriti is also clear to me. I was referring to the fact that every one is credited with a lofty purpose for the life in the analysis so far seen. No body appears to have come to the human form to trouble another so that, that other person completes his bhoga. This appears statistically improbable. As you know I am neither atheist nor a non Hindu, but merely seeker of knowledge. Again speaking dispassionately, does it not appear strange that everybody is able to fulfill his purpose of life by worshipping one of the 12 forms of Shiva ? Does this mean that every body is able to obtain final emancipation irrespective of the planetary position in his chart?Please do not misunderstand me, these questions I am raising to get better understanding of principles of Jyotish vis-a-vis wiping off of dhrudhamula karma bhoga by worships of whether Jyotirlingas, Ishta devata, Palana Devata, Guru Devata or any other form as is being suggested. I would readily agree if it is suggested that the worships can lessen hardships and help one on path of emancipation, but not a blanket wipe off. Kindly correct me if I am wrong.Regards,Chandrashekhar. pvr108 wrote: Dear Chandrashekhar ji,> Dear Jay,> I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > whether we are really serving the science by this.> Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > Shiva's form only ?> Regards,> Chandrashekhar..I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of words in response.The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of life is to get moksha.But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind each incarnation.Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free.Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and various jyotirlingas.May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2003 Report Share Posted October 29, 2003 Hare Rama Krsna There is the external Lingas situated in India, but that is not the only place that the Jyotirlingas reside. Do people in the world unable to visit India miss the blessings of Shiva?? Shiva reveals Himself on every continent, in sacred mountains and sites, with other names appropriate to that individual culture. Lord Shiva resides within us in a Jyoti rupa, that light within the cave of the heart, the Jyotirlinga purose of life is where that light came from and what is it burning for. Connecting to that light, doing mantra and offering that light water is also Jyotirlinga worship. The Jyotirlingas can also be used for seeing the type of Shiva lingam to worship, ie. a black Shiva linga for Mahakaleshwar (libra-black). Namah Sivaya Freedom -----Original Message----- Chandrashekhar Sharma [boxdel] Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:21 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Freedom, In so far as I understand, Jyotirlingas are situate at specific places , which number 12 in all. Worship of Shiva Linga and Jyotirlingas in photographs, could not be equated with worshipping the Jyotirlingas at the place that they are situate. Lord Shiva is supposed to reside in those places in Jyoti form. Are we not using the term worshipping Jyotirlinga very loosely, without reference to the Sthana Mahatmya ? Regards, Chandrashekhar. Freedom wrote: Hare Rama Krsna Yes, the Jyotirlinga are not a simple way to see the life purpose, the whole chart is the reason for incarnating. They are showing a higher purpose in life beyond what we are incarnating for. We still need to see a person’s dharma, artha, kama, moksa, and everything associated with that in the chart. The Ishta guides our Atman to moksa (as it is seen from the 12th to karakamsa- jivanmuktamsa). The Ishta is to be worshiped everyday (esp. in the mornings), no matter the rupa it is connected to Visnu. The Jyotirlinga is the light inside us always, and we can be aware of it always, it is connected to the AK, the light that illuminates the individual atmam. It is connected to Shiva. External worship of the Jyotirlinga for the average person can be done on Mondays. Namah Shivaya Freedom -----Original Message----- Chandrashekhar Sharma [boxdel] Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:11 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Dear Jay, I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is fetching theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka might be happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think whether we are really serving the science by this. Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's knowledge nor is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of life to clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and Punya ? Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and Ishta devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to Shiva's form only ? Regards, Chandrashekhar.. J. Weiss wrote: Dear Narasimha, Sarajit and members, Indeed another fascinating topic of Jyotish but doesn't that 'simply' leave us (again?) with only 12 groups of " purpose of this life " ? Please enlighten me/us. Kindest regards Jay Weiss ----- Original Message ----- Ramesh Gangaramani varahamihira Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:30 AM RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat Dear Sarajitji, I would like to know my purpose of life too. My tithi left is 2.78%, hence spent is 97.22%. As per this my Jyotirlingam will be indicated by 12th sign which is Pisces! I am a Leo lagna and Pisces is my 8th house. What would be the purpose of my life? One of the earlier mails indicated Triyambekshwara as my Jyotirlinga that I should pray. Is that right? Thank you for your help and kind regards Ramesh -----Original Message----- Sarajit Poddar [sarajit] Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:27 AM varahamihira RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life || Jaya Jagannath || Dear Dilipda, The percentage of Tithi already spent is 86.23% according to your calculation. Just find what is 86.23% of 12 and you have 10.34 as the reminder. Round up and you have 11 as the Jyotirlingam indicating sign. This is kedarnath as you said and represent 5th house. The mission is knowledge and mantra. What else? See what else is indicated by placement of the planets there and the aspects! Best Wishes Sarajit -----Original Message----- drdilip [drdilip] Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:35 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life II NAMAH SHIVAAYA II Dear Narasimha ji Namaste, Any topic of jyotish gets a new dimension and a higher meaning when you explain. Thanks for explaining so nicely! In my chart, JHL 5 shows krishna saptami and 13.77 % of it is left. This is subtracted from 100 , and we get 86.23. 86.23*3= 258.69. Dividing it by 25 , we get 10 and some fraction, rounding it up, we get 11. Thus the sign in my case is aquarius. The jyotirlinga is kedarnath. Aquarius is my 5th house in rasi chart. What is the purpose then of my creation? Mantra sadhana ? Devotion to Lord ? Please explain. Warm regards Dilip Banerjee. ----- Original Message ----- pvr108 To: varahamihira Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Namashshivaayai Cha Namashshivaaya Dear Karen, Namaste. As the mantra I wrote at the beginning says, Moon and Sun symbolize Shivaa (Parvati) and Shiva respectively. It is their union that produces us all, for various purposes. Your mail captured it well and you remembered Sanjay's teaching so well. BTW, there is an easier way to compute this, if you have JHLite. In JHora or JHoraLite, look at the % of tithi left (both give it). Subtract the number from 100. Multiply the result with 3. Divide the resulting number by 25 and round it up to get an integer. That gives the index to the sign (1=Ar, 2=Ta and so on). Example: In my chart, JHoraLite shows Krishna Chaturdasi and shows the % of tithi left as 85.99%. Now, subtracting 85.99 from 100, I get 100-85.99=14.01. Multiplying with 3, I get 14.01x3=42.03. Dividing 42.03 by 25, I get (1+some fraction). Rounding it *up*, the integer I get is 2. So the sign in my case is Taurus (2nd sign). This sign shows the purpose of one's creation. In my case, Taurus is my 9th house as well as Lagnamsaka. It shows dharma as the purpose of my creation by my parents. Sanjay spoke on this in great detail last year at the west coast seminar too. Get those CDs from Lakshmi! There is one more thing. I don't remember if this was recorded in any of the CD's or not, but Sanjay mentioned using AK and AmK instead of Sun and Moon too (I remember that the first time Sanjay mentioned it was when we were all driving to Lakshmi's house one evening for dinner, but he may have mentioned it in a subsequent class too. I am not sure). Sun and Moon show the natural (naisargika/viswa/universal) atma and mana. They are relevant as far as creation (nisarga) is concerned. Naisargika karakatwas are lorded by Brahma, while chara karakwas are ruled by Vishnu. The individual atma and mana are shown by AK and AmK. They are more relevant as far as one's activities and spiritual progress are concerned (which are a Vishnu thing and not a Brahma thing)!! Sanjay mentioned doing similar calculations based on AK and AmK too. I leave it to you to interpret this... May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > II OM NAMAH SHIVAAYA II > > Dear Dr. Dilip, > > I heard Sanjay-ji speak of this in this year's East Coast conference briefly. This is what I remember and I hope any errors will be corrected. > > One tithi is defined as 12 degrees of movement of the Moon with respect to the Sun. Each of the 12 degrees that make up a single tithi can be assigned to each of the 12 rasi depending on the portion of the tithi that has passed. The sign of the derived rasi will determine the jyotirlinga. > > Sanjay-ji used his own chart as an example. The chart is attached for reference in .jhd format. > > Moon 19 Aq 58= 319.81 degrees > Sun 21Cn 05= 111.07 > > moon-sun= 208.8/ 12 degrees= > > 17.408 > > So 17 tithis have passed and is currently in 18 tithi. Or in other words, 3rd day of the dark half subtracting 15. Most software will do this part.. > > 17 tithis x 12 degree/tithi = 204 > 208.8- 204= 4.4 degrees into the tithi > Converting this