Guest guest Posted May 24, 2004 Report Share Posted May 24, 2004 Dear Saaji and others who wrote to me, I will have to take a rain check for a couple of weeks on your queries as I will be in Singapore. I will definitely read and reply to your mails once I return...so do wait for me! Thanks, Sarbani saaji kulangara [saajik] Monday, May 24, 2004 2:20 PM sarbani; varahamihira Fwd: RE: |Sri Varaha| Re: [vedic astrology] RE: Ishta-Devta for Mars and a Story from Uddhava Gita Om Subrahmanyaya Namah Dear Sarbani Ji, Nice, you wrote in Varahamihira List, I'm comfortable here : -) Ques 2 : I dont know whether I'm correct, but in Maheshwar khand of Skanda Puranam it's said that Skanda accepted Devasena his wife. I dont have Purana with me so please read this portion if you have Skanda Puranam. In Subrahmanya Sahasranamam we recite at the end: Sri Valli Devasena sameta Subrahmanyaya namah, And Sri Ramadasji earlier wrote some other points also. And there are many temples where Subrahmanya has Valli and Devasena with him. If he's not married what does it mean? To your next point, ...sarva deva namaskara keshava pratigachhati. (Where is it from?) Well I'm a Vishnu bhakta also as my mom taught me in my childhood, only vishnu namam(Narayana) we can utter whatever we do, or wherever we are. Rest all have reservations like cleanliness, concentration and the like. With this point, reciting the name of Lord Vishnu, let me tell you again that what you wrote is again a one sided coin. In Shiva Purana and related Puranas, it says Lord Shiva is one who entrusts the job of creation to Brahma, sthiti to Lord Vishnu, while He's the omnipotent. The Puranas themselves have contradictions in many matters, and since the words of Maharshis cant go wrong or what all they say have to come true, we have to assume that all are correct, which will ultimately lead us to the fact that all is one, and it's our mindset that differentiates Gods. Earlier you wrote that .......adya shakti are various forms for that paramatman. When you say Adi Parashakti, doesn't that mean Paramatman itself ? Or you again differentiate this? Ofcourse the creation of Universe is a mistery and I think this is the only matter even Hrishis couldn't answer clearly. I have read a few selected chapters of Brihat Samhita, in the first or second chapter the great Varahmihira says Kapila Maharshi and others hold different opinions in this matter. Leave this, my earlier lines are to the point. In Lalitha Sahasranamam it's said that those who recited other sahasranamams janmajanmanthar can only get Lalitha Sahasranamam ? Have you gone through Shrimad Devi Bhagavatam? Since you have deep knowledge of mantras and stotras you might be. Doesn't that clearly state if there is no shakti or Devi, there is no Brahma, Vishnu and Maheshwar??? In Sri Devi Mahatmyam(Durga Saptashati) , Devi gave boon to the King that He will become a 'Manu'. I know , there are many temples where we have 'Sanakara Narayanan' and Ardhanareeswaran! I shall conclude narrating one other story in short, one great scholar or a saint jumped from a high story building saying ` If there is some one called God is true, I wont happen anything `, he had only fracture on his legs. The other scholars made him brasht, since he didnt say ` Since there is God I wont happen anything `, the reason was the scholar had doubts in his mind! I may have misunderstood your points again(u have my horoscope, hence u can understand that I often do), but I'm sure that, it will ensure a better explanation from your deep and vast knowledge. Best Regards, Saaji varahamihira , " Sarbani Sarkar " <sarbani@s...> wrote: Dear Hari, 1. The dvadasakshari is Om Namo Bhagavate Narasimhaya. There is another beautiful mantra but as there some objections on VA list, I will not post it there; but maybe I will post it on Varahamihira. 2. Please quote me the shastra or purana which says Kartikeya is married. 3. This is not my view, but what we follow at SJC. The ultimate goal is Vishnu...sarva deva namaskara keshava pratigachhati. But we feel that everyone is not ready to worship the ultimate. You begin somewhere; and you can begin with any deity but you will end up with Vishnu. The beginning depends on one's spiritual development. Also Shubhnagi does not specifically have a Vhamunda yoga: for that you need either Venus in 5th, or Mars and Venus together or Mars, Venus and Rahu together. More later in mail to Shubhnagi. Bets regards, Sarbani _____ Hari M [onlyhari] Monday, May 17, 2004 5:19 PM Sarbani Sarkar; 'Shubhangi Naik'; vedic astrology Cc: varahamihira |Sri Varaha| Re: [vedic astrology] RE: Ishta-Devta for Mars and a Story from Uddhava Gita ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| Dear Sarbani, I agree with your point. However I would like to clarify whether the mantra you advised for Shubhangi ie., Om Namo Bhagavate Nrisimhadevaya is dwadasakshari or not; it appears to have thirteen aksharas. Secondly, I am also surprised when you say that generally women dont worship Murugan or Lord Subramania Swamy...in the South, for many families, Muruga is usually the kula devata and hence women also worship him. Thirdly I understand from your email that worship of Chamundi is also satvik so why not give a choice and leave it to the person to choose as per his/her wishes. Your stand, while justified, is rather rigid and leaves no choice for the person to choose his/her istadevata in the pantheon of Hindu deities. regards Hari Sarbani Sarkar <sarbani@s...