Fwd: Fwd: Help on Sanskrit

[Guest guest]

Dear Sri Robben,

 

Hope this helps you.

 

Best Regards,

 

Saaji

 

--- Chandrashekhar <boxdel wrote:

> Sat, 03 Jul 2004 01:55:44 +0530

> Chandrashekhar <boxdel

> saaji kulangara <saajik

> Re: Fwd: Help on Sanskrit

>

> Dear Saaji

> You are right. Mantreshwara only says that some say this.

> He has not

> given his opinion on that aspect. However we could assume

> that by

> drawing the reader's attention to this opinion, he wants

> the reader to

> test this for himself.

> Chandrashekhar.

> saaji kulangara wrote:

>

> >Namaste Chandrashekharji,

> >

> >No one replied for this message. I've basic knowledge of

> Sanskrit, I

> >translate this in the way Sareen and Sastry did. (With -

> na hi iti

> >kathito) Not only that with the sound hee I feel the

> author doesn;t

> >approve this dictum of cancellation of K.Yoga. Am I

> correct in this

> >interpretation?

> >

> >Best Regards,

> >

> >Saaji

> >

> >

> >varahamihira , " Robben Hixson "

> <passage@b...>

> >wrote:

> >To any and all that are familiar with Sanskrit,

> >

> >The following is a verse from Phaladeepika (Adhyaya VI -

> 5):

> >ivxaeStu sun)an)axuéxura> Svir>)aeÉy-

> >vidhostu sunaphänaphädhurudhuräù svariùphobhaya-

> >

> >iSwtEv¡riviÉ¢RhEirtrwa tu kemÔ‚m>,

> >

> >sthitairvaàravibhirgrahairitarathä tu kemadrumaù |

> >

> >ihmiTvi; ctuòye ¢hyute=w kemÔ‚mae

> >

> >himatviñi catuñöaye grahayute'tha kemadrumo

> >

> >n hIit kiwtae=wva ihmkraÍhE> keNÔgE>. 5.

> >

> >na héti kathito'thavä himakarädgrahaiù kendragaiù || 5||

> >

> >

> >

> >S. S. Sareen and V. Subrahmanya Sastri translate the

> last part as:

> >

> > " Some astrologers opine that there will be no Kemadruma

> if an Angle

> >or the Moon is associated with a planet or where planets

> occupy an

> >Angular house reckoned from the Moon. "

> >

> >(Which is accepted, I believe.)

> >

> >But Dr. G. S. Kapoor has translated:

> >

> > " Some learneds are of the opinion that there will be

> Kemadruma Yoga

> >if (1) When a Kendra or the Moon is associated with a

> planet, (2)

> >When there is a planet in a Kendra from the Moon. "

> >

> >These are in direct contradition and it might be just a

> publishing

> >error, but I would now like to understand the verse from

> the

> >Sanskrit. Would someone point out the Sanskrit portion

> that this

> >hinges upon? I would be most grateful.

> >

> >Best regards,

> >

> >Robben

> >--- End forwarded message ---

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Take Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

http://mobile./maildemo