Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Vistiji,

 

I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

 

However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

substantiate this?

 

By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a

jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

authorize him to do so.

 

In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

(jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read

(though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker "

koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

the bondages - they always have all 8.

 

Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

dig deeper into your wisdom..

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

 

sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> Thank you for your reply.

> Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

Durga.

> Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

all

> Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that

Vishnu

> being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

that.

>

> See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the

> nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

> actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

eclipses.

> Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

based on

> the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its

only a

> representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

>

> The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

just as

> the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among

those

> born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.

Divine

> souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

being at

> one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

Hitler

> (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.

>

> Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to

look at

> God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

at God

> as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

Shiva

> who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

>

> So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

atmakaraka is

> Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the

concept

> of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be

freed of

> his/her ahamkara.

> Looking forward to your reply.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> >

> > || OM TAT SAT||

> > Dear Visti,

> > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either

you

> > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita

> > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> >

> > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

radiant

> > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

constellations I am

> > the Moon. "

> >

> > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

Surya as

> > Ahamkara?

> >

> > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness

of

> > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara

Principle

> > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> >

> > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as

> > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

of the

> > three worlds?

> >

> > regards,

> > nitish

> >

> > sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of

the atma?

> > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha

(guru), Agni

> > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > >

> > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the

kala

> > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

anahata chakra.

> > >

> > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile

without any

> > > of this.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > >

> > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only

to a

> > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their

families;

> > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of

the term.

> > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment

of our

> > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely

selfish.

> > > >

> > > > P

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>

> > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

Nitish and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but

really

> > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'

which are

> > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun

AK.

> > However

> > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does

not come

> > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so

easily

> > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '

I '

> > will

> > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > >

> > > > Best

> > > > Sharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

<sohamsa

> > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > >

> > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope

of

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly

> > in the

> > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange

I find

> > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense

> > to me:

> > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the

> > effacement

> > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .

> > > >

> > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge

you both

> > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think

it is

> > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English

> > also has

> > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the

right

> > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a

> > exaggerated

> > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has

that

> > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain

> > wrong to

> > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that

> > he also

> > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes,

that is

> > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people

I know

> > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not

only

> > that

> > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > >

> > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed

> > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric

i.e.

> > their

> > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the

> > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.

> > egocentricity does

> > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go

through

> > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How

they

> > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological

> > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure

> > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity

through

> > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is

egocentric.

> > > >

> > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)

> > who was

> > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree

> > that she

> > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then

have her

> > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her

> > brother get

> > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then

> > (she) get

> > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very

soon

> > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and

> > consistent

> > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and

only

> > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is

probably

> > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding

way at

> > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..

> > > >

> > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people

must

> > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson

> > for all

> > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards

divinity

> > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and

search

> > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to

the

> > > > point.

> > > >

> > > > Comments?

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always

> > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less

than

> > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of

> > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > Tijana

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

deep/shallow,

> > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only

in

> > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.

> > separation

> > > > of

> > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and

hence

> > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma

involved.

> > > > >

> > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the

> > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its

> > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house

towards

> > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific

> > > > queries.

> > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your

queries.

> > > > >

> > > > > best regards,

> > > > > nitish

> > > > >

> > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " tijanadamjanovic "

> > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these

discussions

> > > > on Atma

> > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.

> > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha

> > shastra to

> > > > serve,

> > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I

> > assume

> > > > you

> > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also

> > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest

> > meaning

> > > > is

> > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer

Vivekananda) .

> > > > Only in

> > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.

What

> > artha

> > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " yeeahoo_99 "

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to

work.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to

> > " serve " , all

> > > > AKs

> > > > > > > " serve " .

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person

akin to

> > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -

jivanmukta -

> > > > provided

> > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo

being a

> > > > dharma

> > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through

10th

> > > > house of

> > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn

> > > > principles of

> > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else

> > to be

> > > > done

> > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already

achieved

> > > > everything

> > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer

Gita).

> > > > Those who

> > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > their

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master

had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.

Thus,

> > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

remaining

> > > > karma/

> > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more

> > substance

> > > > to

> > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two

which

> > > > continued

> > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " tijana " <nix_nixen@>

wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you

had

> > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun

AK

> > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

based on

> > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > But do

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > Saturn

> > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " yeeahoo_99 "

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

show

> > > > what

> > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are

protected

> > > > and

> > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,

Janaka

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

whatever

> > > > that " hardly

> > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > anything

> > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > karakas (BK,

> > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva "

(serving

> > > > every

> > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that

> > Narendranath

> > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar

> > sharpness

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > others,

> > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri

Ramakrishna,

> > > > even

> > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),

and

> > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

Swami

> > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical

Vedanta

> > > > that

> > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the

society.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

task... "

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not

> > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained

> > highest

> > > > level

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > could

> > > > be the

> > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the

rest of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power

manifests

> > > > through

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " tijana " <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > (karaka

> > > > for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > What is

> > > > the

> > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

has

> > to be

> > > > learnt

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > " Shiva

> > > > jnane

> > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > given to

> > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

as AK

> > > > should be

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very

> > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " v reality " <reality_v@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

lesson

> > to be

> > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be

understood

> > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be

very

> > > > humble to

> > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

teachers.

> > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > native is

> > > > always

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that

they

> > never

> > > > get

> > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must

learn

> > > > lessons

> > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > father

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see

it in

> > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we

> > discuss

> > > > other

> > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

need to

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart

where

> > > > the

> > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned

about

> > > > others

> > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect

others

> > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When

Ju

> > is in

> > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows

> > everything

> > > > and

> > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

of

> > > > course

> > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > energies

> > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person

should

> > > > learn to

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

not so

> > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

good

> > > > placement

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile./

> > <http://mobile./>> /

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile. <http://mobile./

> > <http://mobile./>> /

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________

> > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

for just

> > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <http://a.ninemsn./

> > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.

> > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

2Fci%

> > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda s.com

> > <http://www.jatavedas.com/ <http://www.jatavedas.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.

Check out

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find

what you

> > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your

> > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > -------------------------

> > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > >

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> >

> > > > someone who knows.

> > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hare rama krsna

Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

 

There are many divisions like this, koshas (anna,prana,jnana (mana),

vijnana, ananda), gunas, tattvas, linga sarira, sookshma sarira,

chakrams, pranas, nadis etc. Now we must see what is relevant in which

situation. All this discussion arised on axis seeing 7H from Su or AK.

What is the difference between Su and Ak in chart? Getting out of

bondage can be done on many ways, by yoga, bhakti, jnana etc. Even in

Upanishads there are few examples when person get mukti through

Mercy/Bhakti.

 

So what means this breaking walls of our bandhana? How to break buddhi

? And why?

 

Buddhi is source of viveka, and when this viveka is connected to

transcedental topics then this is good buddhi which will help and this

engagement in spirtiual pursuits will liberate one from tri-guna. So

yoga, bhakti and jnana will do this automatically on all levels (if

done correctly).

 

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz

email: rafal

Articles & Consultations: http://rohinaa.com

 

 

 

Dear Vistiji,

 

I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

 

However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

substantiate this?

 

By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a

jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

authorize him to do so.

 

In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

(jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read

(though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"

koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

the bondages - they always have all 8.

 

Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

dig deeper into your wisdom..

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

 

sohamsa ,

Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> Thank you for your reply.

> Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

Durga.

> Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

all

> Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that

Vishnu

> being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

that.

>

> See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the

 

> nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

 

> actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

eclipses.

> Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

based on

> the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its

only a

> representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

>

> The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

just as

> the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among

those

> born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.

Divine

> souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

being at

> one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

Hitler

> (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.

>

> Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to

look at

> God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

at God

> as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

 

Shiva

> who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

>

> So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

atmakaraka is

> Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the

concept

> of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be

freed of

> his/her ahamkara.

> Looking forward to your reply.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

 

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> >

> > || OM TAT SAT||

> > Dear Visti,

> > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ?

Either

you

> > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by

Gita

> > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> >

> > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

radiant

> > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

constellations I am

> > the Moon."

> >

> > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

Surya as

> > Ahamkara?

> >

> > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a

witness

of

> > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara

Principle

> > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> >

> > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as

> > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the

eye

of the

> > three worlds?

> >

> > regards,

> > nitish

> >

> > sohamsa

<sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight

bondages of

the atma?

> > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu),

Akasha

(guru), Agni

> > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi

(budha).

> > >

> > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes

of the

kala

> > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

 

anahata chakra.

> > >

> > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is

futile

without any

> > > of this.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > >

> > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes

naturally only

to a

> > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to

serve their

families;

> > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true

sense of

the term.

> > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and

contentment

of our

> > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's

purely

selfish.

> > > >

> > > > P

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%

40>

> > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

Nitish and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as

well but

really

> > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and

' aham'

which are

> > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only

in Sun

AK.

> > However

> > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others

as it does

not come

> > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away

from them so

easily

> > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma,

then the '

I '

> > will

> > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > >

> > > > Best

> > > > Sharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

<sohamsa

 

> > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji, Nitish

and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > >

> > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in

the hope

of

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself

disagreeing subtly

> > in the

> > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the

exchange

I find

> > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a

lot of sense

> > to me:

> > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level

as the

> > effacement

> > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".

> > > >

> > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural

knowledge

you both

> > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I

dont think

it is

> > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See,

English

> > also has

> > > > a lot of words which have subtly different

meanings, and the

right

> > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who

has a

> > exaggerated

> > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this

world has

that

> > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it

is plain

> > wrong to

> > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously

observe that

> > he also

> > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say

"yes,

that is

> > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds

of people

I know

> > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK,

and not

only

> > that

> > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > >

> > > > I personally think the only statement that can be

observed

> > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are

egocentric

i.e.

> > their

> > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather

than the

> > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.

> > egocentricity does

> > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes

them go

through

> > > > experiences in life such that their core self is

tested. How

they

> > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other

astrological

> > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make,

based on pure

> > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to

divinity

through

> > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is

 

egocentric.

> > > >

> > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share

her data)

> > who was

> > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher

degree

> > that she

> > > > worked hard for, then get married and then

divorced, then

have her

> > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then

have her

> > brother get

> > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her

too), then

> > (she) get

> > > > married again and her husband develop terminal

cancer very

soon

> > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a

strong and

> > consistent

> > > > support outside of herself - she has become self

reliant and

only

> > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She

is

probably

> > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any

outstanding

way at

> > > > all, and probably much less than all the people

around her..

> > > >

> > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK

people

must

> > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a

general lesson

> > for all

> > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them

towards

divinity

> > > > through experiences that make them focus on

themselves and

search

> > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much

more to

the

> > > > point.

> > > >

> > > > Comments?

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is

not always

> > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be

nothing less

than

> > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the

right way of

> > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > Tijana

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

 

deep/shallow,

> > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a

basis only

in

> > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a

basis i.e.

> > separation

> > > > of

> > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only

though) and

hence

> > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind

of karma

involved.

> > > > >

> > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th

part of the

> > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part,

it becomes its

> > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that

sign/house

towards

> > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to

your specific

> > > > queries.

> > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the

truth of your

queries.

> > > > >

> > > > > best regards,

> > > > > nitish

> > > > >

> > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijanadamjanovic"

> > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised

in these

discussions

> > > > on Atma

> > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of

serving.

> > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn

principles of artha

> > shastra to

> > > > serve,

> > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to

differentiate? I

> > assume

> > > > you

> > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into

account also

> > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne,

but regarding

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja

yoga whose deepest

> > meaning

> > > > is

> > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas

(refer

Vivekananda) .

> > > > Only in

> > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the

perfect King.

What

> > artha

> > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is

what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita

Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the

cosmos has chosen to

work.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only

SUN AK has to

> > "serve", all

> > > > AKs

> > > > > > > "serve".

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun

AK gives a person

akin to

> > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to

Janaka -

jivanmukta -

> > > > provided

> > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based

on this?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people

to take Dhartharastra

as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from

6th house. Leo

being a

> > > > dharma

> > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of

service through

10th

> > > > house of

> > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a

Sun AK should learn

> > > > principles of

> > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will

hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as

there is nothing else

> > to be

> > > > done

> > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna

has already

achieved

> > > > everything

> > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the

three worlds(refer

Gita).

> > > > Those who

> > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to

serve, whatever be

> > their

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm

bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a

coincidence that His Master

had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting

his karma/desires.

Thus,

> > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to

exhaust his

remaining

> > > > karma/

> > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK).

There is no more

> > substance

> > > > to

> > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic

relationship of the two

which

> > > > continued

> > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even

more brilliant if you

had

> > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is

what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are

you implying that Sun

AK

> > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you

determing dharma

based on

> > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to

take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will

hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm

bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > But do

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that

His Master had exalted

> > Saturn

> > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > What is the thing

that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra

and ancient texts that

show

> > > > what

> > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure

that his subjects are

protected

> > > > and

> > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary

path. Look at krishna,

Janaka

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and

you will understand

whatever

> > > > that "hardly

> > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to.

> > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your

statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > anything

> > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope

and the rest of the

> > karakas (BK,

> > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will

follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is

"Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"

(serving

> > > > every

> > > > > > > > > being as the full

manifestation of God) that

> > Narendranath

> > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > from his Master

Ramakrishna who had Sun in

Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda

had developed peculiar

> > sharpness

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > perception and

assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from

the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius,

he could, as compared to

> > others,

> > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in

the words of Sri

Ramakrishna,

> > > > even

> > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > the Master told them in

simple language (Aq Sun),

and

> > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With its dispositor

Jupiter in Libra, gradually

Swami

> > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips

and hints on practical

Vedanta

> > > > that

> > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > benefit individual and

collective life in the

society.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual

persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...),

otherwise it`s very hard

task..."

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like

you have done is not

> > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in

Aries and had attained

> > highest

> > > > level

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun

AK is placed in Libra, it

> > could

> > > > be the

> > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual

power of a sign over the

rest of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and

this spiritual power

manifests

> > > > through

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its

sign placement.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its

qualities are those of Raja

> > (karaka

> > > > for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of

the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > What is

> > > > the

> > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly

ever do? The lesson that

has

> > to be

> > > > learnt

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in

the highest sence it gives

> > "Shiva

> > > > jnane

> > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man

as God)-the divine lesson

> > given to

> > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK).

For spiritual persons Sun

as AK

> > > > should be

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs

(Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very

> > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"v reality" <reality_v@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for

your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask

another query re Sun AK. The

lesson

> > to be

> > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction

of ego. Can this also be

understood

> > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > as the

effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >To:

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > >Wed,

22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA

KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >I would add

that with Gu AK person have to be

very

> > > > humble to

> > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > >techers and

natives, like priests, gurus,

teachers.

> > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > >practise

Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > native is

> > > > always

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > >and gives

emotions but the problem is that

they

> > never

> > > > get

> > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > >themselves

from other people. The person must

learn

> > > > lessons

> > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > >people

represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > father

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > >grahas

represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > >Take few

examples of people you know and see

it in

> > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat

Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal

Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah

adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Person

should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri

Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email:

rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish

pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > v reality

napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > This is an

interesting discussion. Could we

> > discuss

> > > > other

> > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > in an

article that natives with Moon as AK

need to

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > and loving

to others. But I know of a chart

where

> > > > the

> > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > nature very

caring, loving and concerned

about

> > > > others

> > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > is the

lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >To:

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Date:

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum

namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN

Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju

AK person should learn to respect

others

> > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >should

be ready to learn from others. When

Ju

> > is in

> > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >himself

then native thinks that he knows

> > everything

> > > > and

> > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > >His

knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

of

> > > > course

> > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA

AK person should learn to catalyze

> > energies

> > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > >other

techniques, while with JU AK person

should

> > > > learn to

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >like

kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

not so

> > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

good

> > > > placement

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > >be not

so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri

Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > >email:

rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish

pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN

Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile./

 

> > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile. <http://mobile./

 

> > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

____________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________

> > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

for just

> > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

<http://a.ninemsn./

 

> > <http://a.ninemsn./>>

com.au/b.

> > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > >

>2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

2Fci%

> > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > >

>2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru

Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > for

articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com

> > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >-----------

--------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the

right car based on your needs.

Check out

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________

_________ _________

> > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement:

Make shopping exciting. Find

what you

> > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

 

> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http%

3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1%

2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > >

3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

Internet in your

> > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > -------------------------

> > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > >

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> >

> > > > someone who knows.

> > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

I'm glad you liked the discussion.

Did you miss the citations from the Shiva purana?

Comments to your questions:

 

I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and

Nitish, but

there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

 

Visti: Glad to know.

 

However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to

the

conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

substantiate this?

 

Visti: The second sloka i qouted stated that there are

i) eight bondages;

ii) these are on the jeevatma;

iii) without controlling these bondages one will not achieve

mukti.

 

The implication of points i) and ii) imply that we are speaking of

an animate being (jeevaatma) and that it is bound down by eight

bondages. The logical inference here is that these are the eight

charakaraka. Let me add here that when you read the dhyana bindu

upanishad you learn of the eight petals surrounding the heart, and that

the atma takes on different emotions, states and natures during its

movement through these eight petals.

Now comes the problem: If the atma resides in the heart and is

surrounded by these eight petals, then why is the Atmakaraka one of

these eight petals? The answer is: because the atma believes it is one

of these petals! What a predicament! From this we also learn that all

eight of the charakarakas are ALL different aspects of our OWN atma.

It is our luck that the Shiva purana teaches us that these are indeed

bondages, and manifest in the eight forms of prakriti.

 

To clarify, its not just the atmakaraka which focuses on each of

these bondages, but each charakaraka individually is bound down by

these bondages. Example: Where the seventh from AK shows the desires

which caused this birth, the Darakaraka itself shows the desires latent

from the last life, which continuously color our likes and dislikes in

relationships and financial matters... Another bondage. So all eight

show a bondage.

 

By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is

put in a

jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

authorize him to do so.

 

In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages

does not by

instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

(jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one).

 

Visti: I think it was the fourth sloka of the same samhita, where it

reads that the eight bondages are caused due to karma. Example: If I in

my past life thought that great rajayoga comes from having a great

bathroom or swimming pool or living next to a river, and would strive

to attain that, then surely in this life i will be bound by that desire

and have Moon as my Darakaraka. So the karma caused the Bandhana, and

this is what i believe Shiva Purana tried to explain.

 

I have read

(though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"

koshas/sareeras/

 

Visti: In these two paragraphs you have been focusing on walls,

sharira and koshas. I understand your perspective, but where the five

koshas relate to the five stages of consciousness (the 16 divisional

charts), and the three shariras relate to the Sun, Moon and Lagna,

really the eight bondages are on the atma whose existance is prominent

in one of the shariras.

But because the Atma invariably is the cause of all the shariras to

exist to begin with, it has an overriding sway in the persons existence.

 

parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

the bondages - they always have all 8.

Visti: Yes, i clarified that all have all eight, just as all have

eight charakaraka. Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the Sun, so

also all planets in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have

ahamkara. In the tradition we are taught to worship the planet

presiding over the eighth weekday from those planets in kendra to AK to

remove the ahamkara.

Example: for Mars as atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday order is

the Sun. So the native should worship Shiva in the Rameshvara

Jyotirlinga form to overcome their ahamkara.

 

Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply

trying to

dig deeper into your wisdom..

 

Hope this helps.

Looking forward to your reply.

Yours sincerely,

 

 

--

 

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

 

vedicastrostudent wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Vistiji,

 

I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

 

However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

substantiate this?

 

By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a

jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

authorize him to do so.

 

In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

(jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read

(though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"

koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

the bondages - they always have all 8.

 

Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

dig deeper into your wisdom..

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

 

sohamsa ,

Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> Thank you for your reply.

> Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

Durga.

> Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

all

> Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that

Vishnu

> being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

that.

>

> See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the

 

> nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

 

> actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

eclipses.

> Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

based on

> the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its

only a

> representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

>

> The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

just as

> the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among

those

> born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.

Divine

> souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

being at

> one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

Hitler

> (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.

>

> Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to

look at

> God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

at God

> as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

 

Shiva

> who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

>

> So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

atmakaraka is

> Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the

concept

> of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be

freed of

> his/her ahamkara.

> Looking forward to your reply.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

 

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> >

> > || OM TAT SAT||

> > Dear Visti,

> > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ?

Either

you

> > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by

Gita

> > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> >

> > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

radiant

> > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

constellations I am

> > the Moon."

> >

> > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

Surya as

> > Ahamkara?

> >

> > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a

witness

of

> > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara

Principle

> > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> >

> > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as

> > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the

eye

of the

> > three worlds?

> >

> > regards,

> > nitish

> >

> > sohamsa

<sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight

bondages of

the atma?

> > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu),

Akasha

(guru), Agni

> > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi

(budha).

> > >

> > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes

of the

kala

> > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

 

anahata chakra.

> > >

> > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is

futile

without any

> > > of this.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > >

> > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes

naturally only

to a

> > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to

serve their

families;

> > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true

sense of

the term.

> > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and

contentment

of our

> > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's

purely

selfish.

> > > >

> > > > P

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%

40>

> > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

Nitish and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as

well but

really

> > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and

' aham'

which are

> > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only

in Sun

AK.

> > However

> > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others

as it does

not come

> > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away

from them so

easily

> > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma,

then the '

I '

> > will

> > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > >

> > > > Best

> > > > Sharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

<sohamsa

 

> > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji, Nitish

and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > >

> > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in

the hope

of

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself

disagreeing subtly

> > in the

> > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the

exchange

I find

> > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a

lot of sense

> > to me:

> > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level

as the

> > effacement

> > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".

> > > >

> > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural

knowledge

you both

> > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I

dont think

it is

> > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See,

English

> > also has

> > > > a lot of words which have subtly different

meanings, and the

right

> > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who

has a

> > exaggerated

> > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this

world has

that

> > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it

is plain

> > wrong to

> > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously

observe that

> > he also

> > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say

"yes,

that is

> > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds

of people

I know

> > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK,

and not

only

> > that

> > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > >

> > > > I personally think the only statement that can be

observed

> > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are

egocentric

i.e.

> > their

> > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather

than the

> > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.

> > egocentricity does

> > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes

them go

through

> > > > experiences in life such that their core self is

tested. How

they

> > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other

astrological

> > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make,

based on pure

> > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to

divinity

through

> > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is

 

egocentric.

> > > >

> > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share

her data)

> > who was

> > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher

degree

> > that she

> > > > worked hard for, then get married and then

divorced, then

have her

> > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then

have her

> > brother get

> > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her

too), then

> > (she) get

> > > > married again and her husband develop terminal

cancer very

soon

> > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a

strong and

> > consistent

> > > > support outside of herself - she has become self

reliant and

only

> > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She

is

probably

> > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any

outstanding

way at

> > > > all, and probably much less than all the people

around her..

> > > >

> > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK

people

must

> > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a

general lesson

> > for all

> > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them

towards

divinity

> > > > through experiences that make them focus on

themselves and

search

> > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much

more to

the

> > > > point.

> > > >

> > > > Comments?

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is

not always

> > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be

nothing less

than

> > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the

right way of

> > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > Tijana

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

 

deep/shallow,

> > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a

basis only

in

> > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a

basis i.e.

> > separation

> > > > of

> > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only

though) and

hence

> > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind

of karma

involved.

> > > > >

> > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th

part of the

> > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part,

it becomes its

> > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that

sign/house

towards

> > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to

your specific

> > > > queries.

> > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the

truth of your

queries.

> > > > >

> > > > > best regards,

> > > > > nitish

> > > > >

> > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijanadamjanovic"

> > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised

in these

discussions

> > > > on Atma

> > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of

serving.

> > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn

principles of artha

> > shastra to

> > > > serve,

> > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to

differentiate? I

> > assume

> > > > you

> > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into

account also

> > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne,

but regarding

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja

yoga whose deepest

> > meaning

> > > > is

> > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas

(refer

Vivekananda) .

> > > > Only in

> > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the

perfect King.

What

> > artha

> > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is

what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita

Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the

cosmos has chosen to

work.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only

SUN AK has to

> > "serve", all

> > > > AKs

> > > > > > > "serve".

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun

AK gives a person

akin to

> > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to

Janaka -

jivanmukta -

> > > > provided

> > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based

on this?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people

to take Dhartharastra

as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from

6th house. Leo

being a

> > > > dharma

> > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of

service through

10th

> > > > house of

> > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a

Sun AK should learn

> > > > principles of

> > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will

hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as

there is nothing else

> > to be

> > > > done

> > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna

has already

achieved

> > > > everything

> > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the

three worlds(refer

Gita).

> > > > Those who

> > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to

serve, whatever be

> > their

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm

bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a

coincidence that His Master

had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting

his karma/desires.

Thus,

> > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to

exhaust his

remaining

> > > > karma/

> > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK).

There is no more

> > substance

> > > > to

> > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic

relationship of the two

which

> > > > continued

> > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even

more brilliant if you

had

> > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is

what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are

you implying that Sun

AK

> > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you

determing dharma

based on

> > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to

take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will

hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm

bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > But do

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that

His Master had exalted

> > Saturn

> > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > What is the thing

that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra

and ancient texts that

show

> > > > what

> > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure

that his subjects are

protected

> > > > and

> > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary

path. Look at krishna,

Janaka

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and

you will understand

whatever

> > > > that "hardly

> > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to.

> > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your

statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > anything

> > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope

and the rest of the

> > karakas (BK,

> > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will

follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is

"Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"

(serving

> > > > every

> > > > > > > > > being as the full

manifestation of God) that

> > Narendranath

> > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > from his Master

Ramakrishna who had Sun in

Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda

had developed peculiar

> > sharpness

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > perception and

assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from

the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius,

he could, as compared to

> > others,

> > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in

the words of Sri

Ramakrishna,

> > > > even

> > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > the Master told them in

simple language (Aq Sun),

and

> > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With its dispositor

Jupiter in Libra, gradually

Swami

> > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips

and hints on practical

Vedanta

> > > > that

> > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > benefit individual and

collective life in the

society.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual

persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...),

otherwise it`s very hard

task..."

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like

you have done is not

> > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in

Aries and had attained

> > highest

> > > > level

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun

AK is placed in Libra, it

> > could

> > > > be the

> > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual

power of a sign over the

rest of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and

this spiritual power

manifests

> > > > through

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its

sign placement.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its

qualities are those of Raja

> > (karaka

> > > > for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of

the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > What is

> > > > the

> > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly

ever do? The lesson that

has

> > to be

> > > > learnt

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in

the highest sence it gives

> > "Shiva

> > > > jnane

> > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man

as God)-the divine lesson

> > given to

> > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK).

For spiritual persons Sun

as AK

> > > > should be

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs

(Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very

> > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"v reality" <reality_v@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for

your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask

another query re Sun AK. The

lesson

> > to be

> > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction

of ego. Can this also be

understood

> > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > as the

effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >To:

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > >Wed,

22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA

KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >I would add

that with Gu AK person have to be

very

> > > > humble to

> > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > >techers and

natives, like priests, gurus,

teachers.

> > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > >practise

Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > native is

> > > > always

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > >and gives

emotions but the problem is that

they

> > never

> > > > get

> > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > >themselves

from other people. The person must

learn

> > > > lessons

> > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > >people

represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > father

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > >grahas

represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > >Take few

examples of people you know and see

it in

> > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat

Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal

Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah

adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Person

should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri

Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email:

rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish

pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > v reality

napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > This is an

interesting discussion. Could we

> > discuss

> > > > other

> > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > in an

article that natives with Moon as AK

need to

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > and loving

to others. But I know of a chart

where

> > > > the

> > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > nature very

caring, loving and concerned

about

> > > > others

> > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > is the

lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >To:

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Date:

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum

namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN

Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju

AK person should learn to respect

others

> > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >should

be ready to learn from others. When

Ju

> > is in

> > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >himself

then native thinks that he knows

> > everything

> > > > and

> > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > >His

knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

of

> > > > course

> > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA

AK person should learn to catalyze

> > energies

> > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > >other

techniques, while with JU AK person

should

> > > > learn to

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >like

kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

not so

> > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

good

> > > > placement

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > >be not

so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri

Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > >email:

rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish

pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN

Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile./

 

> > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile. <http://mobile./

 

> > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

____________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________

> > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

for just

> > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

<http://a.ninemsn./

 

> > <http://a.ninemsn./>>

com.au/b.

> > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > >

>2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

2Fci%

> > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > >

>2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru

Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > for

articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com

> > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >-----------

--------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the

right car based on your needs.

Check out

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________

_________ _________

> > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement:

Make shopping exciting. Find

what you

> > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

 

> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http%

3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1%

2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > >

3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

Internet in your

> > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > -------------------------

> > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > >

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> >

> > > > someone who knows.

> > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear SS, Namaskar

Glad to hear you liked it.

Here is my answer to your questions:

 

1. Its specifically ahamkara. Thats why among the bandhanas, the

Sun/AK is associated with Ahamkara. So also each charakaraka has a

natural and functional bondage associated with it.

 

2. We use all nine in the scheme, viz: surya, soma, mangala, budha,

brhaspati, brighu, shani, rahu and sikhi.

We take the eighth planet in the weekday-order from the planet in

kendra. Example if Jupiter is in kendra to Atmakaraka, we may

experience ahamkara towards the guru and knowledge. Count the eighth

from Jupiter, viz: (1)guru, (2)shukra, (3)shani, (4)rahu, (5)ketu,

(6)surya, (7)chandra and (8) mangala. So we advise Bhimashankara or

Bagalasundari worship for this issue to be resolved. This is practiced

in the tradition to ensure the students continue learning.

 

Hope this helps.

Yours sincerely,

 

 

--

 

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

 

Soul Sadhak wrote:

 

 

Dear Visti,

This is a beautiful explaination indeed.

Please can u elaborate a bit more on this:

1. "Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the

Sun, so also all planets in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have

ahamkara. "

Did u mean to say 'bondage' instead of

'ahamkara', or using the term synonymously - why i ask is because we

associate the term Ego (ahamkara) with Sun astrological sense (though

Su is Self at a certain level or that which is not liberated or is

veiled yet).

2. ....worship the planet presiding over the

eighth weekday from those planets in kendra to AK to remove the

ahamkara. Example: for Mars as atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday

order is the Sun.

Sorry for my ignorance, but is the order as

follows:

1- Sun; 2- Moon; 3-

Mars; 4-

Mercury; 5- Jupiter;

6- Venus; 7- Saturn; (8-Rahu ?)

- if so, then how to count

the 8th from Ma as Su?

also, is the 8th taken from

planet kendra to AK or do we take 8th from AK itself?

Many thanx

SS.

sohamsa , Visti Larsen

<visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

> I'm glad you liked the discussion.

> Did you miss the citations from the Shiva purana?

> Comments to your questions:

>

> /I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

> there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

> Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

> scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

> thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

> /

>

> Visti: Glad to know.

>

> /However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

> conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and

that

> each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

> substantiate this?

> /

>

> Visti: The second sloka i qouted stated that there are

> i) eight bondages;

> ii) these are on the jeevatma;

> iii) without _controlling_ these bondages one will not achieve

mukti.

>

> The implication of points i) and ii) imply that we are speaking of

an

> animate being (jeevaatma) and that it is bound down by eight

bondages.

> The logical inference here is that these are the eight

charakaraka. Let

> me add here that when you read the dhyana bindu upanishad you

learn of

> the eight petals surrounding the heart, and that the atma takes on

 

> different emotions, states and natures during its movement through

these

> eight petals.

> Now comes the problem: If the atma resides in the heart and is

> surrounded by these eight petals, then why is the Atmakaraka one

of

> these eight petals? The answer is: because the atma believes it is

one

> of these petals! What a predicament! From this we also learn that

all

> eight of the charakarakas are ALL different aspects of our OWN

atma.

> It is our luck that the Shiva purana teaches us that these are

indeed

> bondages, and manifest in the eight forms of prakriti.

>

> To clarify, its not just the atmakaraka which focuses on each of

these

> bondages, but each charakaraka individually is bound down by these

 

> bondages. Example: Where the seventh from AK shows the desires

which

> caused this birth, the Darakaraka itself shows the desires latent

from

> the last life, which continuously color our likes and dislikes in

> relationships and financial matters... Another bondage. So all

eight

> show a bondage.

>

> /By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in

a

> jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

> sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

> walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The

jailkeeper

> must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

> authorize him to do so.

> /

>

> /In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not

by

> instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

> (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

> additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages

can

> be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one).

> /

>

> Visti: I think it was the fourth sloka of the same samhita, where

it

> reads that the eight bondages are caused due to karma. Example: If

I in

> my past life thought that great rajayoga comes from having a great

 

> bathroom or swimming pool or living next to a river, and would

strive to

> attain that, then surely in this life i will be bound by that

desire and

> have Moon as my Darakaraka. So the karma caused the Bandhana, and

this

> is what i believe Shiva Purana tried to explain.

>

> / I have read

> (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

> see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

> part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

> in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"

> koshas/sareeras//

>

> Visti: In these two paragraphs you have been focusing on walls,

sharira

> and koshas. I understand your perspective, but where the five

koshas

> relate to the five stages of consciousness (the 16 divisional

charts),

> and the three shariras relate to the Sun, Moon and Lagna, really

the

> eight bondages are on the atma whose existance is prominent in one

of

> the shariras.

> But because the Atma invariably is the cause of all the shariras

to

> exist to begin with, it has an overriding sway in the persons

existence.

>

> /parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

> whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

> the bondages - they always have all 8./

>

> Visti: Yes, i clarified that all have all eight, just as all have

eight

> charakaraka. Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the Sun, so also

all

> planets in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have ahamkara.

In the

> tradition we are taught to worship the planet presiding over the

eighth

> weekday from those planets in kendra to AK to remove the ahamkara.

> Example: for Mars as atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday order

is

> the Sun. So the native should worship Shiva in the Rameshvara

> Jyotirlinga form to overcome their ahamkara.

>

> /Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying

to

> dig deeper into your wisdom../

>

> Hope this helps.

> Looking forward to your reply.

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> vedicastrostudent wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Vistiji,

> >

> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish,

but

> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see

addressed.

> > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages

(and

> > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

> >

> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed

and that

> > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

> > substantiate this?

> >

> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is

put in a

> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages

(in a

> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that

the 4

> > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The

jailkeeper

> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

> > authorize him to do so.

> >

> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does

not by

> > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

> > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the

bondages can

> > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read

> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and

I only

> > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing

some

> > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that

people

> > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"

> > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have

Ahamkar,

> > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without

one of

> > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> >

> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply

trying to

> > dig deeper into your wisdom..

> >

> > Thanks,

> >

> > Sundeep

> >

> > sohamsa <sohamsa%40>,

 

> > Visti Larsen visti@ wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > Thank you for your reply.

> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that

Rahu is

> > Durga.

> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and

Agni are

> > all

> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually

saying that

> > Vishnu

> > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know

better than

> > that.

> > >

> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this

corresponds to the

> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the

nakshatras are

> > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of

devatas come as

> > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

> > eclipses.

> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can

find

> > based on

> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by

it. But its

> > only a

> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

> > >

> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is

Surya,

> > just as

> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon.

And among

> > those

> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those

being fully

> > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of

ahamkara.

> > Divine

> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri

Krishna

> > being at

> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump,

Adolph

> > Hitler

> > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of

the scale.

> > >

> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT

ways to

> > look at

> > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we

must look

> > at God

> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the

specific form of

> > Shiva

> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

> > >

> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with

Surya

> > atmakaraka is

> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed...

Infact the

> > concept

> > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka

will be

> > freed of

> > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> > > >

> > > > || OM TAT SAT||

> > > > Dear Visti,

> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by

Surya ? Either

> > you

> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara

going by Gita

> > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> > > >

> > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all

luminaries the

> > radiant

> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

> > constellations I am

> > > > the Moon."

> > > >

> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are

lead by

> > Surya as

> > > > Ahamkara?

> > > >

> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan

as a witness

> > of

> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating

Ahamkara

> > Principle

> > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence

principle?

> > > >

> > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be

referred to as

> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha

chakshusay', the eye

> > of the

> > > > three worlds?

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > nitish

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>

> > <sohamsa%

> > 40>,

> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the

eight bondages of

> > the atma?

> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti

(rahu), Akasha

> > (guru), Agni

> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and

Prithvi (budha).

> > > > >

> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the

eight spokes of the

> > kala

> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight

spokes of the

> > anahata chakra.