to signs starting from Aries. Fours have passed and the correct sign based on janma tithi is 5 sign i.e Leo. > > The jyotirlinga for Leo, as given in VRA is Dhusaneswar. > > This is my understanding of how the jyotirlinga of the tithi is computed. You helped me by writing that this jyotirlinga is the giver of sacred knowledge. I'm wondering if there is also a benefit to one's health as well. > > Best Wishes, > Karen > > > Dear Gurus and learned members, > > Often we get confused about our purpose in life,- why we have come here, what was the intension of the Supreme Being to send us in this lovely and terrible world! No amount of knowledge found in the books of philosophy can give us satisfaction. A revelation, a spiritual understanding can only quench our thirst for this secrete knowledge. > > In last year's West Coast Conference, Guruji Pt. Sanjay Rath had revealed the way to this sacred knowledge. He told that , the Jyotirlinga associated with the tithi of a person, is the giver of this knowledge. If one constantly does the " Japa " of the Mantra associated with the Jyotirlinga , this knowledge comes easily. > > ......I confused in understanding this. Would anyone please make me understand what Guruji wanted to say i.e. how to find out the Jyotirlinga associated with the Janma Tithi. > > Warm regards > Dilip Banerjee. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release 10/16/03 |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2003 Report Share Posted October 31, 2003 Om Gurave Namah Namaste Freedom, I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light? Regards, Lakshmi Freedom <freedom wrote: Hare Rama KrsnaYes to be born in Bhu loka, you have to have some sin.It is said that Shani and Gulika are the main causes of our birth here inBhu loka. Look at Ista and Kasta phala of each planet to get a biggerpicture on this.Namah SivayaJ. Weiss [jayhw]Monday, October 27, 2003 2:44 AMvarahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose oflifeDear Narasimha,You wrote:">The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back> for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and> finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind> each incarnation.".I fully agree to the part following 'But..', but do you mean to imply thatALL living souls were/are/will be "past sinners" ?That leaves us with no good souls here on earth...Warm regardsJay Weiss-"pvr108" <pvr<varahamihira >Monday, October 27, 2003 12:50 AM|Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life> Dear Chandrashekhar ji,>> > Dear Jay,> > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is> fetching> > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka> might be> > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think> > whether we are really serving the science by this.> > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's> knowledge nor> > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of> life to> > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and> Punya ?> > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and> Ishta> > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to> > Shiva's form only ?> > Regards,> > Chandrashekhar..>> I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of> words in response.>> The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of> life is to get moksha.>> But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their> energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that> the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back> for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and> finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind> each incarnation.>> Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of> the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free.>> Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another> religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we> understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand> the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and> various jyotirlingas.>> May Jupiter's light shine on us,> Narasimha>>>>> |Om Tat Sat|> http://www.varahamihira>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 31, 2003 Report Share Posted October 31, 2003 Dear Lakshmi, " Sin " is a heavy word. " Desire " is a simpler word. A soul gets reborn because of desires. Even the Lord takes birth when He has a *desire* to do so. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > Om Gurave Namah > > Namaste Freedom, > > I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light? > > Regards, > Lakshmi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2003 Report Share Posted November 1, 2003 Om Gurave Namah Namaste Narasimha, That was a good distinction:). But then, isn't it a sense of duty and a commitment to the task He had taken upon himself that prompts the Lord's "desire"? Regards, Lakshmipvr108 <pvr wrote: Dear Lakshmi,"Sin" is a heavy word. "Desire" is a simpler word.A soul gets reborn because of desires. Even theLord takes birth when He has a *desire* to do so.May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha> Om Gurave Namah> > Namaste Freedom,> > I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light?