Upgrah Calculation Mistake

[Guest guest]

Dear Rath and Rao PVR

 

RAM KRISHN HARE

 

Your views about Gulik etc. rising at the end of respective

part of planet are wrong.BPHS(Mumbai) clearly states that it

is at the begining.Even common sense shows that if it is ending

moment,then Gulikoday and Gulik-ast will be same.So how will you

justify " Shanyansho Gulik: "

 

Thanks

 

Anilkumar

 

OM TAT SAT

[Guest guest]

` nmae naray[ay,

om namo näräyaëäya|Dear Anil Kumar Ji,

If you refer to my earlier mail may be in December 2003,I have written about this.Both in BPHS and Uttara Kalamrita,it is mentioned that Shani's portion is Gulika ie.,the beginning portion of Shani's portion. In a query to Shri Chandrashekhar Ji, I had given all the calculation also about Gulika and Mandi.The same is explained in Muhurta Madhaveeyam also.

Here is the shloka from Muhurta Madhaveeyam.It also tells about the interpretation of Ardha Prahara and Yama Kantaka :

 

 

¢havarnawadyae vasrSy àma[aòÉagaid nawa> ³me[,

twa mampTyaí tTp<cma*a y Aa*<znawSs @vaòmSy.

%´ ³mat! gui¦k< AkRsutSy Éag<,jIva<zk< tu ymk<qkmamn<it,

AxRàharmé[aid idne;u ved zElai]ba[ vsuviû guhanna<zat!.

grahäväranäthädayo väsarasya pramäëäñöabhägädi näthäù krameëa|

tathä mämapatyäçca tatpaïcamädyä ya ädyaàçanäthassa eväñöamasya||

ukta kramät guÿikam arkasutasya bhägaàjéväàçakaà tu yamakaëöakamämananti|ardhaprahäramaruëädi dineñu veda çailäkñibäëa vasuvahni guhänanäàçät||

I hope this helps you.

With Shri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana,

Ramadas Rao.aokedia <anilkedia wrote:

Dear Rath and Rao PVRRAM KRISHN HAREYour views about Gulik etc. rising at the end of respectivepart of planet are wrong.BPHS(Mumbai) clearly states that it is at the begining.Even common sense shows that if it is ending moment,then Gulikoday and Gulik-ast will be same.So how will you justify "Shanyansho Gulik:"ThanksAnilkumarOM TAT SAT|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira

 

Win an evening with the Indian cricket captain:

India Promos.

[Guest guest]

` nmae naray[ay,

om namo näräyaëäya|Dear Anil Kumar Ji,

If you refer to my earlier mail may be in December 2003,I have written about this.Both in BPHS and Uttara Kalamrita,it is mentioned that Shani's portion is Gulika ie.,the beginning portion of Shani's portion. In a query to Shri Chandrashekhar Ji, I had given all the calculation also about Gulika and Mandi.The same is explained in Muhurta Madhaveeyam also.

Here is the shloka from Muhurta Madhaveeyam.It also tells about the interpretation of Ardha Prahara and Yama Kantaka :

 

 

¢havarnawadyae vasrSy àma[aòÉagaid nawa> ³me[,

twa mampTyaí tTp<cma*a y Aa*<znawSs @vaòmSy.

%´ ³mat! gui¦k< AkRsutSy Éag<,jIva<zk< tu ymk<qkmamn<it,

AxRàharmé[aid idne;u ved zElai]ba[ vsuviû guhanna<zat!.

grahäväranäthädayo väsarasya pramäëäñöabhägädi näthäù krameëa|

tathä mämapatyäçca tatpaïcamädyä ya ädyaàçanäthassa eväñöamasya||

ukta kramät guÿikam arkasutasya bhägaàjéväàçakaà tu yamakaëöakamämananti|ardhaprahäramaruëädi dineñu veda çailäkñibäëa vasuvahni guhänanäàçät||

I hope this helps you.

With Shri Hari Vaayu Naama Smarana,

Ramadas Rao.aokedia <anilkedia wrote:

Dear Rath and Rao PVRRAM KRISHN HAREYour views about Gulik etc. rising at the end of respectivepart of planet are wrong.BPHS(Mumbai) clearly states that it is at the begining.Even common sense shows that if it is ending moment,then Gulikoday and Gulik-ast will be same.So how will you justify "Shanyansho Gulik:"ThanksAnilkumarOM TAT SAT|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira

 

Win an evening with the Indian cricket captain:

India Promos.