> > > > >

> > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT

karakas is futile

> > without any

> > > > > of this.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > >

> > > > > --

> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles

visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

<http://srigaruda.com

> > <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > > > > <http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>

> > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>>

> > > > >

> > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Do you not think that "serving others"

comes naturally only

> > to a

> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who

want to serve their

> > families;

> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in

the true sense of

> > the term.

> > > > > > Because we know very well that in

happiness and contentment

> > of our

> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth!

So it's purely

> > selfish.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > P

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>

> > <sohamsa%

> > 40>

> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK

(to Tijanaji,

> > Nitish and

> > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this

thread as well but

> > really

> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too

quickly.

> > > > > > English words cant describe so well '

ahankar ' and ' aham'

> > which are

> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see

this only in Sun

> > AK.

> > > > However

> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to

serve others as it does

> > not come

> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I

' away from them so

> > easily

> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with

Paramatma, then the '

> > I '

> > > > will

> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Best

> > > > > > Sharat

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > -

> > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent

<vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > <sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>

> > > > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK

(to Tijanaji, Nitish

> > and

> > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with

interest in the hope

> > of

> > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself

disagreeing subtly

> > > > in the

> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep

down in the exchange

> > I find

> > > > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which

makes a lot of sense

> > > > to me:

> > > > > > "Can this also be understood at a

different level as the

> > > > effacement

> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the

scriptural knowledge

> > you both

> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK

people: I dont think

> > it is

> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are

egotistic. See, English

> > > > also has

> > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly

different meanings, and the

> > right

> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person

is one who has a

> > > > exaggerated

> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone

in this world has

> > that

> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny

it), it is plain

> > > > wrong to

> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and

simultaneously observe that

> > > > he also

> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self

importance and say "yes,

> > that is

> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite

hundreds of people

> > I know

> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have

Sun AK, and not

> > only

> > > > that

> > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their

chart.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I personally think the only statement

that can be observed

> > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that

they are egocentric

> > i.e.

> > > > their

> > > > > > view of the world is based on the

individual rather than the

> > > > > > society. They may or may not be

egotistical (i.e.

> > > > egocentricity does

> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK

simply makes them go

> > through

> > > > > > experiences in life such that their core

self is tested. How

> > they

> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of

other astrological

> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely

make, based on pure

> > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are

guided to divinity

> > through

> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently

their view is

> > egocentric.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I

can share her data)

> > > > who was

> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and

denied a higher degree

> > > > that she

> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and

then divorced, then

> > have her

> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful

way, then have her

> > > > brother get

> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then

leave her too), then

> > > > (she) get

> > > > > > married again and her husband develop

terminal cancer very

> > soon

> > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to

find a strong and

> > > > consistent

> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has

become self reliant and

> > only

> > > > > > finds consistent happiness in

meditation/reiki. She is

> > probably

> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not

in any outstanding

> > way at

> > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the

people around her..

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact

that Sun AK people

> > must

> > > > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is

simply a general lesson

> > > > for all

> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide

them towards

> > divinity

> > > > > > through experiences that make them focus

on themselves and

> > search

> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I

find much more to

> > the

> > > > > > point.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of

yours "It is not always

> > > > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK

must be nothing less

> > than

> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m

on the right way of

> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...>

wrote:

> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with

paramatma -

> > deep/shallow,

> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of

things have a basis only

> > in

> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga

yoga has a basis i.e.

> > > > separation

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is

illusory only though) and

> > hence

> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on

the kind of karma

> > involved.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet

rules a 12th part of the

> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus,

in part, it becomes its

> > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs

of that sign/house

> > towards

> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it

further.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to

answer to your specific

> > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will

discover the truth of your

> > queries.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijanadamjanovic"

> > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The

questions raised in these

> > discussions

> > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific

way of serving.

> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must

learn principles of artha

> > > > shastra to

> > > > > > serve,

> > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju

AK? How to differentiate? I

> > > > assume

> > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the

houses into account also

> > > > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on

the throne, but regarding

> > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to

real Raja yoga whose deepest

> > > > meaning

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of

indriyas (refer

> > Vivekananda) .

> > > > > > Only in

> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of

Janaka or the perfect King.

> > What

> > > > artha

> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in

mind?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

> > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own

dharma is what you probably had

> > in

> > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in

this context.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended

is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord

of the cosmos has chosen to

> > work.

> > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific

that only SUN AK has to

> > > > "serve", all

> > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > "serve".

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying

that Sun AK gives a person

> > akin to

> > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person

akin to Janaka -

> > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > provided

> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put

in.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing

dharma based on this?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th

lord.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun

AK people to take Dhartharastra

> > as an

> > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is

seen from 6th house. Leo

> > being a

> > > > > > dharma

> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its

purpose of service through

> > 10th

> > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from

it. So a Sun AK should learn

> > > > > > principles of

> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja

will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve"

only as there is nothing else

> > > > to be

> > > > > > done

> > > > > > > > > in the three worlds

because Krishna has already

> > achieved

> > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve

in the three worlds(refer

> > Gita).

> > > > > > Those who

> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn

to learn to serve, whatever be

> > > > their

> > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s

Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in

> > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary

combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s

a coincidence that His Master

> > had

> > > > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK?

What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > needed

> > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after

exhausting his karma/desires.

> > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK)

came here to exhaust his

> > remaining

> > > > > > karma/

> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna

(Rahu AK). There is no more

> > > > substance

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life

karmic relationship of the two

> > which

> > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration

would be even more brilliant if you

> > had

> > > > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own

dharma is what you probably had

> > in

> > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context.

But, are you implying that Sun

> > AK

> > > > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > > > person akin to

Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

> > based on

> > > > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK

people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja

will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s

Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in

> > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary

combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > itself).

> > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a

coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > > > Saturn

> > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK?

What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > needed

> > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

> > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > What is the

thing that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita,

arthashastra and ancient texts that

> > show

> > > > > > what

> > > > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do

to ensure that his subjects are

> > protected

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward

evolutionary path. Look at krishna,

> > Janaka

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta

Maurya and you will understand

> > whatever

> > > > > > that "hardly

> > > > > > > > > > > ever do" equates

to.

> > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going

by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > > > anything

> > > > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the

horoscope and the rest of the

> > > > karakas (BK,

> > > > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his

subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the

mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"

> > (serving

> > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > being as the

full manifestation of God) that

> > > > Narendranath

> > > > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master

Ramakrishna who had Sun in

> > Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK,

Vivekananda had developed peculiar

> > > > sharpness

> > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > perception and

assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the

gems' from the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in

Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep

meaning in the words of Sri

> > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > even

> > > > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told

them in simple language (Aq Sun),

> > and

> > > > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > With its

dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

> > Swami

> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > > > started

assimilating tips and hints on practical

> > Vedanta

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > benefit

individual and collective life in the

> > society.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > "...For

spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva

jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > task..."

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Putting up

statements like you have done is not

> > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK

placed in Aries and had attained

> > > > highest

> > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality.

Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > > > could

> > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the

spiritual power of a sign over the

> > rest of

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the

chart and this spiritual power

> > manifests

> > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK

and its sign placement.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave

Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the

Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > > > (karaka

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > first

house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > > > What is

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja

will hardly ever do? The lesson that

> > has

> > > > to be

> > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is

serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > > > "Shiva

> > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > seva"

(service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > > > given to

> > > > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

(Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

> > as AK

> > > > > > should be

> > > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s

signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

> > very

> > > > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm

regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"v reality" <reality_v@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear

Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank

you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > If I

may ask another query re Sun AK. The

> > lesson

> > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the

reduction of ego. Can this also be

> > understood

> > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > different

level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the

effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

> > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >I

would add that with Gu AK person have to be

> > very

> > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

> > teachers.

> > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > native is

> > > > > > always

> > > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>and gives emotions but the problem is that

> > they

> > > > never

> > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>themselves from other people. The person must

> > learn

> > > > > > lessons

> > > > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > > > father

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > everything

those

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Take few examples of people you know and see

> > it in

> > > > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > v

reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

This is an interesting discussion. Could we

> > > > discuss

> > > > > > other

> > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > need to

> > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

and loving to others. But I know of a chart

> > where

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

nature very caring, loving and concerned

> > about

> > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>With Ju AK person should learn to respect

> > others

> > > > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>should be ready to learn from others. When

> > Ju

> > > > is in

> > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>himself then native thinks that he knows

> > > > everything

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

> > of

> > > > > > course

> > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > > > energies

> > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>other techniques, while with JU AK person

> > should

> > > > > > learn to

> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

> > not so

> > > > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > > > materially

but

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

> > good

> > > > > > placement

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>be not so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>http://mobile. <http://mobile./

> > <http://mobile./>

> > > > <http://mobile./ <http://mobile./>>>

/

> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>><http://mobile. <http://mobile./

> > <http://mobile./>

> > > > <http://mobile./ <http://mobile./>>>

/

> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > for just

> > > > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > > >

CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://a.ninemsn. <http://a.ninemsn./

> > <http://a.ninemsn./>

> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./ <http://a.ninemsn./>>>

com.au/b.

> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

> > 2Fci%

> > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > > >

_r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>http://www.jataveda s.com

> > > > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>

> > <http://www.jatavedas.com/ <http://www.jatavedas.com/>>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Choose the right car based on your needs.

> > Check out

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________

_________ _________ _________

> > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find

> > what you

> > > > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > > >

www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://a.ninemsn. com.au/

> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/ <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>

> > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>>

> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http%

3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > > >

2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

> > 3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > > > >

3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go

puts the Internet in your

> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > -------------------------

> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better

travel answers

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

 

> > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=>

> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > link=list & sid=396545469

> > > >

> > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

 

> > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=>

> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > >

> > > > > > someone who knows.

> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hare rama krsna

Dear SS, Namaskar

 

If I may help:

 

#1 Naisargika karakatwa in Kendra to AK shows things which we are

attached to. Ju in kendra to AK will give person who has ahamkara

connected to being teacher/knowledgable/moral person.

 

#2 Ma(1), Me(2), Ju(3), Ve(4), Sa(5), Ra(6), Ke(7), Su(8).

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz

email: rafal

Articles & Consultations: http://rohinaa.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hare Rama KrishnaDear Rafal,Can you please use larger font , so us elderly folks can read what you are saying,,I'd like to read your posts.Thank-you!with regardsLakshmirafal <starsuponme wrote: hare rama krsna Dear Sundeep, Namaskar There are many divisions like this, koshas (anna,prana,jnana (mana), vijnana, ananda), gunas, tattvas, linga sarira, sookshma sarira, chakrams, pranas, nadis etc. Now we must see what is relevant in which situation. All

this discussion arised on axis seeing 7H from Su or AK. What is the difference between Su and Ak in chart? Getting out of bondage can be done on many ways, by yoga, bhakti, jnana etc. Even in Upanishads there are few examples when person get mukti through Mercy/Bhakti. So what means this breaking walls of our bandhana? How to break buddhi ? And why? Buddhi is source of viveka, and when this viveka is connected to transcedental topics then this is good buddhi which will help and this engagement in spirtiual pursuits will liberate one from tri-guna. So yoga, bhakti and jnana will do this automatically on all levels (if done correctly). Regards, Rafal Gendarz email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com Articles & Consultations: http://rohinaa.com Dear Vistiji, I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed. Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and thank you for the information, it was very useful for me). However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please substantiate this? By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4 walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must authorize him to do so. In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker" koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar, whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of the bondages - they always have all 8. Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply

trying to dig deeper into your wisdom.. Thanks, Sundeep sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti wrote: > > ??? ??? ?????? > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar > Thank you for your reply. > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is Durga. > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are all > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that Vishnu > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than that. > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it eclipses. > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find based on > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its only a > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas. > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya, just as > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among those > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara. Divine > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna being at > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph Hitler > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale. > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways

to look at > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look at God > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of Shiva > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun. > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya atmakaraka is > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the concept > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be freed of > his/her ahamkara. > Looking forward to your reply. > > Yours sincerely, > > -- > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru > Jaimini SJC - Denmark > email: visti <visti > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com >

<http://srigaruda.com> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote: > > > > || OM TAT SAT|| > > Dear Visti, > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either you > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita > > Chapter 10 verse 21: > > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the radiant > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the constellations I am > > the Moon." > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by Surya as > > Ahamkara? > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness of > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara Principle > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence

principle? > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye of the > > three worlds? > > > > regards, > > nitish > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa% 40>, > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ??? ??? ?????? > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of the atma? > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha (guru), Agni > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha). > > > > > > And

how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the kala > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the anahata chakra. > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile without any > > > of this. > > > > > > Yours sincerely, > > > > > > -- > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark > > > email: visti@ <visti@> > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com> > > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote: > > > > Hello Sharat, > > > > > > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes naturally only to a > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their families; > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of the term. > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment of our > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely selfish. > > > > > > > > P > > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@> > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa% 40> > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish and > > > > v_reality) > > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya|| > > > > Dear Sundeep, > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but really > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly. > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham' which are > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun AK. > > However > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does not come > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so easily >

> > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the ' I ' > > will > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '. > > > > > > > > Best > > > > Sharat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@> > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa > > <sohamsa%40>> > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish and > > >

> v_reality) > > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish, > > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope of > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly > > in the > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange I find > > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a lot of sense > > to me: > > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level as the > > effacement > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?". > > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge you both > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think it is > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English >

> also has > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the right > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a > > exaggerated > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has that > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain > > wrong to > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that > > he also > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say "yes, that is > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds of people I know > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not only > > that > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart. > > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that

can be observed > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric i.e. > > their > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e. > > egocentricity does > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go through > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How they > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity through > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is egocentric. > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data) >

> who was > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree > > that she > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then have her > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her > > brother get > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then > > (she) get > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very soon > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and > > consistent > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and only > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is probably > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding way at > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people

around her.. > > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people must > > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a general lesson > > for all > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards divinity > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and search > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to the > > > > point. > > > > > > > > Comments? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..> > >

wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is not always > > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be nothing less than > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of > > > > finding answers on my queries. > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote: > > > > > Dear Tijana, > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma - deep/shallow, > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only in > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e. > > separation > >

> > of > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and hence > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma involved. > > > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house towards > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further. > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific > > > > queries. > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your queries. > > > > > > > > > > best regards, > > > > > nitish > > > > > > > >

> > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, "tijanadamjanovic" > > <nix_nixen@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these discussions > > > > on Atma > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving. > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha > > shastra to > > > > serve, > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I > > assume > > > > you > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also >

> (2nd, 6th, > > > > 10th)? > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding > > > > spirituality > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest > > meaning > > > > is > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer Vivekananda) . > > > > Only in > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King. What > > artha > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind? > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, "yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT || > > > > > > > Dear Tijana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had in > > mind > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to work. > > > > Thus, > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to > > "serve", all > > > > AKs > > > > > > > "serve". > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person akin to > > > > Janaka?! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka - jivanmukta - > > > > provided > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an > > > > example! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo being a > >

> > dharma > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through 10th > > > > house of > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn > > > > principles of > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as there is nothing else > > to be > > > > done > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already achieved > > > > everything > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer Gita). > > > > Those who > > > > > > > do not

serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be > > their > > > > AK. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in > > lagna in > > > > Dhanus > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by > > itself). > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master had > > > > exalted > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami > > needed > > > > these? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires. Thus, > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

remaining > > > > karma/ > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more > > substance > > > > to > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two which > > > > continued > > > > > > > in this birth also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > NITISH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, "tijana" <nix_nixen@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > >

> > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you had > > > > just answer > > > > > > > > my question. > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had in > > mind > > > > > > > mentioning > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun AK > > > > gives a > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma based on > > > > this? Will > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an > > > > example! > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving. > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in > > lagna in > >

> > Dhanus > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by > > itself). > > > > But do > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted > > Saturn > > > > in 9th > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami > > needed > > > > these? > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, "yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that show > > > > what > > > > > > > all a > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are protected > > > > and > > > > > > > progress > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna, Janaka > > > > and > > > > > > > >

> ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand whatever > > > > that "hardly > > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to. > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do > > > > anything > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the > > karakas (BK, > > > > PiK, > > > > > > > Puk, > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva" (serving > > > > every > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that > > Narendranath > > > > > > >

received > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in Aquarius. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar > > sharpness > > > > of > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with > > > > unusual power > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to > > others, > > > > > > > easily > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri Ramakrishna, > > > > even > > > > > > >

though > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun), and > > > > never as > > > > > > > > > preaching. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually Swami > > > > > > > Vivekananda > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical Vedanta > > > > that > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the society. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in > > > > Jupiter`s > > > > > > > signs > > > > > > > >

> > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard task..." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not > > wise. Sri > > > > > > > Yukteswar > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained > > highest > > > > level > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it > > could > > > > be the > > > > > > > most > > > > > > > > > spiritual person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the rest of > > > > the > > > > > > > signs/ >

> > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power manifests > > > > through > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > NITISH > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, "tijana" <nix_nixen@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su, > > > > > > > >

> > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja > > (karaka > > > > for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th). > > What is > > > > the > > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that has > > to be > > > > learnt > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives > > "Shiva > > > > jnane > > > > > > > Shiva > > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man as God)-the divine lesson > > given to > > > > us by > > > > > > > > > Swami > > > >

> > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun as AK > > > > should be > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very > > > > hard task. > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40>, "v reality" <reality_v@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The lesson > > to be > > > > > > > learnt > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK, > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be understood > > > > at a > > > > > > > > > > different level > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@> > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40> > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com > > > > <sohamsa%40> > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > >

> > > > >Dear Su > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be very > > > > humble to > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > spiritual > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus, teachers. > > > > With Ma > > > > > > > AK > > > > > > > > > > person must > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the > > native is > > > > always > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > > caring, > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that they > > never > > > > get

> > > > > > > enough > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must learn > > > > lessons > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy / > > father > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > everything those > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent. > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see it in > > > > praxix. > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > wishes, > > > > > > > > > > >

>Bojan > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum > > > > melodies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath

Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@ > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we > > discuss > > > > other > > > > > > > AKs > > > > > > > > > > too. I read > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon

as AK need to > > > > learn > > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > more > > > > > > > > > > > >caring > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart where > > > > the > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > > > >by > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned about > > > > others > > > > > > > since > > > > > > > > > > young. So > > > > > > > > > > > >what > > > > > > > > > > > > is

the lesson to be learnt? > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect others > > > > > > > knowledge > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition, > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When Ju > > is in > > > > > > > kendra to > > > > > > > > > > AK or is > > > > > > > > > > > >AK > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows > > everything > > > > and > > > > > > > now > > >

> > > > > > He > > > > > > > > > > can share > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers of > > > > course > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be > > > > naturally in > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze > > energies > > > > > > > through > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI > > > > > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > >

> > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person should > > > > learn to > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > more humble > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be > > > > focused on > > > > > > > > > Jupiter- > > > > > > > > > > karakas > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its not so > > > > easy > > > > > > > > > > materially but > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya

is in good > > > > placement > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > AK > > > > > > > > > > then it > > > > > > > > > > > >can > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>__________ __ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > > _________ _ > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > pocket: > > > > > > > > > > > >mail, > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile./ > > <http://mobile./>> / > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC > > > > > > > > > > > >

>><http://mobile. <http://mobile./ > > <http://mobile./>> / > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ > > _________ > > > > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car for just > > > > $30 at > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com. > > > > > > > >

> > > >au > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <http://a.ninemsn./ > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b. > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F% > > > > > > > 2Fsecure% > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa% 2Fci% > > > > 5F450304% > > > > > > > > > 2Fet% > > > > > > > > > > 5F2% > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > >

>_m=EXT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda s.com > > <http://www.jatavedas.com/ <http://www.jatavedas.com/>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ---- > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos > > > > > > > > > > new Car > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ > > _________ _ > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find what you > > > > want at > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. com.au/ <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/ > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>> > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom% > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F% 3Fid% > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 &

_r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > > Be a better Globetrotter.

Get better travel answers > > > > > > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc= X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-? link=list & sid=396545469 > > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc= X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-? link=list & sid=396545469>>from > > > > > > someone who knows. > > > > Answers -

Check it out. > > > > > > > > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear SS, Namaskar

Thank you for your reply.

Here follows my clarifications to your points. Your points are given in

italics.

 

 

the charakaraka represents relevant

bondage of the veiled soul. (somehow i

feel bondage/bandhana is different in shade from ahamkara/ego)

 

Visti: Ahamkara is one of the eight bondages. That way thinking it

isn't is in itself causing the bondage.

 

it's 8th from the planet in kendra to

AK that has to be treated with JL mantra

 

Visti: Yes.

 

the natural order for counting of the

weekdays is: Su (1) , Mo(2), Ma (3),

Me(4), Ju (5), Ve(6), Sa(7), Ra(8), Ke(9)

 

Bingo.

- though i don't really get why Ke

wud be included when it is excluded from the 8-charakarakas.

 

Ke as such represents severing of any

bondage.

Is it because it is the natural karaka (as things exist in creation)

hence included for weekdays ?

 

Visti: Once Ketu is included in a scheme, it

means we are no longer looking at the jeevatma, but the paramatma... no

longer the individual but God. It is through God that we overcome our

weaknesses.

 

 

Thanx a tonne

 

Visti: Your of course welcome.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

--

 

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

 

Soul Sadhak wrote:

 

 

Many thanx Visti, that clarifies.

if i get it right,

 

the charakaraka represents relevant

bondage of the veiled soul. (somehow i

feel bondage/bandhana is different in shade from ahamkara/ego)

it's 8th from the planet in kendra to AK

that has to be treated with JL mantra

the natural order for counting of the

weekdays is: Su (1) , Mo(2), Ma (3),

Me(4), Ju (5), Ve(6), Sa(7), Ra(8), Ke(9)

 

- though i don't really get why Ke wud be

included when it is excluded from the 8-charakarakas.

 

Ke as such represents severing of any

bondage. Is it because it is the natural karaka (as things exist in

creation) hence included for weekdays ?

Thanx a tonne

SS

sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti

wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear SS, Namaskar

> Glad to hear you liked it.

> Here is my answer to your questions:

>

> 1. Its specifically ahamkara. Thats why among the bandhanas, the

Sun/AK

> is associated with Ahamkara. So also each charakaraka has a

natural and

> functional bondage associated with it.

>

> 2. We use all nine in the scheme, viz: surya, soma, mangala,

budha,

> brhaspati, brighu, shani, rahu and sikhi.

> We take the eighth planet in the weekday-order from the planet in

> kendra. Example if Jupiter is in kendra to Atmakaraka, we may

experience

> ahamkara towards the guru and knowledge. Count the eighth from

Jupiter,

> viz: (1)guru, (2)shukra, (3)shani, (4)rahu, (5)ketu, (6)surya,

> (7)chandra and (8) mangala. So we advise Bhimashankara or

Bagalasundari

> worship for this issue to be resolved. This is practiced in the

> tradition to ensure the students continue learning.

>

> Hope this helps.

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> Soul Sadhak wrote:

> >

> > Dear Visti,

> >

> > This is a beautiful explaination indeed.

> >

> > Please can u elaborate a bit more on this:

> >

> > 1. "Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the Sun, so also all

planets

> > in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have ahamkara. "

> >

> > Did u mean to say 'bondage' instead of 'ahamkara', or using

the term

> > synonymously - why i ask is because we associate the term Ego

 

> > (ahamkara) with Sun astrological sense (though Su is Self at

a certain

> > level or that which is not liberated or is veiled yet).

> >

> > 2. ....worship the planet presiding over the eighth weekday

from those

> > planets in kendra to AK to remove the ahamkara. Example: for

Mars as

> > atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday order is the Sun.

> >

> > Sorry for my ignorance, but is the order as follows:

> >

> > 1- Sun; 2- Moon; 3- Mars; 4- Mercury; 5- Jupiter;

> > 6- Venus; 7- Saturn; /(8-Rahu ?)/

> >

> > - if so, then how to count the 8th from Ma as Su?

> >

> > also, is the 8th taken from planet kendra to AK or do we take

8th from

> > AK itself?

> >

> > Many thanx

> >

> > SS.

> >

> > sohamsa , Visti Larsen visti@

wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

> > > I'm glad you liked the discussion.

> > > Did you miss the citations from the Shiva purana?

> > > Comments to your questions:

> > >

> > > /I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and

Nitish, but

> > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see

addressed.

> > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and

given

> > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8

bondages (and

> > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for

me).

> > > /

> > >

> > > Visti: Glad to know.

> > >

> > > /However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to

the

> > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially

removed and that

> > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you

please

> > > substantiate this?

> > > /

> > >

> > > Visti: The second sloka i qouted stated that there are

> > > i) eight bondages;

> > > ii) these are on the jeevatma;

> > > iii) without _controlling_ these bondages one will not

achieve mukti.

> > >

> > > The implication of points i) and ii) imply that we are

speaking of an

> > > animate being (jeevaatma) and that it is bound down by

eight bondages.

> > > The logical inference here is that these are the eight

charakaraka. Let

> > > me add here that when you read the dhyana bindu

upanishad you learn of

> > > the eight petals surrounding the heart, and that the

atma takes on

> > > different emotions, states and natures during its

movement through

> > these

> > > eight petals.

> > > Now comes the problem: If the atma resides in the heart

and is

> > > surrounded by these eight petals, then why is the

Atmakaraka one of

> > > these eight petals? The answer is: because the atma

believes it is one

> > > of these petals! What a predicament! From this we also

learn that all

> > > eight of the charakarakas are ALL different aspects of

our OWN atma.

> > > It is our luck that the Shiva purana teaches us that

these are indeed

> > > bondages, and manifest in the eight forms of prakriti.

> > >

> > > To clarify, its not just the atmakaraka which focuses on

each of these

> > > bondages, but each charakaraka individually is bound

down by these

> > > bondages. Example: Where the seventh from AK shows the

desires which

> > > caused this birth, the Darakaraka itself shows the

desires latent from

> > > the last life, which continuously color our likes and

dislikes in

> > > relationships and financial matters... Another bondage.

So all eight

> > > show a bondage.

> > >

> > > /By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and

is put in a

> > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages (in a

> > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean

that the 4

> > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom.

The jailkeeper

> > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction

must

> > > authorize him to do so.

> > > /

> > >

> > > /In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages

does not by

> > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

> > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must

supply

> > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the

bondages can

> > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one).

> > > /

> > >

> > > Visti: I think it was the fourth sloka of the same

samhita, where it

> > > reads that the eight bondages are caused due to karma.

Example: If I in

> > > my past life thought that great rajayoga comes from

having a great

> > > bathroom or swimming pool or living next to a river, and

would

> > strive to

> > > attain that, then surely in this life i will be bound by

that desire

> > and

> > > have Moon as my Darakaraka. So the karma caused the

Bandhana, and this

> > > is what i believe Shiva Purana tried to explain.

> > >

> > > / I have read

> > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani,

and I only

> > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I

missing some

> > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says

that people

> > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively

"weaker"

> > > koshas/sareeras//

> > >

> > > Visti: In these two paragraphs you have been focusing on

walls, sharira

> > > and koshas. I understand your perspective, but where the

five koshas

> > > relate to the five stages of consciousness (the 16

divisional charts),

> > > and the three shariras relate to the Sun, Moon and

Lagna, really the

> > > eight bondages are on the atma whose existance is

prominent in one of

> > > the shariras.

> > > But because the Atma invariably is the cause of all the

shariras to

> > > exist to begin with, it has an overriding sway in the

persons existence.

> > >

> > > /parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

> > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born

without one of

> > > the bondages - they always have all 8./

> > >

> > > Visti: Yes, i clarified that all have all eight, just as

all have eight

> > > charakaraka. Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the

Sun, so also all

> > > planets in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have

ahamkara. In the

> > > tradition we are taught to worship the planet presiding

over the eighth

> > > weekday from those planets in kendra to AK to remove the

ahamkara.

> > > Example: for Mars as atmakaraka the eighth planet in

weekday order is

> > > the Sun. So the native should worship Shiva in the

Rameshvara

> > > Jyotirlinga form to overcome their ahamkara.

> > >

> > > /Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you,

simply trying to

> > > dig deeper into your wisdom../

> > >

> > > Hope this helps.

> > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

> > > <http://srigaruda.com>

> > >

> > > vedicastrostudent wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Vistiji,

> > > >

> > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you

and Nitish, but

> > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to

see addressed.

> > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated

and given

> > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has

8 bondages (and

> > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful

for me).

> > > >

> > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from

there to the

> > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially

removed and that

> > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can

you please

> > > > substantiate this?

> > > >

> > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime

and is put in a

> > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the

4 bondages (in a

> > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically

mean that the 4

> > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get

freedom. The jailkeeper

> > > > must open the door and the court that has

jurisdiction must

> > > > authorize him to do so.

> > > >

> > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8

bondages does not by

> > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that

karma

> > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You

must supply

> > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of

the bondages can

> > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I

have read

> > > > (though not completely) a translation of

Vivekacudamani, and I only

> > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I

missing some

> > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it

says that people

> > > > in various stages of enlightenment have

progressively "weaker"

> > > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems

to have Ahamkar,

> > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever

born without one of

> > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > >

> > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you,

simply trying to

> > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>,

> > > > Visti Larsen visti@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > > > Thank you for your reply.

> > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like

saying that Rahu is

> > > > Durga.

> > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya,

Shiva and Agni are

> > > > all

> > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are

actually saying that

> > > > Vishnu

> > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us

know better than

> > > > that.

> > > > >

> > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and

this corresponds to the

> > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit

of the nakshatras are

> > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms

of devatas come as

> > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the

nakshatra it

> > > > eclipses.

> > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi

chart, we can find

> > > > based on

> > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata

represented by it. But its

> > > > only a

> > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are

not devatas.

> > > > >

> > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of

ahamkara is Surya,

> > > > just as

> > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind

is Moon. And among

> > > > those

> > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades

of those being fully

> > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete

control of ahamkara.

> > > > Divine

> > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna

Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

> > > > being at

> > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald

Trump, Adolph

> > > > Hitler

> > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the

other end of the scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there

are EIGHT ways to

> > > > look at

> > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the

Ahamkara we must look

> > > > at God

> > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And

the specific form of

> > > > Shiva

> > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for

the Sun.

> > > > >

> > > > > So please don't make the equation that

everyone with Surya

> > > > atmakaraka is

> > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional

indeed... Infact the

> > > > concept

> > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya

atmakaraka will be

> > > > freed of

> > > > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > >

> > > > > --

> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles

visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > > > <http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>>

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||

> > > > > > Dear Visti,

> > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is

represented by Surya ? Either

> > > > you

> > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents

Ahamkara going by Gita

> > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of

all luminaries the

> > > > radiant

> > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi,

and of the

> > > > constellations I am

> > > > > > the Moon."

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of

planets are lead by

> > > > Surya as

> > > > > > Ahamkara?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring

Surya Narayan as a witness

> > > > of

> > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality

creating Ahamkara

> > > > Principle

> > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental

intelligence principle?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara

should be referred to as

> > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and

`Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

> > > > of the

> > > > > > three worlds?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > nitish

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>

> > > > <sohamsa%

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking

about the eight bondages of

> > > > the atma?

> > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra),

Prakriti (rahu), Akasha

> > > > (guru), Agni

> > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu

(shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map

into the eight spokes of the

> > > > kala

> > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the

eight spokes of the

> > > > anahata chakra.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its

EIGHT karakas is futile

> > > > without any

> > > > > > > of this.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and

articles visit:

> > > > > > http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com> <http://srigaruda.com

> > > > <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com>

> > > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Do you not think that "serving

others" comes naturally only

> > > > to a

> > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe

people who want to serve their

> > > > families;

> > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless

service in the true sense of

> > > > the term.

> > > > > > > > Because we know very well that

in happiness and contentment

> > > > of our

> > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and

growth! So it's purely

> > > > selfish.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > P

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > > > sohamsa

 

> > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > <sohamsa%

> > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007

2:23:04 AM

> > > > > > > > Re: Re:

Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > > > Nitish and

> > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > > > > > Good observations, I was

following this thread as well but

> > > > really

> > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in

too quickly.

> > > > > > > > English words cant describe so

well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'

> > > > which are

> > > > > > > > different and I agree that one

cannot see this only in Sun

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > However

> > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to

learn to serve others as it does

> > > > not come

> > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant

take ' I ' away from them so

> > > > easily

> > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to

merge with Paramatma, then the '

> > > > I '

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > Sharat

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent

<vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29,

2007 8:56 PM

> > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re:

Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have been reading your

exchange with interest in the hope

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > learning something new, but I

find myself disagreeing subtly

> > > > > > in the

> > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In

fact, deep down in the exchange

> > > > I find

> > > > > > > > this statement made by

"v_reality" which makes a lot of sense

> > > > > > to me:

> > > > > > > > "Can this also be understood at

a different level as the

> > > > > > effacement

> > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?".

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none

of the scriptural knowledge

> > > > you both

> > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several

Sun AK people: I dont think

> > > > it is

> > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people

are egotistic. See, English

> > > > > > also has

> > > > > > > > a lot of words which have

subtly different meanings, and the

> > > > right

> > > > > > > > one has to be used. An

egotistic person is one who has a

> > > > > > exaggerated

> > > > > > > > sense of self-importance.

Almost everyone in this world has

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself

if you deny it), it is plain

> > > > > > wrong to

> > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK

and simultaneously observe that

> > > > > > he also

> > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of

self importance and say "yes,

> > > > that is

> > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I

can cite hundreds of people

> > > > I know

> > > > > > > > who are very self important and

DONT have Sun AK, and not

> > > > only

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun

in their chart.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I personally think the only

statement that can be observed

> > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people

is that they are egocentric

> > > > i.e.

> > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > view of the world is based on

the individual rather than the

> > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be

egotistical (i.e.

> > > > > > egocentricity does

> > > > > > > > not imply self importance) -

the AK simply makes them go

> > > > through

> > > > > > > > experiences in life such that

their core self is tested. How

> > > > they

> > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably

on lots of other astrological

> > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I

can safely make, based on pure

> > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK

people are guided to divinity

> > > > through

> > > > > > > > experiences of the self,

consequently their view is

> > > > egocentric.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont

know if I can share her data)

> > > > > > who was

> > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor)

and denied a higher degree

> > > > > > that she

> > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get

married and then divorced, then

> > > > have her

> > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather

painful way, then have her

> > > > > > brother get

> > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit

(and then leave her too), then

> > > > > > (she) get

> > > > > > > > married again and her husband

develop terminal cancer very

> > > > soon

> > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant

seem to find a strong and

> > > > > > consistent

> > > > > > > > support outside of herself -

she has become self reliant and

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in

meditation/reiki. She is

> > > > probably

> > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too,

but not in any outstanding

> > > > way at

> > > > > > > > all, and probably much less

than all the people around her..

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute

the fact that Sun AK people

> > > > must

> > > > > > > > learn to "reduce their ego".

That is simply a general lesson

> > > > > > for all

> > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK

will guide them towards

> > > > divinity

> > > > > > > > through experiences that make

them focus on themselves and

> > > > search

> > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the

statement I find much more to

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > point.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > Only from one simple

statement of yours "It is not always

> > > > > > > > possible for me..." i read that

your AK must be nothing less

> > > > than

> > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i

think i`m on the right way of

> > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99

<nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of

soul with paramatma -

> > > > deep/shallow,

> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all

kind of things have a basis only

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even

Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.

> > > > > > separation

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which

is illusory only though) and

> > > > hence

> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss

depending on the kind of karma

> > > > involved.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a

planet rules a 12th part of the

> > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively

:). Thus, in part, it becomes its

> > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide

the affairs of that sign/house

> > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may

explore it further.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > It is not always possible

for me to answer to your specific

> > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you

will discover the truth of your

> > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijanadamjanovic"

> > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve.

The questions raised in these

> > > > discussions

> > > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the

specific way of serving.

> > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK

must learn principles of artha

> > > > > > shastra to

> > > > > > > > serve,

> > > > > > > > > > the same stands for

Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I

> > > > > > assume

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas

of the houses into account also

> > > > > > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > > > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets

service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is

related to real Raja yoga whose deepest

> > > > > > meaning

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th

house of indriyas (refer

> > > > Vivekananda) .

