Guest guest Posted February 6, 2004 Report Share Posted February 6, 2004 Questions re badhakesh placement: 1/if badhakesh is well placed, exalted..etc.. 2/if badhakesh is poorly placed, debilitated, MKS, otherwise weakened.. would that 1/enhance 2/ reduce /respectively/ its badhak nature/manifestations? Thanks, Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 dear anna what matters is the affliction. affliction to badhak, affliction to its 12th housebadhak causing affliction to any pllnat with other malefics esp mandi & nodes regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Questions re badhakesh placement: 1/if badhakesh is well placed, exalted..etc.. 2/if badhakesh is poorly placed, debilitated, MKS, otherwise weakened.. would that 1/enhance 2/ reduce /respectively/ its badhak nature/manifestations? Thanks, Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Dear Prashant, Thanks for response. I've read on affliction on B. /and its 12th- but nothing on its relative strenght- Just have a feeling that its own strenght/placement must be relevant too. Afflictions should make it weaker, thus more malefic- just a speculation before 'hear' that as an opinion..Also, when living-non-living things will be primarily affected, as /randomly/ seen- not big enough sample do I have for this for any conclusion to be made. /In my own case, 11th H B.-brother was affected, non-living things re to 11th are not./ More examples will hopefully give clearer answers. Thanks again. Regards, Anna-prashant narang Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)varahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Qs-Badhakesh state dear anna what matters is the affliction. affliction to badhak, affliction to its 12th housebadhak causing affliction to any pllnat with other malefics esp mandi & nodes regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Questions re badhakesh placement: 1/if badhakesh is well placed, exalted..etc.. 2/if badhakesh is poorly placed, debilitated, MKS, otherwise weakened.. would that 1/enhance 2/ reduce /respectively/ its badhak nature/manifestations? Thanks, Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online |Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira _______________ -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 dear anna may b u can find sanjay ji's lesson on this in the files section. alternately u can opt for prasna marga. u will get to know abt dhatu/moola/jeeva classification thru which u can discriminate between what kind of problem will the badhaka give? i mean whther it will b related to living/non living... we discussed(sjc classes) badhaka cases. in most of them , either it was dbilted or exalted or 12 from it was severly afflictd. this means , deb & exalt.n makes it severe. for detail analysis, u must use navamsa. if u want we can discuss any case of ur choice. then u have diff kind of duryogas with badhak which r primarily for horary charts, but sanjay ji uses them in birth charts too. i m not too sure if it always works.such yoags r hanthu kamas, ranthu kamas etc. i also have couple of them. im sure next year i wont b confused at all with these yogas as the concerned dasa will prove itself!! if u want the lesson by sanjay ji, i can mail it to u , regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Dear Prashant, Thanks for response. I've read on affliction on B. /and its 12th- but nothing on its relative strenght- Just have a feeling that its own strenght/placement must be relevant too. Afflictions should make it weaker, thus more malefic- just a speculation before 'hear' that as an opinion..Also, when living-non-living things will be primarily affected, as /randomly/ seen- not big enough sample do I have for this for any conclusion to be made. /In my own case, 11th H B.-brother was affected, non-living things re to 11th are not./ More examples will hopefully give clearer answers. Thanks again. Regards, Anna-prashant narang Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)varahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Qs-Badhakesh state dear anna what matters is the affliction. affliction to badhak, affliction to its 12th housebadhak causing affliction to any pllnat with other malefics esp mandi & nodes regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Questions re badhakesh placement: 1/if badhakesh is well placed, exalted..etc.. 2/if badhakesh is poorly placed, debilitated, MKS, otherwise weakened.. would that 1/enhance 2/ reduce /respectively/ its badhak nature/manifestations? Thanks, Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online |Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira _______________ -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Dear Prashant, Thanks, I would appreciate if you would share your notes /I have B. from Sanjay's conf/ Best wishes, Anna-prashant narang Sat, 7 Feb 2004 00:45:06 -0800 (PST)varahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Qs-Badhakesh state dear anna may b u can find sanjay ji's lesson on this in the files section. alternately u can opt for prasna marga. u will get to know abt dhatu/moola/jeeva classification thru which u can discriminate between what kind of problem will the badhaka give? i mean whther it will b related to living/non living... we discussed(sjc classes) badhaka cases. in most of them , either it was dbilted or exalted or 12 from it was severly afflictd. this means , deb & exalt.n makes it severe. for detail analysis, u must use navamsa. if u want we can discuss any case of ur choice. then u have diff kind of duryogas with badhak which r primarily for horary charts, but sanjay ji uses them in birth charts too. i m not too sure if it always works.such yoags r hanthu kamas, ranthu kamas etc. i also have couple of them. im sure next year i wont b confused at all with these yogas as the concerned dasa will prove itself!! if u want the lesson by sanjay ji, i can mail it to u , regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Dear Prashant, Thanks for response. I've read on affliction on B. /and its 12th- but nothing on its relative strenght- Just have a feeling that its own strenght/placement must be relevant too. Afflictions should make it weaker, thus more malefic- just a speculation before 'hear' that as an opinion..Also, when living-non-living things will be primarily affected, as /randomly/ seen- not big enough sample do I have for this for any conclusion to be made. /In my own case, 11th H B.