> > Regards,> Lakshmi|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2003 Report Share Posted November 1, 2003 > So no confusion about multiplicity of Gods in Hindu religion for >me. There has been confusion about multplicity of deva-s in heathenish cultures for last 2000 years; this was solved(garbled) by induction of theological(of course, Christian) concepts such as polytheism, hemitheism, monotheism. To reformulate thus: the root cause is misunderstanding(unable to understand) of 'other'. Lately theologians have brought this problem to the fore: have we(Christians, Western culture) understood heathens? On the contrary, have heathens comprehend Christians. Some settle this problem by baptizing this understanding with 'corruption of old testament, proselytization-an evil'; reformulations and redescriptions do not solve problems; nor do they help us in understanding the same. They but distorts the experience. How to understand this 'There is only one God, Lord God; and our deva-s are devils' by not triviliazing a believers' experience as being hallucinated or being intolerant. a. Cosmos created by Lord God who is outside of His Created Cosmos b. Cosmos is His Will(intentions) c. The regularities(causes) in Cosmos are instatiations of His Will, for example, how the equal length of the eyelashes could instantiate the purposes of God. d. Understanding His Will is beyond our human cognitive abilities e. To solve d), Lord God has to reveal His purposes f. Such revelation is UNIQUE(look at Christological dilemma; and its production of atheism etc), for There is only one Will g. Such revelation is religion(look at Genesis: Lord God gave religion to mankind) h. Religion(singular noun) makes the Cosmos explanatory-intelligible; being part of Cosmos, religion is explanatory intelligible account of itself g. Thus Christians(Jews, Muslims) are compelled to see heathenish notions of gods either in Pagan Rome or in India as devil h. In this process, they have to locate entities such as 'hinduism', 'buddism', 'paganism' being false religions, idolatry, false/corrupt revelation. Put it simply: what one experiences is not what it is. We do experience Sun movement across horizon as geo-centric, which is not underlying reality. Galileo never said then Europeans were hallucinating; he rather fought against then Church which gave explanation, underlying reality = what we experience. He degraded the experience to phenomenon; made a distinction b/w underlying reality and phenomenon Indian traditions were more concerned on understanding human nature/experience; In doing so, they developed some cognitive sciences, such as avidya, mayaa, ajnana depending on various traditions. Now, the modern Indian brethern are confusing them with spirituality, esoterica, His Will, Lord God, Meaning of Life, by mapping their learnt formal language of Theology onto their experience. There is nothing spritiual in it; they are rather competitors to modern psychologies exported from theology maquerading as Scientific(sorry folks, study the analysis by reductionists in Western philosophical traditions) Caution: I am not criticising Christianity here; nor do I claim that those who claim hindu deva-s being devils are stupid. Their experience make sense if we study scientifically(by saving phenomena). The Indian experience ever since its eclipse w/ Islam continued to today in the name of social sciences, linguistics etc in India metamorphised into confused mass. If Christianity, Islam, Judaism are religions, there are no religions(ontological commitment to the same) in India. But what we see in India is the experience of believers in Lord God! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 1, 2003 Report Share Posted November 1, 2003 Dear Laxmi/narasimhaji, Could not we say mistakes commited in past life instead? Chandrashekhar. pvr108 wrote: Dear Lakshmi, "Sin" is a heavy word. "Desire" is a simpler word. A soul gets reborn because of desires. Even the Lord takes birth when He has a *desire* to do so. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > Om Gurave Namah > > Namaste Freedom, > > I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light? > > Regards, > Lakshmi |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2003 Report Share Posted November 2, 2003 Saturn is the karaka for the shad-ripus, and Gulika is the poison we have given to others. They are just the karakas of our ‘sin’, showing that we have it. -----Original Message----- Karu [heen] Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:16 AM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Jaya Jagannath Dear Freedom, Practically, I was stick in to following rules for rebirth. 1.Strong 7th house. 2. 