Fw: PLUTO was known to Vyas 5561 BC

[Guest guest]

-

" vrnparker " <vrnparker

<vediculture >

Wednesday, June 16, 2004 11:52 AM

[world-vedic] PLUTO was known to Vyas 5561 BC

 

 

PLUTO (was known to Vyas) in 5561 BCE

 

 

 

jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)

July 18, 1996

Message-Id: <4skjnn$a8u

Organization: Mantra Corporation, USA

Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu

 

THE SCIENTIFIC DATING OF THE MAHABHARAT WAR

16th October 5,561 BCE

 

By Dr. Padmakar Vishnu Vartak (Part-8)

Courtesy of Prasad Gokhale

 

Krittikaam Peedayan Teekshnaihi Nakshatram...... [30-Bheeshma.3]

 

Vyas states that there was one Nakshatra, i.e, some immobile liminary

troubling Krittika (Pleides) with its sharp rays. This " star " in Krittika

must have been some " planet " . It must have been stationary for many years,

that is why Vyas called it Nakshatra which means a thing that does not move

according to Mahabharat itself [Na Ksharati Iti Makshatram]

 

Hence the Nakshatra was a planet moving very slowly like pluto which takes

nine years to cross one Nakshatra of 13 degrees. My assumption that this

Nakshatra was Pluto gets confirmed by B.O.R.I (Bhandarkar Oriental Research

Institute?) Edition which states thus:

 

Krittikasu Grahasteevro Nakshatre Prathame Jvalan......

[26- Bhishma.3]

 

Some editions mention 'Grahasteekshnah'. Thus Teevra, Teekshana and

Nakshatra are the names of one and the same planet (graha) which was in

Krittlka in 5561 BCE Let us see if Vyas has given these names to Pluto and

if Pluto was in Krittika. It is stated that Krittika was troubled with sharp

rays by that planet -- this indicates that it was Nirayan Krittika.

 

Pluto was at 175 degrees in 1979.

 

It takes 248 years per rotation.

 

1979+5561=7540 years.

 

7540 divided by 248 gives 30.403223 turns.

 

0.403223 turn means 145 degrees.

 

175 - 145 = 30 degrees.

 

 

 

This is the site of Krittika. Thus it is proved beyond doubt that Vyas bas

mentioned the position of Pluto, which was discovered to the modern world in

1930. Vyas could have used his Yogic Vision or mathematical brain or a lens

or some other device to discover Teevra, Teekshna' or Nakshatra or Pluto.

 

Thus all the three so-called 'New' planets are discovered from Mahabharat.

It is usually held that before the discovery of Herschel in 1781 AD, only

five planets were known to the world. This belief is wrong because Vyas has

mentioned 'seven Great planets', three times in Mahabharat.

 

Deepyamanascha Sampetuhu Divi Sapta

Mahagrahah....[2-Bhishma.17]

 

This stanza states that the seven great planets were brilliant and shining;

so Rahu and Ketu are out of question. Rahu and Ketu are described as

Graha' 23 meaning Nodal points. (Parus means a node). Evidently Rahu and

Ketu are not included in these seven great planets. The Moon also is not

included, because it was not visible on that day of Amavasya with Solar

Eclipse.

- From the positions discovered by me and given by Vyas it is seen that

Mars, Sun, Mercury, Jupiter, Uranus, Venus and Neptune were the seven great

planets accumulated in a small field extending from Anuradha to Purva

Bhadrapada. So they appeared to Ved-Vyas as colliding with each other,

during total solar eclipse.

 

Nissaranto Vyadrushanta Suryaat Sapta

Mahagrahah....[4-Karna 37].

 

This stanza clearly states that these seven great planets were 'seen' moving

away from the Sun. As these are 'seen', Rahu and Ketu are out of question.

This is the statement of sixteenth day of the War, naturally the Moon has

moved away from the Sun. Hence, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Uranus, Venus

and Neptune are the seven great planets mentioned by Vyas.

 

Praja Samharane Rajan Somam Sapta grahah

Iva......[22-Drona 37].

 

Here again seven planets are mentioned, excluding the Moon.

 

Even if we do not consider the planetary positions, from the above three

stanzas, it is clear that seven planets are mentioned which do not include

the Sun, Moon, Rahu and Ketu. Naturally the conclusion is inevitable that

Vyas did know Uranus (Shveta) and Neptune (Shyama) as planets.

 

If they were known from 5561 years BCE then why they got forgotten? The

answer is simple, that these two planets, Uranus and Neptune were not useful

in predicting the future of a person. So they lost importance and in the

course of time they were totally forgotten. But, in any case, Neelakantha

from 17th century knew these two planets very weIl. Neelakantha is about a

hundred years ancient than Herschel, and he writes that Mahapata (Uranus) is

a famous planet in the Astronomical science of India. He also mentions the

planet 'Parigha' i.e. Neptune. 22 So both were known in India, at least one

Hundered years before Herschel. Vyas is 7343 years ancient than Herschel,

but still he knew all the three planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto.

 

 

 

...... to be continued.

 

Courtesy of Prasad Gokhale