-brother was affected, non-living things re to 11th are not./ More examples will hopefully give clearer answers. Thanks again. Regards, Anna-prashant narang Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)varahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Qs-Badhakesh state dear anna what matters is the affliction. affliction to badhak, affliction to its 12th housebadhak causing affliction to any pllnat with other malefics esp mandi & nodes regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Questions re badhakesh placement: 1/if badhakesh is well placed, exalted..etc.. 2/if badhakesh is poorly placed, debilitated, MKS, otherwise weakened.. would that 1/enhance 2/ reduce /respectively/ its badhak nature/manifestations? Thanks, Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online |Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira _______________ -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online |Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira _______________ -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Sorry Prashant, forgot to tell you that from my limitted number of cases I've gotten the same impression that debilitated or exalted badhakesh pl.are 'the worst' /subjective and less subj. parametars/ Regards, Anna-prashant narang Sat, 7 Feb 2004 00:45:06 -0800 (PST)varahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Qs-Badhakesh state dear anna may b u can find sanjay ji's lesson on this in the files section. alternately u can opt for prasna marga. u will get to know abt dhatu/moola/jeeva classification thru which u can discriminate between what kind of problem will the badhaka give? i mean whther it will b related to living/non living... we discussed(sjc classes) badhaka cases. in most of them , either it was dbilted or exalted or 12 from it was severly afflictd. this means , deb & exalt.n makes it severe. for detail analysis, u must use navamsa. if u want we can discuss any case of ur choice. then u have diff kind of duryogas with badhak which r primarily for horary charts, but sanjay ji uses them in birth charts too. i m not too sure if it always works.such yoags r hanthu kamas, ranthu kamas etc. i also have couple of them. im sure next year i wont b confused at all with these yogas as the concerned dasa will prove itself!! if u want the lesson by sanjay ji, i can mail it to u , regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Dear Prashant, Thanks for response. I've read on affliction on B. /and its 12th- but nothing on its relative strenght- Just have a feeling that its own strenght/placement must be relevant too. Afflictions should make it weaker, thus more malefic- just a speculation before 'hear' that as an opinion..Also, when living-non-living things will be primarily affected, as /randomly/ seen- not big enough sample do I have for this for any conclusion to be made. /In my own case, 11th H B.-brother was affected, non-living things re to 11th are not./ More examples will hopefully give clearer answers. Thanks again. Regards, Anna-prashant narang Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:39:10 -0800 (PST)varahamihira Subject: Re: |Sri Varaha| Qs-Badhakesh state dear anna what matters is the affliction. affliction to badhak, affliction to its 12th housebadhak causing affliction to any pllnat with other malefics esp mandi & nodes regards prashant108 ar <jyotish108 wrote: Questions re badhakesh placement: 1/if badhakesh is well placed, exalted..etc.. 2/if badhakesh is poorly placed, debilitated, MKS, otherwise weakened.. would that 1/enhance 2/ reduce /respectively/ its badhak nature/manifestations? Thanks, Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online |Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira _______________ -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.comhttp://www.mail.com/?sr=signup|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online |Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira _______________ -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 dear anna *have u noticed that char/fixed/dual have badhaka in dif houses, but in all the 3, badhaka aspects lagna. did sanjay ji tell u the reason behind this? if yes, plz share with us... what's the criterion behind selection of these houses for respective lagna rasis? *prasna marga talks abt badhaka in refrence to wrath of deity. this sounds appropriate in case of horary. does this work in natal charts ?. for our conveneience , we can tell stories of previuos birth. somehow, this doesnt convince me atleast. * i've seen cases where badhaka didnt give any malefic results inspite of duryogas. i dont say that badhaka doesnt work. but there is much more to badhaka that needs to b explored for getting accurate results. after all in every horoscope there is badhaka, & only 1out of 12 will probably have it in 12th , but rest of 11 will have it in some house /rasi or other. not everyone complains... perhaps we need to take up more cases, preferably live cases... i'vent compiled my notes, this discussion will surely help to do so.... reagrds prashant Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2004 Report Share Posted February 7, 2004 Dear Prashant,Yes, this is very intriguing issue- I have the same Qs and doubts you expressed here,all the time- I am sure THERE is something to this, but there are so many gray areas...I hope to find the answers to.Please 'see me' bellow @dear anna*have u noticed that char/fixed/dual have badhaka in dif houses, but in all the 3, badhaka aspects lagna. did sanjay ji tell u the reason behind this? if yes, plz share with us...@Yes, I have- my understanding is that it wouldn't be 'badhaka' if NOT associated with lagna- I wish if Sanjay told us more..what's the criterion behind selection of these houses for respective lagna rasis?@I wish I kne w!!! For Taurus Lagna in particular! Bitter-sweet YK? What about Moon as badhakesh for Scorpio Lagna? Can one assume that Sc Lagna is meant to have difficult relationship with mother?*prasna marga talks abt badhaka in refrence to wrath of deity. this sounds appropriate in case of horary. does this work in natal charts ?. for our conveneience , we can tell stories of previuos birth. somehow, this doesnt convince me atleast. @Sanjay wrote about that /Summer 03 conference/- Sure, there is no way to prove 'wrath of deity or anything from previous lives- Sanjay says it works in N.Chart- how can anything be sufficiently convincing /to mind/ from previous lives?I even don't expect that- the most I expect is on the level of manifestation /in this life/, and some consistency /haven't seen yet/* i've seen cases where badhaka didnt give any malefic results inspite of duryogas. i dont say that badhaka doesnt work. but there is much more to badhaka that needs to b explored for getting accurate results.after all in every horoscope there is badhaka, & only 1out of 12 will probably have it in 12th , but rest of 11 will have it in some house /rasi or other. not everyone complains...perhaps we need to take up more cases, preferably live cases...@I agree- it also seems to me that there is more to this- thus my constant wondering- I will send you one interesting chart, privately/data not for public useYes, more research and more GUIDANCE would be needed herei'vent compiled my no tes, this discussion will surely help to do so....@You know, unless we get new inputs, from those who know, we would continue 'discussing' the same things all over and again- not productive..please send materials you have, whatever you have- I will do the same-and let's hope to get more info from Sanjay and others soon.reagrdsprashantBest wishes,Anna -- _________Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.