> wrote: Dear Shubhangi (and Hari), We are taught in our parampara that the the ultimate goal is the paramam padam or Vishnu. In order to relieve the burden of our sins and lead us towards moksha; to forgive and protect us at all times; the one in whom we take sharana in our darkest hour, is the Ishta Devata. We always worship the Ishta Devata as Vishnu in one of the dasavatar forms as only Vishnu will lead us to moksha, as he is the ultimate end or satya. The mantras we use for Ishta Devata prarthana is from the Bhagavat Purana with prefixes of Om Namo Bhagavate...In your case, Mars as Ishta Devata indicates Nrisimhadeva and the Ishta Mantra for the same is Om Namo Bhagavate Nrisimhadevaya. Mars when otherwise indicating deities in any of the charts, can represent Kartikeya, Hanuman or Chamunda. Usually women don't worship Kartikeya, the God of War, although Subramania Swamy is greatly revered in the south. Hanuman is very much worshippable as he removes all 'sankata' and removes ugra mangala doshas. Chamunda, the presiding deity of the Devi Mahatmya, is the goddess who sits in our hearts and who has the utimate power to deliver even the most tortured souls roaming the universe. She is the great goddess whom Rama worshipped with the Chamunda Hrdaya mantra (a navarna mantra which Rama transformed into a dasakshari by adding pranava) immediately prior to embarking on his final battle with Ravana. She is trigunatmika, very pure and supremely divine and she is not associated with black magic. That her immense powers are invoked for tamasik practices is another matter. For that matter even Dakshinamurty and Dattatreya are invoked for black magic practices. In fact the Dattatreya Tantra is one of the worst in such matters. Let me share a story with all of you from the Uddhava Gita. Krishna says that there are three methods of worship. The first is Satvik, where the focus is entirely on Krishna (read: Supreme Being in any form) and is utterly without any purpose or selfish motivation. The second is Rajasik, where the worship is motivated for selfish purposes be it siddhi, moksha, wealth, knowledge etc. and the final type is Tamasik, where the worship is motivated for selfish purposes along with the intention of harming or causing injury to another. Ishta Devata worship can never be anything else but Satvik...and for that matter all other worships as well. Best Regards, Sarbani _____ Shubhangi Naik [shubhangi_naik@r...] Monday, May 17, 2004 11:11 AM vedic astrology [vedic astrology] Ishta-Devta for Mars Dear Sirs, I have been reading all the mails on Ishta-devtas and Atmakarakas. I have some queries and concerns regarding ishta-devta for planet Mars. I understand that hanuman,kartikeya,chamunda-devi and narsimha all represents mars except kartikeya all 3 are married in their respective original forms. All of them except kartikey are incarnations of : Hanuman - shiva Chamunda - gauri/parvati Narsimha - vishnu Generally Hanuman is not advised because he never married and is a celibate. If this be than even rest 3 were not married and also the incarnation was with specific objective or purpose. I pray hanuman as a representation of mars because know much of hanuman who is worshiped all over India but have little or no knowledge or information about kartikeya who is more so famous in south as Subramaniym or Chamunda-devi i know for sure that her name is used while performing some evil/black-magic kind of and Narsimha is the one who came to rescue bhakt pralhad.. Also except for hanuman who is also symbolised as " das " and who assisted Rama to attain his objective..the others are warrior gods... Generally one would advise to pray kartikeya, chamunda and narsimha...but how is it possible to pray all for one Mars (since all of them represents mars) and it would only mean thinking on whether we are praying to a right devta or not. I request the members to help me clarify my doubts and concerns. I am enclosing my birth-chart for reference if need be. Is simply praying ishta-devta and regularly performing pooja enough or one needs to recite mantras also? If mantras are necessary, may I request to recommend a mantra to me? I await your response. Thanking you. Regards Shubhangi <http://clients.rediff.com/signature/track_sig.asp> _____ SBC <http://pa./*http://us.rd./evt=24311/*http://promo.y ahoo.c om/sbc/> - Internet access at a great low price. |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.