vipareeta raja yoga(actual case of not fructifying)

[Guest guest]

Dear Rafalji and other gurus:

 

Despite having multiple VRY in my chart and despite running the

appropriate dasa and the transits, the VRY has NOT fructified in my

case. Almost every astrologer who looked into my chart predicted that I

will experience significant success due to the VRY. On the contrary, I

have gone through considerable difficulties, trauma and misery during

that period. Once I explain to them they always give a new astrological

interpretation to my current state and ascribe it to some other factors.

 

Would you please look into the chart and give your assessment:

 

Birth details:

27 Oct 1959, 18: 25 hours, tiruchirapalli, tamil nadu, India (78E41,

10N49).

 

If you see the chart, the 3HL and 6HL(Mercury) are in the 8H. Jupiter

(9HL and 12HL) is also in 8H. Some even opine that the 8HL(Ketu) is in

12H. So, there are multiple instances of VRY.

 

Moreover I am running Ra/Jup as per VD. In the Jup AD, since Jup is

12HL, some astrologers opined that VRY has to fructify. Further, till

Nov 2007, transit Jup was in my 8H -- the same house where Natal Jup was

placed, which in the opinion of some, should almost ensure that VRY has

to happen.

 

Despite all these coming together, the VRY failed to fructify.

 

I lost my job in June 2007 and till date have yet to find a job. I can't

describe how traumatic this whole 10 months has been..!

 

vedic astrology , Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme

wrote:

>

> *kleem namah narasimhaaya*

> Dear Pascal , Namaskar

>

> Nope it isnt. VRA yogas are very important and show influential

position

> due to dethrowment (Shani) of others (friend or enemy depending on

sign).

>

> You can judge PV Narasimha Rao politic chart to analyze the yoga.

>

> Regards,

> Rafal Gendarz / SJC Teacher

> www: http://rohinaa.com / email: rafal

>

>

>

>

>

> pascalthomas_va napisa?(a):

> >

> > I've read that great astrologer B.V. Raman did not have good opinion

> > of VPR, he rejected them. Is this correct?

> >

> > Regards

> > Pascal

> >

> >

>

>

>