Guest guest Posted October 16, 2008 Report Share Posted October 16, 2008 Please read interesting mail and beautiful reply of Mr. Goel...  TC  Astrolearner from brazil   --- On Wed, 15/10/08, Prashant Pandey <praspandey wrote: Prashant Pandey <praspandey [ind. & West. Astrology] Re: CHAR kARKA 7 OR/AND 8 Indian_Astrology_Group_Daily_Digest Wednesday, 15 October, 2008, 6:58 PM Birth details of Mr. Yasser Arafat:- 27'th Aug 1929 02:01 AM Le Caire (Egypt) --- In Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, " Prashant Pandey " <praspandey@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Sir, > I am giving hilarious example of this concept i.e. Late > Mr.Yasser Arafat(Greatest friend of Late Shri Rajiv Gandhi). > > This fellow was leader and he was very paasionate for fighting for > his own country. > > If anybody fights for his own nation with great passion for good > reasons then his AK should be Ve,if that person doesn't support > violence primarily. > > If you will see according to Rashi chara-karaka scheme then you will > find Mo as his AK and Ju as AmK(means, his soul had no passion as > even Su and Ve are not taking even seat of AmK) which doesn't suit > according to his personality. > > And Ve is at 1 degree and Su at 10 degree while his AK and AmK are > at 20 and 29 degree means a lot gap for Ve and Su to become AK and > AmK. I should say in other words that no influence of Ve and Su at > soul level as primary planet. > > But instead,, if you go according to Lunar Mansion's method then you > will find Ve as his AK. And this Ve is 5'th to Mo means mantresa > tara .Fighting for his country,, was his mantra of life. Ve is also > placed in natural vadha tara so it was also giving alot problem to > him,, he was also in great problem due to his passionate attitude. > > I have many examples which supports this char karaka scheme (Which > is according to Lunar Mansion).This example is at least giving clear > cut discrepancy in taking chara-karakas at Rashi level. > > My intention is not to over-haul vedic concepts and even my > intention is not to insult our great Maharishis. > > Regs, > Prashant Pandey > > --- In > Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, " Prashant > Pandey " <praspandey@ > wrote: > > > > Dear Sir, > > You dont feel that we should get the charakarka according > > to Lunar Mansions instead of Rashi. > > > > I am cross-checking on some of the charts and i am getting good > > breakthrough on this concept.I know that whatever i am saying,,it > is > > not according to our scriptures but dont know how this new concept > > is giving good response.You also please verify it and please tell > me > > that am i right or not?? > > > > I think you have alot charts and alot experience so you can easily > > tell about this concept. > > > > Even in my case it is working.I and my friends feel(because ppl > who > > listen us can better give feed back) that i am influenced by Su > > instead of Ve. > > > > Regs, > > Prashant Pandey > > > > My details:- > > 11'th May 1979 > > 08:09AM > > Varanasi(India) > > > > Indian_Astrology_ Group_Daily_ Digest@grou ps.com, Gopal > > Goel <gkgoel1937@ > wrote: > > > > > > Dear  Friends, > > > I humbly mention that Mr Narshiman has not understood the > meaning > > > of two opening Verses oF BPHS neither in letter or spirit: > > > Pt Sitaram Jha was great Sanskrit scholar and Principal of most > > famous > > > Astrological Institute in Varanasi . I will give below the > > translation given by > > > him : > > > First verse :Same as translated by Narshiman > > > This is also in line with Sutra 1.1.10 > > > Thus it is clear that both schemes are applicable , only it is > to > > be decided as to which scheme will apply in which situation. > > > Second Verse:Mr Narshiman has not translated it properly , as > such > > his inferences > > > needs to be examined with care and can not be accepted strait > away. > > > Let us examine the translation of Pt Sitaram Jha: > > > " Some authorities hold the opinion that in 7 char karka > scheme , > > when two karka 's > > > are on same degree ,  in such a situation Rahu is to be > > considered , and other say > > > that 8 char Karka scheme including Rahu should be considered > > INDEPENDENTLY " > > > > > > BPHS DOES NOT DISCARD THE ABOVE VIEW IN ANY MANNER. > > >  > > > This defines the role of Rahu in seven char karka scheme. > > > Jaimini sutra 1.1.19 says that putra karka is merged in matru > > karka (obiously in > > > seven char karka scheme). This means that seven char karka > scheme > > is applicable > > > in Mundane affairs ant not on nativities of living being. > > > Bphs clearly indicates the names of eight char karka including > > Putra karka. > > > It also specify the rules for replacement of char karka by sthir > > Karkas. > > > A careful study of this chapter reveals that in case of char > > karka REPLACEMENT in seven char karka scheme , first replacement > > will be introduced by Rahu -a karka of confusion and decite. > > > Bphs further says that out of three constituents of Mahraja > yoga , > > one is provided by > > > the conjuction of AK ans PUTK. > > > As progeny is only possible in the case of living > > > being , eight karka scheme is applicable for living being only. > > > > > > SEVEN KARKA SCHEME SHOULD BE APPLIED ON MUNDANE CHARTS. > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > >  G.K.GOEL > > > Ph: 09350311433 > > > Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR > > > NEW DELHI-110 076 > > > INDIA > > > > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to > > http://messenger. / invite/ > > > > > > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger./invite/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.