URL for sanskrit grammar software RE: Root Languages - JK

[Guest guest]

Sanskrit Grammar software= Ganakastadhyayi, URL=

http://www.taralabalu.org/panini/

 

--- Swee Chan <swee wrote:

> Jaya Jagannatha

>

> Dear JK,

>

> Sankrit roots - in Malay (where I'm from), Slovenian, German etc

> languages..I recognize only numbers and very, very, very, very basic

> Sanskrit and noone to teach me here. What a curse has befallen upon

> me! In

> my next life, I shall be a sanskritist :-)

> BTW, the panini site (can't recall the url) has a good software for

> grammar.

>

> Love,

> Swee

> www.brihaspati.net

>

> _____

>

> jk.dasgupta [jk.dasgupta]

> Monday, March 21, 2005 7:46 AM

> varahamihira

> Re: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

>

> Dear Chandrashekharji,

>

> That is the most sadest part. I know that most Indian languages are

> based on

> sanskrit and if one is good in grammar of any Indian language - it is

> not

> difficult for him to understand sanskrit. But I am not good in

> grammar of

> any Indian language-not even bengali.

>

>

>

> Best regards

>

> jk

> -

> Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46

> varahamihira

> Monday, March 21, 2005 03:00

> Re: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

>

> Dear J. K. Da,

> You are so modest. Sanskrit has undergone many changes through

> passage of

> time and many other than the Grammar of Panini were used in times

> gone by.

> Even then most of Indian languages being rooted in Sanskrit, one can

> understand the intent of Sanskrit shlokas, in most instances.

> Regards,

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> jk.dasgupta wrote:

> Yes Chandrashekharji. I am well aware of my weakness of not

> understanding

> sanskrit. So I always look for logical explanatory comentries.

>

> Best regards

>

> jk

> -

> Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46

> varahamihira

> Sunday, March 20, 2005 02:39

> Re: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

>

> Dear J.K. Da,

> You are making a profound statement and yet claim to be a slow

> learner. It

> is rightly said " Vidya Vinayen Shobhate "

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> jk.dasgupta wrote:

> Dear all,

>

> My spiritual sikhsa guru Swami Chinmayanandaji used to tell that

> spirituality is a subject by itself- like medical or engineering. By

> worshiping medical books everyday-one can never become a doctor. Like

> that

> just worshiping the scriptures everyday or mugging up the slokas

> therin one

> can never become knowledgeable. He used to always tell that

> scriptures are

> to be studied by sitting at the feet of guru - as sanskrit is a

> difficult

> and tricky language. Simple literal meaning of one sanskrit word may

> be

> misleading and may mean so many things. A guru has to explain what

> the sloka

> actually means.

>

> He also used to warn always not to pick up one sloka from a scripture

> and

> jump to interpret it. The slokas are to be studied in totality. That

> is the

> reason the slokas of Scriptures have often been misinterpreted.

>

> Swamiji used to teach that Brahma vidya or para vidya is beyond

> words. It is

> beyond the perception of awaken state of human being. Therefore the

> teacher

> in the scripures always uses examples to explain the truth to the

> nearest

> possible fineness and therefore all the scriptures follow a certain

> logic to

> arive at a conclusion.

>

> After that, following that direction shown by guru & realising the

> truth is

> the job of the student. Realising the truth is only possible in deep

> meditative stage and once the truth is realised all arguments end

> there.

> (and I am far far from it :-), just repeating what Swamiji used to

> tell)

>

> Till the truth is such realised - every vidya is apara and the

> argument

> continues. Such arguments among scholars have taken place in past -

> are

> taking place in present and will take place in future also. That is

> the

> process of evaluation.

>

> Whatever have been discussed in this chain were simply fantastic. We

> are all

> human being.. so it is natural for us to get imotional at certain

> point. In

> my openion those imotional portions should not be taken seriously.

> Imotions

> will come and go - but the windows opened towards the knowledge

> during the

> process will always remain opened.

>

> Personally I am not at all knowledgeable in sanskrit - so always look

> for

> the explanatory comentries of slokas and the logic behind the

> explanations.

> That is why I am a very slow learner.

