#3 : Marriage Puzzle Answer! (to Panditji)

[Guest guest]

Dear narasimha

 

The technique mentioned by you may require further research.

If i take my case 7th lord from venus is venus and 7th lord from

lagan is also venus.

venus is placed in makar rashi in navamsa , means dipositor become

saturn but I was not married in saturn antardasha.

also 7th lord from moon is sun which is placed in aquarius in

navamsa...again the dipositor comes out to be saturn.

 

That means from all the three aspects lagan,moon and venus... my

antardasha planet is coming out to be saturn which did not gave me

marriage in its antardasha.

 

regards

Nikhil Gupta

 

vedic astrology , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao "

<pvr wrote:

>

> Namaste friends,

>

> > Your point is well made, if look at so many techniques and

parameters

> > as you have rightly pointed out all the grahas become capable of

> > giving the result. That is the point I have been trying to make

for

> > past so many months. If one looks at main kundali then arudhs in

it,

> > darakarak, UL, then do the same for navansh for marraige, you

will

> > find that every graha has a potentioal to give marriage. Then

one is

> > left with a muddy water and things are not clear so we go on to

newer

> > techniques to find out why the said dasha gave the result.

>

> Even without using arudhas etc, there are multiple candidates and

there are no clear rules to pick one candidate.

>

> In the husband's chart in the puzzle, you picked Saturn because

Mercury was less likely and not because Saturn was a great candidate

to give marriage! You said you picked Saturn because he was the 7th

lord from Moon in rasi and Mercury had nothing to do with 7th. If we

look at the lords, occupants and aspectors of 7th from lagna and

Moon in rasi chart, several planets can come out. If we look at

their rasi, navamsa and nakshatra dispositors, even more planets

become qualified.

>

> Thus, the problem of having multiple candidates and having to make

a choice is not a problem of only those who use arudhas. I have so

far not seen anybody give a consistent set of rules to predict the

mahadasa and antardasa of wedding based on clear rules, whether

using arudhas or not.

>

> * * *

>

> My father uses simple navamsa dispositor based principles with

Vimsottari dasa. The navamsa dispositors of the rasi dispositors of

various house lords are important planets for the houses. For

example, the 7th lord from my Venus is Venus. His rasi dispositor is

Mars. Navamsa dispositor of Mars is Jupiter. I got married in

Jupiter antardasa. The 7th lord from Venus in my wife's chart is

Saturn. He is in Taurus in rasi chart. Lord Venus is in Sagittarius

in navamsa. She got married in Jupiter antardasa as per Vimsottari.

The dispositor of 7th lord from Venus in my sister's rasi chart is

Jupiter and he is in Cancer navamsa. She got married in Moon

antardasa as per Vimsottari.

>

> Of course, these thumbrules don't always work. But, in Jeyaram's

case, 7th lord from lagna and Venus is Venus himself. His dispositor

in rasi chart is Mars. Mars is in a Saturnine sign in navamsa.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

> -------------------------------

> Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> SJC website: http://www.SriJagannath.org

> -------------------------------

>

> vedic astrology , Panditji <navagraha@g...>

wrote:

> > Namaste Jeyaram,

> >

> > Your point is well made, if look at so many techniques and

parameters

> > as you have rightly pointed out all the grahas become capable of

> > giving the result. That is the point I have been trying to make

for

> > past so many months. If one looks at main kundali then arudhs in

it,

> > darakarak, UL, then do the same for navansh for marraige, you

will

> > find that every graha has a potentioal to give marriage. Then

one is

> > left with a muddy water and things are not clear so we go on to

newer

> > techniques to find out why the said dasha gave the result.

> >

> > Now as all grahas qulify to give results, event if known in

advance

> > can be easily justified as all of them promise the result in

this tens

> > of parameters scenario. However if one uses a few time tested

> > parameters consistently and gets most of the information from the

> > rashi chart alone one does not get confused as much.

> >

> > BTW, do not assume that I have not tried the other

> > parameters/techniques, I do not use them unless I have had

consistent

> > results on many charts. Everyone has to find that technique that

works

> > for them consistently in a large percent of cases.

> >

> > ...

> >

> >

> > On 5/26/05, Jeyaram <jeyaram009> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Narasimha Ji,

> > >

> > > I am interspersing my comments and observations in your reply:

> > >

> > > [Narasimha]

> > > It is not true that dasas did not show the event. The problem

is that

> > > multiple dates out of the four dates given by you can be

justified using

> > > dasas. On the contrary, annual TP chart of one date really

stood out.

> > >

> > > [Jeyaram]

> > > That is precisely my point! So when multiple dates could be

justified using

> > > dasas, how can we say that the Dasa was pinpointing the

event ? Here I am

> > > talking about the timing of event than the nature of event

itself.

> > >

> > > The following planets qualified as significators for giving

marriage:

> > >

> > > 1.RAH (Reasons:Darakaraka, conjoined with VEN in Navamsa)

> > > 2. SAT (Reasons: Aspecting the 7th house in Rasi & Navamsa)

> > > 3. MON (Reasons: conjoined with UL Lord JUP)

> > > 4. VEN (Reasons: Natural Significator, 7th Lord in Rasi)

> > > 5. MER (Reasons: Conjoined VEN in UL in Saggitarius ??)

> > > 6. JUP (Reasons: UL Lord)

> > > 7. MAR (Reasons: 7th Lord of Navamsa and aspecting UL Lord in

Rasi)

> > > 8. SUN (Reasons: Conjoined Navamsa 7th Lord in Navamsa)

> > > 9. KET (Reasons: Natural significator of marriage)

> > [snip]

>