Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Dear Visti and Freedom, I truly appreciate the kind reply of you both. 1. Dear Visti can you kindly explain the logic behind the calculation as given by Sanjayji, you have always encouraged to search on the logic of most dictums, so it would be most helpful if you would unravel it for us. 2. The most imp thing that comes to my mind is if Sanjayjis knew about the deg of AL then why hasn't it been mentioned in JHL, also since if it is a knowledge of parampara (as some say it is not mentioned in the classics) then there " surely must be a use to the degs of AL " and other Arudhas degs - can you pls tell us all the usage of it. Would love to hear back from you Kind regards, SJ Mumbai P.S: Kanupriay sorry for the multiple posts, but the message was not reaching the list from one email id, hence now after one complete day of sending it , it has reached finally in multiple messages. From Mr. Visti Dear Freedom, Namaskar Remember when Guruji taught how to see the Nakñatra of the Ärüòha Lagna? Simply take the degree of Lagna and transpose that on the Ärüòha Lagna and other Ärüòhas. i.e. if the Lagna is 26 degree, then the Ärüòha lagna will also be 26 degrees, as will all the other Ärüòhas. Basically this means that the degree of the Bhäva is the same as the Ärüòha. From Mr.Freedom Dear Sunil, My understanding is that it is possible to calculate degrees but it is not used for general interpretation. The AL is mainly interpreted based on the sign, its lord, conjunctions in the same sign, and the placement of other arudhas relative to it. Arudhas are recalculated in other vargas based on that lagna, so the degree is not needed to see the AL in other vargas. Namah Sivaya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 || Om Gurave Namah || Dear Sunil and Learned Jyotishas, In the current BPHS we have Maharishi Parashara did not seem to mention the degrees. We cannot assume the degrees unless Guruji explicitly states it. It's very possible that Guruji just told Visti and Freedom just to experiment with the idea. He could have been testing them too . I would still wait for Guruji to give a official statement about this. Till then I will not take the degrees. Arudhas are Maya, What is the meaning of degrees?(this could mean it has amsha's and then ruling dieties, D60 Karma and what not!). Does it apply to the world maya?. I am not sure. Warm Regards Sanjay P Om Tat Sat varahamihira , " suniljohn_2002 " <suniljohn_2004@h...> wrote: > Dear Visti and Freedom, > > I truly appreciate the kind reply of you both. > > 1. Dear Visti can you kindly explain the logic behind the calculation > as given by Sanjayji, you have always encouraged to search on the > logic of most dictums, so it would be most helpful if you would > unravel it for us. > > > 2. The most imp thing that comes to my mind is if Sanjayjis knew > about the deg of AL then why hasn't it been mentioned in JHL, also > since if it is a knowledge of parampara (as some say it is not > mentioned in the classics) then there " surely must be a use to the > degs of AL " and other Arudhas degs - can you pls tell us all the > usage of it. > > Would love to hear back from you > > Kind regards, > SJ > Mumbai > P.S: Kanupriay sorry for the multiple posts, but the message was not > reaching the list from one email id, hence now after one complete day > of sending it , it has reached finally in multiple messages. > > From Mr. Visti > Dear Freedom, Namaskar > > Remember when Guruji taught how to see the Nakñatra of the Ärüòha > Lagna? Simply take the degree of Lagna and transpose that on the > Ärüòha Lagna and other Ärüòhas. i.e. if the Lagna is 26 degree, then > the Ärüòha lagna will also be 26 degrees, as will all the other > Ärüòhas. > > Basically this means that the degree of the Bhäva is the same as the > Ärüòha. > > From Mr.Freedom > > Dear Sunil, > My understanding is that it is possible to calculate degrees but it > is not > used for general interpretation. The AL is mainly interpreted based > on the > sign, its lord, conjunctions in the same sign, and the placement of > other > arudhas relative to it. Arudhas are recalculated in other vargas > based on > that lagna, so the degree is not needed to see the AL in other > vargas. > > Namah Sivaya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 |Hare Rama Krsna| Dear Sanjay, Namaskar Sanjayji gave us several examples with this principle – focused on the Nakñatra occupied by the Ärüòha Lagna. Maybe Sanjayji did not want us to share these notes with others online – that’s a possibility. So next time theres talk of Upagrahas, Kala Chakra, Varëada Lagna, Ärüòha Lagna, Nakshatras, or anything in the entire 3rd chapter of BPHS – I’ll consider keeping it to myself, that way I don’t get subjected to these kind of doubts. Instead you can wait for Guruji to tell you himself – since you prefer that. Thanks for the help Sanjay. Yours, Visti Larsen visti sanjayp [sanjayp] 17 August 2004 22:06 varahamihira |Sri Varaha| Re: Logic & Usage of degs of Arudhas || Om Gurave Namah || Dear Sunil and Learned Jyotishas, In the current BPHS we have Maharishi Parashara did not seem to mention the degrees. We cannot assume the degrees unless Guruji explicitly states it. It's very possible that Guruji just told Visti and Freedom just to experiment with the idea. He could have been testing them too . I would still wait for Guruji to give a official statement about this. Till then I will not take the degrees. Arudhas are Maya, What is the meaning of degrees?(this could mean it has amsha's and then ruling dieties, D60 Karma and what not!). Does it apply to the world maya?. I am not sure. Warm Regards Sanjay P Om Tat Sat varahamihira , " suniljohn_2002 " <suniljohn_2004@h...> wrote: > Dear Visti and Freedom, > > I truly appreciate the kind reply of you both. > > 1. Dear Visti can you kindly explain the logic behind the calculation > as given by Sanjayji, you have always encouraged to search on the > logic of most dictums, so it would be most helpful if you would > unravel it for us. > > > 2. The most imp thing that comes to my mind is if Sanjayjis knew > about the deg of AL then why hasn't it been mentioned in JHL, also > since if it is a knowledge of parampara (as some say it is not > mentioned in the classics) then there " surely must be a use to the > degs of AL " and other Arudhas degs - can you pls tell us all the > usage of it. > > Would love to hear back from you > > Kind regards, > SJ > Mumbai > P.S: Kanupriay sorry for the multiple posts, but the message was not > reaching the list from one email id, hence now after one complete day > of sending it , it has reached finally in multiple messages. > > From Mr. Visti > Dear Freedom, Namaskar > > Remember when Guruji taught how to see the Nakñatra of the Ärüòha > Lagna? Simply take the degree of Lagna and transpose that on the > Ärüòha Lagna and other Ärüòhas. i.e. if the Lagna is 26 degree, then > the Ärüòha lagna will also be 26 degrees, as will all the other > Ärüòhas. > > Basically this means that the degree of the Bhäva is the same as the > Ärüòha. > > From Mr.Freedom > > Dear Sunil, > My understanding is that it is possible to calculate degrees but it > is not > used for general interpretation. The AL is mainly interpreted based > on the > sign, its lord, conjunctions in the same sign, and the placement of > other > arudhas relative to it. Arudhas are recalculated in other vargas > based on > that lagna, so the degree is not needed to see the AL in other > vargas. > > Namah Sivaya |Om Tat Sat| http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.