> > > > > > > > Only in

> > > > > > > > > > that sense we can

talk of Janaka or the perfect King.

> > > > What

> > > > > > artha

> > > > > > > > > > shastra principles

you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

> > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill

ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > > > in

> > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

Gita in this context.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Context that was

intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > All must work if

the lord of the cosmos has chosen to

> > > > work.

> > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing

specific that only SUN AK has to

> > > > > > "serve", all

> > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > "serve".

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > But, are

you implying that Sun AK gives a person

> > > > akin to

> > > > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK

gives a person akin to Janaka -

> > > > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > > > provided

> > > > > > > > > > > enough effort

has been put in.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you

determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need

not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Will you

advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

> > > > as an

> > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of

service is seen from 6th house. Leo

> > > > being a

> > > > > > > > dharma

> > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign

fulfills its purpose of service through

> > > > 10th

> > > > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is

6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn

> > > > > > > > principles of

> > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to

serve.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again,

what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > All souls have

to "Serve" only as there is nothing else

> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > done

> > > > > > > > > > > in the three

worlds because Krishna has already

> > > > achieved

> > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > that is there to

achieve in the three worlds(refer

> > > > Gita).

> > > > > > > > Those who

> > > > > > > > > > > do not serve,

are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > >

(extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > But do you

think it`s a coincidence that His Master

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and

Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > One is not

re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda

(Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

> > > > remaining

> > > > > > > > karma/

> > > > > > > > > > > desires with

Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more

> > > > > > substance

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > this than a

past-life karmic relationship of the two

> > > > which

> > > > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > > > in this birth

also.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave

Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Your

elaboration would be even more brilliant if you

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill

ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > > > in

> > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in

this context. But, are you implying that Sun

> > > > AK

> > > > > > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > > > > > person akin

to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

> > > > based on

> > > > > > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > > > > > you advise

Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again,

what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > >

(extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s

a coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and

Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm

regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

> > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om

Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear

Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Read

up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

> > > > show

> > > > > > > > what

> > > > > > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja

has to do to ensure that his subjects are

> > > > protected

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > > > > > on the

upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,

> > > > Janaka

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

> > > > whatever

> > > > > > > > that "hardly

> > > > > > > > > > > > > ever

do" equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > > > > > anything

> > > > > > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > > > > > karakas (BK,

> > > > > > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > GK)

i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Actually, the mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"

> > > > (serving

> > > > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > > > being

as the full manifestation of God) that

> > > > > > Narendranath

> > > > > > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

> > > > Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Being

Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar

> > > > > > sharpness

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

perception and assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > > > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > pick

up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With

Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see'

the deep meaning in the words of Sri

> > > > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > > > even

> > > > > > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

preaching.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With

its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

> > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

started assimilating tips and hints on practical

> > > > Vedanta

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

benefit individual and collective life in the

> > > > society.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

"...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

(Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > > > task..."

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Putting up statements like you have done is not

> > > > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri,

has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained

> > > > > > highest

> > > > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

shows the spiritual power of a sign over the

> > > > rest of

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

planets in the chart and this spiritual power

> > > > manifests

> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

dispositor of AK and its sign placement.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > > > > > (karaka

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > > > > > What is

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

> > > > has

> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > > > > > "Shiva

> > > > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

seva" (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > > > > > given to

> > > > > > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

> > > > as AK

> > > > > > > > should be

> > > > > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

> > > > very

> > > > > > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"v reality" <reality_v@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

> > > > lesson

> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> is the reduction of ego. Can this also be

> > > > understood

> > > > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

> > > > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be

> > > > very

> > > > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

> > > > teachers.

> > > > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

person must

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > > > native is

> > > > > > > > always

> > > > > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >and gives emotions but the problem is that

> > > > they

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >themselves from other people. The person must

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > > lessons

> > > > > > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > > > > > father

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Take few examples of people you know and see

> > > > it in

> > > > > > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > > > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > This is an interesting discussion. Could we

> > > > > > discuss

> > > > > > > > other

> > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > > > need to

> > > > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

more

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > and loving to others. But I know of a chart

> > > > where

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > nature very caring, loving and concerned

> > > > about

> > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect

> > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >should be ready to learn from others. When

> > > > Ju

> > > > > > is in

> > > > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >himself then native thinks that he knows

> > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > course

> > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > > > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > > > > > energies

> > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >other techniques, while with JU AK person

> > > > should

> > > > > > > > learn to

> > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

> > > > not so

> > > > > > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

> > > > good

> > > > > > > > placement

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

_________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile./

> > > > <http://mobile./>

> > > > > > <http://mobile./

<http://mobile./>>> /

> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >><http://mobile. <http://mobile./

> > > > <http://mobile./>

> > > > > > <http://mobile./

<http://mobile./>>> /

> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > > > for just

> > > > > > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > http://a.ninemsn. <http://a.ninemsn./

> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>

> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn./

<http://a.ninemsn./>>> com.au/b.

> > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

> > > > 2Fci%

> > > > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

_r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >http://www.jataveda s.com

> > > > > > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>

> > > > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Choose the right car based on your needs.

> > > > Check out

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > ____________

_________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find

> > > > what you

> > > > > > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> http://a.ninemsn. com.au/

> > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>

> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

> > > > 3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ------------ ---------

--------- ---

> > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go:

Go puts the Internet in your

> > > > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos

& more.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > -------------------------

> > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

better travel answers

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

> > > > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=>

> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > > > link=list & sid=396545469

> > > > > >

> > > > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

> > > > <http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=>

> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > > > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > someone who knows.

> > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hare rama krsna

Dear Lakshmi, Namaskar

 

I did it unconciously, hope now its better.

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz

email: rafal

Articles & Consultations: http://rohinaa.com

 

 

Hare Rama Krishna

Dear Rafal,

Can you please use larger font , so us elderly folks can read what you

are saying,,I'd like to read your posts.

Thank-you!

with regards

Lakshmi

 

rafal <starsuponme (AT) wp (DOT) pl> wrote:

 

 

hare rama

krsna

Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

 

There are many divisions like this, koshas (anna,prana,jnana

(mana), vijnana, ananda), gunas, tattvas, linga sarira, sookshma

sarira, chakrams, pranas, nadis etc. Now we must see what is relevant

in which situation. All this discussion arised on axis seeing 7H from

Su or AK. What is the difference between Su and Ak in chart? Getting

out of bondage can be done on many ways, by yoga, bhakti, jnana etc.

Even in Upanishads there are few examples when person get mukti through

Mercy/Bhakti.

 

So what means this breaking walls of our bandhana? How to break buddhi

? And why?

 

Buddhi is source of viveka, and when this viveka is connected to

transcedental topics then this is good buddhi which will help and this

engagement in spirtiual pursuits will liberate one from tri-guna. So

yoga, bhakti and jnana will do this automatically on all levels (if

done correctly).

 

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz

email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

Articles & Consultations: http://rohinaa.com

 

 

 

 

Dear Vistiji,

 

I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

 

However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

substantiate this?

 

By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a

jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

authorize him to do so.

 

In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

(jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read

(though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"

koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

the bondages - they always have all 8.

 

Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

dig deeper into your wisdom..

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

 

sohamsa ,

Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> Thank you for your reply.

> Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

Durga.

> Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

all

> Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that

Vishnu

> being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

that.

>

> See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the

 

> nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

 

> actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

eclipses.

> Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

based on

> the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its

only a

> representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

>

> The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

just as

> the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among

those

> born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.

Divine

> souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

being at

> one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

Hitler

> (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.

>

> Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to

look at

> God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

at God

> as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

 

Shiva

> who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

>

> So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

atmakaraka is

> Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the

concept

> of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be

freed of

> his/her ahamkara.

> Looking forward to your reply.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

 

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> >

> > || OM TAT SAT||

> > Dear Visti,

> > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ?

Either

you

> > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by

Gita

> > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> >

> > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

radiant

> > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

constellations I am

> > the Moon."

> >

> > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

Surya as

> > Ahamkara?

> >

> > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a

witness

of

> > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara

Principle

> > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> >

> > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as

> > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the

eye

of the

> > three worlds?

> >

> > regards,

> > nitish

> >

> > sohamsa

<sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight

bondages of

the atma?

> > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu),

Akasha

(guru), Agni

> > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi

(budha).

> > >

> > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes

of the

kala

> > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

 

anahata chakra.

> > >

> > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is

futile

without any

> > > of this.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > >

> > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes

naturally only

to a

> > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to

serve their

families;

> > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true

sense of

the term.

> > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and

contentment

of our

> > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's

purely

selfish.

> > > >

> > > > P

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%

40>

> > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

Nitish and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as

well but

really

> > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and

' aham'

which are

> > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only

in Sun

AK.

> > However

> > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others

as it does

not come

> > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away

from them so

easily

> > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma,

then the '

I '

> > will

> > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > >

> > > > Best

> > > > Sharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

<sohamsa

 

> > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji, Nitish

and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > >

> > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in

the hope

of

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself

disagreeing subtly

> > in the

> > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the

exchange

I find

> > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a

lot of sense

> > to me:

> > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level

as the

> > effacement

> > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".

> > > >

> > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural

knowledge

you both

> > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I

dont think

it is

> > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See,

English

> > also has

> > > > a lot of words which have subtly different

meanings, and the

right

> > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who

has a

> > exaggerated

> > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this

world has

that

> > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it

is plain

> > wrong to

> > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously

observe that

> > he also

> > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say

"yes,

that is

> > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds

of people

I know

> > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK,

and not

only

> > that

> > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > >

> > > > I personally think the only statement that can be

observed

> > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are

egocentric

i.e.

> > their

> > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather

than the

> > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.

> > egocentricity does

> > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes

them go

through

> > > > experiences in life such that their core self is

tested. How

they

> > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other

astrological

> > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make,

based on pure

> > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to

divinity

through

> > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is

 

egocentric.

> > > >

> > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share

her data)

> > who was

> > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher

degree

> > that she

> > > > worked hard for, then get married and then

divorced, then

have her

> > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then

have her

> > brother get

> > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her

too), then

> > (she) get

> > > > married again and her husband develop terminal

cancer very

soon

> > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a

strong and

> > consistent

> > > > support outside of herself - she has become self

reliant and

only

> > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She

is

probably

> > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any

outstanding

way at

> > > > all, and probably much less than all the people

around her..

> > > >

> > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK

people

must

> > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a

general lesson

> > for all

> > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them

towards

divinity

> > > > through experiences that make them focus on

themselves and

search

> > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much

more to

the

> > > > point.

> > > >

> > > > Comments?

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is

not always

> > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be

nothing less

than

> > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the

right way of

> > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > Tijana

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

 

deep/shallow,

> > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a

basis only

in

> > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a

basis i.e.

> > separation

> > > > of

> > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only

though) and

hence

> > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind

of karma

involved.

> > > > >

> > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th

part of the

> > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part,

it becomes its

> > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that

sign/house

towards

> > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to

your specific

> > > > queries.

> > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the

truth of your

queries.

> > > > >

> > > > > best regards,

> > > > > nitish

> > > > >

> > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijanadamjanovic"

> > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised

in these

discussions

> > > > on Atma

> > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of

serving.

> > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn

principles of artha

> > shastra to

> > > > serve,

> > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to

differentiate? I

> > assume

> > > > you

> > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into

account also

> > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne,

but regarding

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja

yoga whose deepest

> > meaning

> > > > is

> > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas

(refer

Vivekananda) .

> > > > Only in

> > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the

perfect King.

What

> > artha

> > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is

what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita

Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the

cosmos has chosen to

work.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only

SUN AK has to

> > "serve", all

> > > > AKs

> > > > > > > "serve".

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun

AK gives a person

akin to

> > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to

Janaka -

jivanmukta -

> > > > provided

> > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based

on this?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people

to take Dhartharastra

as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from

6th house. Leo

being a

> > > > dharma

> > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of

service through

10th

> > > > house of

> > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a

Sun AK should learn

> > > > principles of

> > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will

hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as

there is nothing else

> > to be

> > > > done

> > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna

has already

achieved

> > > > everything

> > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the

three worlds(refer

Gita).

> > > > Those who

> > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to

serve, whatever be

> > their

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm

bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a

coincidence that His Master

had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting

his karma/desires.

Thus,

> > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to

exhaust his

remaining

> > > > karma/

> > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK).

There is no more

> > substance

> > > > to

> > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic

relationship of the two

which

> > > > continued

> > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even

more brilliant if you

had

> > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is

what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are

you implying that Sun

AK

> > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you

determing dharma

based on

> > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to

take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will

hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm

bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > But do

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that

His Master had exalted

> > Saturn

> > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"yeeahoo_99"

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > What is the thing

that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra

and ancient texts that

show

> > > > what

> > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure

that his subjects are

protected

> > > > and

> > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary

path. Look at krishna,

Janaka

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and

you will understand

whatever

> > > > that "hardly

> > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to.

> > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your

statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > anything

> > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope

and the rest of the

> > karakas (BK,

> > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will

follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is

"Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"

(serving

> > > > every

> > > > > > > > > being as the full

manifestation of God) that

> > Narendranath

> > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > from his Master

Ramakrishna who had Sun in

Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda

had developed peculiar

> > sharpness

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > perception and

assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from

the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius,

he could, as compared to

> > others,

> > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in

the words of Sri

Ramakrishna,

> > > > even

> > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > the Master told them in

simple language (Aq Sun),

and

> > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With its dispositor

Jupiter in Libra, gradually

Swami

> > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips

and hints on practical

Vedanta

> > > > that

> > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > benefit individual and

collective life in the

society.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual

persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...),

otherwise it`s very hard

task..."

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like

you have done is not

> > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in

Aries and had attained

> > highest

> > > > level

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun

AK is placed in Libra, it

> > could

> > > > be the

> > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual

power of a sign over the

rest of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and

this spiritual power

manifests

> > > > through

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its

sign placement.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"tijana" <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its

qualities are those of Raja

> > (karaka

> > > > for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of

the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > What is

> > > > the

> > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly

ever do? The lesson that

has

> > to be

> > > > learnt

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in

the highest sence it gives

> > "Shiva

> > > > jnane

> > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man

as God)-the divine lesson

> > given to

> > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK).

For spiritual persons Sun

as AK

> > > > should be

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs

(Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very

> > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>,

"v reality" <reality_v@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for

your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask

another query re Sun AK. The

lesson

> > to be

> > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction

of ego. Can this also be

understood

> > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > as the

effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >To:

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > >Wed,

22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA

KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >I would add

that with Gu AK person have to be

very

> > > > humble to

> > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > >techers and

natives, like priests, gurus,

teachers.

> > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > >practise

Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > native is

> > > > always

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > >and gives

emotions but the problem is that

they

> > never

> > > > get

> > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > >themselves

from other people. The person must

learn

> > > > lessons

> > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > >people

represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > father

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > >grahas

represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > >Take few

examples of people you know and see

it in

> > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat

Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal

Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah

adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Person

should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri

Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email:

rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish

pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > v reality

napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > This is an

interesting discussion. Could we

> > discuss

> > > > other

> > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > in an

article that natives with Moon as AK

need to

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > and loving

to others. But I know of a chart

where

> > > > the

> > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > nature very

caring, loving and concerned

about

> > > > others

> > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > is the

lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >To:

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Date:

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum

namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN

Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju

AK person should learn to respect

others

> > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >should

be ready to learn from others. When

Ju

> > is in

> > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >himself

then native thinks that he knows

> > everything

> > > > and

> > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > >His

knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

of

> > > > course

> > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA

AK person should learn to catalyze

> > energies

> > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > >other

techniques, while with JU AK person

should

> > > > learn to

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >like

kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

not so

> > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

good

> > > > placement

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > >be not

so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal

Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri

Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > >email:

rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish

pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN

Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile.

<http://mobile./

 

> > <http://mobile./>> /

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile.

<http://mobile./

 

> > <http://mobile./>> /

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

____________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________

> > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

for just

> > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

<http://a.ninemsn./

 

> > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.

> > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > >

>2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

2Fci%

> > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > >

>2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru

Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > for

articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com

> > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >-----------

--------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the

right car based on your needs.

Check out

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________

_________ _________

> > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement:

Make shopping exciting. Find

what you

> > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

 

> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http%

3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1%

2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > >

3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

Internet in your

> > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > -------------------------

> > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > >

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> >

> > > > someone who knows.

> > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited. The idea therefore, has to be rejected. Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita has to be studied properly under a Guru.Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Vistiji,

 

I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

 

However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

substantiate this?

 

By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a

jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper

must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

authorize him to do so.

 

In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

(jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read

(though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people

in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker "

koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of

the bondages - they always have all 8.

 

Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

dig deeper into your wisdom..

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

 

sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> Thank you for your reply.

> Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

Durga.

> Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

all

> Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that

Vishnu

> being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

that.

>

> See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the

> nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

> actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

eclipses.

> Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

based on

> the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its

only a

> representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

>

> The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

just as

> the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among

those

> born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.

Divine

> souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

being at

> one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

Hitler

> (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.

>

> Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to

look at

> God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

at God

> as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

Shiva

> who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

>

> So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

atmakaraka is

> Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the

concept

> of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be

freed of

> his/her ahamkara.

> Looking forward to your reply.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> >

> > || OM TAT SAT||

> > Dear Visti,

> > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either

you

> > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita

> > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> >

> > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

radiant

> > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

constellations I am

> > the Moon. "

> >

> > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

Surya as

> > Ahamkara?

> >

> > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness

of

> > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara

Principle

> > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> >

> > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as

> > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

of the

> > three worlds?

> >

> > regards,

> > nitish

> >

> > sohamsa <

sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of

the atma?

> > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha

(guru), Agni

> > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > >

> > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the

kala

> > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

anahata chakra.

> > >

> > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile

without any

> > > of this.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > >

> > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only

to a

> > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their

families;

> > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of

the term.

> > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment

of our

> > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely

selfish.

> > > >

> > > > P

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > sohamsa <

sohamsa%

40>

> > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

Nitish and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but

really

> > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'

which are

> > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun

AK.

> > However

> > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does

not come

> > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so

easily

> > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '

I '

> > will

> > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > >

> > > > Best

> > > > Sharat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -

> > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

<sohamsa

> > <sohamsa%40>>

> > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

and

> > > > v_reality)

> > > >

> > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > >

> > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope

of

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly

> > in the

> > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange

I find

> > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense

> > to me:

> > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the

> > effacement

> > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .

> > > >

> > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge

you both

> > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think

it is

> > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English

> > also has

> > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the

right

> > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a

> > exaggerated

> > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has

that

> > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain

> > wrong to

> > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that

> > he also

> > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes,

that is

> > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people

I know

> > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not

only

> > that

> > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > >

> > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed

> > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric

i.e.

> > their

> > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the

> > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.

> > egocentricity does

> > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go

through

> > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How

they

> > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological

> > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure

> > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity

through

> > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is

egocentric.

> > > >

> > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)

> > who was

> > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree

> > that she

> > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then

have her

> > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her

> > brother get

> > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then

> > (she) get

> > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very

soon

> > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and

> > consistent

> > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and

only

> > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is

probably

> > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding

way at

> > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..

> > > >

> > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people

must

> > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson

> > for all

> > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards

divinity

> > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and

search

> > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to

the

> > > > point.

> > > >

> > > > Comments?

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>

 

> > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always

> > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less

than

> > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of

> > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > Tijana

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

deep/shallow,

> > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only

in

> > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.

> > separation

> > > > of

> > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and

hence

> > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma

involved.

> > > > >

> > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the

> > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its

> > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house

towards

> > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > >

> > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific

> > > > queries.

> > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your

queries.

> > > > >

> > > > > best regards,

> > > > > nitish

> > > > >

> > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " tijanadamjanovic "

 

> > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these

discussions

> > > > on Atma

> > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.

> > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha

> > shastra to

> > > > serve,

> > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I

> > assume

> > > > you

> > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also

> > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > spirituality

> > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest

> > meaning

> > > > is

> > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer

Vivekananda) .

> > > > Only in

> > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.

What

> > artha

> > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " yeeahoo_99 "

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to

work.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to

> > " serve " , all

> > > > AKs

> > > > > > > " serve " .

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person

akin to

> > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -

jivanmukta -

> > > > provided

> > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo

being a

> > > > dharma

> > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through

10th

> > > > house of

> > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn

> > > > principles of

> > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else

> > to be

> > > > done

> > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already

achieved

> > > > everything

> > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer

Gita).

> > > > Those who

> > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > their

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master

had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.

Thus,

> > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

remaining

> > > > karma/

> > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more

> > substance

> > > > to

> > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two

which

> > > > continued

> > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " tijana " <nix_nixen@>

wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you

had

> > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

in

> > mind

> > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun

AK

> > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

based on

> > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > example!

> > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > lagna in

> > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > itself).

> > > > But do

> > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > Saturn

> > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > needed

> > > > these?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " yeeahoo_99 "

<nitish.arya@ >

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

show

> > > > what

> > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are

protected

> > > > and

> > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,

Janaka

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

whatever

> > > > that " hardly

> > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > anything

> > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > karakas (BK,

> > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva "

(serving

> > > > every

> > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that

> > Narendranath

> > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar

> > sharpness

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > others,

> > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri

Ramakrishna,

> > > > even

> > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),

and

> > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

Swami

> > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical

Vedanta

> > > > that

> > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the

society.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

task... "

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not

> > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained

> > highest

> > > > level

> > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > could

> > > > be the

> > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the

rest of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power

manifests

> > > > through

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " tijana " <nix_nixen@>

 

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > (karaka

> > > > for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > What is

> > > > the

> > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

has

> > to be

> > > > learnt

> > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > " Shiva

> > > > jnane

> > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > given to

> > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

as AK

> > > > should be

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very

> > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>, " v reality " <reality_v@>

 

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

lesson

> > to be

> > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be

understood

> > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be

very

> > > > humble to

> > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

teachers.

> > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > native is

> > > > always

> > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that

they

> > never

> > > > get

> > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must

learn

> > > > lessons

> > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > father

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see

it in

> > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we

> > discuss

> > > > other

> > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

need to

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart

where

> > > > the

> > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned

about

> > > > others

> > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect

others

> > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When

Ju

> > is in

> > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows

> > everything

> > > > and

> > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

of

> > > > course

> > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > energies

> > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person

should

> > > > learn to

> > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

not so

> > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

good

> > > > placement

> > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <

http://mobile./

> > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile. <

http://mobile./

> > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________

> > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

for just

> > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./

> > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.

> > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

2Fci%

> > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com

> > <http://www.jatavedas.com/ <

http://www.jatavedas.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.

Check out

> > > >

> > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find

what you

> > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. com.au/

<http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your

> > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > -------------------------

> > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > >

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

 

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./dir/_ylc=

 

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> >

> > > > someone who knows.

> > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri SoulTo call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure! That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why strengthen the ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under bondage " . In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is not a question of happening. Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. Thanks and RegardsBharatOn 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <soulsadhak wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into which the beings Return.

When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute, is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

 

The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that-Absolute within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

 

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu wrote:>> Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish

> > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes> from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is> something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying

> something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than> Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are

> saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything> limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless

> Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita

> has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent wrote:

> >> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

> > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

> >> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that> > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

> > substantiate this?> >> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

> > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > authorize him to do so.> >> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

> > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

> > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only> > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

> > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker " > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

> > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > the bondages - they always have all 8.> >> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

> > dig deeper into your wisdom..> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sundeep> >> > sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>, Visti Larsen> > visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >> > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > Thank you for your reply.> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

> > Durga.> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are> > all> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > Vishnu

> > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > that.> > >> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

> > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as> > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > eclipses.> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

> > based on> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > only a> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > >

> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,> > just as> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > those> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.> > Divine> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > being at> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

> > Hitler> > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > >> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to> > look at

> > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > at God> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of> > Shiva> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

> > >> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > atmakaraka is> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > concept

> > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > freed of> > > his/her ahamkara.> > > Looking forward to your reply.> > >> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > email: visti@ <

visti@> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > http://srigaruda.com

> > > <http://srigaruda.com>> > >> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > >

> > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > Dear Visti,> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either> > you> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita

> > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > >> > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the> > radiant> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

> > constellations I am> > > > the Moon. " > > > >> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > Surya as> > > > Ahamkara?

> > > >> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness> > of> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > Principle

> > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > >> > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

> > of the> > > > three worlds?> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > nitish> > > >> > > >

sohamsa <sohamsa%40> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>,> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > >

> > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of> > the atma?> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha

> > (guru), Agni> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).> > > > >> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the

> > kala> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the> > anahata chakra.> > > > >> > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile

> > without any> > > > > of this.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > <http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > >> > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > >> > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only

> > to a> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > families;> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of

> > the term.> > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > of our> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely

> > selfish.> > > > > >> > > > > > P> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > 40>> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > Nitish and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but> > really> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > which are> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun

> > AK.> > > > However> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > not come> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so

> > easily> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > I '> > > > will> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > >> > > > > > Best> > > > > > Sharat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > -

> > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com> > <sohamsa@

<sohamsa%40>> > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>>> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM> > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

> > and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,> > > > > >> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope

> > of> > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly> > > > in the> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange

> > I find> > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense> > > > to me:> > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the

> > > > effacement> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge

> > you both> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > it is> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English

> > > > also has> > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the> > right> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a

> > > > exaggerated> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has> > that> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain

> > > > wrong to> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that> > > > he also> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes,

> > that is> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people> > I know> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not

> > only> > > > that> > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > >> > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed

> > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric> > i.e.> > > > their> > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the

> > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.> > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > through

> > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How> > they> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure

> > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > through> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > egocentric.

> > > > > >> > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > who was> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree

> > > > that she> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > have her> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her

> > > > brother get> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > (she) get> > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very

> > soon> > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and> > > > consistent> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and

> > only> > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > probably> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding

> > way at> > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..> > > > > >> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people

> > must> > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson> > > > for all> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards

> > divinity> > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > search> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to

> > the> > > > > > point.> > > > > >> > > > > > Comments?> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, nix nixen> > <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always> > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less

> > than> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > >> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

> > deep/shallow,> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > in> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.> > > > separation> > > > > > of> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > hence> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma

> > involved.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its

> > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > towards> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your

> > queries.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > >> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>,> > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > discussions

> > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha

> > > > shastra to> > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > assume> > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also> > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > > > spirituality> > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > meaning> > > > > > is> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer

> > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > What> > > > artha> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>, " yeeahoo_99 " > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to> > work.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to

> > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > " serve " .> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person

> > akin to> > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -> > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

> > as an> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo

> > being a> > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through> > 10th> > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else

> > > > to be> > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > achieved> > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer> > Gita).> > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > > > their> > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master

> > had> > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.

> > Thus,> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > remaining> > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more

> > > > substance> > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > which> > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, " tijana " > > <nix_nixen@>> > wrote:> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you

> > had> > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > my question.> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun> > AK

> > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma> > based on> > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted> > > > Saturn> > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, " yeeahoo_99 " > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

> > show> > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > protected

> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > Janaka

> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand> > whatever> > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do> > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > > > karakas (BK,> > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva " > > (serving> > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

> > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > sharpness

> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > > > others,> > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > and

> > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

> > Swami> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical> > Vedanta> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > society.> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > Jupiter`s> > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > task... " > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained> > > > highest> > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it> > > > could> > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the

> > rest of> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power

> > manifests> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>, " tijana " > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > > > (karaka> > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > > > What is> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

> > has> > > > to be> > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > > > " Shiva> > > > > > jnane> > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > > > given to> > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

> > as AK> > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

> > very> > > > > > hard task.> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, " v reality " > > <reality_v@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The> > lesson> > > > to be> > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > understood> > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > very> > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > all> > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

> > teachers.> > > > > > With Ma> > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > native is> > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that

> > they> > > > never> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must

> > learn> > > > > > lessons> > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > > > father> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > it in> > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we> > > > discuss

> > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > need to> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart> > where> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > already> > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned

> > about> > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > others> > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > Ju

> > > > is in> > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > everything> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > can share> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

> > of> > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > comes> > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > > > energies> > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > should> > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > not so

> > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

> > good> > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the> > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <

http://mobile./> > > > <http://mobile./>>

/> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><

http://mobile. <http://mobile./> > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________> > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > for just> > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > 2Fci%> > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com> > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.

> > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > what you> > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://a.ninemsn. com.au/> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > <

http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

> > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -------------------------> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > > > >> > > >> > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > link=list & sid=396545469> > > >

> > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > >> > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >

> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just one thought more,... here the word " Happening " means that it something is the cause and merging is an effect. So the sentence refutes the same.Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindu wrote:

Namaste Sri SoulTo call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure! That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why strengthen the ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under bondage " . In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is not a question of happening. Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. Thanks and RegardsBharatOn 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <

soulsadhak wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into which the beings Return.

When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute, is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

 

The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that-Absolute within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

 

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu wrote:

>> Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish

> > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes> from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is> something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying

> something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than> Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are

> saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything> limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless

> Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita

> has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent wrote:

> >> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

> > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

> >> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that> > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please

> > substantiate this?> >> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

> > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > authorize him to do so.> >> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by

> > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can

> > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only> > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

> > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker " > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

> > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > the bondages - they always have all 8.> >> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to

> > dig deeper into your wisdom..> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sundeep> >> >

sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>, Visti Larsen> > visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >> > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > Thank you for your reply.> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

> > Durga.> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are> > all> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > Vishnu

> > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > that.> > >> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

> > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as> > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > eclipses.> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

> > based on> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > only a> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > >

> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,> > just as> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > those> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully

> > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.> > Divine> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > being at> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph

> > Hitler> > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > >> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to> > look at

> > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > at God> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of> > Shiva> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

> > >> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > atmakaraka is> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > concept

> > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > freed of> > > his/her ahamkara.> > > Looking forward to your reply.> > >> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > email: visti@ <

visti@> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > http://srigaruda.com

> > > <http://srigaruda.com>> > >> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > >

> > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > Dear Visti,> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either> > you> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita

> > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > >> > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the> > radiant> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

> > constellations I am> > > > the Moon. " > > > >> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > Surya as> > > > Ahamkara?

> > > >> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness> > of> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > Principle

> > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > >> > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

> > of the> > > > three worlds?> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > nitish> > > >> > > >

sohamsa <sohamsa%40> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>,> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:> > > > >

> > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > >

> > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of> > the atma?> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha

> > (guru), Agni> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).> > > > >> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the

> > kala> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the> > anahata chakra.> > > > >> > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile

> > without any> > > > > of this.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > <http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > >> > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > >> > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only

> > to a> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > families;> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of

> > the term.> > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > of our> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely

> > selfish.> > > > > >> > > > > > P> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > >

sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > 40>> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

 

> > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > Nitish and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but> > really> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > which are> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun

> > AK.> > > > However> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > not come> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so

> > easily> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > I '> > > > will> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > >> > > > > > Best> > > > > > Sharat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > -

> > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com> > <sohamsa@

<sohamsa%40>> > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>>> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

> > and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,> > > > > >> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope

> > of> > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly> > > > in the> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange

> > I find> > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense> > > > to me:> > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the

> > > > effacement> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge

> > you both> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > it is> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English

> > > > also has> > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the> > right> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a

> > > > exaggerated> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has> > that> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain

> > > > wrong to> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that> > > > he also> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes,

> > that is> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people> > I know> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not

> > only> > > > that> > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > >> > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed

> > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric> > i.e.> > > > their> > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the

> > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.> > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > through

> > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How> > they> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure

> > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > through> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > egocentric.

> > > > > >> > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > who was> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree

> > > > that she> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > have her> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her

> > > > brother get> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > (she) get> > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very

> > soon> > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and> > > > consistent> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and

> > only> > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > probably> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding

 

> > way at> > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..> > > > > >> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people

> > must> > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson> > > > for all> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards

> > divinity> > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > search> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to

> > the> > > > > > point.> > > > > >> > > > > > Comments?> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, nix nixen> > <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > wrote:> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always> > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less

> > than> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > >> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

> > deep/shallow,> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > in> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.> > > > separation> > > > > > of> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > hence> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma

> > involved.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its

> > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > towards> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your

> > queries.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > >> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>,> > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > discussions

> > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha

> > > > shastra to> > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > assume> > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also> > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > > > spirituality> > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > meaning> > > > > > is> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer

> > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > What> > > > artha> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>, " yeeahoo_99 " > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to> > work.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to

> > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > " serve " .> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person

> > akin to> > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -> > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

> > as an> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo

> > being a> > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through> > 10th> > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else

> > > > to be> > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > achieved> > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer> > Gita).> > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > > > their> > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master

> > had> > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.

> > Thus,> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > remaining> > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more

> > > > substance> > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > which> > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, " tijana " > > <nix_nixen@>

> > wrote:> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you

> > had> > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > my question.> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun> > AK

> > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma> > based on> > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted> > > > Saturn> > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, " yeeahoo_99 " > > <nitish.arya

@ >> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

> > show> > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > protected

> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > Janaka

> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand> > whatever> > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do> > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > > > karakas (BK,> > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva " > > (serving> > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

> > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > sharpness

> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > > > others,> > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > and

> > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

> > Swami> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical> > Vedanta> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > society.> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > Jupiter`s> > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > task... " > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained> > > > highest> > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it> > > > could> > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the

> > rest of> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power

> > manifests> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>, " tijana " > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > > > (karaka> > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > > > What is> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

> > has> > > > to be> > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > > > " Shiva> > > > > > jnane> > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > > > given to> > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

> > as AK> > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

> > very> > > > > > hard task.> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>, " v reality " > > <reality_v@>

> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The> > lesson> > > > to be> > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > understood> > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > very

> > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > all> > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

> > teachers.> > > > > > With Ma> > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > native is> > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that

> > they> > > > never> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must

> > learn> > > > > > lessons> > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > > > father> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > it in> > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we> > > > discuss

> > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > need to> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart> > where> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > already> > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned

> > about> > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > others> > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > Ju

> > > > is in> > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > everything> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > can share> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

> > of> > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > comes> > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > > > energies> > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > should> > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > not so

> > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

> > good> > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the> > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <

http://mobile./> > > > <http://mobile./>>

/> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><

http://mobile. <http://mobile./> > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________> > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > for just> > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > 2Fci%> > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com> > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.

> > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > what you> > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://a.ninemsn. com.au/> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > <

http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

> > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -------------------------> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers

> > > > > >> > > >> > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > link=list & sid=396545469> > > >

> > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > >> > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >

> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking aloud: What we are discussing right now is what we have been taught; what we have studied in scriptures. Obviously intretations differ; words differ; meanings differ. Sometimes it's better to learn from life than to parrot scriptures!

 

Yes, nothing is impure, that is, everything is pure--I would love to see all of us applying this in real life and embracing Osama Bin Laden with love if we confront him rather than running away in terror.

 

Discussions are easier than life!

Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindusohamsa Sent: Friday, September 7, 2007 12:11:40 PMRe: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

Just one thought more,... here the word "Happening" means that it something is the cause and merging is an effect. So the sentence refutes the same.Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindu@ gmail.com> wrote:

Namaste Sri SoulTo call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure! That you feel impure is different from "being" impure. Why strengthen the ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying "Atman is under bondage". In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is not a question of happening. Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. Thanks and RegardsBharat

 

On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak < soulsadhak > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into which the beings Return.

