Badhaka Discussion: Mandi (Gulika) or Kharesha to activate

[Guest guest]

OM Gam Gajavakraye Namah

 

Dear learned sisyas and Gurus;

Badhaka plays an important role in ones chart. Sanjay has been kind

enough to write a paper on this ( July 03) and Visti has presented

this at the West Coast conference and is on CD for study.

 

That said, I have doubts; I ahve read and listened to the

instruction and continue my studies on this matter.

As I read additional information by DR.M.L.GUPTA he suggests the

following " The so called badhaka lord for a particular lagna

should only be treated as an actual badhaka, if it simultaneously be

the lord of the house tenanted by Mandi (Gulika) or Kharesha (Lord

of 22nd drekkana from the lagna) " . He continues;

" But according to sloka 48 of Adhyaya II in JATAKA PARIJATA, it is

stated that the 11th house, its owner and the planets posited in

11th house for moveable signs lagna, the 9th house, its lord and

planets in the 9th house for fixed signs Lagna, and the 7th house,

its lord and the planets in 7th house for the dual signs lagna

should only be treated as badhaka if the lord of the said house

simultaneously be the lord of the house tenanted by Mandi (Gulika)

or Karesha i.e. the lord of 22nd drekkana from the lagna "

 

His discussion is at http://www.starteller.com/estart11.html

 

That rider suggests a more focused way of looking at Badhaka and how

to apply the rules given by Sanjayji.

Can a Guru add clarity on this matter.

 

Regards,

Frank in San Diego