>

> regards and with best wishes

>

> jk

>

>

>

>

> -

> <b_lakshmi_ramesh lakshmi ramesh

> varahamihira

> Friday, March 18, 2005 22:49

> RE: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

>

> Om Gurave Namah

>

> Dear Ajit,

>

> Well, I was certainly not the one who talked about swarupa-gynaana

> and

> vritti-gynaana....

> <http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/01.gif>

>

> Jokes apart, you are absolutely right...its high time we stop

> concentrating

> on words and start concentrating on feelings.

>

> Your posts are always wonderful, Ajit. Please keep writing more

> often.

>

> Regards,

> Lakshmi

>

> Ajit Krishnan <astro wrote:

> .. hamsasso.aham ..

> Dear Lakshmi,

> We started with the Mundaka upanishad which teaches that this para

> vidya is

> beyond names, but are back to insisting upon names, words and

> dictionaries.

> Call this gyana Shiva, or call him Vishnu. Have faith, surrender to

> him, and

> be happy.

> ajit

>

>

> _____

>

> lakshmi ramesh [b_lakshmi_ramesh]

> Friday, March 18, 2005 3:35 AM

> varahamihira

> RE: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

> Om Gurave Namah

> Namaste Ajit,

> Thaks for this excellent mail. However, I want to know the " name " of

> the

> gynana by which a spider, an elephant, a snake, a hunter realized

> God. The

> spider spun the web for sheltering the idol of Shiva, the elephant

> bathed

> Him with water brought in its trunk, the snake adorned Him with naga

> maNis

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

Best wishes

 

Nandan

 

 

______________________

India Matrimony: Find your life partner online

Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony

[Guest guest]

Welcome back Nandan & thank you for the link. It is nice to see yr mail

after a long gap.

 

regards

 

jk

 

-

" Nandan Chakraborty " <nanadhan

<varahamihira >

Monday, March 21, 2005 13:13

URL for sanskrit grammar software RE: |Sri Varaha| Root Languages -

JK

 

 

>

> Sanskrit Grammar software= Ganakastadhyayi, URL=

> http://www.taralabalu.org/panini/

>

> --- Swee Chan <swee wrote:

> > Jaya Jagannatha

> >

> > Dear JK,

> >

> > Sankrit roots - in Malay (where I'm from), Slovenian, German etc

> > languages..I recognize only numbers and very, very, very, very basic

> > Sanskrit and noone to teach me here. What a curse has befallen upon

> > me! In

> > my next life, I shall be a sanskritist :-)

> > BTW, the panini site (can't recall the url) has a good software for

> > grammar.

> >

> > Love,

> > Swee

> > www.brihaspati.net

> >

> > _____

> >

> > jk.dasgupta [jk.dasgupta]

> > Monday, March 21, 2005 7:46 AM

> > varahamihira

> > Re: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekharji,

> >

> > That is the most sadest part. I know that most Indian languages are

> > based on

> > sanskrit and if one is good in grammar of any Indian language - it is

> > not

> > difficult for him to understand sanskrit. But I am not good in

> > grammar of

> > any Indian language-not even bengali.

> >

> >

> >

> > Best regards

> >

> > jk

> > -

> > Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46

> > varahamihira

> > Monday, March 21, 2005 03:00

> > Re: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

> >

> > Dear J. K. Da,

> > You are so modest. Sanskrit has undergone many changes through

> > passage of

> > time and many other than the Grammar of Panini were used in times

> > gone by.

> > Even then most of Indian languages being rooted in Sanskrit, one can

> > understand the intent of Sanskrit shlokas, in most instances.

> > Regards,

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > jk.dasgupta wrote:

> > Yes Chandrashekharji. I am well aware of my weakness of not

> > understanding

> > sanskrit. So I always look for logical explanatory comentries.