When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute, is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due to ignorance/darkness) , mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that- Absolute within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

sohamsa@ .com, "Bharat - Hindu Astrology" <astrologyhindu@ ...> wrote: >> Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes> from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is> something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than> Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything> limited is subject to

change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > >

> On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ ... wrote: > >> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed. > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me). > >> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that> > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please > > substantiate this?> >> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages (in a> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4 > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > authorize him to do so.> >> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only> > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > in various stages of

enlightenment have progressively "weaker"> > koshas/sareeras/ parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar, > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > the bondages - they always have all 8.> >> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sundeep> >> > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40>, Visti Larsen> > visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ?????? > > >

> > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > Thank you for your reply.> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is > > Durga.> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are> > all> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > Vishnu > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > that.> > >> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as> > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > eclipses.> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find > >

based on> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > only a> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > >> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,> > just as> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > those> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.> > Divine> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > being at> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph > > Hitler> > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > >> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there

are EIGHT ways to> > look at > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > at God> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of> > Shiva> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun. > > >> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > atmakaraka is> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > concept > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > freed of> > > his/her ahamkara.> > > Looking forward to your reply.> > >> > > Yours sincerely, > > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > email: visti@ < visti@> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > http://srigaruda.com> > > <http://srigaruda.com>> > >> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > Dear Visti,> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either> > you> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > >> > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the> > radiant> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the > > constellations I am> > >

> the Moon."> > > >> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > Surya as> > > > Ahamkara? > > > >> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness> > of> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > Principle > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > >> > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye > > of the> > > > three worlds?> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > nitish> > > >> > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > 40. com>,> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of> > the atma?> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha > > (guru), Agni> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).> > > > >> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the > > kala> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the> > anahata chakra.> > > > >> > > > > Really any talk on the

atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile > > without any> > > > > of this.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com < http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > <http://srigaruda.com < http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > >>

> > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > >> > > > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes naturally only > > to a> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > families;> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of > > the term.> > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > of our> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely > > selfish.> > > > > >> > > > > > P> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

 

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou ps.com> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > 40. com>> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > Nitish and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya|| > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but> > really> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly. > > > >

> > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > which are> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun > > AK.> > > > However> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > not come> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so > > easily> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > I '> > > > will> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '. > > > > > >> > > > > > Best> > > > > > Sharat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > - > > > > >

> ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > <sohamsa <sohamsa%40>> > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>>> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish > > and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,> > > > > >> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope > > of> >

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly> > > > in the> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange > > I find> > > > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a lot of sense> > > > to me:> > > > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level as the > > > > effacement> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge > > you both> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > it is> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English > > > > also has> > > > > > a lot of

words which have subtly different meanings, and the> > right> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has> > that> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain > > > > wrong to> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that> > > > he also> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say "yes, > > that is> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds of people> > I know> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not > > only> > > > that> > > > > > may not even

have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > >> > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric> > i.e.> > > > their> > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.> > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > through > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How> > they> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure > > > > > >

experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > through> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > egocentric. > > > > > >> > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > who was> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree > > > > that she> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > have her> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her > > > > brother get> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > (she) get> > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very > > soon> > >

> > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and> > > > consistent> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and > > only> > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > probably> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding > > way at> > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..> > > > > >> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people > > must> > > > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a general lesson> > > > for all> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards > > divinity> > > > > > through

experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > search> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to > > the> > > > > > point.> > > > > >> > > > > > Comments?> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, nix nixen

> > <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is not always> > > > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be nothing less > > than> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > >> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma - > >

deep/shallow,> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > in> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.> > > > separation> > > > > > of> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > hence> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma > > involved.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > towards> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your > > queries.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > >> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>,

> > "tijanadamjanovic"> > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > discussions > > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha > > > > shastra to> > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > assume> > > > > > you > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account

also> > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding > > > > > > spirituality> > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > meaning> > > > > > is> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > What> > > > artha> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind? > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99"

> > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to> > work.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > there is nothing

specific that only SUN AK has to > > > > "serve", all> > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > "serve".> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person > > akin to> > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -> > jivanmukta - > > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > >

> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra > > as an> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo > > being a> > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through> > 10th> > > > > > house of > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly

ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as there is nothing else > > > > to be> > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > achieved> > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer> > Gita).> > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be > > > > their> > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in> > > > lagna in> > > > > >

Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master > > had> > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami > > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires. > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > remaining> > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There

is no more > > > > substance> > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > which> > > > > > continued > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > NITISH > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, "tijana"

> > <nix_nixen@> > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you > > had> > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > my question.> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun> > AK > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing

dharma> > based on> > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in > > > > lagna in> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > But do > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted> > > > Saturn> > > > > > in 9th > > > > > > > > > >

bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, "yeeahoo_99"

> > <nitish.arya @ >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that > > show> > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > protected > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > >

progress> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > Janaka > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand> > whatever> > > > > > that "hardly> > > > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to. > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do> > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the > > > > karakas (BK,> > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"> > (serving> > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > sharpness > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > unusual power> > > > >

> > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > Ramakrishna, > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > and> > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With its

dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually > > Swami> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical> > Vedanta> > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > Jupiter`s> > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard > > task..."> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > wise. Sri > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained> > > > highest> > > > > > level > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it> > > > could> > > > > > be the > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the > > rest of> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > >

signs/> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power> > manifests> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, "tijana"

> > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja > > > > (karaka> > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th). > > > > What is> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that > > has> > > > to be> > > > > >

learnt> > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives > > > > "Shiva> > > > > > jnane> > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man as God)-the divine lesson > > > > given to> > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun > > as AK> > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s > > very> > > > > > hard task.> > > >

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, "v reality"> > <reality_v@> > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated. > > > >

> > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The> > lesson> > > > to be> > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > understood> > > > > > at a > > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>

 

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > very> > > > > > humble to > > > > > > > > > all> > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus, > > teachers.>

> > > > > With Ma> > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the > > > > native is> > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that > > they> > > > never> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must > > learn> > > > > >

lessons> > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy / > > > > father> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > it in> > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we> > > > discuss > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I

read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK > > need to> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart> > where> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > already> > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned > > about> >

> > > > others> > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > >what > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > others> > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > Ju> > > > is in> > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > everything> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > can share> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers > > of> > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > comes> >

> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > should> > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > focused on > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > not so> > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in > >

good> > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > then it > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>LN Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the> > > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. < http://mobile./> > > > <http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>< http://mobile. <http://mobile./> > > > < http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car > > for just> > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. < http://a.ninemsn./> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F% > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > 2Fci%> > > > > > 5F450304% > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda s.com> > > > <http://www.jataveda s.com/ <http://www.jataveda s.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs. > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > what you> > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. com.au/> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > < http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F% > > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_

taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >

>> > > > > >> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers > > > > > >> > > >> > <http://us.rd. /evt=48254/*http://answers. /dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469> > > > > > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers. /dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from > > > >> > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri PromilaWhat can I say - A impatient response without effective reasoning and seriously misjudging the intelligence of others. Thanks and RegardsBharatOn 9/7/07, Promila Chitkara <promilac wrote:

 

 

 

 

Thinking aloud: What we are discussing right now is what we have been taught; what we have studied in scriptures. Obviously intretations differ; words differ; meanings differ. Sometimes it's better to learn from life than to parrot scriptures!

 

 

Yes, nothing is impure, that is, everything is pure--I would love to see all of us applying this in real life and embracing Osama Bin Laden with love if we confront him rather than running away in terror.

 

Discussions are easier than life!

Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindu@

gmail.com>sohamsa Sent: Friday, September 7, 2007 12:11:40 PMRe: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

Just one thought more,... here the word " Happening " means that it something is the cause and merging is an effect. So the sentence refutes the same.Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Bharat - Hindu Astrology <

astrologyhindu@ gmail.com> wrote:

Namaste Sri SoulTo call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure! That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why strengthen the ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under bondage " . In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is not a question of happening. Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. Thanks and RegardsBharat

 

On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <

soulsadhak > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into which the beings Return.

When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute, is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due to ignorance/darkness) , mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that- Absolute within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

 

sohamsa@ .com, " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu@ ...> wrote: >> Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes> from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is

> something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than

> Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything

> limited is subject to

change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > >

> On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ ... wrote: > >> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed. > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and

> > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me). > >> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that

> > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please > > substantiate this?> >> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages (in a> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4 > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must

> > authorize him to do so.> >> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

> > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

> > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > in various stages of

enlightenment have progressively " weaker " > > koshas/sareeras/ parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar, > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> >> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sundeep> >

> > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>, Visti Larsen> > visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ?????? > > >

> > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > Thank you for your reply.> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is > > Durga.> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

> > all> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > Vishnu > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > that.

> > >> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as

> > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > eclipses.> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find > >

based on> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > only a> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > >> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

> > just as> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > those> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.

> > Divine> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > being at> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph > > Hitler

> > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > >> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there

are EIGHT ways to> > look at > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > at God> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

> > Shiva> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun. > > >> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > atmakaraka is

> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > concept > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > freed of> > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > Looking forward to your reply.> > >> > > Yours sincerely, > > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ < visti@> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com> > > <

http://srigaruda.com>> > >> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > Dear Visti,> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either

> > you> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > >> > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

> > radiant> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the > > constellations I am> > >

> the Moon. " > > > >> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > Surya as> > > > Ahamkara? > > > >> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness

> > of> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > Principle > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > >

> > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye > > of the> > > > three worlds?

> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > nitish> > > >> > > >

sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > 40. com>,> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of

> > the atma?> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha > > (guru), Agni> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > > > >> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the > > kala> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

> > anahata chakra.> > > > >> > > > > Really any talk on the

atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile > > without any> > > > > of this.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > --

> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <

visti@>> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > > >

http://srigaruda.com < http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > <

http://srigaruda.com < http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > >>

> > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > >> > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only > > to a> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > families;> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of > > the term.> > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > of our> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely > > selfish.> > > > > >> > > > > > P> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

 

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> >

40. com>> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > Nitish and> > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > >> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya|| > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but

> > really> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly. > > > >

> > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > which are> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun > > AK.

> > > > However> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > not come> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so > > easily> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > I '> > > > will> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '. > > > > > >> > > > > > Best> > > > > > Sharat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > - > > > > >

> ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > <sohamsa@

. com <sohamsa%40>> > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>>> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish > > and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > >> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope > > of> >

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly> > > > in the> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange > > I find

> > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense> > > > to me:> > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the > > > > effacement> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge > > you both> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > it is> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English > > > > also has> > > > > > a lot of

words which have subtly different meanings, and the> > right> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has

> > that> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain > > > > wrong to> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that

> > > > he also> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes, > > that is> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people

> > I know> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not > > only> > > > that> > > > > > may not even

have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > >> > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric

> > i.e.> > > > their> > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (

i.e.> > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > through > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How

> > they> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure > > > > > >

experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > through> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > egocentric. > > > > > >

> > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > who was> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree

> > > > that she> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > have her> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her > > > > brother get> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > (she) get> > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very > > soon> > >

> > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and> > > > consistent> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and > > only

> > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > probably> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding > > way at

> > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..> > > > > >> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people

> > must> > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson> > > > for all> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards > > divinity> > > > > > through

experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > search> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to > > the> > > > > > point.

> > > > > >> > > > > > Comments?> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, nix nixen

> > <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always> > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less > > than

> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma - > >

deep/shallow,> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > in> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.

> > > > separation> > > > > > of> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > hence> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma > > involved.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > towards> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your > > queries.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > >> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>,

> > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > discussions > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha > > > > shastra to> > > > > > serve,

> > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > assume> > > > > > you > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account

also> > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > meaning> > > > > > is> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > What> > > > artha> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind? > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>, " yeeahoo_99 "

> > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to

> > work.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > there is nothing

specific that only SUN AK has to > > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > " serve " .> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person > > akin to> > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -

> > jivanmukta - > > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > >

> > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra > > as an> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo > > being a> > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through

> > 10th> > > > > > house of > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly

ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else > > > > to be> > > > > > done

> > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > achieved> > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer

> > Gita).> > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be > > > > their> > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in> > > > lagna in> > > > > >

Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master > > had> > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami > > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires. > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > remaining> > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There

is no more > > > > substance> > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > which> > > > > > continued > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > NITISH > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, " tijana "

> > <nix_nixen@> > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you > > had> > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun

> > AK > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing

dharma> > based on> > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted> > > > Saturn> > > > > > in 9th > > > > > > > > > >

bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>, " yeeahoo_99 "

> > <nitish.arya @ >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that > > show> > > > > > what

> > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > protected > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > >

progress> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > Janaka > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

> > whatever> > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to. > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the > > > > karakas (BK,

> > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva " > > (serving> > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > sharpness > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > unusual power> > > > >

> > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > Ramakrishna, > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > and

> > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With its

dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually > > Swami> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical

> > Vedanta> > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the

> > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard > > task... " > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > wise. Sri > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained

> > > > highest> > > > > > level > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > > > could> > > > > > be the > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the > > rest of> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > >

signs/> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power> > manifests> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>, " tijana "

> > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja > > > > (karaka> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th). > > > > What is> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that > > has> > > > to be> > > > > >

learnt> > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives > > > > " Shiva> > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson > > > > given to> > > > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun > > as AK> > > > > > should be

> > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s > > very> > > > > > hard task.

> > > >

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>, " v reality " > > <reality_v@> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated. > > > >

> > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The> > lesson> > > > to be> > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > understood> > > > > > at a > > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>

 

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > very> > > > > > humble to > > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus, > > teachers.>

> > > > > With Ma> > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the > > > > native is> > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that > > they> > > > never> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must > > learn> > > > > >

lessons> > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy / > > > > father> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > it in> > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa

.. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we

> > > > discuss > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I

read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK > > need to> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart

> > where> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned > > about> >

> > > > others> > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > >what > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > others

> > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > Ju> > > > is in> > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > everything

> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers > > of> > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > comes

> >

> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be > > > > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > should> > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > focused on > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > not so

> > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in > >

good> > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > then it > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>LN Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

http://mobile. < http://mobile./> > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><

http://mobile. <

http://mobile./> > > > < http://mobile./>>

/> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car > > for just> > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F% > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > 2Fci%> > > > > > 5F450304% > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com> > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs. > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > what you> > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > >

www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn

.. com.au/> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > <

http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F% > > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_

taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >

>> > > > > >> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers > > > > > >

> > > >> > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469

> > > > > > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from > > > >> > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

Need a vacation?

Get great deals to amazing places on Travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri SoulTruly so... so shouldn't when we interpret our scriptures- think on polishing the view rather than reaffirming the wrong view?I rest my case.Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <soulsadhak wrote:

 

 

 

 

As the Vision, so is the View.

It is only those who See Beyond Dualities do not distinguish b/w Pure and Impure; Self and Absolute; I and Vishnu...

Rest are still trying to polish their Vision.

Jyotisha is one way of Being One with The True Vision.

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu wrote:>> Namaste Sri Soul

> > To call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is> impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are> impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure!

> > That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why strengthen the> ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative> thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under

> bondage " .> > In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is> not a question of happening.> > Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further

> comments to your further responses.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak wrote:

> >> > Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into> > which the beings Return.> >> > When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute,

> > is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due> > to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic> > (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

> >> > The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until> > the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that-Absolute> > within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

> >> >> > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:> > >> > > Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish

> > >> > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage> > comes> > > from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it> > is

> > > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like> > saying> > > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> > > Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other

> > than> > > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we> > are> > > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> > > that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything

> > > limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling> > changeless> > > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > >> > > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.

> > >> > > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad> > Gita> > > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > >> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Vistiji,

> > > >> > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.> > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

> > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).> > > >> > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the

> > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that> > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please> > > > substantiate this?

> > > >> > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a> > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

> > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > > > authorize him to do so.

> > > >> > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by> > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply

> > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can> > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only

> > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some> > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker "

> > > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,> > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > >> > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to> > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> > > >> > > > Thanks,

> > > >> > > > Sundeep> > > >> > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>, Visti> > Larsen> > > > visti@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > >> > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > > > Thank you for your reply.> > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is> > > > Durga.> > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

> > > > all> > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > > > Vishnu> > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

> > > > that.> > > > >> > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are

> > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as> > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > > > eclipses.> > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find

> > > > based on> > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > > > only a> > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.

> > > > >> > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,> > > > just as> > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among

> > > > those> > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully> > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.> > > > Divine

> > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > > > being at> > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph> > > > Hitler

> > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > > > >> > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to> > > > look at

> > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > > > at God> > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of

> > > > Shiva> > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.> > > > >> > > > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

> > > > atmakaraka is> > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > > > concept> > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be

> > > > freed of> > > > > his/her ahamkara.> > > > > Looking forward to your reply.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >

> > > > > --> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <

visti@> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > > http://srigaruda

..com> > > > > <http://srigaruda.com>> > > > >> > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> > > > > >> > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > > > Dear Visti,> > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either

> > > > you> > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita> > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > > > >> > > > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the

> > > > radiant> > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the> > > > constellations I am> > > > > > the Moon. " > > > > > >

> > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > > > Surya as> > > > > > Ahamkara?> > > > > >> > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness

> > > > of> > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > > > Principle> > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> > > > > >> > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

> > > > of the> > > > > > three worlds?> > > > > >> > > > > > regards,> > > > > > nitish> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>> > <> > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of

> > > > the atma?> > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha> > > > (guru), Agni> > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the> > > > kala> > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

> > > > anahata chakra.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile> > > > without any> > > > > > > of this.

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > --> > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@

>> > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > > > >

http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > > > <

http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only> > > > to a

> > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > > > families;> > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of

> > > > the term.> > > > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > > > of our> > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely

> > > > selfish.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > P> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>> > > > > > > > sohamsa

<sohamsa%40>> > <> > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>> > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM> > > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > > > Nitish and> > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||> > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but> > > > really> > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > > > which are> > > > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun

> > > > AK.> > > > > > However> > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > > > not come> > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so

> > > > easily> > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > > > I '> > > > > > will> > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Best> > > > > > > > Sharat> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <

vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com> > > > <

sohamsa <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

40>>> > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM> > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

> > > > and> > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope> > > > of> > > > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly

> > > > > > in the> > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange> > > > I find> > > > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense

> > > > > > to me:> > > > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the> > > > > > effacement> > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge> > > > you both> > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think

> > > > it is> > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English> > > > > > also has> > > > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the

> > > > right> > > > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a> > > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has

> > > > that> > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain> > > > > > wrong to> > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that

> > > > > > he also> > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes,> > > > that is> > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people

> > > > I know> > > > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not> > > > only> > > > > > that> > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed> > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric

> > > > i.e.> > > > > > their> > > > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the> > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (

i.e.> > > > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > > > through> > > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How

> > > > they> > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure

> > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > > > through> > > > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is

> > > > egocentric.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > > > who was

> > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree> > > > > > that she> > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then

> > > > have her> > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her> > > > > > brother get> > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then

> > > > > > (she) get> > > > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very> > > > soon> > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and

> > > > > > consistent> > > > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and> > > > only> > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is

> > > > probably> > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding> > > > way at> > > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people> > > > must> > > > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson

> > > > > > for all> > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards> > > > divinity> > > > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and

> > > > search> > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to> > > > the> > > > > > > > point.> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Comments?> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>40>,> > nix nixen> > > > <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always

> > > > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less> > > > than> > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of

> > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -

> > > > deep/shallow,> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > > > in> > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.> > > > > > separation> > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > > > hence

> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma> > > > involved.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the

> > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its> > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific

> > > > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your> > > > queries.> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

40>,> > > > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these

> > > > discussions> > > > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha

> > > > > > shastra to> > > > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > > > assume

> > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also> > > > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding> > > > > > > > spirituality> > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest

> > > > > > meaning> > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer> > > > Vivekananda) .

> > > > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > > > What> > > > > > artha

> > > > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>40>,> > " yeeahoo_99 " > > > > <

nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had> > > > in> > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to> > > > work.> > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to> > > > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > " serve " .

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person> > > > akin to> > > > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -> > > > jivanmukta -> > > > > > > > provided

> > > > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

> > > > as an> > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo

> > > > being a> > > > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through> > > > 10th

> > > > > > > > house of> > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > > > principles of

> > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > > > achieved> > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer> > > > Gita).> > > > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > > > > > their> > > > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > > > lagna in> > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master> > > > had> > > > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > > > needed> > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.> > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

> > > > remaining> > > > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more> > > > > > substance

> > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > > > which> > > > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>40>,> > " tijana " > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you> > > > had> > > > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had> > > > in> > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun> > > > AK> > > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

> > > > based on> > > > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an> > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > > > lagna in> > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do> > > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > > > > > Saturn> > > > > > > > in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

40>,> > " yeeahoo_99 " > > > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

> > > > show> > > > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are

> > > > protected> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,

> > > > Janaka> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand> > > > whatever

> > > > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.> > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > > > > > karakas (BK,> > > > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva "

> > > > (serving> > > > > > > > every> > > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > > > Narendranath

> > > > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in> > > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > > > sharpness> > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to> > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > > > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),

> > > > and> > > > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually> > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical

> > > > Vedanta> > > > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the

> > > > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > > > > > Jupiter`s> > > > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > > > task... " > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not

> > > > > > wise. Sri> > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained

> > > > > > highest> > > > > > > > level> > > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > > > > > could> > > > > > > > be the> > > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the> > > > rest of> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power> > > > manifests> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>40>,> > " tijana " > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja> > > > > > (karaka> > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).> > > > > > What is> > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that> > > > has> > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives> > > > > > " Shiva

> > > > > > > > jnane> > > > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > > > > > given to> > > > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

> > > > as AK> > > > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

> > > > very> > > > > > > > hard task.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>40>,

> > " v reality " > > > > <reality_v@>> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

> > > > lesson> > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > > > understood> > > > > > > > at a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > > > sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > > > very> > > > > > > > humble to> > > > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,> > > > teachers.

> > > > > > > > With Ma> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > > > native is> > > > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that> > > > they> > > > > > never> > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must

> > > > learn> > > > > > > > lessons> > > > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /> > > > > > father> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see

> > > > it in> > > > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > > > Best> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we> > > > > > discuss

> > > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > > > need to> > > > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart> > > > where

> > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > native> > > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned> > > > about

> > > > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@

..com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect

> > > > others> > > > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > > > Ju> > > > > > is in> > > > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows

> > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > now> > > > > > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > can share> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers> > > > of

> > > > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > > > comes> > > > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze> > > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person

> > > > should> > > > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > > > focused on> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > > > not so> > > > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in> > > > good> > > > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > then it> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the> > > > > > > > Internet in> > > > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <

http://mobile./> > > > > > <http://mobile./>>

/> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><

http://mobile. <http://mobile./> > > > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > > > for just> > > > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > > > 2Fci%

> > > > > > > > 5F450304%> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com> > > > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.> > > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > > > what you> > > > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://a.ninemsn. com.au/> > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > > > <

http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%> > > > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---> > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > -------------------------> > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers> > > > > > > >

> > > > > >> > > > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > > > link=list & sid=396545469

> > > > > >> > > > <http://us.rd.

/evt=48254/*http://answers.

/dir/_ylc=> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > > > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥Respected Param Guru Vistiji,

 

Namaskar. I have some doubts at the basics.

If the AK is in say Kanya as in my case(Rahu) and Jupiter and Saturn are in Dhanus and Ketu, LL(Budha) and Moon are in Pisces then what would that entail? How to arrive at the JL as 8th from Ju would be Mars and from Saturn would be Ju again and what about the planets in the subsequent kendra?

Or have I missed something vital???

 

Nalini

 

 

 

Visti Larsen <vistisohamsa Sent: Friday, 7 September, 2007 3:55:52 AMRe: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥

Dear SS, NamaskarThank you for your reply.Here follows my clarifications to your points. Your points are given in italics.

 

the charakaraka represents relevant bondage of the veiled soul. (somehow i feel bondage/bandhana is different in shade from ahamkara/ego)Visti: Ahamkara is one of the eight bondages. That way thinking it isn't is in itself causing the bondage.

 

it's 8th from the planet in kendra to AK that has to be treated with JL mantraVisti: Yes.

 

the natural order for counting of the weekdays is: Su (1) , Mo(2), Ma (3), Me(4), Ju (5), Ve(6), Sa(7), Ra(8), Ke(9)Bingo.

- though i don't really get why Ke wud be included when it is excluded from the 8-charakarakas.Ke as such represents severing of any bondage. Is it because it is the natural karaka (as things exist in creation) hence included for weekdays ?

Visti: Once Ketu is included in a scheme, it means we are no longer looking at the jeevatma, but the paramatma... no longer the individual but God. It is through God that we overcome our weaknesses.

Thanx a tonne

Visti: Your of course welcome.

Yours sincerely, -- Visti Larsen - SJC GuruJaimini SJC - Denmark email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) comFor consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda. com Soul Sadhak wrote:

 

Many thanx Visti, that clarifies.

if i get it right,

 

the charakaraka represents relevant bondage of the veiled soul. (somehow i feel bondage/bandhana is different in shade from ahamkara/ego)

it's 8th from the planet in kendra to AK that has to be treated with JL mantra

the natural order for counting of the weekdays is: Su (1) , Mo(2), Ma (3), Me(4), Ju (5), Ve(6), Sa(7), Ra(8), Ke(9)

- though i don't really get why Ke wud be included when it is excluded from the 8-charakarakas.

Ke as such represents severing of any bondage. Is it because it is the natural karaka (as things exist in creation) hence included for weekdays ?

Thanx a tonne

SSsohamsa@ .com, Visti Larsen <visti wrote:>> ??? ??? ??????> > Dear SS, Namaskar> Glad to hear you liked it.> Here is my answer to your questions:> > 1. Its specifically ahamkara. Thats why among the bandhanas, the Sun/AK > is associated with Ahamkara. So also each charakaraka has a natural and > functional bondage associated with it.> > 2. We use all nine in the scheme, viz: surya, soma, mangala, budha, > brhaspati, brighu, shani, rahu and sikhi.> We take the eighth planet in the weekday-order from the planet in > kendra. Example if Jupiter is in kendra to Atmakaraka, we may experience > ahamkara towards the guru and knowledge. Count the eighth from Jupiter, > viz: (1)guru, (2)shukra,

(3)shani, (4)rahu, (5)ketu, (6)surya, > (7)chandra and (8) mangala. So we advise Bhimashankara or Bagalasundari > worship for this issue to be resolved. This is practiced in the > tradition to ensure the students continue learning.> > Hope this helps.> Yours sincerely,> > -- > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> Jaimini SJC - Denmark> email: visti <visti@ ...> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda. com > <http://srigaruda. com>> > Soul Sadhak wrote:> >> > Dear Visti,> >> > This is a beautiful explaination indeed.>

>> > Please can u elaborate a bit more on this:> >> > 1. "Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the Sun, so also all planets > > in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have ahamkara. "> >> > Did u mean to say 'bondage' instead of 'ahamkara', or using the term > > synonymously - why i ask is because we associate the term Ego > > (ahamkara) with Sun astrological sense (though Su is Self at a certain > > level or that which is not liberated or is veiled yet).> >> > 2. ....worship the planet presiding over the eighth weekday from those > > planets in kendra to AK to remove the ahamkara. Example: for Mars as > > atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday order is the Sun.> >> > Sorry for my ignorance, but is the order as follows:> >> > 1- Sun; 2- Moon; 3- Mars; 4- Mercury; 5-

Jupiter;> > 6- Venus; 7- Saturn; /(8-Rahu ?)/> >> > - if so, then how to count the 8th from Ma as Su?> >> > also, is the 8th taken from planet kendra to AK or do we take 8th from > > AK itself?> >> > Many thanx> >> > SS.> >> > sohamsa@ .com, Visti Larsen visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ??????> > >> > > Dear Sundeep, Namaskar> > > I'm glad you liked the discussion.> > > Did you miss the citations from the Shiva purana?> > > Comments to your questions:> > >> > > /I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.> > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > >

scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).> > > /> > >> > > Visti: Glad to know.> > >> > > /However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that> > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please> > > substantiate this?> > > /> > >> > > Visti: The second sloka i qouted stated that there are> > > i) eight bondages;> > > ii) these are on the jeevatma;> > > iii) without _controlling_ these bondages one will not achieve mukti.> > >> > > The implication of points i) and ii) imply that we are speaking of an> > > animate being (jeevaatma) and that

it is bound down by eight bondages.> > > The logical inference here is that these are the eight charakaraka. Let> > > me add here that when you read the dhyana bindu upanishad you learn of> > > the eight petals surrounding the heart, and that the atma takes on> > > different emotions, states and natures during its movement through > > these> > > eight petals.> > > Now comes the problem: If the atma resides in the heart and is> > > surrounded by these eight petals, then why is the Atmakaraka one of> > > these eight petals? The answer is: because the atma believes it is one> > > of these petals! What a predicament! From this we also learn that all> > > eight of the charakarakas are ALL different aspects of our OWN atma.> > > It is our luck that the Shiva purana teaches us that these are indeed>

> > bondages, and manifest in the eight forms of prakriti.> > >> > > To clarify, its not just the atmakaraka which focuses on each of these> > > bondages, but each charakaraka individually is bound down by these> > > bondages. Example: Where the seventh from AK shows the desires which> > > caused this birth, the Darakaraka itself shows the desires latent from> > > the last life, which continuously color our likes and dislikes in> > > relationships and financial matters... Another bondage. So all eight> > > show a bondage.> > >> > > /By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a> > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4> > > walls have to be broken down in

order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > > authorize him to do so.> > > /> > >> > > /In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by> > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can> > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one).> > > /> > >> > > Visti: I think it was the fourth sloka of the same samhita, where it> > > reads that the eight bondages are caused due to karma. Example: If I in> > > my past life thought that great rajayoga comes from having a great> > > bathroom or swimming pool or living next to a river, and

would > > strive to> > > attain that, then surely in this life i will be bound by that desire > > and> > > have Moon as my Darakaraka. So the karma caused the Bandhana, and this> > > is what i believe Shiva Purana tried to explain.> > >> > > / I have read> > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only> > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some> > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"> > > koshas/sareeras/ /> > >> > > Visti: In these two paragraphs you have been focusing on walls, sharira> > > and koshas. I understand your perspective, but where the five koshas> > > relate to the five stages of

consciousness (the 16 divisional charts),> > > and the three shariras relate to the Sun, Moon and Lagna, really the> > > eight bondages are on the atma whose existance is prominent in one of> > > the shariras.> > > But because the Atma invariably is the cause of all the shariras to> > > exist to begin with, it has an overriding sway in the persons existence.> > >> > > /parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,> > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > > the bondages - they always have all 8./> > >> > > Visti: Yes, i clarified that all have all eight, just as all have eight> > > charakaraka. Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the Sun, so also all> > > planets in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have ahamkara. In the> > >

tradition we are taught to worship the planet presiding over the eighth> > > weekday from those planets in kendra to AK to remove the ahamkara.> > > Example: for Mars as atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday order is> > > the Sun. So the native should worship Shiva in the Rameshvara> > > Jyotirlinga form to overcome their ahamkara.> > >> > > /Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to> > > dig deeper into your wisdom../> > >> > > Hope this helps.> > > Looking forward to your reply.> > > Yours sincerely,> > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > email: visti@ <visti@> > > For

consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda. com> > > <http://srigaruda. com>> > >> > > vedicastrostudent wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Vistiji,> > > >> > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.> > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).> > > >> > > > However, it is an unverified

logical leap from there to the> > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that> > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please> > > > substantiate this?> > > >> > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a> > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4> > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > > > authorize him to do so.> > > >> > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by> > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that

karma> > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can> > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only> > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some> > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively "weaker"> > > > koshas/sareeras/ parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,> > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.> > > >> > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply

trying to> > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> > > >> > > > Thanks,> > > >> > > > Sundeep> > > >> > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa% 40. com>,> > > > Visti Larsen visti@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > >> > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > > > Thank you for your reply.> > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is> > > > Durga.> > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are> > > > all> > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying

that> > > > Vishnu> > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > > > that.> > > > >> > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are> > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as> > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > > > eclipses.> > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find> > > > based on> > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > > > only a> > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > > > >> > >

> > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,> > > > just as> > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > > > those> > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully> > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.> > > > Divine> > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > > > being at> > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph> > > > Hitler> > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > > > >> > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to> > > > look at> > > > > God

through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > > > at God> > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of> > > > Shiva> > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.> > > > >> > > > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > > > atmakaraka is> > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > > > concept> > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > > > freed of> > > > > his/her ahamkara.> > > > > Looking forward to your reply.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > --> > > > > Visti

Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > > http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>> > > > > <http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>>> > > > >> > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||>

> > > > > Dear Visti,> > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either> > > > you> > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita> > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > > > >> > > > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the> > > > radiant> > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the> > > > constellations I am> > > > > > the Moon."> > > > > >> > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > > > Surya as> > > > > > Ahamkara?> > > > > >> > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a

witness> > > > of> > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > > > Principle> > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > > > >> > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye> > > > of the> > > > > > three worlds?> > > > > >> > > > > > regards,> > > > > > nitish> > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa% 40. com>> > > > <sohamsa%> > > > 40. com>,> > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of> > > > the atma?> > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha> > > > (guru), Agni> > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).> > > > > > >> > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the> > > > kala> > > > > > > chakra, which are

simultaneously the eight spokes of the> > > > anahata chakra.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile> > > > without any> > > > > > > of this.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > --> > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>> > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > > > > http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com> <http://srigaruda. com> > > > <http://srigaruda. com>>> > > > > > > <http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>> > > > <http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>>>> > > >

> > >> > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes naturally only> > > > to a> > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > > > families;> > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of> > > > the term.> > > > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > > > of our> > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely> > > > selfish.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > P> > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > <sohamsa% 40. com>> > > > <sohamsa%> > > > 40. com>> > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM> > > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > > > Nitish and> > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||> > > > > > > > Dear

Sundeep,> > > > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but> > > > really> > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.> > > > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > > > which are> > > > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun> > > > AK.> > > > > > However> > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > > > not come> > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so> > > > easily> > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > > > I '> > > > >

> will> > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Best> > > > > > > > Sharat> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrost udent@>> > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com> > > > <sohamsa <sohamsa% 40.

com>> > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>>> > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM> > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish> > > > and> > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope> > > > of> > > > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly> > > > > > in the> > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the

exchange> > > > I find> > > > > > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a lot of sense> > > > > > to me:> > > > > > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level as the> > > > > > effacement> > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge> > > > you both> > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > > > it is> > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English> > > > > > also has> > > > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the>

> > > right> > > > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a> > > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has> > > > that> > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain> > > > > > wrong to> > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that> > > > > > he also> > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say "yes,> > > > that is> > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds of people> > > > I know> > > > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not> >

> > only> > > > > > that> > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed> > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric> > > > i.e.> > > > > > their> > > > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the> > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.> > > > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > > > through> > > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How> > > >

they> > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure> > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > > > through> > > > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > > > egocentric.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > > > who was> > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree> > > > > > that she> > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > > > have her> > > > >

> > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her> > > > > > brother get> > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > > > (she) get> > > > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very> > > > soon> > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and> > > > > > consistent> > > > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and> > > > only> > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > > > probably> > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding> > > > way at> > > > > >

> > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people> > > > must> > > > > > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a general lesson> > > > > > for all> > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards> > > > divinity> > > > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > > > search> > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to> > > > the> > > > > > > > point.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Comments?> > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, nix nixen <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is not always> > > > > > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be nothing less> > > > than> > > > > > > >

Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -> > > > deep/shallow,> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > > > in> > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.> > > > > > separation> > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > soul

from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > > > hence> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma> > > > involved.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its> > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > > > towards> > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > > > Hopefully,

in time, you will discover the truth of your> > > > queries.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "tijanadamjanovic"> > > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> >

> > discussions> > > > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha> > > > > > shastra to> > > > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > > > assume> > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also> > > > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding> > > > > > > > spirituality> > > > > >

> > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > > > meaning> > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer> > > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > > > What> > > > > > artha> > > > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99"> > > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had> > > > in> > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.> > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to> > > > work.> > > > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to> > > > > > "serve", all> > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > "serve".> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person> > > > akin to> > > > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -> > > > jivanmukta -> > > > > > > >

provided> > > > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra> > > > as an> > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo> > > > being a> > > > > > > >

dharma> > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through> > > > 10th> > > > > > > > house of> > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as there is nothing else> > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because

Krishna has already> > > > achieved> > > > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer> > > > Gita).> > > > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be> > > > > > their> > > > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in> > > > > > lagna in> > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > > > itself).> > > > > > > > >

> > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master> > > > had> > > > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > > > needed> > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.> > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > > > remaining> > > > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more> > > > > >

substance> > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > > > which> > > > > > > > continued> > > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "tijana" <nix_nixen@>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you> > > > had> > > > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > > > my question.> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had> > > > in> > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun> > > > AK> > > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing

dharma> > > > based on> > > > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an> > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in> > > > > > lagna in> > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > > > itself).> > > > > > > > But do> > > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had

exalted> > > > > > Saturn> > > > > > > > in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > > > needed> > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99"> > > > <nitish.arya@

>> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that> > > > show> > > > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > > > protected> >

> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > > > Janaka> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand> > > > whatever> > > > > > > > that "hardly> > > > > > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to.> > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do> > > > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the> > > > > >

karakas (BK,> > > > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"> > > > (serving> > > > > > > > every> > > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in> > > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >

> > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > > > sharpness> > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to> > > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > > >

Ramakrishna,> > > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > > > and> > > > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually> > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical> > > > Vedanta> > > > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > > could> > > >

> > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > > > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > > > Jupiter`s> > > > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard> > > > task..."> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > > > wise. Sri> > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in

Aries and had attained> > > > > > highest> > > > > > > > level> > > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it> > > > > > could> > > > > > > > be the> > > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the> > > > rest of> > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual

power> > > > manifests> > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "tijana" <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja> > > > > > (karaka> > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).> > > > > > What is> > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that> > > > has> > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > learnt>

> > > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives> > > > > > "Shiva> > > > > > > > jnane> > > > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man as God)-the divine lesson> > > > > > given to> > > > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun> > > > as AK> > > > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs

(Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s> > > > very> > > > > > > > hard task.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "v reality" <reality_v@>> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The> > > > lesson> > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > > > understood> > > > > > > > at a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > >

> sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > >

> > <sohamsa% 40. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > > > very> > > > > > > > humble to> > > > > > > > > > > all> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,> > > > teachers.> > > > > > > > With Ma> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the> > > > > > native is> > > > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that> > > > they> > > > > > never> >

> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must> > > > learn> > > > > > > > lessons> > > > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /> > > > > > father> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > > > it in> > > > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > > > Best> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÃ…,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we> > > > > > discuss> > > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives

with Moon as AK> > > > need to> > > > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart> > > > where> > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > native> > > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > already> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned>

> > > about> > > > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > > >

others> > > > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > > > Ju> > > > > > is in> > > > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > now> >

> > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > > > can share> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers> > > > of> > > > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > > > comes> > > > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be> > > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to

catalyze> > > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > > > should> > > > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > > > focused on> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > > > not so> > > > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in> > > > good> > > > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > then it>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >>LN Kumar> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the> > > > > > > > Internet in> > > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile. /> > > > <http://mobile. />> > > > > > <http://mobile. / <http://mobile. />>> /> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile. <http://mobile. /> > > > <http://mobile. />> > > > > > <http://mobile. / <http://mobile. />>> /> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________> > > > > >

_________> > > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car> > > > for just> > > > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <http://a.ninemsn. /> > > > <http://a.ninemsn.