3rd from AK 3. Position of the Moon( Mind) I can guess about Saturn. But why Gulika ? Coulkd you kindly explain it ? Thanks for the new dimensions of Ishta and Kasta pala. Karu > Hare Rama Krsna > Yes to be born in Bhu loka, you have to have some sin. > It is said that Shani and Gulika are the main causes of our birth here in > Bhu loka. Look at Ista and Kasta phala of each planet to get a bigger > picture on this. > Namah Sivaya > > > > J. Weiss [jayhw] > Monday, October 27, 2003 2:44 AM > varahamihira > Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of > life > > Dear Narasimha, > You wrote: > " >The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > > each incarnation. " . > > I fully agree to the part following 'But..', but do you mean to imply that > ALL living souls were/are/will be " past sinners " ? > That leaves us with no good souls here on earth... > > Warm regards > Jay Weiss > > > > > - > " pvr108 " <pvr > <varahamihira > > Monday, October 27, 2003 12:50 AM > |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji, > > > > > Dear Jay, > > > I tend to agree with you.My personal opinion is that this is > > fetching > > > theories too far. They might appear attractive and the Jataka > > might be > > > happy knowing some lofty purpose for his life. But we should think > > > whether we are really serving the science by this. > > > Please understand that I am neither challenging any body's > > knowledge nor > > > is it my intention to hurt anyone. However is not the purpose of > > life to > > > clear off the account of our previous life balance of Papa and > > Punya ? > > > Again , how do we rationalise between Jyotirlinga worship and > > Ishta > > > devata worship indicated by Parashara, since Jyotirlingas refer to > > > Shiva's form only ? > > > Regards, > > > Chandrashekhar.. > > > > I always appreciate your frankness. Let me try to say a couple of > > words in response. > > > > The purpose of life is always as you said. The ultimate purpose of > > life is to get moksha. > > > > But, when Shiva and Shakti join to create an individual, their > > energy is a specific house and that shows the specific purpose that > > the person is to serve. The ultimate purpose of life IS to pay back > > for all sins, commit no sins, i.e. overcome all attachment and > > finally get moksha. But, each soul has a temporary purpose behind > > each incarnation. > > > > Yes, Jyotirlingas are Shiva's form only, but Shiva IS the Guru of > > the universe. It is He who gives us knowledge and breaks us free. > > > > Hinduism has so many gods. To a casual observer from another > > religion, it may all seem like confusion and chaos. Unless we > > understand the reason behind the multitude, we will not understand > > the difference between ishta devata, palana devata, guru devata and > > various jyotirlingas. > > > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > > |Om Tat Sat| > > http://www.varahamihira > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2003 Report Share Posted November 3, 2003 Hare Rama Krsna Bhagavan makes the rules of Dharma, and then follows them as well. It was Parasurama killing his mother that gave Rama the Curse of Mother. It was Rama sending away Sita that gave Krsna the curse of Venus (but was this not just the curse of Narada being fulfilled). Guruji said the next Avatar’s chart will contain certain curses accrued from the life of Krsna (the battle). The great epics start with the stories of how the devas get cursed and how they come to Bhumi loka to purify themselves of their karma. Devas, let alone humans don’t come perfectly pure to this loka. Guruji often says ‘a man without faults is a man without virtue’. It is our faults/desires/shad-ripus that help us to have compassion on others. Who doesn’t have some sin, how else could Jesus ask the person with no sin to throw the first stone? Notice Visnu didn’t just come down to fulfill a purpose and then take off. Bhagavan followed the rules of Dharma, incarnated due to karmas, and then left with karmas that would cause Him to incarnate again one day. Sins and purpose, curses and blessings, they are all rapped up in a nice little bundle called Life (Maya). Namah Sivaya -----Original Message----- lakshmi ramesh [b_lakshmi_ramesh] Friday, October 31, 2003 7:20 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Gurave Namah Namaste Narasimha, That was a good distinction:). But then, isn't it a sense of duty and a commitment to the task He had taken upon himself that prompts the Lord's " desire " ? Regards, Lakshmi pvr108 <pvr wrote: Dear Lakshmi, " Sin " is a heavy word. " Desire " is a simpler word. A soul gets reborn because of desires. Even the Lord takes birth when He has a *desire* to do so. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > Om Gurave Namah > > Namaste Freedom, > > I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light? > > Regards, > Lakshmi |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Do you ? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 3, 2003 Report Share Posted November 3, 2003 OM NAMO GURUBRIHASPATHAYE Dear Freedom, Thanks Karu - Freedom varahamihira Sunday, November 02, 2003 2:20 PM RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Saturn is the karaka for the shad-ripus, and Gulika is the poison we have given to others. They are just the karakas of our ‘sin’, showing that we have it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 4, 2003 Report Share Posted November 4, 2003 ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| > Bhagavan makes the rules of Dharma, and then follows them as well. It was > Parasurama killing his mother that gave Rama the Curse of Mother. It was > Rama sending away Sita that gave Krsna the curse of Venus (but was this not > just the curse of Narada being fulfilled). Guruji said the next Avatar's > chart will contain certain curses accrued from the life of Krsna (the > battle). I have this doubt: Rahu & Ketu are governed by the celestial dances of the Earth, Moon and Sun so whoever is born on Earth (Bhumi loka) must indisputably be governed by the nodes. Thus rebirth is inevitable unless one takes steps to correct the imbalances present at birth. For the avatars who manifested on Earth, they must also be governed by the nodes. But is rebirth equally certain? For after finishing their tasks, they go straight back to the unborn Lord, which I presume can be equated to liberation or salvation or final emancipation. Secondly, assuming that the (accurate) horoscopes of each of the avatars were available, would they contain clues on how the soul proceeds towards final emancipation? How to find the horoscope for Lord Narasimha who appeared straight out of a pillar in full grown form (not like Rama or Krishna who were born as babies)? I ask this question because how will we know the chart of the next avatar if he appears just like that. Lastly why more than one avatar? does it mean that the Lord having decided to manifest on Earth is fully under the control of rebirth and must come again and again till the unborn Lord decides the Earth should be destroyed? regards Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2003 Report Share Posted November 5, 2003 Om Gurave Namah Namaste Freedom, Thanks for your reply. Freedomji, from the begining, life was held sacred by all sages, especially Human Life. It is said by the Maharishis that unless a Being accumulated a lot of punya, human birth is not granted to that being, which is contrary to your theory. You know, Human birth is considered just one step away from "daivatva", and a truly great human being is not less than a God himself. And, Freedom, when you are saying that the Lord incarnated because of sins and curses, are you not doubting his own words...yada yada hi dharmasya glaanirbhavathi bhaarata...". Ofcourse, it is his tremendous commitment to upholding of dharma that makes him accountable for his acts, whenever he took human form. But to say that he incarnated only because of sins and curses, of His own or some one else's, is silly, because He definitely has some higher goal/purpose in mind. Curses are just incidental :-)) Talking about Jesus (I have high regard for Him), Freedom, Christianity basically assumes all beings to be sinners, which is not so in hinduism. In Hinduism, all beings and the entire Universe is Narayana and basically blemishless. Both creeds are opposites, one negative and the other positive, but both are paths that lead to the Godhead. Regards, Lakshmi Freedom <freedom wrote: Hare Rama Krsna Bhagavan makes the rules of Dharma, and then follows them as well. It was Parasurama killing his mother that gave Rama the Curse of Mother. It was Rama sending away Sita that gave Krsna the curse of Venus (but was this not just the curse of Narada being fulfilled). Guruji said the next Avatar’s chart will contain certain curses accrued from the life of Krsna (the battle). The great epics start with the stories of how the devas get cursed and how they come to Bhumi loka to purify themselves of their karma. Devas, let alone humans don’t come perfectly pure to this loka. Guruji often says ‘a man without faults is a man without virtue’. It is our faults/desires/shad-ripus that help us to have compassion on others. Who doesn’t have some sin, how else could Jesus ask the person with no sin to throw the first stone? Notice Visnu didn’t just come down to fulfill a purpose and then take off. Bhagavan followed the rules of Dharma, incarnated due to karmas, and then left with karmas that would cause Him to incarnate again one day. Sins and purpose, curses and blessings, they are all rapped up in a nice little bundle called Life (Maya). Namah Sivaya lakshmi ramesh [b_lakshmi_ramesh]Friday, October 31, 2003 7:20 PMvarahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Gurave Namah Namaste Narasimha, That was a good distinction:). But then, isn't it a sense of duty and a commitment to the task He had taken upon himself that prompts the Lord's "desire"? Regards, Lakshmipvr108 <pvr wrote: Dear Lakshmi,"Sin" is a heavy word. "Desire" is a simpler word.A soul gets reborn because of desires. Even theLord takes birth when He has a *desire* to do so.May Jupiter's light shine on us,Narasimha> Om Gurave Namah> > Namaste Freedom,> > I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light?