> >

> > Best regards

> >

> > jk

> > -

> > Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46

> > varahamihira

> > Sunday, March 20, 2005 02:39

> > Re: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

> >

> > Dear J.K. Da,

> > You are making a profound statement and yet claim to be a slow

> > learner. It

> > is rightly said " Vidya Vinayen Shobhate "

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > jk.dasgupta wrote:

> > Dear all,

> >

> > My spiritual sikhsa guru Swami Chinmayanandaji used to tell that

> > spirituality is a subject by itself- like medical or engineering. By

> > worshiping medical books everyday-one can never become a doctor. Like

> > that

> > just worshiping the scriptures everyday or mugging up the slokas

> > therin one

> > can never become knowledgeable. He used to always tell that

> > scriptures are

> > to be studied by sitting at the feet of guru - as sanskrit is a

> > difficult

> > and tricky language. Simple literal meaning of one sanskrit word may

> > be

> > misleading and may mean so many things. A guru has to explain what

> > the sloka

> > actually means.

> >

> > He also used to warn always not to pick up one sloka from a scripture

> > and

> > jump to interpret it. The slokas are to be studied in totality. That

> > is the

> > reason the slokas of Scriptures have often been misinterpreted.

> >

> > Swamiji used to teach that Brahma vidya or para vidya is beyond

> > words. It is

> > beyond the perception of awaken state of human being. Therefore the

> > teacher

> > in the scripures always uses examples to explain the truth to the

> > nearest

> > possible fineness and therefore all the scriptures follow a certain

> > logic to

> > arive at a conclusion.

> >

> > After that, following that direction shown by guru & realising the

> > truth is

> > the job of the student. Realising the truth is only possible in deep

> > meditative stage and once the truth is realised all arguments end

> > there.

> > (and I am far far from it :-), just repeating what Swamiji used to

> > tell)

> >

> > Till the truth is such realised - every vidya is apara and the

> > argument

> > continues. Such arguments among scholars have taken place in past -

> > are

> > taking place in present and will take place in future also. That is

> > the

> > process of evaluation.

> >

> > Whatever have been discussed in this chain were simply fantastic. We

> > are all

> > human being.. so it is natural for us to get imotional at certain

> > point. In

> > my openion those imotional portions should not be taken seriously.

> > Imotions

> > will come and go - but the windows opened towards the knowledge

> > during the

> > process will always remain opened.

> >

> > Personally I am not at all knowledgeable in sanskrit - so always look

> > for

> > the explanatory comentries of slokas and the logic behind the

> > explanations.

> > That is why I am a very slow learner.

> >

> > regards and with best wishes

> >

> > jk

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > <b_lakshmi_ramesh lakshmi ramesh

> > varahamihira

> > Friday, March 18, 2005 22:49

> > RE: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

> >

> > Om Gurave Namah

> >

> > Dear Ajit,

> >

> > Well, I was certainly not the one who talked about swarupa-gynaana

> > and

> > vritti-gynaana....

> > <http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/01.gif>

> >

> > Jokes apart, you are absolutely right...its high time we stop

> > concentrating

> > on words and start concentrating on feelings.

> >

> > Your posts are always wonderful, Ajit. Please keep writing more

> > often.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Lakshmi

> >

> > Ajit Krishnan <astro wrote:

> > .. hamsasso.aham ..

> > Dear Lakshmi,

> > We started with the Mundaka upanishad which teaches that this para

> > vidya is

> > beyond names, but are back to insisting upon names, words and

> > dictionaries.

> > Call this gyana Shiva, or call him Vishnu. Have faith, surrender to

> > him, and

> > be happy.

> > ajit

> >

> >

> > _____

> >

> > lakshmi ramesh [b_lakshmi_ramesh]

> > Friday, March 18, 2005 3:35 AM

> > varahamihira

> > RE: |Sri Varaha| Mundakya on Para

> > Om Gurave Namah

> > Namaste Ajit,

> > Thaks for this excellent mail. However, I want to know the " name " of

> > the

> > gynana by which a spider, an elephant, a snake, a hunter realized

> > God. The

> > spider spun the web for sheltering the idol of Shiva, the elephant

> > bathed

> > Him with water brought in its trunk, the snake adorned Him with naga

> > maNis

> >

> === message truncated ===

>

>

> Best wishes

>

> Nandan

>

>

> ______________________

> India Matrimony: Find your life partner online

> Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony

>

>

>

> |Om Tat Sat|

> http://www.varahamihira

>