/>> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn. / <http://a.ninemsn. />>> com.au/b.> > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > > > 2Fci%> > > > > > > > 5F450304%> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > > >

_t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda s.com> > > > > > <http://www.jataveda s.com/ <http://www.jataveda s.com/>> > > >

<http://www.jataveda s.com/ <http://www.jataveda s.com/>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.> > > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________> > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > > > what you> > > > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. com.au/> > > > <http://a.ninemsn. com.au/ <http://a.ninemsn. com.au/>> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn. com.au/ <http://a.ninemsn. com.au/>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%> > > > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---> > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers. / dir/_ylc=> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers. / dir/_ylc=>> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI

EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > > > link=list & sid=396545469> > > > > >> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers. / dir/_ylc=> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers. / dir/_ylc=>> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > > >

link=list & sid=396545469>>from> > > > > >> > > > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >>Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bharat,

 

Please weigh your words before you shoot them. In one of your earlier mails you said "Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses."

 

After making that statement you have replied thrice.

 

I think it's you who wrote in hurry.

 

Reasoning? Reasoning is always based on five senses! One needs to go beyond five senses/reasoning to realize the truth. Reason can only help you pass judgements!

 

Light!

Promila

 

Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindusohamsa Sent: Friday, September 7, 2007 1:29:57 PMRe: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

Namaste Sri PromilaWhat can I say - A impatient response without effective reasoning and seriously misjudging the intelligence of others. Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Promila Chitkara <promilac > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thinking aloud: What we are discussing right now is what we have been taught; what we have studied in scriptures. Obviously intretations differ; words differ; meanings differ. Sometimes it's better to learn from life than to parrot scriptures!

 

Yes, nothing is impure, that is, everything is pure--I would love to see all of us applying this in real life and embracing Osama Bin Laden with love if we confront him rather than running away in terror.

 

Discussions are easier than life!

 

Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindu@ gmail.com>sohamsa@ .comFriday, September 7, 2007 12:11:40 PMRe: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

Just one thought more,... here the word "Happening" means that it something is the cause and merging is an effect. So the sentence refutes the same.Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Bharat - Hindu Astrology < astrologyhindu@ gmail.com> wrote: Namaste Sri SoulTo call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure! That you feel impure is different from "being" impure. Why strengthen the ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying "Atman is under bondage". In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is not a question of happening. Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. Thanks and RegardsBharat

 

On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak < soulsadhak > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into which the beings Return.

When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute, is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due to ignorance/darkness) , mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that- Absolute within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

sohamsa@ .com, "Bharat - Hindu Astrology" <astrologyhindu@ ...> wrote: >> Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes> from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything > limited is subject

to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > >

> On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ ... wrote: > >> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed. > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me). > >> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please > > substantiate this?> >> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages (in a> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4 > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must > > authorize him to do so.> >> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > in various stages of

enlightenment have progressively "weaker"> > koshas/sareeras/ parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar, > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > the bondages - they always have all 8. > >> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sundeep> >> > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou ps.com>, Visti Larsen> > visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ?????? > > > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > Thank you for your reply.> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is > > Durga.> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are > > all> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > Vishnu > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > that. > > >> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > eclipses.> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find >

> based on> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its> > only a> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > >> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya, > > just as> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > those> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara. > > Divine> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > being at> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph > > Hitler > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > >> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages,

there are EIGHT ways to> > look at > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look> > at God> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of > > Shiva> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun. > > >> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > atmakaraka is> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > concept > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > freed of> > > his/her ahamkara. > > > Looking forward to your reply.> > >> > > Yours sincerely, > > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark > > > email: visti@ < visti@> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com> > > < http://srigaruda.com>> > >> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > Dear Visti,> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either > > you> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > >> > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the > > radiant> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the > > constellations I am> >

> > the Moon."> > > >> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by> > Surya as> > > > Ahamkara? > > > >> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness > > of> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > Principle > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye > > of the> > > > three worlds? > > > >> > > > regards,> > > > nitish> > > >> > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> > > 40. com>,> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of > > the atma?> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha > > (guru), Agni> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha). > > > > >> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the > > kala> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the > > anahata chakra.> > > > >> > > > > Really any talk on

the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile > > without any> > > > > of this.> > > > >> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ < visti@>> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com < http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > < http://srigaruda.com < http://srigaruda.com>>> > > >

>> > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > >> > > > > > Do you not think that "serving others" comes naturally only > > to a> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > families;> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of > > the term.> > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > of our> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely > > selfish.> > > > > >> > > > > > P> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

 

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou ps.com> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > 40. com>> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > Nitish and> > > > > > v_reality) > > > > > >> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya|| > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but > > really> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly. > > >

> > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > which are> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun > > AK.> > > > However> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does> > not come> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so > > easily> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '> > I '> > > > will> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '. > > > > > >> > > > > > Best> > > > > > Sharat> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > - > > > >

> > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > <sohamsa <sohamsa%40>> > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>>> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish > > and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish, > > > > > >> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope > > of> >

> > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly> > > > in the> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange > > I find > > > > > > this statement made by "v_reality" which makes a lot of sense> > > > to me:> > > > > > "Can this also be understood at a different level as the > > > > effacement> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense?".> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge > > you both> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > it is> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English > > > > also has> > > > > > a lot of

words which have subtly different meanings, and the> > right> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has > > that> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain > > > > wrong to> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that > > > > he also> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say "yes, > > that is> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I can cite hundreds of people > > I know> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not > > only> > > > that> > > > > > may not

even have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > >> > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric > > i.e.> > > > their> > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical ( i.e.> > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > through > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How > > they> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure > > > > >

> experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity> > through> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > egocentric. > > > > > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)> > > > who was> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree > > > > that she> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > have her> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her > > > > brother get> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > (she) get> > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very > > soon> >

> > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and> > > > consistent> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and > > only > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > probably> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding > > way at > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..> > > > > >> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people > > must> > > > > > learn to "reduce their ego". That is simply a general lesson> > > > for all> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards > > divinity> > > > > > through

experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > search> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to > > the> > > > > > point. > > > > > >> > > > > > Comments?> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, nix nixen > > <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours "It is not always> > > > > > possible for me..." i read that your AK must be nothing less > > than> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > >> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma - > >

deep/shallow,> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > in> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e. > > > > separation> > > > > > of> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > hence> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma > > involved.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > towards> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your > > queries.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > >> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, > > "tijanadamjanovic"> > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > discussions > > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha > > > > shastra to> > > > > > serve, > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > assume> > > > > > you > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account

also> > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding > > > > > > spirituality > > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > meaning> > > > > > is> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > What> > > > artha> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind? > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> sohamsa@ .com > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99" > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to > > work.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > there is

nothing specific that only SUN AK has to > > > > "serve", all> > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > "serve".> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person > > akin to> > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka - > > jivanmukta - > > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra > > as an> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo > > being a> > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through > > 10th> > > > > > house of > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja

will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All souls have to "Serve" only as there is nothing else > > > > to be> > > > > > done > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > achieved> > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer > > Gita).> > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be > > > > their> > > > > > AK. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in> > > > lagna in> > > > >

> Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master > > had> > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami > > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires. > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > remaining> > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK).

There is no more > > > > substance> > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > which> > > > > > continued > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > NITISH > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, "tijana" > > <nix_nixen@> > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you > > had> > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > my question. > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun > > AK > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing

dharma> > based on> > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an > > > > > > example! > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in > > > > lagna in > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > But do > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted> > > > Saturn> > > > > > in 9th > > > > > > > > > >

bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99" > > <nitish.arya @ >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that > > show> > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > protected > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > >

progress> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > Janaka > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand > > whatever> > > > > > that "hardly> > > > > > > > > > > ever do" equates to. > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do > > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the > > > > karakas (BK, > > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"> > (serving> > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > sharpness > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > unusual power> > > > >

> > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > Ramakrishna, > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > and> > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With its

dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually > > Swami> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical > > Vedanta> > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > Jupiter`s > > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard > > task..."> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > wise. Sri > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained > > > > highest> > > > > > level > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it > > > > could> > > > > > be the > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the > > rest of> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > >

signs/> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power> > manifests> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, "tijana" > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja > > > > (karaka> > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th). > > > > What is> > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that > > has> > > > to be> > > > > >

learnt> > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives > > > > "Shiva> > > > > > jnane > > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > seva" (service of man as God)-the divine lesson > > > > given to> > > > > > us by > > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun > > as AK> > > > > > should be > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s > > very> > > > > > hard task. > > > >

> > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, "v reality"> > <reality_v@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated. > > > >

> > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The> > lesson> > > > to be> > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > understood> > > > > > at a > > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>

 

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > very> > > > > > humble to > > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus, > > teachers.> > > > > > With

Ma> > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the > > > > native is> > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that > > they> > > > never> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must > > learn> > > > > > lessons> > > >

> > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy / > > > > father> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > it in> > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath

Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa . com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we > > > > discuss > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK > > need to> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart > > where> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned > > about> > > > > > others>

> > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > >what > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > others> > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > Ju> > > > is in> > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > everything > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > can share > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers > > of> > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > >

> > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > should> > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > be > > > > >

> > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > focused on > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > not so> > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in > > good> > > > >

> placement> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > then it > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.

com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________ > > > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the > > > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> http://mobile.

< http://mobile./> > > > < http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>< http://mobile. < http://mobile./> > > > < http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car > > for just> > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. < http://a.ninemsn./> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F% > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > 2Fci%> > > > > > 5F450304% > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda s.com> > > > <http://www.jataveda s.com/ <http://www.jataveda s.com/>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs. > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping

exciting. Find> > what you> > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn . com.au/> > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > < http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F% > > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT>

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >

>> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers > > > > > > > > > >> > <http://us.rd. /evt=48254/*http://answers. /dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469> > > > > > <http://us.rd. /evt=48254/*http://answers. /dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from > > > >> > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Travel.

 

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri SoulNow relate Atmakaraka and its role to trying and break through this ignorance. Its questioning and its strife. It would give a different meaning altogether. Instead of trying to break the non-existent...... its role would be to reaffirm that what IS. A subtle difference can change the whole life perspective from Jyotish point of view. Isn't it?

Thanks and RegardsBharatOn 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <soulsadhak wrote:

 

 

 

 

Truly so...we Pray Asato Maa Jyotirgamaya

that The Absolute is Seen as The Absolute.

Behind the Veils of Ignorance it is forgotten - Who is trying to Understand The Self and Why.

There is no such division whatsoever - yet it Percieved so.

Vishnu's Maya.

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu wrote:>> Namaste Sri Soul>

> Truly so... so shouldn't when we interpret our scriptures- think on> polishing the view rather than reaffirming the wrong view?> > I rest my case.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat

> > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak wrote:> >> > As the Vision, so is the View.> >> > It is only those who See Beyond Dualities do not distinguish b/w Pure and

> > Impure; Self and Absolute; I and Vishnu...> >> > Rest are still trying to polish their Vision.> >> > Jyotisha is one way of Being One with The True Vision.> >

> > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:> > >> > > Namaste Sri Soul> > >

> > > To call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is> > > impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are> > > impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure!

> > >> > > That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why strengthen> > the> > > ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the

> > separative> > > thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under> > > bondage " .> > >> > > In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization

> > is> > > not a question of happening.> > >> > > Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further> > > comments to your further responses.

> > >> > > Thanks and Regards> > > Bharat> > >> > >> > >> > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:> > > >

> > > > Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source> > into> > > > which the beings Return.> > > >> > > > When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of

> > Absolute,> > > > is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava> > (generated due> > > > to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and

> > karmic> > > > (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.> > > >> > > > The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist> > until> > > > the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self

> > /part-of-that-Absolute> > > > within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.> > > >> > > >> > > >

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " > > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish> > > > >

> > > > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage> > > > comes> > > > > from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously> > thinking it

> > > > is> > > > > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is> > like> > > > saying> > > > > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and

> > omnipotent> > > > > Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something> > other> > > > than> > > > > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then,

> > we> > > > are> > > > > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other> > things> > > > > that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space.

> > Anything> > > > > limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling> > > > changeless> > > > > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.

> > > > >> > > > > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > > > >> > > > > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad> > Bhagavad

> > > > Gita> > > > > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks and Regards> > > > > Bharat> > > > >

> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Vistiji,> > > > > >> > > > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but> > > > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed.

> > > > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > > > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and> > > > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

> > > > > >> > > > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > > > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and

> > that> > > > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please> > > > > > substantiate this?> > > > > >> > > > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in

> > a> > > > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in> > a> > > > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4

> > > > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The> > jailkeeper> > > > > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > > > > > authorize him to do so.

> > > > > >> > > > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not> > by> > > > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

> > > > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > > > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages> > can> > > > > > be done individually (

e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > > > > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I> > only> > > > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some

> > > > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that> > people> > > > > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker "

> > > > > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,> > > > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one> > of> > > > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > > > >> > > > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying> > to> > > > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > >> > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > >> > > > > >

sohamsa <sohamsa%40>, Visti> > > > Larsen> > > > > > visti@ wrote:

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > > > > > Thank you for your reply.> > > > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is> > > > > > Durga.> > > > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are

> > > > > > all> > > > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying> > that> > > > > > Vishnu> > > > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than

> > > > > > that.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to> > the> > > > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras

> > are> > > > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come> > as> > > > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it

> > > > > > eclipses.> > > > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find> > > > > > based on> > > > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But

> > its> > > > > > only a> > > > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya,

> > > > > > just as> > > > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And> > among> > > > > > those> > > > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being

> > fully> > > > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara.> > > > > > Divine> > > > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

> > > > > > being at> > > > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph> > > > > > Hitler> > > > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the

> > scale.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to> > > > > > look at> > > > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

> > > > > > at God> > > > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form> > of> > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > > > > > atmakaraka is> > > > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the

> > > > > > concept> > > > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > > > > > freed of> > > > > > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > > > > > Looking forward to your reply.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > > > email: visti@ <

visti@> > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > > > >

http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > > > > > Dear Visti,> > > > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ?

> > Either> > > > > > you> > > > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by> > Gita> > > > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the> > > > > > radiant> > > > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

> > > > > > constellations I am> > > > > > > > the Moon. " > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

> > > > > > Surya as> > > > > > > > Ahamkara?> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a

> > witness> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > > > > > Principle> > > > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as> > > > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the

> > eye> > > > > > of the> > > > > > > > three worlds?> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>> > > > <> > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > > > > >

40>,> > > > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages> > of> > > > > > the atma?

> > > > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha> > > > > > (guru), Agni> > > > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of> > the> > > > > > kala> > > > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

> > > > > > anahata chakra.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile> > > > > > without any

> > > > > > > > > of this.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > --> > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <

visti@>> > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally> > only> > > > > > to a

> > > > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > > > > > families;> > > > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of

> > > > > > the term.> > > > > > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and> > contentment> > > > > > of our> > > > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely

> > > > > > selfish.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > P> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>> > > > <> > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM> > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > > > > > Nitish and> > > > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but> > > > > > really

> > > > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.> > > > > > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and '

> > aham'> > > > > > which are> > > > > > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun> > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > However

> > > > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it> > does> > > > > > not come> > > > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them

> > so> > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the> > '> > > > > > I '

> > > > > > > > will> > > > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > Sharat> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > -> > > > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <

vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa <sohamsa%40>

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>>> > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM> > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > Nitish> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the> > hope> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing

> > subtly> > > > > > > > in the> > > > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the> > exchange> > > > > > I find

> > > > > > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of> > sense> > > > > > > > to me:> > > > > > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the

> > > > > > > > effacement> > > > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge

> > > > > > you both> > > > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think> > > > > > it is> > > > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English

> > > > > > > > also has> > > > > > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and> > the> > > > > > right

> > > > > > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a> > > > > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world

> > has> > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain> > > > > > > > wrong to

> > > > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe> > that> > > > > > > > he also> > > > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes,

> > > > > > that is> > > > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of> > people> > > > > > I know> > > > > > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not

> > > > > > only> > > > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed> > > > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric

> > > > > > i.e.> > > > > > > > their> > > > > > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than> > the> > > > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (

i.e.> > > > > > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested.> > How> > > > > > they> > > > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other

> > astrological> > > > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on> > pure> > > > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity

> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > > > > > egocentric.> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her> > data)> > > > > > > > who was> > > > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree

> > > > > > > > that she> > > > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then> > > > > > have her> > > > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her

> > > > > > > > brother get> > > > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then> > > > > > > > (she) get

> > > > > > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very> > > > > > soon> > > > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and

> > > > > > > > consistent> > > > > > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant> > and> > > > > > only

> > > > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is> > > > > > probably> > > > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding

> > > > > > way at> > > > > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around> > her..> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people> > > > > > must> > > > > > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general

> > lesson> > > > > > > > for all> > > > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards> > > > > > divinity

> > > > > > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and> > > > > > search> > > > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more

> > to> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > point.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > 40>,> > > > nix nixen

> > > > > > <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not> > always> > > > > > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing

> > less> > > > > > than> > > > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way> > of> > > > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <

nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -> > > > > > deep/shallow,

> > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis> > only> > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.> > > > > > > > separation> > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and

> > > > > > hence> > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma> > > > > > involved.> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes

> > its> > > > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > > > > > towards> > > > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your> > specific> > > > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>,> > > > > > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > > > > > discussions> > > > > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha

> > > > > > > > shastra to> > > > > > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to> > differentiate? I

> > > > > > > > assume> > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also

> > > > > > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > > > > > > > spirituality> > > > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose> > deepest> > > > > > > > meaning

> > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer> > > > > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > > > > > Only in

> > > > > > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > > > > > What> > > > > > > > artha> > > > > > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>,> > > > " yeeahoo_99 " > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably> > had> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka> > 22.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen

> > to> > > > > > work.> > > > > > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to

> > > > > > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > > " serve " .> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person> > > > > > akin to> > > > > > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -> > > > > > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take> > Dhartharastra> > > > > > as an

> > > > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo

> > > > > > being a> > > > > > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through

> > > > > > 10th> > > > > > > > > > house of> > > > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should> > learn

> > > > > > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is> > serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing

> > else> > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already

> > > > > > achieved> > > > > > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer

> > > > > > Gita).> > > > > > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever

> > be> > > > > > > > their> > > > > > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK

> > in> > > > > > > > lagna in> > > > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > > > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His> > Master> > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even

> > Swami> > > > > > > > needed> > > > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his

> > karma/desires.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > > > > > remaining

> > > > > > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more> > > > > > > > substance

> > > > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > > > > > which> > > > > > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>,> > > > " tijana " > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if> > you> > > > > > had> > > > > > > > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > my question.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably> > had

> > > > > > in> > > > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that

> > Sun> > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

> > > > > > based on> > > > > > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as

> > an> > > > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is> > serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK> > in> > > > > > > > lagna in> > > > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > > > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had> > exalted> > > > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > > > > > > in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even> > Swami> > > > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > 40>,> > > > " yeeahoo_99 "

> > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever

> > do?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts

> > that> > > > > > show> > > > > > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are

> > > > > > protected> > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at

> > krishna,> > > > > > Janaka> > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

> > > > > > whatever> > > > > > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't> > do> > > > > > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the> > > > > > > > karakas (BK,> > > > > > > > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva " > > > > > > (serving> > > > > > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > > > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in> > > > > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > > > > > sharpness> > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him> > with> > > > > > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared

> > to> > > > > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri

> > > > > > Ramakrishna,> > > > > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq

> > Sun),> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually> > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical> > > > > > Vedanta> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > > > > > society.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be> > in

> > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s> > > > > > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > > > > > task... " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not

> > > > > > > > wise. Sri> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had

> > attained> > > > > > > > highest> > > > > > > > > > level> > > > > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra,

> > it> > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > be the> > > > > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the> > > > > > rest of

> > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power

> > > > > > manifests> > > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > 40>,> > > > " tijana " > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of

> > Raja> > > > > > > > (karaka> > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in

> > 10th).> > > > > > > > What is> > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

> > > > > > has> > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it> > gives> > > > > > > > " Shiva> > > > > > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine> > lesson

> > > > > > > > given to> > > > > > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons

> > Sun> > > > > > as AK> > > > > > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise

> > it`s> > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > hard task.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>,> > > > " v reality " > > > > > > <reality_v@>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

> > > > > > lesson> > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be

> > > > > > understood> > > > > > > > > > at a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different level> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

> > > > > > sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > 40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to

> > be> > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > humble to> > > > > > > > > > > > > all> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,> > > > > > teachers.> > > > > > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > > > > > native is> > > > > > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that> > > > > > they> > > > > > > > never

> > > > > > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person> > must> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > lessons

> > > > > > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy

> > /> > > > > > > > father> > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and

> > see> > > > > > it in> > > > > > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > > > > > Best> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and> > sing/hum> > > > > > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa

.. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear> > Rafalji/Members> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could> > we> > > > > > > > discuss> > > > > > > > > > other

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > > > > > need to> > > > > > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a

> > chart> > > > > > where> > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > native> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned

> > > > > > about> > > > > > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect

> > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others.> > When> > > > > > Ju> > > > > > > > is in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > now> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good> > teachers> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > course

> > > > > > > > > > > > > comes> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will

> > be> > > > > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to> > catalyze> > > > > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person

> > > > > > should> > > > > > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can> > be> > > > > > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

> > > > > > not so> > > > > > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

> > > > > > good> > > > > > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then it> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as

> > mahadasha.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________

> > _________> > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts

> > the> > > > > > > > > > Internet in> > > > > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile. <

http://mobile./> > > > > > > > <http://mobile./>>

/> > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><

http://mobile. <http://mobile./> > > > > > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > > > > > for just> > > > > > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin%> > 2Fa%

> > > > > > 2Fci%> > > > > > > > > > 5F450304%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813%> > 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > > > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://www.jataveda s.com

> > > > > > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs.> > > > > > Check out> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > > > > > what you

> > > > > > > > > > want at> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn

.. com.au/> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > > > > > <

http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323%> > 2F4%2F%> > > > > > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_

> > EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---> > > > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in

> > your> > > > > > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -------------------------

> > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > <

http://us.rd./

evt=48254/*http://answers.

/> > dir/_ylc=> > > > > >> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY> > > > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > > > > > link=list & sid=396545469> > > > > > > >> > > > > > <

http://us.rd./evt=48254/*

http://answers./> > dir/_ylc=> > > > > >> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > > > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?> > > > > > link=list & sid=396545469>>from> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > someone who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥

Dear Nalini, Namaskar

More planets entail more Jyotirlingas. Some worship Mahavidyas instead.

Yours sincerely,

 

 

--

 

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

 

nalini swamy wrote:

 

 

 

हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥

 

Respected Param Guru

Vistiji,

 

Namaskar. I have some doubts at the

basics. 

If the AK is in  say Kanya as in my

case(Rahu) and Jupiter and Saturn are in Dhanus and Ketu, LL(Budha) and

Moon are in Pisces then what would that entail? How to arrive at the JL

as  8th from Ju would be Mars and from Saturn would be Ju again and

what about the planets in the subsequent kendra?

Or have I missed something vital???

 

Nalini

 

 

 

 

 

-----

Original Message ----

Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

sohamsa

Friday, 7 September, 2007 3:55:52 AM

Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

 

हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥

 

Dear SS, Namaskar

Thank you for your reply.

Here follows my clarifications to your points. Your points are given in

italics.

 

 

the charakaraka represents relevant

bondage of the veiled soul. (somehow i

feel bondage/bandhana is different in shade from ahamkara/ego)

 

Visti: Ahamkara is one of the eight bondages. That way thinking it

isn't is in itself causing the bondage.

 

 it's 8th from the planet in kendra to

AK that has to be treated with JL mantra

 

Visti: Yes.

 

 the natural order for counting of the

weekdays is: Su (1) , Mo(2), Ma (3),

Me(4), Ju (5), Ve(6), Sa(7), Ra(8), Ke(9)

 

Bingo.

- though i don't really get why Ke

wud be included when it is excluded from the 8-charakarakas.

 

Ke as such represents severing of any

bondage. Is it because it is the natural karaka (as things exist in

creation) hence included for weekdays ?

 

Visti: Once Ketu is included in a scheme, it

means we are no longer looking at the jeevatma, but the paramatma... no

longer the individual but God. It is through God that we overcome our

weaknesses.

 

Thanx a tonne

 

Visti: Your of course welcome.

 

Yours sincerely,

--

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda. com

 

Soul Sadhak wrote:

 

 

Many thanx Visti, that clarifies.

if i get it right,

 

the charakaraka represents relevant

bondage of the veiled soul. (somehow i

feel bondage/bandhana is different in shade from ahamkara/ego)

 it's 8th from the planet in kendra to

AK that has to be treated with JL mantra

 the natural order for counting of the

weekdays is: Su (1) , Mo(2), Ma (3),

Me(4), Ju (5), Ve(6), Sa(7), Ra(8), Ke(9)

 

- though i don't really get why Ke wud be

included when it is excluded from the 8-charakarakas.

 

Ke as such represents severing of any

bondage. Is it because it is the natural karaka (as things exist in

creation) hence included for weekdays ?

Thanx a tonne

SS

sohamsa@ .com, Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear SS, Namaskar

> Glad to hear you liked it.

> Here is my answer to your questions:

>

> 1. Its specifically ahamkara. Thats why among the bandhanas, the

Sun/AK

> is associated with Ahamkara. So also each charakaraka has a

natural and

> functional bondage associated with it.

>

> 2. We use all nine in the scheme, viz: surya, soma, mangala,

budha,

> brhaspati, brighu, shani, rahu and sikhi.

> We take the eighth planet in the weekday-order from the planet in

> kendra. Example if Jupiter is in kendra to Atmakaraka, we may

experience

> ahamkara towards the guru and knowledge. Count the eighth from

Jupiter,

> viz: (1)guru, (2)shukra, (3)shani, (4)rahu, (5)ketu, (6)surya,

> (7)chandra and (8) mangala. So we advise Bhimashankara or

Bagalasundari

> worship for this issue to be resolved. This is practiced in the

> tradition to ensure the students continue learning.

>

> Hope this helps.

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti@ ...

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.

com

> <http://srigaruda.

com>

>

> Soul Sadhak wrote:

> >

> > Dear Visti,

> >

> > This is a beautiful explaination indeed.

> >

> > Please can u elaborate a bit more on this:

> >

> > 1. "Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the Sun, so also all

planets

> > in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have ahamkara. "

> >

> > Did u mean to say 'bondage' instead of 'ahamkara', or using

the term

> > synonymously - why i ask is because we associate the term Ego

 

> > (ahamkara) with Sun astrological sense (though Su is Self at

a certain

> > level or that which is not liberated or is veiled yet).

> >

> > 2. ....worship the planet presiding over the eighth weekday

from those

> > planets in kendra to AK to remove the ahamkara. Example: for

Mars as

> > atmakaraka the eighth planet in weekday order is the Sun.

> >

> > Sorry for my ignorance, but is the order as follows:

> >

> > 1- Sun; 2- Moon; 3- Mars; 4- Mercury; 5- Jupiter;

> > 6- Venus; 7- Saturn; /(8-Rahu ?)/

> >

> > - if so, then how to count the 8th from Ma as Su?

> >

> > also, is the 8th taken from planet kendra to AK or do we take

8th from

> > AK itself?

> >

> > Many thanx

> >

> > SS.

> >

> > sohamsa@ .com, Visti Larsen visti@ wrote:

> > >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

> > > I'm glad you liked the discussion.

> > > Did you miss the citations from the Shiva purana?

> > > Comments to your questions:

> > >

> > > /I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and

Nitish, but

> > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see

addressed.

> > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and

given

> > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8

bondages (and

> > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for

me).

> > > /

> > >

> > > Visti: Glad to know.

> > >

> > > /However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to

the

> > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially

removed and that

> > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you

please

> > > substantiate this?

> > > /

> > >

> > > Visti: The second sloka i qouted stated that there are

> > > i) eight bondages;

> > > ii) these are on the jeevatma;

> > > iii) without _controlling_ these bondages one will not

achieve mukti.

> > >

> > > The implication of points i) and ii) imply that we are

speaking of an

> > > animate being (jeevaatma) and that it is bound down by

eight bondages.

> > > The logical inference here is that these are the eight

charakaraka. Let

> > > me add here that when you read the dhyana bindu

upanishad you learn of

> > > the eight petals surrounding the heart, and that the

atma takes on

> > > different emotions, states and natures during its

movement through

> > these

> > > eight petals.

> > > Now comes the problem: If the atma resides in the heart

and is

> > > surrounded by these eight petals, then why is the

Atmakaraka one of

> > > these eight petals? The answer is: because the atma

believes it is one

> > > of these petals! What a predicament! From this we also

learn that all

> > > eight of the charakarakas are ALL different aspects of

our OWN atma.

> > > It is our luck that the Shiva purana teaches us that

these are indeed

> > > bondages, and manifest in the eight forms of prakriti.

> > >

> > > To clarify, its not just the atmakaraka which focuses on

each of these

> > > bondages, but each charakaraka individually is bound

down by these

> > > bondages. Example: Where the seventh from AK shows the

desires which

> > > caused this birth, the Darakaraka itself shows the

desires latent from

> > > the last life, which continuously color our likes and

dislikes in

> > > relationships and financial matters... Another bondage.

So all eight

> > > show a bondage.

> > >

> > > /By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and

is put in a

> > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages (in a

> > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean

that the 4

> > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom.

The jailkeeper

> > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction

must

> > > authorize him to do so.

> > > /

> > >

> > > /In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages

does not by

> > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

> > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must

supply

> > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the

bondages can

> > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one).

> > > /

> > >

> > > Visti: I think it was the fourth sloka of the same

samhita, where it

> > > reads that the eight bondages are caused due to karma.

Example: If I in

> > > my past life thought that great rajayoga comes from

having a great

> > > bathroom or swimming pool or living next to a river, and

would

> > strive to

> > > attain that, then surely in this life i will be bound by

that desire

> > and

> > > have Moon as my Darakaraka. So the karma caused the

Bandhana, and this

> > > is what i believe Shiva Purana tried to explain.

> > >

> > > / I have read

> > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani,

and I only

> > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I

missing some

> > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says

that people

> > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively

"weaker"

> > > koshas/sareeras/ /

> > >

> > > Visti: In these two paragraphs you have been focusing on

walls, sharira

> > > and koshas. I understand your perspective, but where the

five koshas

> > > relate to the five stages of consciousness (the 16

divisional charts),

> > > and the three shariras relate to the Sun, Moon and

Lagna, really the

> > > eight bondages are on the atma whose existance is

prominent in one of

> > > the shariras.

> > > But because the Atma invariably is the cause of all the

shariras to

> > > exist to begin with, it has an overriding sway in the

persons existence.

> > >

> > > /parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

> > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born

without one of

> > > the bondages - they always have all 8./

> > >

> > > Visti: Yes, i clarified that all have all eight, just as

all have eight

> > > charakaraka. Just as the Chara-atmakaraka is like the

Sun, so also all

> > > planets in kendra to the atmakaraka show where we have

ahamkara. In the

> > > tradition we are taught to worship the planet presiding

over the eighth

> > > weekday from those planets in kendra to AK to remove the

ahamkara.

> > > Example: for Mars as atmakaraka the eighth planet in

weekday order is

> > > the Sun. So the native should worship Shiva in the

Rameshvara

> > > Jyotirlinga form to overcome their ahamkara.

> > >

> > > /Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you,

simply trying to

> > > dig deeper into your wisdom../

> > >

> > > Hope this helps.

> > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.

com

> > > <http://srigaruda. com>

> > >

> > > vedicastrostudent wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Vistiji,

> > > >

> > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you

and Nitish, but

> > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to

see addressed.

> > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated

and given

> > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has

8 bondages (and

> > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful

for me).

> > > >

> > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from

there to the

> > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially

removed and that

> > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can

you please

> > > > substantiate this?

> > > >

> > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime

and is put in a

> > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the

4 bondages (in a

> > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically

mean that the 4

> > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get

freedom. The jailkeeper

> > > > must open the door and the court that has

jurisdiction must

> > > > authorize him to do so.

> > > >

> > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8

bondages does not by

> > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that

karma

> > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You

must supply

> > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of

the bondages can

> > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I

have read

> > > > (though not completely) a translation of

Vivekacudamani, and I only

> > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I

missing some

> > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it

says that people

> > > > in various stages of enlightenment have

progressively "weaker"

> > > > koshas/sareeras/ parts-thereof? Everyone seems to

have Ahamkar,

> > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever

born without one of

> > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > >

> > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you,

simply trying to

> > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..

> > > >

> > > > Thanks,

> > > >

> > > > Sundeep

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%

40. com>,

> > > > Visti Larsen visti@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > > > Thank you for your reply.

> > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like

saying that Rahu is

> > > > Durga.

> > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya,

Shiva and Agni are

> > > > all

> > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are

actually saying that

> > > > Vishnu

> > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us

know better than

> > > > that.

> > > > >

> > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and

this corresponds to the

> > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit

of the nakshatras are

> > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms

of devatas come as

> > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the

nakshatra it

> > > > eclipses.

> > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi

chart, we can find

> > > > based on

> > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata

represented by it. But its

> > > > only a

> > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are

not devatas.

> > > > >

> > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of

ahamkara is Surya,

> > > > just as

> > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind

is Moon. And among

> > > > those

> > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades

of those being fully

> > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete

control of ahamkara.

> > > > Divine

> > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna

Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna

> > > > being at

> > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald

Trump, Adolph

> > > > Hitler

> > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the

other end of the scale.

> > > > >

> > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there

are EIGHT ways to

> > > > look at

> > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the

Ahamkara we must look

> > > > at God

> > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And

the specific form of

> > > > Shiva

> > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for

the Sun.

