A2 and the 2nd house from AL (Question regarding arudhas)

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha

 

Very nice analysis,may god bless you.

I am new to this community hence going through all your beautiful

articles.

2nd house from lagan as mentioned by you shows our Nourishment and

sustainence and we should not link it with actual money as defined

in the texts...very correct.

Arudh of 2nd that is dhan pad shows how world perceive our

Nourishment and sustainence--this is also very correct.

 

But 2nd from AL will show the actual status of our Bank balance.

We may be projecting(dhan pad)in front of the world that we are very

rich but there is a huge possibility that its a mere show off.

 

Therefore more than the 2nd house from lagan and its arudh, to see

the money aspect we must focus on the 2nd from AL.

Also 2nd house from any house is the strength of the previous house.

thats why they are termed as panaphar houses.

 

Thats why 2nd house from AL has lot of importance as per parashar.

 

Regards

Nikhil Gupta

 

 

vedic astrology , pvr wrote:

>

> Namaste,

>

> What I taught is what was passed on to me by my gurus. Though it

> seems straight-forward on a casual look, a lot of tricky questions

> will come to an intelligent person's mind as (s)he assimilates the

> knowledge! Teachings of a guru can sow the seeds, but the plant of

> true knowledge blossoms in one's heart only after the intellect

works

> very hard on assimilation.

>

> Most of us neglect, to our detriment, arudhas in practical

analysis.

> This sometimes includes me. Parasara and Jaimini gave them a lot

of

> importance. A lot of astrologers in my native state in India

(Andhra

> Pradesh) do not make any predictions until arudha chakra is

prepared.

>

> I will attempt to answer your intelligent question to the best of

my

> ability.

>

> > My doubt is, How does objectivity fit into this? Is it

> > not true that people look at the trappings of money

> > (A2) to form their perceptions of some body's richness

> > (2nd house from AL).

>

> Yes, ideally, world's impressions about one's sustenance resources

> should be based on one's wealth, just as the world's impressions

> about one's intelligence and abilities should be based on one's

> awards, trophies and achievements. However, in reality, they may

or

> may not be linked. The world may perceive the winner of a

prestigeous

> award (strong A5) as an undeserving person (5th from AL weak).

> Similarly, the world may perceive a person with a lot of wealth

> (strong A2) as one with poor sustenance/endowment (2nd from AL).

> After all, one may have million dollars in the bank (strong A2),

but

> use a simple vehicle, wear simple dress and have an unassuming

> conduct. Then most people will have an ordinary impression about

how

> well-endowed he is. Houses from AL show people's impressions and

> arudhas of the same houses show real things that exist materially

and

> that should, ideally, govern people's impressions.

>

> There is another important subtle distinction to be made here. Let

us

> step back a little bit.

>

> What does the 2nd house from lagna show? How does it fit with my

> earlier teaching that houses from lagna qualify true self and

houses

> from AL qualify one's image, status and material existence (i.e.

> existence in the perceptions of the world)? Material existence is

> shown by AL and the true individual/personality inside is shown by

> lagna. Can money be an attribute/quality of that true individual

> wrapped inside the material existence?

>

> No!! Money is a part of world's maya (illusion). It's a part of

the

> material existence.

>

> The problem is that literature lists all the results related to

2nd

> house (2nd from lagna, 2nd from paka lagna, 2nd from arudha lagna,

> arudha of 2nd etc) as the results of the 2nd house. We have to

> differentiate and use them appropriately.

>

> Though the 2nd house is supposed to show money, it actually shows

> one's sustenance when we translate things to a basic level. It

shows

> one's sustenance and nourishment. It shows how endowed one is.

One's

> food, money etc are the material manifestations of this

> nourishment/endowment. So the arudha of 2nd shows them (i.e. money

> and food are things that exist in the material world when it comes

to

> one's nourishment). The 2nd from lagna shows the nourishment and

> sustenance of one's true self. The 2nd from arudha lagna shows

> world's impressions about the same.

>

> > Or is it that we need to look at the links between A2

> > and the 2nd house from AL to comment on the

> > perceptions of outside world (of the native's

> > richness)being Subjective or Objective.

> >

> > I am not quiet clear on this. Could you comment,

> > please.

>

> I hope this brings some clarity. But complete knowledge comes only

to

> the one who strives for it.

>

> > Thanks and regards

> > viswanadham

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>