> > Regards,> Lakshmi|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2003 Report Share Posted November 5, 2003 -----Original Message----- lakshmi ramesh [b_lakshmi_ramesh] Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:35 AM varahamihira RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Gurave Namah Namaste Freedom, Namaste Laksmi, Thanks for your reply. Freedomji, from the begining, life was held sacred by all sages, especially Human Life. It is said by the Maharishis that unless a Being accumulated a lot of punya, human birth is not granted to that being, which is contrary to your theory, please see beginning of this conversation to understand that this is not a theory but a reply to someone wondering why so much talk about sin. You know, Human birth is considered just one step away from " daivatva " , and a truly great human being is not less than a God himself. Human birth in Bhu loka is the result of punya and papa, not one or the other only. Can you find a chart with out Punya? Can you find a chart with out Papa? Nahi. And, Freedom, when you are saying that the Lord incarnated because of sins and curses, are you not doubting his own words...yada yada hi dharmasya glaanirbhavathi bhaarata...Abhuthyanam adharmasya tadatmanam srijamyaham. paritranaya sadhunam vinahsaya cha dushkritam. dharmasamsthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge yuge " . Ofcourse, it is his tremendous commitment to upholding of dharma that makes him accountable for his acts, whenever he took human form. But to say that he incarnated only (who said only?) because of sins and curses, of His own or some one else's, is silly, silly if you say only because He definitely has some higher goal/purpose in mind. yes, there is a purpose to the Lord’s play. Curses are just incidental :-)) Curses are not incidental, they have great meaning in understanding Jyotisha. Which Avatars can help us overcome which obstacles can be seen by these curses and blessings. Talking about Jesus (I have high regard for Him), Freedom, Christianity basically assumes all beings to be sinners, not all schools of Christianity, that would be like saying all Hindus do animal sacrifice in Kali temples. which is not so in hinduism. In Hinduism, all beings and the entire Universe is Narayana and basically blemishless not all schools of Hinduism. Both creeds are opposites, one negative and the other positive, but both are paths that lead to the Godhead. In both Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism there are various schools of thought, some negative and some positive. The Jyotishi sees beyond these. Philosophers can argue why we incarnate, but the chart reveals the karma of this life. Jai Mahadev Regards, Lakshmi Namah Shivaya Freedom <freedom wrote: Hare Rama Krsna Bhagavan makes the rules of Dharma, and then follows them as well. It was Parasurama killing his mother that gave Rama the Curse of Mother. It was Rama sending away Sita that gave Krsna the curse of Venus (but was this not just the curse of Narada being fulfilled). Guruji said the next Avatars chart will contain certain curses accrued from the life of Krsna (the battle). The great epics start with the stories of how the devas get cursed and how they come to Bhumi loka to purify themselves of their karma. Devas, let alone humans dont come perfectly pure to this loka. Guruji often says a man without faults is a man without virtue. It is our faults/desires/shad-ripus that help us to have compassion on others. Who doesnt have some sin, how else could Jesus ask the person with no sin to throw the first stone? Notice Visnu didnt just come down to fulfill a purpose and then take off. Bhagavan followed the rules of Dharma, incarnated due to karmas, and then left with karmas that would cause Him to incarnate again one day. Sins and purpose, curses and blessings, they are all rapped up in a nice little bundle called Life (Maya). Namah Sivaya lakshmi ramesh [b_lakshmi_ramesh] Friday, October 31, 2003 7:20 PM varahamihira Re: |Sri Varaha| Re: Jyotirlinga & the knowledge of the purpose of life Om Gurave Namah Namaste Narasimha, That was a good distinction:). But then, isn't it a sense of duty and a commitment to the task He had taken upon himself that prompts the Lord's " desire " ? Regards, Lakshmi pvr108 <pvr wrote: Dear Lakshmi, " Sin " is a heavy word. " Desire " is a simpler word. A soul gets reborn because of desires. Even the Lord takes birth when He has a *desire* to do so. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha > Om Gurave Namah > > Namaste Freedom, > > I am puzzled by these repeated references to sin, as the main cause of rebirth. I beg to differ and I feel that a soul reincarnates basically in order to carry out & complete the task given to it. The moment the task is fulfilled the soul is set free ...till such time it's manifestation becomes necessary again.I think the Vishnu avataars illustrate this point well. Don't we all carry within ourselves a spark of that Divine Light? > > Regards, > Lakshmi |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Protect your identity with Mail AddressGuard |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Your use of is subject to the Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.