> > > > >

> > > > > So please don't make the equation that

everyone with Surya

> > > > atmakaraka is

> > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional

indeed... Infact the

> > > > concept

> > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya

atmakaraka will be

> > > > freed of

> > > > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > >

> > > > > --

> > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles

visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>

> > > > > <http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>>

> > > > >

> > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||

> > > > > > Dear Visti,

> > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is

represented by Surya ? Either

> > > > you

> > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents

Ahamkara going by Gita

> > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > "Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of

all luminaries the

> > > > radiant

> > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi,

and of the

> > > > constellations I am

> > > > > > the Moon."

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of

planets are lead by

> > > > Surya as

> > > > > > Ahamkara?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring

Surya Narayan as a witness

> > > > of

> > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality

creating Ahamkara

> > > > Principle

> > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental

intelligence principle?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara

should be referred to as

> > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and

`Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye

> > > > of the

> > > > > > three worlds?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > nitish

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%

40. com>

> > > > <sohamsa%

> > > > 40. com>,

> > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking

about the eight bondages of

> > > > the atma?

> > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra),

Prakriti (rahu), Akasha

> > > > (guru), Agni

> > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu

(shani) and Prithvi (budha).

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map

into the eight spokes of the

> > > > kala

> > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the

eight spokes of the

> > > > anahata chakra.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its

EIGHT karakas is futile

> > > > without any

> > > > > > > of this.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and

articles visit:

> > > > > > http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com> <http://srigaruda.

com

> > > > <http://srigaruda. com>>

> > > > > > > <http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>

> > > > <http://srigaruda. com <http://srigaruda. com>>>

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Do you not think that "serving

others" comes naturally only

> > > > to a

> > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe

people who want to serve their

> > > > families;

> > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless

service in the true sense of

> > > > the term.

> > > > > > > > Because we know very well that

in happiness and contentment

> > > > of our

> > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and

growth! So it's purely

> > > > selfish.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > P

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > <sohamsa%

40. com>

> > > > <sohamsa%

> > > > 40. com>

> > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007

2:23:04 AM

> > > > > > > > Re: Re:

Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > > > Nitish and

> > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > > > > > Good observations, I was

following this thread as well but

> > > > really

> > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in

too quickly.

> > > > > > > > English words cant describe so

well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'

> > > > which are

> > > > > > > > different and I agree that one

cannot see this only in Sun

> > > > AK.

> > > > > > However

> > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to

learn to serve others as it does

> > > > not come

> > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant

take ' I ' away from them so

> > > > easily

> > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to

merge with Paramatma, then the '

> > > > I '

> > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > Sharat

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrost

udent@>

> > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > > > <sohamsa <sohamsa%

40. com>

> > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>>

> > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29,

2007 8:56 PM

> > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re:

Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I have been reading your

exchange with interest in the hope

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > learning something new, but I

find myself disagreeing subtly

> > > > > > in the

> > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In

fact, deep down in the exchange

> > > > I find

> > > > > > > > this statement made by

"v_reality" which makes a lot of sense

> > > > > > to me:

> > > > > > > > "Can this also be understood at

a different level as the

> > > > > > effacement

> > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual

sense?".

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none

of the scriptural knowledge

> > > > you both

> > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several

Sun AK people: I dont think

> > > > it is

> > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people

are egotistic. See, English

> > > > > > also has

> > > > > > > > a lot of words which have

subtly different meanings, and the

> > > > right

> > > > > > > > one has to be used. An

egotistic person is one who has a

> > > > > > exaggerated

> > > > > > > > sense of self-importance.

Almost everyone in this world has

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself

if you deny it), it is plain

> > > > > > wrong to

> > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK

and simultaneously observe that

> > > > > > he also

> > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of

self importance and say "yes,

> > > > that is

> > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him". I

can cite hundreds of people

> > > > I know

> > > > > > > > who are very self important and

DONT have Sun AK, and not

> > > > only

> > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun

in their chart.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I personally think the only

statement that can be observed

> > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people

is that they are egocentric

> > > > i.e.

> > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > view of the world is based on

the individual rather than the

> > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be

egotistical (i.e.

> > > > > > egocentricity does

> > > > > > > > not imply self importance) -

the AK simply makes them go

> > > > through

> > > > > > > > experiences in life such that

their core self is tested. How

> > > > they

> > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably

on lots of other astrological

> > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I

can safely make, based on pure

> > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK

people are guided to divinity

> > > > through

> > > > > > > > experiences of the self,

consequently their view is

> > > > egocentric.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont

know if I can share her data)

> > > > > > who was

> > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor)

and denied a higher degree

> > > > > > that she

> > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get

married and then divorced, then

> > > > have her

> > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather

painful way, then have her

> > > > > > brother get

> > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit

(and then leave her too), then

> > > > > > (she) get

> > > > > > > > married again and her husband

develop terminal cancer very

> > > > soon

> > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant

seem to find a strong and

> > > > > > consistent

> > > > > > > > support outside of herself -

she has become self reliant and

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in

meditation/reiki. She is

> > > > probably

> > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too,

but not in any outstanding

> > > > way at

> > > > > > > > all, and probably much less

than all the people around her..

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute

the fact that Sun AK people

> > > > must

> > > > > > > > learn to "reduce their ego".

That is simply a general lesson

> > > > > > for all

> > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK

will guide them towards

> > > > divinity

> > > > > > > > through experiences that make

them focus on themselves and

> > > > search

> > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the

statement I find much more to

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > point.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, nix nixen

<nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > Only from one simple

statement of yours "It is not always

> > > > > > > > possible for me..." i read that

your AK must be nothing less

> > > > than

> > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i

think i`m on the right way of

> > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99

<nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of

soul with paramatma -

> > > > deep/shallow,

> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all

kind of things have a basis only

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even

Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e.

> > > > > > separation

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which

is illusory only though) and

> > > > hence

> > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss

depending on the kind of karma

> > > > involved.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a

planet rules a 12th part of the

> > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively

:). Thus, in part, it becomes its

> > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide

the affairs of that sign/house

> > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may

explore it further.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > It is not always possible

for me to answer to your specific

> > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you

will discover the truth of your

> > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>,

"tijanadamjanovic"

> > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve.

The questions raised in these

> > > > discussions

> > > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the

specific way of serving.

> > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK

must learn principles of artha

> > > > > > shastra to

> > > > > > > > serve,

> > > > > > > > > > the same stands for

Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I

> > > > > > assume

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas

of the houses into account also

> > > > > > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > > > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets

service on the throne, but regarding

> > > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is

related to real Raja yoga whose deepest

> > > > > > meaning

> > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th

house of indriyas (refer

> > > > Vivekananda) .

> > > > > > > > Only in

> > > > > > > > > > that sense we can

talk of Janaka or the perfect King.

> > > > What

> > > > > > artha

> > > > > > > > > > shastra principles

you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99"

> > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill

ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > > > in

> > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

Gita in this context.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Context that was

intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > All must work if

the lord of the cosmos has chosen to

> > > > work.

> > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing

specific that only SUN AK has to

> > > > > > "serve", all

> > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > "serve".

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > But, are

you implying that Sun AK gives a person

> > > > akin to

> > > > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK

gives a person akin to Janaka -

> > > > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > > > provided

> > > > > > > > > > > enough effort

has been put in.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Are you

determing dharma based on this?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need

not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Will you

advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra

> > > > as an

> > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of

service is seen from 6th house. Leo

> > > > being a

> > > > > > > > dharma

> > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign

fulfills its purpose of service through

> > > > 10th

> > > > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is

6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn

> > > > > > > > principles of

> > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to

serve.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again,

what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > All souls have

to "Serve" only as there is nothing else

> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > done

> > > > > > > > > > > in the three

worlds because Krishna has already

> > > > achieved

> > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > that is there to

achieve in the three worlds(refer

> > > > Gita).

> > > > > > > > Those who

> > > > > > > > > > > do not serve,

are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be

> > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > >

(extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > But do you

think it`s a coincidence that His Master

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and

Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > One is not

re-born after exhausting his karma/desires.

> > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda

(Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

> > > > remaining

> > > > > > > > karma/

> > > > > > > > > > > desires with

Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more

> > > > > > substance

> > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > this than a

past-life karmic relationship of the two

> > > > which

> > > > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > > > in this birth

also.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "tijana"

<nix_nixen@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave

Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Your

elaboration would be even more brilliant if you

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill

ones own dharma is what you probably had

> > > > in

> > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in

this context. But, are you implying that Sun

> > > > AK

> > > > > > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > > > > > person akin

to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma

> > > > based on

> > > > > > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > > > > > you advise

Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an

> > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > So, again,

what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > >

(extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s

a coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and

Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami

> > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > > > Warm

regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "yeeahoo_99"

> > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om

Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear

Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do?

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Read

up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that

> > > > show

> > > > > > > > what

> > > > > > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja

has to do to ensure that his subjects are

> > > > protected

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > > > > > on the

upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,

> > > > Janaka

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

> > > > whatever

> > > > > > > > that "hardly

> > > > > > > > > > > > > ever

do" equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do

> > > > > > > > anything

> > > > > > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

king of the horoscope and the rest of the

> > > > > > karakas (BK,

> > > > > > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > GK)

i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Actually, the mantra is "Shiva jnane Jiva Seva"

> > > > (serving

> > > > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > > > being

as the full manifestation of God) that

> > > > > > Narendranath

> > > > > > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

> > > > Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Being

Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar

> > > > > > sharpness

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

perception and assimilation that empowered him with

> > > > > > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > pick

up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With

Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to

> > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see'

the deep meaning in the words of Sri

> > > > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > > > even

> > > > > > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > > > > > the

Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

preaching.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > With

its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually

> > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

started assimilating tips and hints on practical

> > > > Vedanta

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

benefit individual and collective life in the

> > > > society.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

"...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in

> > > > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

(Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > > > task..."

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Putting up statements like you have done is not

> > > > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri,

has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained

> > > > > > highest

> > > > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it

> > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

shows the spiritual power of a sign over the

> > > > rest of

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

planets in the chart and this spiritual power

> > > > manifests

> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

dispositor of AK and its sign placement.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "tijana"

<nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja

> > > > > > (karaka

> > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th).

> > > > > > What is

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that

> > > > has

> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives

> > > > > > "Shiva

> > > > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

seva" (service of man as God)-the divine lesson

> > > > > > given to

> > > > > > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun

> > > > as AK

> > > > > > > > should be

> > > > > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

> > > > very

> > > > > > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>, "v reality"

<reality_v@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

> > > > lesson

> > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> is the reduction of ego. Can this also be

> > > > understood

> > > > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual

> > > > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa% 40. com>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be

> > > > very

> > > > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >techers and natives, like priests, gurus,

> > > > teachers.

> > > > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

person must

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the

> > > > > > native is

> > > > > > > > always

> > > > > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >and gives emotions but the problem is that

> > > > they

> > > > > > never

> > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >themselves from other people. The person must

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > > lessons

> > > > > > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy /

> > > > > > father

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Take few examples of people you know and see

> > > > it in

> > > > > > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum

> > > > > > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > v reality napisaÃ…,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > This is an interesting discussion. Could we

> > > > > > discuss

> > > > > > > > other

> > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > in an article that natives with Moon as AK

> > > > need to

> > > > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

more

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > and loving to others. But I know of a chart

> > > > where

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > nature very caring, loving and concerned

> > > > about

> > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect

> > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >should be ready to learn from others. When

> > > > Ju

> > > > > > is in

> > > > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >himself then native thinks that he knows

> > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > course

> > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be

> > > > > > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze

> > > > > > energies

> > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >other techniques, while with JU AK person

> > > > should

> > > > > > > > learn to

> > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be

> > > > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its

> > > > not so

> > > > > > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in

> > > > good

> > > > > > > > placement

> > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

_________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

> > > > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>http://mobile. <http://mobile. /

> > > > <http://mobile. />

> > > > > > <http://mobile. / <http://mobile. />>> /

> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >><http://mobile. <http://mobile. /

> > > > <http://mobile. />

> > > > > > <http://mobile. / <http://mobile. />>> /

> > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car

> > > > for just

> > > > > > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > http://a.ninemsn.

<http://a.ninemsn.

/

> > > > <http://a.ninemsn. />

> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn. / <http://a.ninemsn. />>> com.au/b.

> > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%

> > > > 2Fci%

> > > > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

_r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > for articles and consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >http://www.jataveda

s.com

> > > > > > <http://www.jataveda s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>

> > > > <http://www.jataveda s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Choose the right car based on your needs.

> > > > Check out

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > ____________

_________ _________ _________ _________

> > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find

> > > > what you

> > > > > > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com.

au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> http://a.ninemsn.

com.au/

> > > > <http://a.ninemsn. com.au/ <http://a.ninemsn.

com.au/>

> > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn. com.au/ <http://a.ninemsn.

com.au/>>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

> > > > 3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ------------ ---------

--------- ---

> > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go:

Go puts the Internet in your

> > > > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos

& more.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

--------- --------- --------- -

> > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get

better travel answers

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers.

/ dir/_ylc=

> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers.

/ dir/_ylc=>

> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI

EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY

> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?

> > > > link=list & sid=396545469

> > > > > >

> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers.

/ dir/_ylc=

> > > > <http://us.rd. / evt=48254/ *http://answers.

/ dir/_ylc=>

> > > > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI

EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY

> > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?

> > > > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > someone who knows.

> > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Om Gurave Namah

Dear Bharat and all,

I was following the thread with great hope of hearing scripture

comments and also Jyotish implications as initiated by Vistiji.

A subtle difference that can change the whole life perspective from

Jyotish point of view is Ista Devata as the real question is not

what does Atma wants or thinks but what does God wants. Without

seeing this relationship in a chart we can not percieve what is the

most proper-only way for Atma to free itself from bondages.

Warm regards,

Tijana

 

 

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

<astrologyhindu wrote:

>

> Namaste Sri Soul

>

> Now relate Atmakaraka and its role to trying and break through this

> ignorance. Its questioning and its strife. It would give a

different meaning

> altogether. Instead of trying to break the non-existent...... its

role would

> be to reaffirm that what IS. A subtle difference can change the

whole life

> perspective from Jyotish point of view. Isn't it?

>

> Thanks and Regards

> Bharat

>

> On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <soulsadhak wrote:

> >

> > Truly so...we Pray Asato Maa Jyotirgamaya

> >

> > that The Absolute is Seen as The Absolute.

> >

> > Behind the Veils of Ignorance it is forgotten - Who is trying

> > to Understand The Self and Why.

> >

> > There is no such division whatsoever - yet it Percieved so.

> >

> > Vishnu's Maya.

> >

> > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

> > <astrologyhindu@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Sri Soul

> > >

> > > Truly so... so shouldn't when we interpret our scriptures-

think on

> > > polishing the view rather than reaffirming the wrong view?

> > >

> > > I rest my case.

> > >

> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > As the Vision, so is the View.

> > > >

> > > > It is only those who See Beyond Dualities do not distinguish

b/w Pure

> > and

> > > > Impure; Self and Absolute; I and Vishnu...

> > > >

> > > > Rest are still trying to polish their Vision.

> > > >

> > > > Jyotisha is one way of Being One with The True Vision.

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

> > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaste Sri Soul

> > > > >

> > > > > To call the something impure is to call the Self impure.

That itself

> > is

> > > > > impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord

Vishnu but we

> > are

> > > > > impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure!

> > > > >

> > > > > That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why

> > strengthen

> > > > the

> > > > > ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is

in the

> > > > separative

> > > > > thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman

is under

> > > > > bondage " .

> > > > >

> > > > > In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of

> > Realization

> > > > is

> > > > > not a question of happening.

> > > > >

> > > > > Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline

any further

> > > > > comments to your further responses.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > Bharat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is

the

> > Source

> > > > into

> > > > > > which the beings Return.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this

Atman/part of

> > > > Absolute,

> > > > > > is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz.

anava

> > > > (generated due

> > > > > > to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by

maya/illusion) and

> > > > karmic

> > > > > > (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages,

that

> > exist

> > > > until

> > > > > > the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self

> > > > /part-of-that-Absolute

> > > > > > within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu

Astrology "

> > > > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of

bondage? The

> > bondage

> > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of

erroneously

> > > > thinking it

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight

things, is

> > > > like

> > > > > > saying

> > > > > > > something is more powerful than omnipresent,

omniscient and

> > > > omnipotent

> > > > > > > Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that

something

> > > > other

> > > > > > than

> > > > > > > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this

view,

> > then,

> > > > we

> > > > > > are

> > > > > > > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space

with

> > other

> > > > things

> > > > > > > that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms

of space.

> > > > Anything

> > > > > > > limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to

calling

> > > > > > changeless

> > > > > > > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman

as

> > limited.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted

from Srimad

> > > > Bhagavad

> > > > > > Gita

> > > > > > > has to be studied properly under a Guru.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > > Bharat

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Vistiji,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and

Nitish,

> > but

> > > > > > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see

> > addressed.

> > > > > > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated

and given

> > > > > > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8

bondages

> > (and

> > > > > > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful

for me).

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there

to the

> > > > > > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially

removed

> > and

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can

you please

> > > > > > > > substantiate this?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime

and is put

> > in

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages

> > (in

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically

mean that

> > the 4

> > > > > > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get

freedom. The

> > > > jailkeeper

> > > > > > > > must open the door and the court that has

jurisdiction must

> > > > > > > > authorize him to do so.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8

bondages does

> > not

> > > > by

> > > > > > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that

karma

> > > > > > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You

must supply

> > > > > > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of

the

> > bondages

> > > > can

> > > > > > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I

have read

> > > > > > > > (though not completely) a translation of

Vivekacudamani, and I

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I

missing

> > some

> > > > > > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it

says that

> > > > people

> > > > > > > > in various stages of enlightenment have

progressively " weaker "

> > > > > > > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to

have Ahamkar,

> > > > > > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born

without

> > one

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you,

simply

> > trying

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti

> > > > > > Larsen

> > > > > > > > visti@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply.

> > > > > > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying

that Rahu is

> > > > > > > > Durga.

> > > > > > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya,

Shiva and Agni

> > are

> > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are

actually saying

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > Vishnu

> > > > > > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us

know better

> > than

> > > > > > > > that.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this

corresponds

> > to

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the

> > nakshatras

> > > > are

> > > > > > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of

devatas

> > come

> > > > as

> > > > > > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the

nakshatra it

> > > > > > > > eclipses.

> > > > > > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart,

we can

> > find

> > > > > > > > based on

> > > > > > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented

by it.

> > But

> > > > its

> > > > > > > > only a

> > > > > > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not

devatas.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of

ahamkara is

> > Surya,

> > > > > > > > just as

> > > > > > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is

Moon. And

> > > > among

> > > > > > > > those

> > > > > > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of

those being

> > > > fully

> > > > > > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control

of

> > ahamkara.

> > > > > > > > Divine

> > > > > > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa

and Sri

> > Krishna

> > > > > > > > being at

> > > > > > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald

Trump, Adolph

> > > > > > > > Hitler

> > > > > > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other

end of the

> > > > scale.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are

EIGHT ways

> > to

> > > > > > > > look at

> > > > > > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the

Ahamkara we must

> > look

> > > > > > > > at God

> > > > > > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the

specific

> > form

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the

Sun.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So please don't make the equation that everyone

with Surya

> > > > > > > > atmakaraka is

> > > > > > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional

indeed... Infact

> > the

> > > > > > > > concept

> > > > > > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya

atmakaraka will

> > be

> > > > > > > > freed of

> > > > > > > > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > > > > > > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti,

> > > > > > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by

Surya ?

> > > > Either

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents

Ahamkara going by

> > > > Gita

> > > > > > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all

luminaries the

> > > > > > > > radiant

> > > > > > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of

the

> > > > > > > > constellations I am

> > > > > > > > > > the Moon. "

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets

are lead

> > by

> > > > > > > > Surya as

> > > > > > > > > > Ahamkara?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya

Narayan as a

> > > > witness

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality

creating Ahamkara

> > > > > > > > Principle

> > > > > > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence

> > principle?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be

referred to

> > as

> > > > > > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha

chakshusay',

> > the

> > > > eye

> > > > > > > > of the

> > > > > > > > > > three worlds?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>

> > > > > > <

> > > > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > > > > > > > 40>,

> > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > > > > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the

eight

> > bondages

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > the atma?

> > > > > > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti

(rahu),

> > Akasha

> > > > > > > > (guru), Agni

> > > > > > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and

Prithvi

> > (budha).

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the

eight spokes

> > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > kala

> > > > > > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight

spokes of the

> > > > > > > > anahata chakra.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT

karakas is

> > futile

> > > > > > > > without any

> > > > > > > > > > > of this.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles

visit:

> > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes

naturally

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > to a

> > > > > > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want

to serve

> > their

> > > > > > > > families;

> > > > > > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the

true

> > sense of

> > > > > > > > the term.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness

and

> > > > contentment

> > > > > > > > of our

> > > > > > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So

it's purely

> > > > > > > > selfish.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > P

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

40

> > >

> > > > > > <

> > > > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > > > > > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

> > > > > > > > Nitish and

> > > > > > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Good observations, I was following this

thread as well

> > but

> > > > > > > > really

> > > > > > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > > > > > > > > > English words cant describe so well '

ahankar ' and '

> > > > aham'

> > > > > > > > which are

> > > > > > > > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see

this only in

> > Sun

> > > > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > > > However

> > > > > > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve

others as

> > it

> > > > does

> > > > > > > > not come

> > > > > > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I '

away from

> > them

> > > > so

> > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with

Paramatma, then

> > the

> > > > '

> > > > > > > > I '

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent

<vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>

> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

<sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

> > > > Nitish

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with

interest in the

> > > > hope

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself

disagreeing

> > > > subtly

> > > > > > > > > > in the

> > > > > > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down

in the

> > > > exchange

> > > > > > > > I find

> > > > > > > > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which

makes a lot

> > of

> > > > sense

> > > > > > > > > > to me:

> > > > > > > > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different

level as

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > effacement

> > > > > > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the

scriptural

> > knowledge

> > > > > > > > you both

> > > > > > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK

people: I dont

> > think

> > > > > > > > it is

> > > > > > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are

egotistic. See,

> > English

> > > > > > > > > > also has

> > > > > > > > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different

meanings,

> > and

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > right

> > > > > > > > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is

one who has

> > a

> > > > > > > > > > exaggerated

> > > > > > > > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in

this

> > world

> > > > has

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny

it), it is

> > plain

> > > > > > > > > > wrong to

> > > > > > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and

simultaneously

> > observe

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > he also

> > > > > > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance

and say

> > " yes,

> > > > > > > > that is

> > > > > > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite

hundreds of

> > > > people

> > > > > > > > I know

> > > > > > > > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have

Sun AK, and

> > not

> > > > > > > > only

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their

chart.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that

can be

> > observed

> > > > > > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they

are

> > egocentric

> > > > > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual

rather

> > than

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical

(i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > egocentricity does

> > > > > > > > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply

makes them

> > go

> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core

self is

> > tested.

> > > > How

> > > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of

other

> > > > astrological

> > > > > > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely

make, based

> > on

> > > > pure

> > > > > > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided

to

> > divinity

> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their

view is

> > > > > > > > egocentric.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can

share her

> > > > data)

> > > > > > > > > > who was

> > > > > > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a

higher

> > degree

> > > > > > > > > > that she

> > > > > > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then

divorced,

> > then

> > > > > > > > have her

> > > > > > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way,

then have

> > her

> > > > > > > > > > brother get

> > > > > > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave

her too),

> > then

> > > > > > > > > > (she) get

> > > > > > > > > > > > married again and her husband develop

terminal cancer

> > very

> > > > > > > > soon

> > > > > > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find

a strong

> > and

> > > > > > > > > > consistent

> > > > > > > > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become

self

> > reliant

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > only

> > > > > > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in

meditation/reiki. She is

> > > > > > > > probably

> > > > > > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in

any

> > outstanding

> > > > > > > > way at

> > > > > > > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the

people around

> > > > her..

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that

Sun AK

> > people

> > > > > > > > must

> > > > > > > > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply

a general

> > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > for all

> > > > > > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide

them towards

> > > > > > > > divinity

> > > > > > > > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on

themselves

> > and

> > > > > > > > search

> > > > > > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I

find much

> > more

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > point.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > nix nixen

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of

yours " It is not

> > > > always

> > > > > > > > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must

be

> > nothing

> > > > less

> > > > > > > > than

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on

the right

> > way

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with

paramatma -

> > > > > > > > deep/shallow,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things

have a basis

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has

a basis

> > i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > separation

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory

only though)

> > and

> > > > > > > > hence

> > > > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the

kind of

> > karma

> > > > > > > > involved.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a

12th part of

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in

part, it

> > becomes

> > > > its

> > > > > > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that

> > sign/house

> > > > > > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer

to your

> > > > specific

> > > > > > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the

truth of

> > your

> > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > > > " tijanadamjanovic "

> > > > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions

raised in these

> > > > > > > > discussions

> > > > > > > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of

serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn

principles of

> > artha

> > > > > > > > > > shastra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > serve,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to

> > > > differentiate? I

> > > > > > > > > > assume

> > > > > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into

account

> > also

> > > > > > > > > > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > > > > > > > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne,

but

> > regarding

> > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja

yoga whose

> > > > deepest

> > > > > > > > > > meaning

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas

(refer

> > > > > > > > Vivekananda) .

> > > > > > > > > > > > Only in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the

perfect

> > King.

> > > > > > > > What

> > > > > > > > > > artha

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " yeeahoo_99 "

> > > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what

you

> > probably

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita

Chapter

> > 3,sloka

> > > > 22.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the

cosmos has

> > chosen

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > work.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only

SUN AK has

> > to

> > > > > > > > > > " serve " , all

> > > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " serve " .

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK

gives a

> > person

> > > > > > > > akin to

> > > > > > > > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to

Janaka -

> > > > > > > > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > > > > > > > provided

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on

this?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take

> > > > Dhartharastra

> > > > > > > > as an

> > > > > > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from

6th house.

> > Leo

> > > > > > > > being a

> > > > > > > > > > > > dharma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of

service

> > through

> > > > > > > > 10th

> > > > > > > > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun

AK should

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > > principles of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly

ever do is

> > > > serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as

there is

> > nothing

> > > > else

> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > done

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna

has already

> > > > > > > > achieved

> > > > > > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three

> > worlds(refer

> > > > > > > > Gita).

> > > > > > > > > > > > Those who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to

serve,

> > whatever

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava

lord was Sun

> > AK

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish

> > giving by

> > > > > > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence

that His

> > > > Master

> > > > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even

> > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his

> > > > karma/desires.

> > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to

exhaust his

> > > > > > > > remaining

> > > > > > > > > > > > karma/

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK).

There is no

> > more

> > > > > > > > > > substance

> > > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic

relationship of the

> > two

> > > > > > > > which

> > > > > > > > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " tijana "

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more

brilliant

> > if

> > > > you

> > > > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what

you

> > probably

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you

implying

> > that

> > > > Sun

> > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you

determing

> > dharma

> > > > > > > > based on

> > > > > > > > > > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take

Dhartharastra

> > as

> > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly

ever do is

> > > > serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava

lord was Sun

> > AK

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish

> > giving by

> > > > > > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His

Master had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > > > > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even

> > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " yeeahoo_99 "

> > > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will

hardly

> > ever

> > > > do?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and

ancient texts

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > show

> > > > > > > > > > > > what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his

subjects

> > are

> > > > > > > > protected

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path.

Look at

> > > > krishna,

> > > > > > > > Janaka

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will

understand

> > > > > > > > whatever

> > > > > > > > > > > > that " hardly

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your

statement, AK

> > wouldn't

> > > > do

> > > > > > > > > > > > anything

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the

rest of

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > karakas (BK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow

the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva

jnane Jiva

> > Seva "

> > > > > > > > (serving

> > > > > > > > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of

God) that

> > > > > > > > > > Narendranath

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who

had Sun in

> > > > > > > > Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had

developed

> > peculiar

> > > > > > > > > > sharpness

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that

empowered

> > him

> > > > with

> > > > > > > > > > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks

of his

> > Master.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could,

as

> > compared

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the

words of Sri

> > > > > > > > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > > > > > > > even

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple

language (Aq

> > > > Sun),

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in

Libra,

> > gradually

> > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and

hints on

> > practical

> > > > > > > > Vedanta

> > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective

life in

> > the

> > > > > > > > society.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as

AK should

> > be

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very hard

> > > > > > > > task... "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you

have done is

> > not

> > > > > > > > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries

and had

> > > > attained

> > > > > > > > > > highest

> > > > > > > > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is

placed in

> > Libra,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a

sign over

> > the

> > > > > > > > rest of

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this

spiritual

> > power

> > > > > > > > manifests

> > > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign

placement.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " tijana "

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities

are those

> > of

> > > > Raja

> > > > > > > > > > (karaka

> > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th,

dig bala in

> > > > 10th).

> > > > > > > > > > What is

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do?

The lesson

> > that

> > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the

highest sence it

> > > > gives

> > > > > > > > > > " Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-

the divine

> > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > given to

> > > > > > > > > > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For

spiritual

> > persons

> > > > Sun

> > > > > > > > as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > should be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...),

> > otherwise

> > > > it`s

> > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " v reality "

> > > > > > > > <reality_v@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much

> > appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re

Sun AK.

> > The

> > > > > > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can

this also

> > be

> > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in

a

> > spiritual

> > > > > > > > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic

<janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007

08:33:22 -0700

> > (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK

person have

> > to

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like

priests,

> > gurus,

> > > > > > > > teachers.

> > > > > > > > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa

(nonviolence) , with Ch

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > native is

> > > > > > > > > > > > always

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the

problem is

> > that

> > > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > > > never

> > > > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people.

The

> > person

> > > > must

> > > > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > > lessons

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK.

Ch /

> > mother, Sy

> > > > /

> > > > > > > > > > father

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people

you know

> > and

> > > > see

> > > > > > > > it in

> > > > > > > > > > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ >

wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of

glass and

> > > > sing/hum

> > > > > > > > > > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear

> > > > Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting

discussion.

> > Could

> > > > we

> > > > > > > > > > discuss

> > > > > > > > > > > > other

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives

with Moon

> > as AK

> > > > > > > > need to

> > > > > > > > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I

know of a

> > > > chart

> > > > > > > > where

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving

and

> > concerned

> > > > > > > > about

> > > > > > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

<starsuponme@

> > wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007

10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should

learn to

> > respect

> > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn

from others.

> > > > When

> > > > > > > > Ju

> > > > > > > > > > is in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks

that he

> > knows

> > > > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with

everybody. Good

> > > > teachers

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > course

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as

this graha

> > will

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should

learn to

> > > > catalyze

> > > > > > > > > > energies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while

with JU AK

> > person

> > > > > > > > should

> > > > > > > > > > > > learn to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of

course person

> > can

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality,

law, luck

> > etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings

lesson to us so

> > its

> > > > > > > > not so

> > > > > > > > > > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so

if Surya is

> > in

> > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > placement

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is

spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on

Jupiter

> > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having

Jupiter as

> > > > mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________

_________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go:

Go

> > puts

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile.

<http://mobile./

> > > > > > > > > > <http://mobile./>> /

> > > > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile.

<http://mobile./

> > > > > > > > > > <http://mobile./>> /

> > > > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________

_________

> > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple!

Sell your

> > car

> > > > > > > > for just

> > > > > > > > > > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

<http://a.ninemsn./

> > > > > > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.

> > > > > > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom%

> > 2Fcgi%2Dbin%

> > > > 2Fa%

> > > > > > > > 2Fci%

> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813%

> > > > 2Fai%5F859641 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > _t=762955845 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and

consultations visit

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda s.com

> > > > > > > > > > <http://www.jatavedas.com/

<http://www.jatavedas.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------

- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on

your

> > needs.

> > > > > > > > Check out

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new Car

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________

_________

> > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping

exciting.

> > Find

> > > > > > > > what you

> > > > > > > > > > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. com.au/

> > > > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/

> > > > > > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover%

> > 2Eebay%2Ecom%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129%

2D5668%2D323%

> > > > 2F4%2F%

> > > > > > > > 3Fid%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_

taglines_

> > > > EBAY & _m=EXT

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the

Internet

> > in

> > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > ----------------

---------

> > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel

answers

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./

> > > > dir/_ylc=

> > > > > > > >

> > > >

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > > > > > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > > > > > > > link=list & sid=396545469

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

<http://us.rd./evt=48254/*http://answers./

> > > > dir/_ylc=

> > > > > > > >

> > > >

X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsY

> > > > > > > > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?

> > > > > > > > link=list & sid=396545469>>from

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > someone who knows.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vistiji,

Thank you very much again for your in-depth response. However, I

remain a bit confused. Let me play out my thinking process, and you

tell me where I'm wrong. At the outset, when the 8 bondages of the

Atma were introduced, you said/implied(?) that these 8 bondages

represented Prakriti. As I have now educated myself (perhaps not

enough), here you now referring to the Prakriti/Purusha duality as

taught by Samkhya philosophy. I understand that Prakriti is pure

potentiality that is manifested (perhaps by the action of

Purusha/Atma) in multiple stages, in which Buddhi comes first, then

Ahamkara, then the mind and the pancha tattwas.

 

Now to the astrological analysis:

1) Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the

Charakarakas symbolically represent this manifestation?

2) While you have clearly stated that Ahamkara (surya), Manas

(chandra), Buddhi (rahu), Akasha (guru), Agni

(mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha) symbolize

this manifestation, the " chara " nature is yet to be

explained/mapped. For example, are you saying " the Atma manifests

the Ahamkara through its AK petal " ? If not, which petal (CK)

manifests the Ahamkara? If this question is not wrong, it clearly

leads to the matching questions i.e which petal (in terms of

Charakaratwa) manifest the manas, buddhi, akasha, agni, jala, vayu

and prithvi components?

3) What happens when there is Charakaraka replacement? I for

example, have a phenomenal 6 replacements in my chart (after

replacement, my AK is Mercury, AmK is Jupiter, BK is Mars, PiK is

Saturn, MK is Rahu, PK is Moon, GK is again Mercury, DK is Venus).

Sun is not there anymore (29 June 1967, 23:00pm, +5:30 GMT, 78E46,

22N12).

 

 

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

Happy to oblige. Glad you liked the mails.

My comments below to your points.

 

Thank you very much again for your in-depth response.

However, I

remain a bit confused. Let me play out my thinking process, and you

tell me where I'm wrong. At the outset, when the 8 bondages of the

Atma were introduced, you said/implied(?)

that these 8 bondages

represented Prakriti.

 

Visti: The reference to Prakrti is made in the Gita and Shiva purana

itself: Vishvesvara Samhita, chapter 18, sloka 2:

prakR^ityAdyaSTabanddhojIvaHsa ucyate||

Translation: The atma is called Jiva because it is bound down by the

eight types of chains of Prakrti.

 

As I have now educated myself (perhaps not

enough), here you now referring to the Prakriti/Purusha duality as

taught by Samkhya philosophy. I understand that Prakriti is pure

potentiality that is manifested (perhaps by the action of

Purusha/Atma) in multiple stages, in which Buddhi comes first, then

Ahamkara, then the mind and the pancha tattwas.

 

Visti: I wasn't referring to the prakrti/purusha concept, and you raise

a very good point which i cannot answer at present. But we are already

pushing hard away from the tangible jyotish subject we have at hand,

towards something very intangible which can only be learned from a

spiritual guide. Lets keep the Jyotish questions for the Jyotishas, and

the spiritual ones for the Diksha Gurus.

 

Now to the astrological analysis:

1) Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the

Charakarakas symbolically represent this manifestation?

 

Visti: This is my own inference, please don't take it as Parampara.

Yet, I was taught that planets in Kendra to AK increase Ahamkara, and a

natural extension of this to each charakaraka could be implied.

 

2) While you have clearly stated that Ahamkara (surya),

Manas

(chandra), Buddhi (rahu), Akasha (guru), Agni

(mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha) symbolize

this manifestation, the "chara" nature is yet to be

explained/mapped. For example, are you saying "the Atma manifests

the Ahamkara through its AK petal"? If not, which petal (CK)

manifests the Ahamkara? If this question is not wrong, it clearly

leads to the matching questions i.e which petal (in terms of

Charakaratwa) manifest the manas, buddhi, akasha, agni, jala, vayu

and prithvi components?

 

Visti: I agree with your interpretation of this, and believe your on

the right track.

