nodes aspect

[Guest guest]

sadgurudevaaye namah

 

dear sunil

 

sorry, i couldnt reply earlier....

 

mr. goel has given me a reply in detail. here it is..

 

there are many given in various texts in relation to this topic. i'll quote various texts.

parasara says

rahu has full aspects of 5,7, & 9

half aspect of 2 & 10.

& it has malefic aspect of 3 & 6.

it does aspect his own house. (bphs, bombay edition sl 26).

 

laghu parasari

rahu & ketu have seventh apsect for formation of yogas.

 

vridhhi karika says

rahu has 2,7,5 & 9 aspect on padas. it does not consider ketu's aspect.

 

 

his own views:

do consider trines from both nodes, as they cast influence on trines. for dristi on padas, consider only rahu's. special attention should b paid to to rahu's malefic aspects i.e. 3 & 6. for checking yogas, only conjunction & 7th aspect should b seen. for bhava padas, dont consider ketu's aspect of 5,7, & 9.

 

i have not seen any other astrologer even mentioning abt 3 & 6 aspect of rahu. we tried using it on a few charts, it works well. i felt like as if a secret was revealed to me.

of course, we can test it on more charts once akshic records project goes on.

if u have any questions , plz let me know. i'll try to get those clarified with him.

 

regards

prashant narang

 

Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at HotJobs

[Guest guest]

Dear Prashant,

If I remember right Laghu parashari says that Rahu/Ketu (by extension)

also give the results of planets occupying 7th house from them. It does

not talk about Rahu and Ketu having aspect on 7th house. Since he only

says tomograhH, it could also mean only Rahu.

Chandrashekhar.

 

prashant narang wrote:

 

> sadgurudevaaye namah

>

> dear sunil

>

> sorry, i couldnt reply earlier....

>

> mr. goel has given me a reply in detail. here it is..

>

> there are many given in various texts in relation to this topic. i'll

> quote various texts.

> parasara says

> rahu has full aspects of 5,7, & 9

> half aspect of 2 & 10.

> & it has malefic aspect of 3 & 6.

> it does aspect his own house. (bphs, bombay edition sl 26).

>

> laghu parasari

> rahu & ketu have seventh apsect for formation of yogas.

>

> vridhhi karika says

> rahu has 2,7,5 & 9 aspect on padas. it does not consider ketu's aspect.

>

>

> his own views:

> do consider trines from both nodes, as they cast influence on trines.

> for dristi on padas, consider only rahu's. special attention should b

> paid to to rahu's malefic aspects i.e. 3 & 6. for checking yogas, only

> conjunction & 7th aspect should b seen. for bhava padas, dont

> consider ketu's aspect of 5,7, & 9.

>

> i have not seen any other astrologer even mentioning abt 3 & 6 aspect

> of rahu. we tried using it on a few charts, it works well. i felt like

> as if a secret was revealed to me.

> of course, we can test it on more charts once akshic records project

> goes on.

> if u have any questions , plz let me know. i'll try to get those

> clarified with him.

>

> regards

> prashant narang

>

>

> ------

>

> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at HotJobs

>

<http://pa./*http://us.rd./hotjobs/hotjobs_mail_signature_foot\

er_textlink/evt=23983/*http://hotjobs.sweepstakes./careermakeover>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

>

> ------

> *

[Guest guest]

sadgurudevaaye namah

 

dear chandrashekhar ji

these were sri goel sahib's views. i will try to convey ur thoughts. i dont have laghu parasari at my home. personally , i dont believe in 7th 'aspect' of rahu-ketu. it doesnt make sense to me atleast. because any planet with ra or ke is caught in the axis, & shows affliction. what is the need of describing it as 7th aspect. whether it is with rahu or ketu, it will defnitely show affliction.

as such ketu is nothing but another point 180 degrees from rahu. one may call it ketu's effect or rahu's 7th aspect, the affliction is same.

9th from ketu will always have rahu's 3rd aspect. now, this will b afflicted whether it is rahu'3rd or ketu's trinal aspect.

the point lies in the way u diffrentiate while interpreting the two.

regards

prashantChandrashekhar <boxdel wrote:

Dear Prashant,If I remember right Laghu parashari says that Rahu/Ketu (by extension) also give the results of planets occupying 7th house from them. It does not talk about Rahu and Ketu having aspect on 7th house. Since he only says tomograhH, it could also mean only Rahu.Chandrashekhar.prashant narang wrote:> sadgurudevaaye namah> > dear sunil> > sorry, i couldnt reply earlier....> > mr. goel has given me a reply in detail. here it is..> > there are many given in various texts in relation to this topic. i'll > quote various texts.> parasara says> rahu has full aspects of 5,7, & 9> half aspect of 2 & 10.> & it has malefic aspect of 3 & 6.> it does aspect his own house. (bphs, bombay edition sl

26).> > laghu parasari> rahu & ketu have seventh apsect for formation of yogas.> > vridhhi karika says> rahu has 2,7,5 & 9 aspect on padas. it does not consider ketu's aspect.> > > his own views:> do consider trines from both nodes, as they cast influence on trines. > for dristi on padas, consider only rahu's. special attention should b > paid to to rahu's malefic aspects i.e. 3 & 6. for checking yogas, only > conjunction & 7th aspect should b seen. for bhava padas, dont > consider ketu's aspect of 5,7, & 9.> > i have not seen any other astrologer even mentioning abt 3 & 6 aspect > of rahu. we tried using it on a few charts, it works well. i felt like > as if a secret was revealed to me.> of course, we can test it on more charts once akshic records project > goes on.>

if u have any questions , plz let me know. i'll try to get those > clarified with him.> > regards> prashant narang> >> ------> > Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at HotJobs > <http://pa./*http://us.rd./hotjobs/hotjobs_mail_signature_footer_textlink/evt=23983/*http://hotjobs.sweepstakes./careermakeover> >>> Archives: vedic astrology>> Group info: vedic astrology/info.html>> To UNSUBSCRIBE:

Blank mail to vedic astrology->> ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......>> >>> ------> *