Narasimha - further D-1, D-10 and D-24 issues

[Guest guest]

Dear narasimha

 

I would suggest that we should go for shatyamsa chart as it could

vary 2-3 times in the window of 5 minutes.Therefore would be

different in both the cases.

Treat it like a lagan chart with moola dasha.

 

I have tested this chart in atleast 100 charts and the results are

astonishing.

 

Regards

Nikhil Gupta

 

vedic astrology , pvr wrote:

>

> Namaste Mahalinga Iyer,

>

> Brilliant questions! Let me quickly try to comment.

>

> WARNING: My suggestion to beginners and those who get depressed

> easily is to skip this post.

>

> > My questions are:

> >

> > 1. Is it possible that more than a few people will be born in

these

> > two time windows of 5 minutes each?

>

> Of course, YES!!

>

> > 2. Is it possible that some of them will be born in very poor

> > families? And possibly one of them in a very rich family? ie

in

> > very different circumstances?

>

> Yes again.

>

> > 3. Since the D-1 and D-24 charts are essentially the same, is it

> > reasonable to assume that they will have the " same

education " ?

> > I mean, that they will study similar subjects and so on?

>

> Their learning and activities are likely to be similar. However,

> material manifestations of these can be different based on desa-

kaala-

> paatra. Let us take two people with the D-10 you gave. Because of

> Venus and Mercury in 10th giving dharma-karmadhipati yoga, these

two

> people are likely to engage in good activities and be cheerful,

> thoughtful and creative in their activities. Irrespective of their

> actual material careers, this may be the common feature of their

> careers. Due to Sun in A10, some power or politics may be involved

in

> the *actual* career (as seen in the material plane).

>

> However, depending on one's paatra (class), this can mean being

Prime

> Minister or the leader of taxi drivers in a part of the town.

>

> Another note: Apart from lagna, note that there are several

special

> lagnas described by Parasara. For example, varnada lagna shows the

> kind of people one deals with. Ghati lagna shows the kind of

> influence one enjoys. All these things have an influence. So,

people

> born within 5 min can have wide ranging careers.

>

> Having these many parameters may be confusing and some may think

that

> Parasara described them just for the fancy of it and that they

have

> no role. However, my view is that every parameter has a specific

role

> and integrating everything is a daunting task. Bad news is that a

lot

> of this knowledge is lost and there are too many factors to

consider.

> Good news is that a lot of bits and pieces are still preserved in

> traditional families in the remote corners of India.

>

> Astrology as practiced today is much inferior to how it was

practiced

> in India in ancient times. For example, leave special lagnas etc.

> Deva Keralam gives the results based on Nadyamsa (D-150) and

> sometimes ardhanadyamsa (D-300). Elders teach that ardhanadyamsa

is

> the genetic map of a person. How many of us really understand

these

> charts? I, for one, don't.

>

> The way we use it, astrology is not deterministic. It is a

> probabilistic science. But, when all the parameters are thoroughly

> understood and the birthtime is accucrate, I will not be surprised

if

> Vedic astrology is pretty deterministic.

>

> > 4. Since the D-1, D-10 and D-24 charts are essentially the same,

> > is it reasonable to assume that the children born in these two

> > windows of 5 minutes each will have similar careers? Consider

> > that they may be of different gender, different religion,

> > different caste and from different economic groups. You know

> > all these make a difference in India in most choices we make.

> >

> > 5. Further, if D-3 is supposed to denote the number of siblings,

> > D-3 lagna changes only every 40 minutes or so. So all these

> > people will have the same D-1 and D-3 charts. Is it possible

> > that they will all have the same number of siblings, of the

> > same gender?!

> >

> > Please do not label my questions as " mechanistic " or " left

brain " .

> > I am no " scientist " or " rationalist " , I would not even be

studying

> > astrology if I were. This is as much an attempt for me to

understand

> > as it is for me to question.

>

> A lot of lost knowledge has to be recovered. Questions such as the

> ones above are the first step...

>

> Ask these questions and try to make progress. But, even those who

> don't have the energy for pursuing scientific astrology with such

> precision can benefit from Jyotish if they treat it as a

> probabilistic subject.

>

> Anyway, I really have to go to sleep now...

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>