 

3) What happens when there is Charakaraka replacement? I

for

example, have a phenomenal 6 replacements in my chart (after

replacement, my AK is Mercury, AmK is Jupiter, BK is Mars, PiK is

Saturn, MK is Rahu, PK is Moon, GK is again Mercury, DK is Venus).

Sun is not there anymore (29 June 1967, 23:00pm, +5:30 GMT, 78E46,

22N12).

 

Visti: This is a completely different question. For starters I would

refer you to one lecture i held on this in the SJC Jaimini Class: http://www.srigaruda.com/2006/08/11/charakaraka-replacement/

 

Looking forward to your reply.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

--

 

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

 

 

vedicastrostudent wrote:

 

 

Dear Vistiji,

Thank you very much again for your in-depth response. However, I

remain a bit confused. Let me play out my thinking process, and you

tell me where I'm wrong. At the outset, when the 8 bondages of the

Atma were introduced, you said/implied(?) that these 8 bondages

represented Prakriti. As I have now educated myself (perhaps not

enough), here you now referring to the Prakriti/Purusha duality as

taught by Samkhya philosophy. I understand that Prakriti is pure

potentiality that is manifested (perhaps by the action of

Purusha/Atma) in multiple stages, in which Buddhi comes first, then

Ahamkara, then the mind and the pancha tattwas.

 

Now to the astrological analysis:

1) Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the

Charakarakas symbolically represent this manifestation?

2) While you have clearly stated that Ahamkara (surya), Manas

(chandra), Buddhi (rahu), Akasha (guru), Agni

(mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha) symbolize

this manifestation, the "chara" nature is yet to be

explained/mapped. For example, are you saying "the Atma manifests

the Ahamkara through its AK petal"? If not, which petal (CK)

manifests the Ahamkara? If this question is not wrong, it clearly

leads to the matching questions i.e which petal (in terms of

Charakaratwa) manifest the manas, buddhi, akasha, agni, jala, vayu

and prithvi components?

3) What happens when there is Charakaraka replacement? I for

example, have a phenomenal 6 replacements in my chart (after

replacement, my AK is Mercury, AmK is Jupiter, BK is Mars, PiK is

Saturn, MK is Rahu, PK is Moon, GK is again Mercury, DK is Venus).

Sun is not there anymore (29 June 1967, 23:00pm, +5:30 GMT, 78E46,

22N12).

 

Thanks,

 

Sundeep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vistiji,

A sincere thank you to you for your reply and references.

 

Regards,

 

Sundeep

sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Sundeep, Namaskar

> Happy to oblige. Glad you liked the mails.

> My comments below to your points.

>

> /Thank you very much again for your in-depth response. However, I

> remain a bit confused. Let me play out my thinking process, and you

> tell me where I'm wrong. At the outset, when the 8 bondages of the

> Atma were introduced, you said/implied(//?) that these 8 bondages

> represented Prakriti.

> /

>

> Visti: The reference to Prakrti is made in the Gita and Shiva

purana

> itself: Vishvesvara Samhita, chapter 18, sloka 2:

> prakR^ityAdyaSTabanddhojIvaHsa ucyate||

> Translation: The atma is called Jiva because it is bound down by

the

> eight types of chains of Prakrti.

>

> /As I have now educated myself (perhaps not

> enough), here you now referring to the Prakriti/Purusha duality as

> taught by Samkhya philosophy. I understand that Prakriti is pure

> potentiality that is manifested (perhaps by the action of

> Purusha/Atma) in multiple stages, in which Buddhi comes first, then

> Ahamkara, then the mind and the pancha tattwas.

> /

> Visti: I wasn't referring to the prakrti/purusha concept, and you

raise

> a very good point which i cannot answer at present. But we are

already

> pushing hard away from the tangible jyotish subject we have at

hand,

> towards something very intangible which can only be learned from a

> spiritual guide. Lets keep the Jyotish questions for the

Jyotishas, and

> the spiritual ones for the Diksha Gurus.

>

> /Now to the astrological analysis:

> 1) Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the

> Charakarakas symbolically represent this manifestation?

> /

>

> Visti: This is my own inference, please don't take it as

Parampara. Yet,

> I was taught that planets in Kendra to AK increase Ahamkara, and a

> natural extension of this to each charakaraka could be implied.

>

> /2) While you have clearly stated that Ahamkara (surya), Manas

> (chandra), Buddhi (rahu), Akasha (guru), Agni

> (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha)

symbolize

> this manifestation, the " chara " nature is yet to be

> explained/mapped. For example, are you saying " the Atma manifests

> the Ahamkara through its AK petal " ? If not, which petal (CK)

> manifests the Ahamkara? If this question is not wrong, it clearly

> leads to the matching questions i.e which petal (in terms of

> Charakaratwa) manifest the manas, buddhi, akasha, agni, jala, vayu

> and prithvi components?

> /

>

> Visti: I agree with your interpretation of this, and believe your

on the

> right track.

>

> / 3) What happens when there is Charakaraka replacement? I for

> example, have a phenomenal 6 replacements in my chart (after

> replacement, my AK is Mercury, AmK is Jupiter, BK is Mars, PiK is

> Saturn, MK is Rahu, PK is Moon, GK is again Mercury, DK is Venus).

> Sun is not there anymore (29 June 1967, 23:00pm, +5:30 GMT, 78E46,

> 22N12).

> /

>

> Visti: This is a completely different question. For starters I

would

> refer you to one lecture i held on this in the SJC Jaimini Class:

> http://www.srigaruda.com/2006/08/11/charakaraka-replacement/

>

> Looking forward to your reply.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

> <http://srigaruda.com>

>

> vedicastrostudent wrote:

> >

> > Dear Vistiji,

> > Thank you very much again for your in-depth response. However, I

> > remain a bit confused. Let me play out my thinking process, and

you

> > tell me where I'm wrong. At the outset, when the 8 bondages of

the

> > Atma were introduced, you said/implied(?) that these 8 bondages

> > represented Prakriti. As I have now educated myself (perhaps not

> > enough), here you now referring to the Prakriti/Purusha duality

as

> > taught by Samkhya philosophy. I understand that Prakriti is pure

> > potentiality that is manifested (perhaps by the action of

> > Purusha/Atma) in multiple stages, in which Buddhi comes first,

then

> > Ahamkara, then the mind and the pancha tattwas.

> >

> > Now to the astrological analysis:

> > 1) Am I correct in understanding that you are saying that the

> > Charakarakas symbolically represent this manifestation?

> > 2) While you have clearly stated that Ahamkara (surya), Manas

> > (chandra), Buddhi (rahu), Akasha (guru), Agni

> > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha)

symbolize

> > this manifestation, the " chara " nature is yet to be

> > explained/mapped. For example, are you saying " the Atma manifests

> > the Ahamkara through its AK petal " ? If not, which petal (CK)

> > manifests the Ahamkara? If this question is not wrong, it clearly

> > leads to the matching questions i.e which petal (in terms of

> > Charakaratwa) manifest the manas, buddhi, akasha, agni, jala,

vayu

> > and prithvi components?

> > 3) What happens when there is Charakaraka replacement? I for

> > example, have a phenomenal 6 replacements in my chart (after

> > replacement, my AK is Mercury, AmK is Jupiter, BK is Mars, PiK is

> > Saturn, MK is Rahu, PK is Moon, GK is again Mercury, DK is

Venus).

> > Sun is not there anymore (29 June 1967, 23:00pm, +5:30 GMT,

78E46,

> > 22N12).

> >

> > Thanks,

> >

> > Sundeep

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri Promila

 

My post was on the topic and added my thoughts to the subject. Your post was not on the subject, it was judgemental in the sense that it suggested that I and probably others did not understand life or the subject and were commenting here. It was clear it was your post that was judgemental and " who shot off " (If I may reuse a rude phrase that you used). I felt it was immature and said so. Probably it hurt you that I said it. That is probably why you bought a second non-astrological post not pertaining to the topic, to again be judgemental about me.

 

Perhaps you can find maturity in your words if not in mine.

 

As far as my futher replies goes, I changed my mind and replied to one person whom I feel is true seeker of knowledge. Dharma allows breaking of one's words if someone asks for knowledge, and that too when it relates to Brahm Vidya (which is the subject matter of the Srimad Bhagavad Gita and the Upanishads) and which is allowed to be spoken in this group.

 

Hope you reconsider your words in the future.

 

Thanks and Regards

Bharat

 

 

On 9/7/07, Promila Chitkara <promilac wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bharat,

 

Please weigh your words before you shoot them. In one of your earlier mails you said " Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. "

 

 

After making that statement you have replied thrice.

 

I think it's you who wrote in hurry.

 

Reasoning? Reasoning is always based on five senses! One needs to go beyond five senses/reasoning to realize the truth. Reason can only help you pass judgements!

 

 

Light!

Promila

 

Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindu@

gmail.com>sohamsa Sent: Friday, September 7, 2007 1:29:57 PMRe: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

 

Namaste Sri PromilaWhat can I say - A impatient response without effective reasoning and seriously misjudging the intelligence of others. Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, Promila Chitkara <

promilac > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thinking aloud: What we are discussing right now is what we have been taught; what we have studied in scriptures. Obviously intretations differ; words differ; meanings differ. Sometimes it's better to learn from life than to parrot scriptures!

 

Yes, nothing is impure, that is, everything is pure--I would love to see all of us applying this in real life and embracing Osama Bin Laden with love if we confront him rather than running away in terror.

 

Discussions are easier than life!

 

Bharat - Hindu Astrology <astrologyhindu@

gmail.com>sohamsa@ .comFriday, September 7, 2007 12:11:40 PM

Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Vistiji and Nitish)

 

Just one thought more,... here the word " Happening " means that it something is the cause and merging is an effect. So the sentence refutes the same.Thanks and RegardsBharat

 

On 9/7/07, Bharat - Hindu Astrology <

astrologyhindu@ gmail.com> wrote:

Namaste Sri SoulTo call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself is impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we are impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure! That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why strengthen the ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the separative thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under bondage " . In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of Realization is not a question of happening. Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further comments to your further responses. Thanks and RegardsBharat

 

 

On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <

soulsadhak > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the Source into which the beings Return.

When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of Absolute, is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava (generated due to ignorance/darkness) , mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and karmic (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that exist until the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self /part-of-that- Absolute within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

 

sohamsa@ .com, " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu@ ...> wrote: >> Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The bondage comes> from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously thinking it is > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is like saying > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent> Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something other than > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view, then, we are > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with other things> that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space. Anything > limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling changeless > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as limited.> > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad Bhagavad Gita > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat> > > >

> On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ ... wrote: > >> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish, but

> > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see addressed. > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given> > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages (and > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me). > >> > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed and that > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please > > substantiate this?> >> > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put in a> > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages (in a

> > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that the 4 > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The jailkeeper> > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must > > authorize him to do so.> >> > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does not by > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma> > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the bondages can > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I only > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing some > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that people> > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker "

> > koshas/sareeras/ parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar, > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without one of> > the bondages - they always have all 8. > >

> > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply trying to > > dig deeper into your wisdom..> >> > Thanks,> >> > Sundeep> >

> > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>, Visti Larsen > > visti@ wrote:> > >> > > ??? ??? ?????? > > > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > Thank you for your reply.> > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is > > Durga.> > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni are > > all> > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying that> > Vishnu > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better than> > that. > > >> > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds to the> > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the nakshatras are > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas come as > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > eclipses.> > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can find > > based on> > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it. But its

> > only a> > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > >> > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is Surya, > > just as

> > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And among> > those> > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being fully > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of ahamkara. > > Divine> > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri Krishna> > being at> > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph > > Hitler > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the scale.> > >> > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways to> > look at > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must look

> > at God> > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific form of > > Shiva> > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun. > > >> > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya

> > atmakaraka is> > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact the> > concept > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will be> > freed of

> > > his/her ahamkara. > > > Looking forward to your reply.> > >> > > Yours sincerely, > > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark > > > email: visti@ < visti@> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com> > > <

http://srigaruda.com>> > >> > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||> > > > Dear Visti,> > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ? Either > > you> > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by Gita > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > >> > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the > > radiant> > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the > > constellations I am> > > > the Moon. " > > > >> > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead by

> > Surya as> > > > Ahamkara? > > > >> > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a witness > > of> > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara

> > Principle > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence principle?> > > > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to as

> > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay', the eye > > of the> > > > three worlds? > > > >> > > > regards,> > > > nitish

> > > >> > > > sohamsa@ .com

<sohamsa%40> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> > > 40. com>,> > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar> > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight bondages of > > the atma?> > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu), Akasha > > (guru), Agni> > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi (budha). > > > > >> > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes of the > > kala> > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the > > anahata chakra.> > > > >> > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is futile > > without any> > > > > of this.> > > > >

> > > > > Yours sincerely,> > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > > > email: visti@ <

visti@>> > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > < http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > >> > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > Hello Sharat,> > > > > >> > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally only > > to a> > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve their> > families;> > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true sense of > > the term.> > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and contentment> > of our> > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely > > selfish.> > > > > >> > > > > > P> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

 

 

> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com <sohamsa%40grou ps.com> <> > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> >

40. com>> > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,> > Nitish and> > > > > > v_reality) > > > > > >> > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya|| > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well but > > really> > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly. > > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and ' aham'> > which are

> > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in Sun > > AK.> > > > However> > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as it does

> > not come> > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from them so > > easily> > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then the '

> > I '> > > > will> > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '. > > > > > >> > > > > > Best> > > > > > Sharat

> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > - > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <

vedicastrostudent@>> > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

 

 

> > <sohamsa@

. com <sohamsa%40>

> > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>>> > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji, Nitish > > and> > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish, > > > > > >> > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the hope > > of> > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing subtly

> > > > in the> > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the exchange > > I find > > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot of sense

> > > > to me:> > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as the > > > > effacement> > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .

> > > > > >> > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural knowledge > > you both> > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont think

> > it is> > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See, English > > > > also has> > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings, and the

> > right> > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has a > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this world has > > that> > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is plain > > > > wrong to> > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously observe that > > > > he also> > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say " yes, > > that is> > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of people > > I know> > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and not > > only> > > > that> > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.

> > > > > >> > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be observed > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are egocentric

> > i.e.> > > > their> > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather than the > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical ( i.e

..> > > > egocentricity does> > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them go> > through > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is tested. How > > they> > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other astrological> > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based on pure > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to divinity

> > through> > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > egocentric. > > > > > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her data)

> > > > who was> > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher degree > > > > that she> > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced, then

> > have her> > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have her > > > > brother get> > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too), then

> > > > (she) get> > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer very > > soon> > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong and

> > > > consistent> > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self reliant and > > only > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is

> > probably> > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any outstanding > > way at > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around her..

> > > > > >> > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK people > > must> > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general lesson

> > > > for all> > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards > > divinity> > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves and

> > search> > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much more to > > the> > > > > > point. > > > > > >> > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep > > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa%

<sohamsa%25>40. com>, nix nixen

> > <nix_nixen@ ..>> > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not always> > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be nothing less > > than

> > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right way of> > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > >> > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma - > > deep/shallow,> > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis only> > in> > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis i.e. > > > > separation> > > > > > of> > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though) and> > hence> > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of karma > > involved.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of the> > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it becomes its > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that sign/house> > towards> > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your specific> > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of your > > queries.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > best regards,> > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > >> > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa%

<sohamsa%25> 40. com>,

> > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > discussions > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of artha > > > > shastra to> > > > > > serve, > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to differentiate? I> > > > assume> > > > > > you > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account also

> > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but regarding > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose deepest> > > > meaning> > > > > > is> > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect King.> > What> > > > artha> > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind? > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>, " yeeahoo_99 "

> > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||> > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter 3,sloka 22. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has chosen to > > work.> > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has to > > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > " serve " .> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a person

> > akin to> > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka - > > jivanmukta - > > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra > > as an> > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house. Leo > > being a> > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service through > > 10th> > > > > > house of > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should learn> > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is nothing else > > > > to be> > > > > > done > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > achieved> > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three worlds(refer > > Gita).> > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve, whatever be > > > > their> > > > > > AK. > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in

> > > > lagna in> > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by> > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His Master > > had> > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami > > > > needed> > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his karma/desires. > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his> > remaining> > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no more > > > > substance> > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the two> > which> > > > > > continued > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > NITISH > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>40. com>, " tijana "

> > <nix_nixen@> > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish, > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant if you > > had> > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > my question. > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you probably had > > in> > > > mind> > > > > > > > > mentioning> > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying that Sun > > AK > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing dharma> > based on> > > > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra as an > > > > > > example! > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is serving.

> > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun AK in > > > > lagna in > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish giving by

> > > > itself).> > > > > > But do > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had exalted

> > > > Saturn> > > > > > in 9th > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even Swami> > > > needed> > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > > > > > > > > Tijana > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>, " yeeahoo_99 "

> > <nitish.arya @ >> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat || > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly ever do? > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts that > > show> > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > all a> > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects are> > protected > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at krishna,> > Janaka > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand > > whatever> > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to. > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK wouldn't do > > > > > > anything> > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of the > > > > karakas (BK, > > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > Puk,> > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit! > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva Seva " > > (serving> > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that> > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed peculiar> > > > sharpness > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered him with> > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his Master.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as compared to > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri> > Ramakrishna, > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq Sun),> > and

> > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > preaching.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra, gradually > > Swami> > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on practical > > Vedanta> > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > could> > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in the> > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should be in> > > > > > Jupiter`s > > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard > > task... " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is not> > > > wise. Sri > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had attained > > > > highest> > > > > > level > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in Libra, it > > > > could> > > > > > be the > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over the > > rest of> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual power

> > manifests> > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <sohamsa%

<sohamsa%25> 40. com>, " tijana "

> > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those of Raja > > > > (karaka> > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in 10th). > > > > What is> > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson that > > has> > > > to be> > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > by> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it gives > > > > " Shiva> > > > > > jnane > > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine lesson > > > > given to> > > > > > us by > > > > > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual persons Sun > > as AK> > > > > > should be > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s > > very> > > > > > hard task. > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa%

<sohamsa%25> 40. com>, " v reality " > > <reality_v@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK. The

> > lesson> > > > to be> > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also be> > understood> > > > > > at a > > > > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a spiritual> > sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> 40. com>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > < sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

40. com>

 

 

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have to be> > very> > > > > > humble to > > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual> > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests, gurus, > > teachers.> > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch the > > > > native is> > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is that > > they> > > > never> > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > enough> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The person must > > learn> > > > > > lessons> > > > > > > > > also> > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch / mother, Sy / > > > > father> > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > everything those> > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know and see> > it in> > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and sing/hum> > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa . com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear Rafalji/Members > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion. Could we > > > > discuss > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon as AK > > need to> > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a chart > > where> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > native > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > already > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and concerned > > about> > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > >what > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to respect> > others> > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others. When> > Ju

> > > > is in> > > > > > > > > kendra to> > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he knows> > > > everything > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > can share > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good teachers > > of> > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > comes > > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha will be > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to catalyze > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI> > > > > > > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK person> > should> > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person can be> > > > > > focused on > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > karakas> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so its> > not so

> > > > > > easy> > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is in > > good> > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > then it > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter as > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as mahadasha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________ _________ > > > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the > > > > > > Internet in > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> http://mobile. <

http://mobile./> > > > < http://mobile./>>

/> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><

http://mobile. < http://mobile./> > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your car > > for just> > > > > > $30 at> > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.> > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F% > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom% 2Fcgi%2Dbin% 2Fa%> > 2Fci%> > > > > > 5F450304% > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813% 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic> > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jataveda

s.com> > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your needs. > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: Make shopping exciting. Find> > what you> > > > > > want at

> > > > > > > > > > > > www.eBay.com. au> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn . com.au/> > <

http://a.ninemsn.com.au/> > > > < http://a.ninemsn.com.au/>>

> > > > > > > > > > > b.aspx?URL=http% 3A%2F%2Frover% 2Eebay%2Ecom%> > > > > > > > > > > > 2Frover%2F1% 2F705%2D10129% 2D5668%2D323% 2F4%2F%

> > 3Fid%> > > > > > > > > > > > 3D6 & _t=763807330 & _r=email_ taglines_ EBAY & _m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- --- > > > > > > > Take the Internet to Go: Go puts the Internet in your> > > > > > pocket: mail, news, photos & more.> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > > > > Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers > > > > > > > > > >> > <

http://us.rd. /evt=48254/*

http://answers. /dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY

> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469> > > > > > <

http://us.rd. /evt=48254/*

http://answers. /dir/_ylc=> > X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9 TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTI EX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTA zBHNlYwNCQUJwaWx sY

> > XJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQ cm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0 aW9uX3BhZ2U- ?> > link=list & sid=396545469>>from > > > >> > > > > > someone who knows.> > > > > > Answers - Check it out.

> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Need a vacation?

Get great deals to amazing places on Travel.

 

 

 

Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now

(it's updated for today's economy) at Games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harih Om

Sri Gurubhyo Namah

Harih Om

 

 

Namaste Sri Soul

If we see Beyond gross/subtle/causal, there is " Nothing " that needs to be achieved, since it IS already there - the Nirvana - when it is known that the Absolute is Both and Neither: Everything and Nothing - and so is the Individual Being (you, me, everyone)

 

 

Our thinking is - if there is a goal to be achieved, so I have to work for it and achieve it. In other words, we think in terms of action, time and causation to effect our goals. When the scriptures say - " You are that " . They are implying us to think. If I am THAT that I seek, what do I need to do? Doing nothing will not help. Since I am ignorant and just have learned from a book/Guru/ that I am THAT. Having faith in the same we begin to question again and again. Why do I see the Trees and Plants? How come all of this is THAT? Why do I not see IT? How is it possible that the entirety is nothing but IT? Question and Question. In this questioning are we ever trying to say that Atman is under bondage? NO. We are simply questioning our own knowledge that we have gained from our sense-mind-body equipment. We never try and impose another non-verifiable idea to this thinking. So by saying that Atman is ever free, we enforce that idea such that questioning isn't stifled.

Please understand Brahm Vidya is " unbecoming " . I trust you to understand this.

So for the sake of discussion, do you see

the Atmakaraka (and other charakarakas) as the agent of the Absolute (Creator aspect of) or of the Limited Self (Individual Being) that seeks merger with Absolute?

Or is it, that the charakarakas are the Indicators of the percieved boundaries that induce the perception of separation b/w the Individual and the Absolute?

Have I answered your question now?

Thanks and Regards

Bharat

 

On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <soulsadhak wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

If we see Beyond gross/subtle/causal, there is " Nothing " that needs to be achieved, since it IS already there - the Nirvana - when it is known that the Absolute is Both and Neither: Everything and Nothing - and so is the Individual Being (you, me, everyone)

 

So for the sake of discussion, do you see

the Atmakaraka (and other charakarakas) as the agent of the Absolute (Creator aspect of) or of the Limited Self (Individual Being) that seeks merger with Absolute?

Or is it, that the charakarakas are the Indicators of the percieved boundaries that induce the perception of separation b/w the Individual and the Absolute?

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " <astrologyhindu wrote:>

> Namaste Sri Soul> > Now relate Atmakaraka and its role to trying and break through this> ignorance. Its questioning and its strife. It would give a different meaning> altogether. Instead of trying to break the non-existent...... its role would

> be to reaffirm that what IS. A subtle difference can change the whole life> perspective from Jyotish point of view. Isn't it?> > Thanks and Regards> Bharat>

> On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak wrote:> >> > Truly so...we Pray Asato Maa Jyotirgamaya> >> > that The Absolute is Seen as The Absolute.

> >> > Behind the Veils of Ignorance it is forgotten - Who is trying> > to Understand The Self and Why.> >> > There is no such division whatsoever - yet it Percieved so.

> >> > Vishnu's Maya.> >> > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:

> > >> > > Namaste Sri Soul> > >> > > Truly so... so shouldn't when we interpret our scriptures- think on> > > polishing the view rather than reaffirming the wrong view?

> > >> > > I rest my case.> > >> > > Thanks and Regards> > > Bharat> > >> > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:> > > >

> > > > As the Vision, so is the View.> > > >> > > > It is only those who See Beyond Dualities do not distinguish b/w Pure> > and> > > > Impure; Self and Absolute; I and Vishnu...

> > > >> > > > Rest are still trying to polish their Vision.> > > >> > > > Jyotisha is one way of Being One with The True Vision.> > > >> > > > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " > > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Namaste Sri Soul

> > > > >> > > > > To call the something impure is to call the Self impure. That itself> > is> > > > > impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord Vishnu but we

> > are> > > > > impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure!> > > > >> > > > > That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why> > strengthen

> > > > the> > > > > ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is in the> > > > separative> > > > > thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman is under

> > > > > bondage " .> > > > >> > > > > In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of> > Realization> > > > is> > > > > not a question of happening.

> > > > >> > > > > Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline any further> > > > > comments to your further responses.> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards> > > > > Bharat> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:

> > > > > >> > > > > > Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is the> > Source> > > > into> > > > > > which the beings Return.

> > > > > >> > > > > > When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this Atman/part of> > > > Absolute,> > > > > > is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz. anava

> > > > (generated due> > > > > > to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by maya/illusion) and> > > > karmic> > > > > > (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

> > > > > >> > > > > > The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages, that> > exist> > > > until> > > > > > the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self

> > > > /part-of-that-Absolute> > > > > > within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology " > > > > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of bondage? The> > bondage> > > > > > comes> > > > > > > from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of erroneously

> > > > thinking it> > > > > > is> > > > > > > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight things, is> > > > like> > > > > > saying

> > > > > > > something is more powerful than omnipresent, omniscient and> > > > omnipotent> > > > > > > Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that something

> > > > other> > > > > > than> > > > > > > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this view,> > then,> > > > we> > > > > > are

> > > > > > > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space with> > other> > > > things> > > > > > > that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms of space.

> > > > Anything> > > > > > > limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to calling> > > > > > changeless> > > > > > > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman as

> > limited.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted from Srimad

> > > > Bhagavad> > > > > > Gita> > > > > > > has to be studied properly under a Guru.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > > Bharat> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ wrote:

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear Vistiji,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and Nitish,

> > but> > > > > > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see> > addressed.> > > > > > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated and given

> > > > > > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8 bondages> > (and> > > > > > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful for me).

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there to the> > > > > > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially removed

> > and> > > > that> > > > > > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can you please> > > > > > > > substantiate this?> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime and is put> > in> > > > a> > > > > > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4 bondages

> > (in> > > > a> > > > > > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically mean that> > the 4> > > > > > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get freedom. The

> > > > jailkeeper> > > > > > > > must open the door and the court that has jurisdiction must> > > > > > > > authorize him to do so.> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8 bondages does> > not> > > > by> > > > > > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that karma

> > > > > > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You must supply> > > > > > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of the> > bondages

> > > > can> > > > > > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I have read> > > > > > > > (though not completely) a translation of Vivekacudamani, and I

> > > > only> > > > > > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I missing> > some> > > > > > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it says that

> > > > people> > > > > > > > in various stages of enlightenment have progressively " weaker " > > > > > > > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to have Ahamkar,

> > > > > > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born without> > one> > > > of> > > > > > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you, simply> > trying> > > > to> > > > > > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>,> > Visti> > > > > > Larsen> > > > > > > > visti@ wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply.> > > > > > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying that Rahu is

> > > > > > > > Durga.> > > > > > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya, Shiva and Agni> > are> > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are actually saying> > > > that> > > > > > > > Vishnu> > > > > > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us know better

> > than> > > > > > > > that.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this corresponds

> > to> > > > the> > > > > > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the> > nakshatras> > > > are> > > > > > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of devatas

> > come> > > > as> > > > > > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the nakshatra it> > > > > > > > eclipses.> > > > > > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart, we can

> > find> > > > > > > > based on> > > > > > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented by it.> > But> > > > its

> > > > > > > > only a> > > > > > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not devatas.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of ahamkara is

> > Surya,> > > > > > > > just as> > > > > > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is Moon. And> > > > among> > > > > > > > those

> > > > > > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of those being> > > > fully> > > > > > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control of

> > ahamkara.> > > > > > > > Divine> > > > > > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa and Sri> > Krishna> > > > > > > > being at

> > > > > > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald Trump, Adolph> > > > > > > > Hitler> > > > > > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other end of the

> > > > scale.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are EIGHT ways> > to> > > > > > > > look at

> > > > > > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the Ahamkara we must> > look> > > > > > > > at God> > > > > > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the specific

> > form> > > > of> > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the Sun.> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So please don't make the equation that everyone with Surya> > > > > > > > atmakaraka is> > > > > > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional indeed... Infact

> > the> > > > > > > > concept> > > > > > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya atmakaraka will> > be> > > > > > > > freed of

> > > > > > > > > his/her ahamkara.> > > > > > > > > Looking forward to your reply.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > --> > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@> > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > > > <

http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti,> > > > > > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by Surya ?> > > > Either> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents Ahamkara going by> > > > Gita> > > > > > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all luminaries the> > > > > > > > radiant> > > > > > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of the

> > > > > > > > constellations I am> > > > > > > > > > the Moon. " > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets are lead

> > by> > > > > > > > Surya as> > > > > > > > > > Ahamkara?> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya Narayan as a

> > > > witness> > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality creating Ahamkara> > > > > > > > Principle

> > > > > > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence> > principle?> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be referred to

> > as> > > > > > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha chakshusay',> > the> > > > eye> > > > > > > > of the

> > > > > > > > > > three worlds?> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com>> > > > > > <> > > > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> > > > > > > > > 40>,> > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > > > > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the eight> > bondages> > > > of> > > > > > > > the atma?> > > > > > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti (rahu),

> > Akasha> > > > > > > > (guru), Agni> > > > > > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and Prithvi> > (budha).> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the eight spokes> > of> > > > the> > > > > > > > kala> > > > > > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight spokes of the

> > > > > > > > anahata chakra.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT karakas is

> > futile> > > > > > > > without any> > > > > > > > > > > of this.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --> > > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>> > > > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>> > > > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes naturally> > > > only

> > > > > > > > to a> > > > > > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want to serve> > their> > > > > > > > families;

> > > > > > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the true> > sense of> > > > > > > > the term.> > > > > > > > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness and

> > > > contentment> > > > > > > > of our> > > > > > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So it's purely> > > > > > > > selfish.

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > P> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40grou

ps.com> > >> > > > > > <> > > > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>> > > > > > > >

40>> > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > > > > > > > Nitish and> > > > > > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,> > > > > > > > > > > > Good observations, I was following this thread as well> > but> > > > > > > > really

> > > > > > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.> > > > > > > > > > > > English words cant describe so well ' ahankar ' and '

> > > > aham'> > > > > > > > which are> > > > > > > > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see this only in> > Sun

> > > > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > > > However> > > > > > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve others as

> > it> > > > does> > > > > > > > not come> > > > > > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I ' away from

> > them> > > > so> > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with Paramatma, then> > the

> > > > '> > > > > > > > I '> > > > > > > > > > will> > > > > > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Best> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > <

sohamsa <sohamsa%40>> > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>>> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to Tijanaji,

> > > > Nitish> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > v_reality)> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with interest in the> > > > hope> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself disagreeing> > > > subtly> > > > > > > > > > in the> > > > > > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down in the

> > > > exchange> > > > > > > > I find> > > > > > > > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which makes a lot> > of

> > > > sense> > > > > > > > > > to me:> > > > > > > > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different level as> > the

> > > > > > > > > > effacement> > > > > > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the scriptural> > knowledge> > > > > > > > you both> > > > > > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK people: I dont

> > think> > > > > > > > it is> > > > > > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are egotistic. See,> > English> > > > > > > > > > also has

> > > > > > > > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different meanings,> > and> > > > the> > > > > > > > right> > > > > > > > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is one who has

> > a> > > > > > > > > > exaggerated> > > > > > > > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in this> > world> > > > has

> > > > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny it), it is> > plain> > > > > > > > > > wrong to

> > > > > > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and simultaneously> > observe> > > > that> > > > > > > > > > he also

> > > > > > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance and say> > " yes,> > > > > > > > that is> > > > > > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite hundreds of

> > > > people> > > > > > > > I know> > > > > > > > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have Sun AK, and> > not> > > > > > > > only

> > > > > > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their chart.> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that can be> > observed> > > > > > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they are

> > egocentric> > > > > > > > i.e.> > > > > > > > > > their> > > > > > > > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual rather

> > than> > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical (i.e.> > > > > > > > > > egocentricity does

> > > > > > > > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply makes them> > go> > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core self is

> > tested.> > > > How> > > > > > > > they> > > > > > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of other> > > > astrological

> > > > > > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely make, based> > on> > > > pure> > > > > > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided to

> > divinity> > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their view is> > > > > > > > egocentric.

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can share her> > > > data)> > > > > > > > > > who was

> > > > > > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a higher> > degree> > > > > > > > > > that she> > > > > > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then divorced,

> > then> > > > > > > > have her> > > > > > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way, then have> > her> > > > > > > > > > brother get

> > > > > > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave her too),> > then> > > > > > > > > > (she) get> > > > > > > > > > > > married again and her husband develop terminal cancer

> > very> > > > > > > > soon> > > > > > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find a strong> > and> > > > > > > > > > consistent

> > > > > > > > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become self> > reliant> > > > and> > > > > > > > only> > > > > > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in meditation/reiki. She is

> > > > > > > > probably> > > > > > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in any> > outstanding> > > > > > > > way at

> > > > > > > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the people around> > > > her..> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that Sun AK

> > people> > > > > > > > must> > > > > > > > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply a general> > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > for all> > > > > > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide them towards> > > > > > > > divinity

> > > > > > > > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on themselves> > and> > > > > > > > search> > > > > > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I find much

> > more> > > > to> > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > point.> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Comments?> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > nix nixen> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of yours " It is not> > > > always> > > > > > > > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must be

> > nothing> > > > less> > > > > > > > than> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on the right> > way

> > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.> > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with paramatma -> > > > > > > > deep/shallow,> > > > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things have a basis

> > > > only> > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has a basis> > i.e.> > > > > > > > > > separation

> > > > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory only though)> > and> > > > > > > > hence

> > > > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the kind of> > karma> > > > > > > > involved.> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a 12th part of> > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in part, it

> > becomes> > > > its> > > > > > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that> > sign/house> > > > > > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer to your

> > > > specific> > > > > > > > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the truth of

> > your> > > > > > > > queries.> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > nitish> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@

..com> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > > > " tijanadamjanovic " > > > > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions raised in these> > > > > > > > discussions

> > > > > > > > > > > > on Atma> > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn principles of

> > artha> > > > > > > > > > shastra to> > > > > > > > > > > > serve,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to

> > > > differentiate? I> > > > > > > > > > assume> > > > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into account

> > also> > > > > > > > > > (2nd, 6th,> > > > > > > > > > > > 10th)?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne, but

> > regarding> > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja yoga whose

> > > > deepest> > > > > > > > > > meaning> > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas (refer

> > > > > > > > Vivekananda) .> > > > > > > > > > > > Only in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the perfect

> > King.> > > > > > > > What> > > > > > > > > > artha> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > " yeeahoo_99 "

> > > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you

> > probably> > > > had> > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita Chapter> > 3,sloka

> > > > 22.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the cosmos has

> > chosen> > > > to> > > > > > > > work.> > > > > > > > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only SUN AK has

> > to> > > > > > > > > > " serve " , all> > > > > > > > > > > > AKs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " serve " .

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK gives a> > person

> > > > > > > > akin to> > > > > > > > > > > > Janaka?!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to Janaka -

> > > > > > > > jivanmukta -> > > > > > > > > > > > provided> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on this?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take

> > > > Dhartharastra> > > > > > > > as an> > > > > > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from 6th house.> > Leo

> > > > > > > > being a> > > > > > > > > > > > dharma> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of service

> > through> > > > > > > > 10th> > > > > > > > > > > > house of> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun AK should

> > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > > > principles of> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is> > > > serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as there is> > nothing> > > > else> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > done> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna has already> > > > > > > > achieved

> > > > > > > > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three> > worlds(refer> > > > > > > > Gita).

> > > > > > > > > > > > Those who> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to serve,> > whatever

> > > > be> > > > > > > > > > their> > > > > > > > > > > > AK.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun> > AK> > > > in> > > > > > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish> > giving by

> > > > > > > > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence that His> > > > Master> > > > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even

> > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > needed> > > > > > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his> > > > karma/desires.> > > > > > > > Thus,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to exhaust his

> > > > > > > > remaining> > > > > > > > > > > > karma/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK). There is no

> > more> > > > > > > > > > substance> > > > > > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic relationship of the

> > two> > > > > > > > which> > > > > > > > > > > > continued> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > " tijana " > > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more brilliant> > if> > > > you> > > > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > > > just answer> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my question.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what you

> > probably> > > > had> > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > mind> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you implying> > that> > > > Sun> > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > gives a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you determing> > dharma> > > > > > > > based on

> > > > > > > > > > > > this? Will> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take Dhartharastra> > as

> > > > an> > > > > > > > > > > > example!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly ever do is

> > > > serving.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava lord was Sun> > AK> > > > in> > > > > > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for unselfish> > giving by

> > > > > > > > > > itself).> > > > > > > > > > > > But do> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His Master had

> > > > exalted> > > > > > > > > > Saturn> > > > > > > > > > > > in 9th> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you think, why even

> > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > needed> > > > > > > > > > > > these?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > " yeeahoo_99 " > > > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will hardly

> > ever> > > > do?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and ancient texts

> > > > that> > > > > > > > show> > > > > > > > > > > > what> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his subjects> > are> > > > > > > > protected> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > progress> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path. Look at> > > > krishna,

> > > > > > > > Janaka> > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will understand

> > > > > > > > whatever> > > > > > > > > > > > that " hardly> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your statement, AK> > wouldn't> > > > do> > > > > > > > > > > > anything

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the rest of> > the

> > > > > > > > > > karakas (BK,> > > > > > > > > > > > PiK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow the suit!> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva jnane Jiva

> > Seva " > > > > > > > > (serving> > > > > > > > > > > > every> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of God) that

> > > > > > > > > > Narendranath> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who had Sun in

> > > > > > > > Aquarius.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had developed

> > peculiar> > > > > > > > > > sharpness> > > > > > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that empowered

> > him> > > > with> > > > > > > > > > > > unusual power> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks of his

> > Master.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could, as

> > compared> > > > to> > > > > > > > > > others,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > easily> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the words of Sri

> > > > > > > > Ramakrishna,> > > > > > > > > > > > even> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple language (Aq

> > > > Sun),> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > never as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in Libra,> > gradually

> > > > > > > > Swami> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and hints on

> > practical> > > > > > > > Vedanta> > > > > > > > > > > > that> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective life in> > the> > > > > > > > society.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as AK should> > be> > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signs> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s very hard

> > > > > > > > task... " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you have done is

> > not> > > > > > > > > > wise. Sri> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries and had

> > > > attained> > > > > > > > > > highest> > > > > > > > > > > > level> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is placed in> > Libra,> > > > it> > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > be the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > most> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a sign over

> > the> > > > > > > > rest of> > > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signs/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this spiritual

> > power> > > > > > > > manifests> > > > > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign placement.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > " tijana "

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities are those

> > of> > > > Raja> > > > > > > > > > (karaka> > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th, dig bala in> > > > 10th).> > > > > > > > > > What is

> > > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do? The lesson

> > that> > > > > > > > has> > > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the highest sence it> > > > gives> > > > > > > > > > " Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > jnane> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shiva> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-the divine

> > > > lesson> > > > > > > > > > given to> > > > > > > > > > > > us by> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For spiritual> > persons> > > > Sun> > > > > > > > as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > should be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...),

> > otherwise> > > > it`s> > > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > > > hard task.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>,> > > > > > " v reality " > > > > > > > > <reality_v@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much

> > appreciated.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re Sun AK.> > The> > > > > > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > to be> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > learnt> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can this also

> > be> > > > > > > > understood> > > > > > > > > > > > at a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in a> > spiritual> > > > > > > > sense?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic <janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <

sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>> > > > 40>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:33:22 -0700> > (PDT)> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK person have> > to> > > > be> > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > humble to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like priests,> > gurus,> > > > > > > > teachers.> > > > > > > > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person must> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa (nonviolence) , with Ch

> > the> > > > > > > > > > native is> > > > > > > > > > > > always> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > caring,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the problem is

> > that> > > > > > > > they> > > > > > > > > > never> > > > > > > > > > > > get> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people. The

> > person> > > > must> > > > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > > > lessons> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK. Ch /

> > mother, Sy> > > > /> > > > > > > > > > father> > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people you know

> > and> > > > see> > > > > > > > it in> > > > > > > > > > > > praxix.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of glass and

> > > > sing/hum> > > > > > > > > > > > melodies.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear

> > > > Rafalji/Members> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting discussion.

> > Could> > > > we> > > > > > > > > > discuss> > > > > > > > > > > > other> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives with Moon

> > as AK> > > > > > > > need to> > > > > > > > > > > > learn> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I know of a

> > > > chart> > > > > > > > where> > > > > > > > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving and> > concerned> > > > > > > > about> > > > > > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > young. So> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@

> > wp.pl>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re: Jupiter as AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should learn to

> > respect> > > > > > > > others> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn from others.

> > > > When> > > > > > > > Ju> > > > > > > > > > is in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks that he

> > knows> > > > > > > > > > everything> > > > > > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can share> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with everybody. Good

> > > > teachers> > > > > > > > of> > > > > > > > > > > > course> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as this graha

> > will> > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > naturally in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should learn to

> > > > catalyze> > > > > > > > > > energies> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > through> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while with JU AK

> > person> > > > > > > > should> > > > > > > > > > > > learn to> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of course person

> > can> > > > be> > > > > > > > > > > > focused on> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality, law, luck> > etc.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings lesson to us so> > its> > > > > > > > not so> > > > > > > > > > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > materially but> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so if Surya is

> > in> > > > > > > > good> > > > > > > > > > > > placement> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then it> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is spiritual.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on Jupiter> > as> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having Jupiter as

> > > > mahadasha.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________ _________> > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go: Go

> > puts> > > > the> > > > > > > > > > > > Internet in> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile

.. <http://mobile./> > > > > > > > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile

.. <http://mobile./> > > > > > > > > > <

http://mobile./>> /> > > > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________

> > _________> > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple! Sell your> > car> > > > > > > > for just> > > > > > > > > > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >au> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn. <

http://a.ninemsn./> > > > > > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.

> > > > > > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom%

> > 2Fcgi%2Dbin%> > > > 2Fa%> > > > > > > > 2Fci%> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F450304%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5F2%> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Fcg%5F801459% 2Fpi%5F1004813%

> > > > 2Fai%5F859641 & > > > > > > > > > > > > _t=762955845 & > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _r=tig_AUG07 &

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_m=EXT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Best wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SJC Guru Bojan Vidakovic

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for articles and consultations visit> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

http://www.jataveda

s.com> > > > > > > > > > <http://www.jataveda

s.com/ <http://www.jataveda

s.com/>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >----------- --------- --------- ----

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Choose the right car based on your> > needs.> > > > > > > > Check out> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Autos> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new Car> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Finder tool.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________

> > _________> > > > > > > > > > _________ _> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A

....[Message clipped]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namaste Sri TijanaThe mind needs focus and concentration. To which it takes upon an Ishta. Since all is nothing but the Lord, anything can be the Ishta. So if one picks or the destiny shows it, it can be taken. Considering Ishta to be the Lord, one can put one's sorrow, one's questions, one's troubles, one's happiness and share it all with the Ishta. When one does that, one lowers one's ego and recognizes that Supreme exists and slowly with help one recognizes Supreme exists in all entirety and finally one recognizes that in one too. To attribute " wants " to God is like saying it is the " God's desire " . First of all, if at all God does desire, which I seriously doubt, we as human beings wouldn't know that through our limited intelligence and limited knowledge and almost next to infinite ignorance. Secondly, to consider Atman as different from God is going against the mahavakya of the Upanishads and the foundation of Srimad Bhagavad Gita, which says " Atman is Brahman " . In view of this, wouldn't be the role of Atmakaraka to break the illusion of the bondage or to strengthen the illusion of Bondage?

My post is to rethink the foundations on which we are describing Atmakaraka. Please reconsider my posts in the light of the same. Thanks and RegardsBharat

On 9/7/07, tijanadamjanovic <nix_nixen wrote:

 

 

 

 

Om Gurave Namah

Dear Bharat and all,

I was following the thread with great hope of hearing scripture

comments and also Jyotish implications as initiated by Vistiji.

A subtle difference that can change the whole life perspective from

Jyotish point of view is Ista Devata as the real question is not

what does Atma wants or thinks but what does God wants. Without

seeing this relationship in a chart we can not percieve what is the

most proper-only way for Atma to free itself from bondages.

Warm regards,

Tijana

 

 

sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

<astrologyhindu wrote:

>

> Namaste Sri Soul

>

> Now relate Atmakaraka and its role to trying and break through this

> ignorance. Its questioning and its strife. It would give a

different meaning

> altogether. Instead of trying to break the non-existent...... its

role would

> be to reaffirm that what IS. A subtle difference can change the

whole life

> perspective from Jyotish point of view. Isn't it?

>

> Thanks and Regards

> Bharat

>

> On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak <soulsadhak wrote:

> >

> > Truly so...we Pray Asato Maa Jyotirgamaya

> >

> > that The Absolute is Seen as The Absolute.

> >

> > Behind the Veils of Ignorance it is forgotten - Who is trying

> > to Understand The Self and Why.

> >

> > There is no such division whatsoever - yet it Percieved so.

> >

> > Vishnu's Maya.

> >

> > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

> > <astrologyhindu@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste Sri Soul

> > >

> > > Truly so... so shouldn't when we interpret our scriptures-

think on

> > > polishing the view rather than reaffirming the wrong view?

> > >

> > > I rest my case.

> > >

> > > Thanks and Regards

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > As the Vision, so is the View.

> > > >

> > > > It is only those who See Beyond Dualities do not distinguish

b/w Pure

> > and

> > > > Impure; Self and Absolute; I and Vishnu...

> > > >

> > > > Rest are still trying to polish their Vision.

> > > >

> > > > Jyotisha is one way of Being One with The True Vision.

> > > >

> > > > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

> > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Namaste Sri Soul

> > > > >

> > > > > To call the something impure is to call the Self impure.

That itself

> > is

> > > > > impurity. This is like saying we are all within Lord

Vishnu but we

> > are

> > > > > impure - which means Lord Vishnu is impure!

> > > > >

> > > > > That you feel impure is different from " being " impure. Why

> > strengthen

> > > > the

> > > > > ego by thoughts of such divisions? The mala or impurity is

in the

> > > > separative

> > > > > thinking and one tends to strengthen that by saying " Atman

is under

> > > > > bondage " .

> > > > >

> > > > > In an undivided Self, who will merge with what? Question of

> > Realization

> > > > is

> > > > > not a question of happening.

> > > > >

> > > > > Given the nature of the subject, I would like to decline

any further

> > > > > comments to your further responses.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > Bharat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > On 9/7/07, Soul Sadhak soulsadhak@ wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Atman/The Absolute in it's Original state is Free and is

the

> > Source

> > > > into

> > > > > > which the beings Return.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > When manifested as beings (eko bahu syaam), this

Atman/part of

> > > > Absolute,

> > > > > > is Limited by the Veils called mallas (impurities) viz.

anava

> > > > (generated due

> > > > > > to ignorance/darkness), mayeeya (generated by

maya/illusion) and

> > > > karmic

> > > > > > (genreated by good/bad karma) mallas.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The Veiled Soul is referred to as the one with bondages,

that

> > exist

> > > > until

> > > > > > the veils of impurities are cleared and the Self

> > > > /part-of-that-Absolute

> > > > > > within us merges with the Higher Self/Absolute.

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > sohamsa , " Bharat - Hindu

Astrology "

> > > > > > astrologyhindu@ wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Namaste Sri Sundeep, Sri Visti, Sri Nitish

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Atman being ever free, where is the question of

bondage? The

> > bondage

> > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > from not-knowing the True nature of Atman and of

erroneously

> > > > thinking it

> > > > > > is

> > > > > > > something else. To say it bonded by karma or by eight

things, is

> > > > like

> > > > > > saying

> > > > > > > something is more powerful than omnipresent,

omniscient and

> > > > omnipotent

> > > > > > > Atman, that is can bind it. Furthermore, it means that

something

> > > > other

> > > > > > than

> > > > > > > Atman/Brahman exists that can bind it. If we take this

view,

> > then,

> > > > we

> > > > > > are

> > > > > > > saying that Atman/Brahman are floating around in space

with

> > other

> > > > things

> > > > > > > that can bind them. This makes them limited in terms

of space.

> > > > Anything

> > > > > > > limited is subject to change. Therefore, it is akin to

calling

> > > > > > changeless

> > > > > > > Atman/Brahman as changing and limitless Atman/Brahman

as

> > limited.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > The idea therefore, has to be rejected.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Karma does not bind the Atman and the verse quoted

from Srimad

> > > > Bhagavad

> > > > > > Gita

> > > > > > > has to be studied properly under a Guru.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks and Regards

> > > > > > > Bharat

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On 9/6/07, vedicastrostudent vedicastrostudent@ wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Vistiji,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I am eagerly watching the discussion between you and

Nitish,

> > but

> > > > > > > > there are some logical gaps which I would love to see

> > addressed.

> > > > > > > > Specifically, you initially have clearly indicated

and given

> > > > > > > > scriptural evidence for the fact that the soul has 8

bondages

> > (and

> > > > > > > > thank you for the information, it was very useful

for me).

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > However, it is an unverified logical leap from there

to the

> > > > > > > > conclusion that the 8 bondages must be sequentially

removed

> > and

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > each chara AK focusses on one of the bondages. Can

you please

> > > > > > > > substantiate this?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > By analogy, when a person gets convicted of a crime

and is put

> > in

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > jail cell, the four walls of the jail cell are the 4

bondages

> > (in

> > > > a

> > > > > > > > sense) of the person. This does not automatically

mean that

> > the 4

> > > > > > > > walls have to be broken down in order to get

freedom. The

> > > > jailkeeper

> > > > > > > > must open the door and the court that has

jurisdiction must

> > > > > > > > authorize him to do so.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > In much the same way, scriptural evidence of 8

bondages does

> > not

> > > > by

> > > > > > > > instant inference invalidate Nitish's argument that

karma

> > > > > > > > (jailkeeper, court) is the only true bondage. You

must supply

> > > > > > > > additional scriptural evidence of that weakening of

the

> > bondages

> > > > can

> > > > > > > > be done individually (e.g. by AK's focus on one). I

have read

> > > > > > > > (though not completely) a translation of

Vivekacudamani, and I

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > see mention of the the 3 sariras and 5 koshas. Am I

missing

> > some

> > > > > > > > part of it (or some other key scriptures) where it

says that

> > > > people

> > > > > > > > in various stages of enlightenment have

progressively " weaker "

> > > > > > > > koshas/sareeras/parts-thereof? Everyone seems to

have Ahamkar,

> > > > > > > > whether or not they have Sun AK. No one is ever born

without

> > one

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > the bondages - they always have all 8.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Hope you see my point. I am not contradicting you,

simply

> > trying

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > dig deeper into your wisdom..

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>,

> > Visti

> > > > > > Larsen

> > > > > > > > visti@ wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish, Namaskar

> > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply.

> > > > > > > > > Surely Surya is not Ahamkara, thats like saying

that Rahu is

> > > > > > > > Durga.

> > > > > > > > > Using that equation we could say that Aditya,

Shiva and Agni

> > are

> > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > Surya... Taking a line from your mail we are

actually saying

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > Vishnu

> > > > > > > > > being an aditya is Surya? Obviously both of us

know better

> > than

> > > > > > > > that.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > See, the devatas reside in svarga loka and this

corresponds

> > to

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > nakshatras. The grahas through their transit of the

> > nakshatras

> > > > are

> > > > > > > > > actually eclipsing them and thus certain forms of

devatas

> > come

> > > > as

> > > > > > > > > indicating by 1) the graha eclipsing. 2) the

nakshatra it

> > > > > > > > eclipses.

> > > > > > > > > Since nakshatras are the basis of the rasi chart,

we can

> > find

> > > > > > > > based on

> > > > > > > > > the state of a graha the actual devata represented

by it.

> > But

> > > > its

> > > > > > > > only a

> > > > > > > > > representation as the Grahas themselves are not

devatas.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > The graha which 'represents' the bondage of

ahamkara is

> > Surya,

> > > > > > > > just as

> > > > > > > > > the graha representing the bondage of the mind is

Moon. And

> > > > among

> > > > > > > > those

> > > > > > > > > born with Surya as atmakaraka we have grades of

those being

> > > > fully

> > > > > > > > > engrossed in ahamkara vs. having complete control

of

> > ahamkara.

> > > > > > > > Divine

> > > > > > > > > souls like Vivekananda, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa

and Sri

> > Krishna

> > > > > > > > being at

> > > > > > > > > one end of the scale. With fellows like Donald

Trump, Adolph

> > > > > > > > Hitler

> > > > > > > > > (exalted surya yuti AK) and others at the other

end of the

> > > > scale.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Now, to overcome these eight bondages, there are

EIGHT ways

> > to

> > > > > > > > look at

> > > > > > > > > God through which we can be freed. For the

Ahamkara we must

> > look

> > > > > > > > at God

> > > > > > > > > as Paramatman. This is the remedy itself. And the

specific

> > form

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > who will help us realize this is Ishana for the

Sun.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > So please don't make the equation that everyone

with Surya

> > > > > > > > atmakaraka is

> > > > > > > > > Paramatman. That would be quite delusional

indeed... Infact

> > the

> > > > > > > > concept

> > > > > > > > > of Paramatma is the means to which the Surya

atmakaraka will

> > be

> > > > > > > > freed of

> > > > > > > > > his/her ahamkara.

> > > > > > > > > Looking forward to your reply.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@

> > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > || OM TAT SAT||

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Visti,

> > > > > > > > > > How do you prove that Ahamkara is represented by

Surya ?

> > > > Either

> > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > mean to say that Lord Krishna represents

Ahamkara going by

> > > > Gita

> > > > > > > > > > Chapter 10 verse 21:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > " Of the tweleve adityas I am vishnu, of all

luminaries the

> > > > > > > > radiant

> > > > > > > > > > Sun , of the seven Maruts I am marichi, and of

the

> > > > > > > > constellations I am

> > > > > > > > > > the Moon. "

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying that Sura/Surya group of planets

are lead

> > by

> > > > > > > > Surya as

> > > > > > > > > > Ahamkara?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Are you saying that the Vedas adoring Surya

Narayan as a

> > > > witness

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > all actions (Sakshi) is an individuality

creating Ahamkara

> > > > > > > > Principle

> > > > > > > > > > and not an impersonal transcendental intelligence

> > principle?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Please explain why Surya as Ahamkara should be

referred to

> > as

> > > > > > > > > > Paramatma, the soul of all and `Jagadaikha

chakshusay',

> > the

> > > > eye

> > > > > > > > of the

> > > > > > > > > > three worlds?

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

 

40>

> > > > > > <

> > > > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > > > > > > > 40>,

> > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear List, Namaskar

> > > > > > > > > > > Why hasn't anyone started talking about the

eight

> > bondages

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > the atma?

> > > > > > > > > > > Ahamkara (surya), Manas (chandra), Prakriti

(rahu),

> > Akasha

> > > > > > > > (guru), Agni

> > > > > > > > > > > (mangala), Jala (shukra), Vayu (shani) and

Prithvi

> > (budha).

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > And how these eight bondages map into the

eight spokes

> > of

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > kala

> > > > > > > > > > > chakra, which are simultaneously the eight

spokes of the

> > > > > > > > anahata chakra.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Really any talk on the atma and its EIGHT

karakas is

> > futile

> > > > > > > > without any

> > > > > > > > > > > of this.

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Yours sincerely,

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > --

> > > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > > > > > > > > > email: visti@ <visti@>

> > > > > > > > > > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles

visit:

> > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>

> > > > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com <

http://srigaruda.com>>

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Promila Chitkara wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Sharat,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Do you not think that " serving others " comes

naturally

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > to a

> > > > > > > > > > > > handful people? There maybe people who want

to serve

> > their

> > > > > > > > families;

> > > > > > > > > > > > however, that is not selfless service in the

true

> > sense of

> > > > > > > > the term.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Because we know very well that in happiness

and

> > > > contentment

> > > > > > > > of our

> > > > > > > > > > > > families lies our happiness and growth! So

it's purely

> > > > > > > > selfish.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > P

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat <gidoc@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%

 

40

> > >

> > > > > > <

> > > > > > > > sohamsa% <sohamsa%25>

> > > > > > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:23:04 AM

> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

> > > > > > > > Nitish and

> > > > > > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ||Namah Shivaya||

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sundeep,

> > > > > > > > > > > > Good observations, I was following this

thread as well

> > but

> > > > > > > > really

> > > > > > > > > > > > found the ' ego ' bit coming in too quickly.

> > > > > > > > > > > > English words cant describe so well '

ahankar ' and '

> > > > aham'

> > > > > > > > which are

> > > > > > > > > > > > different and I agree that one cannot see

this only in

> > Sun

> > > > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > > > However

> > > > > > > > > > > > as you say, Sun AK needs to learn to serve

others as

> > it

> > > > does

> > > > > > > > not come

> > > > > > > > > > > > naturally to them. And you cant take ' I '

away from

> > them

> > > > so

> > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > > but perhaps if one wants to merge with

Paramatma, then

> > the

> > > > '

> > > > > > > > I '

> > > > > > > > > > will

> > > > > > > > > > > > have to merge in to ' Him '.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sharat

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > -

> > > > > > > > > > > > ** vedicastrostudent

<vedicastrostudent@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > <sohamsa <sohamsa%

40>

> > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

<sohamsa%25>

> > <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>>

> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:56 PM

> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: Jupiter as AK (to

Tijanaji,

> > > > Nitish

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > v_reality)

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijanaji and Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I have been reading your exchange with

interest in the

> > > > hope

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > learning something new, but I find myself

disagreeing

> > > > subtly

> > > > > > > > > > in the

> > > > > > > > > > > > essence of what you say. In fact, deep down

in the

> > > > exchange

> > > > > > > > I find

> > > > > > > > > > > > this statement made by " v_reality " which

makes a lot

> > of

> > > > sense

> > > > > > > > > > to me:

> > > > > > > > > > > > " Can this also be understood at a different

level as

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > effacement

> > > > > > > > > > > > of 'self' in a spiritual sense? " .

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my take - I have none of the

scriptural

> > knowledge

> > > > > > > > you both

> > > > > > > > > > > > have, only I have seen several Sun AK

people: I dont

> > think

> > > > > > > > it is

> > > > > > > > > > > > fair to say that Sun AK people are

egotistic. See,

> > English

> > > > > > > > > > also has

> > > > > > > > > > > > a lot of words which have subtly different

meanings,

> > and

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > right

> > > > > > > > > > > > one has to be used. An egotistic person is

one who has

> > a

> > > > > > > > > > exaggerated

> > > > > > > > > > > > sense of self-importance. Almost everyone in

this

> > world

> > > > has

> > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > (and you are fooling yourself if you deny

it), it is

> > plain

> > > > > > > > > > wrong to

> > > > > > > > > > > > observe a person have Sun AK and

simultaneously

> > observe

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > he also

> > > > > > > > > > > > has an exaggerated sense of self importance

and say

> > " yes,

> > > > > > > > that is

> > > > > > > > > > > > what the Sun AK does to him " . I can cite

hundreds of

> > > > people

> > > > > > > > I know

> > > > > > > > > > > > who are very self important and DONT have

Sun AK, and

> > not

> > > > > > > > only

> > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > may not even have a strong Sun in their

chart.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I personally think the only statement that

can be

> > observed

> > > > > > > > > > > > repeatedly with Sun AK people is that they

are

> > egocentric

> > > > > > > > i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > > > > view of the world is based on the individual

rather

> > than

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > society. They may or may not be egotistical

(i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > egocentricity does

> > > > > > > > > > > > not imply self importance) - the AK simply

makes them

> > go

> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences in life such that their core

self is

> > tested.

> > > > How

> > > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > > > > > respond to it depends probably on lots of

other

> > > > astrological

> > > > > > > > > > > > factors. The only statement I can safely

make, based

> > on

> > > > pure

> > > > > > > > > > > > experience, is that Sun AK people are guided

to

> > divinity

> > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > experiences of the self, consequently their

view is

> > > > > > > > egocentric.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > I know one Sun AK woman (dont know if I can

share her

> > > > data)

> > > > > > > > > > who was

> > > > > > > > > > > > molested (by her own professor) and denied a

higher

> > degree

> > > > > > > > > > that she

> > > > > > > > > > > > worked hard for, then get married and then

divorced,

> > then

> > > > > > > > have her

> > > > > > > > > > > > mom die of cancer in a rather painful way,

then have

> > her

> > > > > > > > > > brother get

> > > > > > > > > > > > divorced in a messy lawsuit (and then leave

her too),

> > then

> > > > > > > > > > (she) get

> > > > > > > > > > > > married again and her husband develop

terminal cancer

> > very

> > > > > > > > soon

> > > > > > > > > > > > afterward. Net result: she cant seem to find

a strong

> > and

> > > > > > > > > > consistent

> > > > > > > > > > > > support outside of herself - she has become

self

> > reliant

> > > > and

> > > > > > > > only

> > > > > > > > > > > > finds consistent happiness in

meditation/reiki. She is

> > > > > > > > probably

> > > > > > > > > > > > egotistical in some degree too, but not in

any

> > outstanding

> > > > > > > > way at

> > > > > > > > > > > > all, and probably much less than all the

people around

> > > > her..

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Consequently, I really dispute the fact that

Sun AK

> > people

> > > > > > > > must

> > > > > > > > > > > > learn to " reduce their ego " . That is simply

a general

> > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > for all

> > > > > > > > > > > > of mankind. Sun AK people's AK will guide

them towards

> > > > > > > > divinity

> > > > > > > > > > > > through experiences that make them focus on

themselves

> > and

> > > > > > > > search

> > > > > > > > > > > > for the truth: now that's the statement I

find much

> > more

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > point.

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Comments?

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sundeep

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > nix nixen

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@ ..>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Only from one simple statement of

yours " It is not

> > > > always

> > > > > > > > > > > > possible for me... " i read that your AK must

be

> > nothing

> > > > less

> > > > > > > > than

> > > > > > > > > > > > Sun. Am i right? If yes, then i think i`m on

the right

> > way

> > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > finding answers on my queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > yeeahoo_99 <nitish.arya@ ...> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja Yoga is the yoga of soul with

paramatma -

> > > > > > > > deep/shallow,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual - all kind of things

have a basis

> > > > only

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > paramatma. Thus, even Raja-bhanga yoga has

a basis

> > i.e.

> > > > > > > > > > separation

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > soul from paramatma (which is illusory

only though)

> > and

> > > > > > > > hence

> > > > > > > > > > > > > material/spiritual loss depending on the

kind of

> > karma

> > > > > > > > involved.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > As the lord of a sign, a planet rules a

12th part of

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > consciousness, relatively :). Thus, in

part, it

> > becomes

> > > > its

> > > > > > > > > > > > > responsibility to guide the affairs of that

> > sign/house

> > > > > > > > towards

> > > > > > > > > > > > > fulfillment. You may explore it further.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > It is not always possible for me to answer

to your

> > > > specific

> > > > > > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully, in time, you will discover the

truth of

> > your

> > > > > > > > queries.

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > nitish

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > > > " tijanadamjanovic "

> > > > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, all must serve. The questions

raised in these

> > > > > > > > discussions

> > > > > > > > > > > > on Atma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas were on the specific way of

serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we say that Sun AK must learn

principles of

> > artha

> > > > > > > > > > shastra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > serve,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the same stands for Ma and Ju AK? How to

> > > > differentiate? I

> > > > > > > > > > assume

> > > > > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > are taking karakatvas of the houses into

account

> > also

> > > > > > > > > > (2nd, 6th,

> > > > > > > > > > > > 10th)?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sun/Raja gets service on the throne,

but

> > regarding

> > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and Atma this is related to real Raja

yoga whose

> > > > deepest

> > > > > > > > > > meaning

> > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > inseparable from 10th house of indriyas

(refer

> > > > > > > > Vivekananda) .

> > > > > > > > > > > > Only in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that sense we can talk of Janaka or the

perfect

> > King.

> > > > > > > > What

> > > > > > > > > > artha

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shastra principles you had in mind?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " yeeahoo_99 "

> > > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om TAT SAT ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what

you

> > probably

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning Gita in this context.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Context that was intended is Gita

Chapter

> > 3,sloka

> > > > 22.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All must work if the lord of the

cosmos has

> > chosen

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > work.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing specific that only

SUN AK has

> > to

> > > > > > > > > > " serve " , all

> > > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " serve " .

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, are you implying that Sun AK

gives a

> > person

> > > > > > > > akin to

> > > > > > > > > > > > Janaka?!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Sun AK gives a person akin to

Janaka -

> > > > > > > > jivanmukta -

> > > > > > > > > > > > provided

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough effort has been put in.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you determing dharma based on

this?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Sun AK need not be 9th lord.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will you advise Sun AK people to take

> > > > Dhartharastra

> > > > > > > > as an

> > > > > > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The attitude of service is seen from

6th house.

> > Leo

> > > > > > > > being a

> > > > > > > > > > > > dharma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trikona sign fulfills its purpose of

service

> > through

> > > > > > > > 10th

> > > > > > > > > > > > house of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Artha, which is 6th from it. So a Sun

AK should

> > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > > principles of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > artha shastra to serve.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly

ever do is

> > > > serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All souls have to " Serve " only as

there is

> > nothing

> > > > else

> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > done

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the three worlds because Krishna

has already

> > > > > > > > achieved

> > > > > > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is there to achieve in the three

> > worlds(refer

> > > > > > > > Gita).

> > > > > > > > > > > > Those who

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do not serve, are reborn to learn to

serve,

> > whatever

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > their

> > > > > > > > > > > > AK.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava

lord was Sun

> > AK

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish

> > giving by

> > > > > > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But do you think it`s a coincidence

that His

> > > > Master

> > > > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturn in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even

> > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One is not re-born after exhausting his

> > > > karma/desires.

> > > > > > > > Thus,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vivekananda (Rahu PiK) came here to

exhaust his

> > > > > > > > remaining

> > > > > > > > > > > > karma/

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > desires with Ramakrishna (Rahu AK).

There is no

> > more

> > > > > > > > > > substance

> > > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this than a past-life karmic

relationship of the

> > two

> > > > > > > > which

> > > > > > > > > > > > continued

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this birth also.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " tijana "

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Nitish,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your elaboration would be even more

brilliant

> > if

> > > > you

> > > > > > > > had

> > > > > > > > > > > > just answer

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > my question.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To fulfill ones own dharma is what

you

> > probably

> > > > had

> > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > mind

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mentioning

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gita in this context. But, are you

implying

> > that

> > > > Sun

> > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > gives a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person akin to Janaka?! Are you

determing

> > dharma

> > > > > > > > based on

> > > > > > > > > > > > this? Will

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you advise Sun AK people to take

Dhartharastra

> > as

> > > > an

> > > > > > > > > > > > example!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, again, what Raja will hardly

ever do is

> > > > serving.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami Vivekananda` s Dharm bhava

lord was Sun

> > AK

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > lagna in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (extraordinary combination for

unselfish

> > giving by

> > > > > > > > > > itself).

> > > > > > > > > > > > But do

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think it`s a coincidence that His

Master had

> > > > exalted

> > > > > > > > > > Saturn

> > > > > > > > > > > > in 9th

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhava and Rahu AK? What do you

think, why even

> > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > needed

> > > > > > > > > > > > these?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " yeeahoo_99 "

> > > > > > > > <nitish.arya@ >

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Om Tat Sat ||

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Tijana,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the thing that Raja will

hardly

> > ever

> > > > do?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Read up Gita, arthashastra and

ancient texts

> > > > that

> > > > > > > > show

> > > > > > > > > > > > what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja has to do to ensure that his

subjects

> > are

> > > > > > > > protected

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > progress

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on the upward evolutionary path.

Look at

> > > > krishna,

> > > > > > > > Janaka

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ChandraGupta Maurya and you will

understand

> > > > > > > > whatever

> > > > > > > > > > > > that " hardly

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ever do " equates to.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, going by your

statement, AK

> > wouldn't

> > > > do

> > > > > > > > > > > > anything

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the king of the horoscope and the

rest of

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > karakas (BK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > PiK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Puk,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GK) i.e. his subjects will follow

the suit!

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, the mantra is " Shiva

jnane Jiva

> > Seva "

> > > > > > > > (serving

> > > > > > > > > > > > every

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being as the full manifestation of

God) that

> > > > > > > > > > Narendranath

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > received

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from his Master Ramakrishna who

had Sun in

> > > > > > > > Aquarius.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Being Sun AK, Vivekananda had

developed

> > peculiar

> > > > > > > > > > sharpness

> > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > perception and assimilation that

empowered

> > him

> > > > with

> > > > > > > > > > > > unusual power

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pick up 'the gems' from the talks

of his

> > Master.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With Sun in Sagittarius, he could,

as

> > compared

> > > > to

> > > > > > > > > > others,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > easily

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'see' the deep meaning in the

words of Sri

> > > > > > > > Ramakrishna,

> > > > > > > > > > > > even

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > though

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Master told them in simple

language (Aq

> > > > Sun),

> > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > never as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > preaching.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With its dispositor Jupiter in

Libra,

> > gradually

> > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > started assimilating tips and

hints on

> > practical

> > > > > > > > Vedanta

> > > > > > > > > > > > that

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > benefit individual and collective

life in

> > the

> > > > > > > > society.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ...For spiritual persons Sun as

AK should

> > be

> > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (Shiva jnane...), otherwise it`s

very hard

> > > > > > > > task... "

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting up statements like you

have done is

> > not

> > > > > > > > > > wise. Sri

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yukteswar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Giri, has Sun AK placed in Aries

and had

> > > > attained

> > > > > > > > > > highest

> > > > > > > > > > > > level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spirituality. Even if Sun AK is

placed in

> > Libra,

> > > > it

> > > > > > > > > > could

> > > > > > > > > > > > be the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > most

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual person.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK shows the spiritual power of a

sign over

> > the

> > > > > > > > rest of

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signs/

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > planets in the chart and this

spiritual

> > power

> > > > > > > > manifests

> > > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dispositor of AK and its sign

placement.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NITISH

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " tijana "

> > > > > > > > <nix_nixen@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun is the Self. Its qualities

are those

> > of

> > > > Raja

> > > > > > > > > > (karaka

> > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > first house, lord of the 5th,

dig bala in

> > > > 10th).

> > > > > > > > > > What is

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that Raja will hardly ever do?

The lesson

> > that

> > > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK is serving, in the

highest sence it

> > > > gives

> > > > > > > > > > " Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > jnane

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shiva

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seva " (service of man as God)-

the divine

> > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > given to

> > > > > > > > > > > > us by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Swami

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vivekananda (Sun AK). For

spiritual

> > persons

> > > > Sun

> > > > > > > > as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > should be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter`s signs (Shiva jnane...),

> > otherwise

> > > > it`s

> > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > hard task.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Warm regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tijana

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > " v reality "

> > > > > > > > <reality_v@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bojan-ji

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. Much

> > appreciated.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I may ask another query re

Sun AK.

> > The

> > > > > > > > lesson

> > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > learnt

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sun AK,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the reduction of ego. Can

this also

> > be

> > > > > > > > understood

> > > > > > > > > > > > at a

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > different level

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as the effacement of 'self' in

a

> > spiritual

> > > > > > > > sense?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan Vidakovic

<janbovid@>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > <sohamsa% <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

 

> > <sohamsa%25> <sohamsa%25>

> > > > 40>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007

08:33:22 -0700

> > (PDT)

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >HARE RAMA KRISHNA

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would add that with Gu AK

person have

> > to

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > humble to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spiritual

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >techers and natives, like

priests,

> > gurus,

> > > > > > > > teachers.

> > > > > > > > > > > > With Ma

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > person must

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >practise Ahumsa

(nonviolence) , with Ch

> > the

> > > > > > > > > > native is

> > > > > > > > > > > > always

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > very

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > caring,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >and gives emotions but the

problem is

> > that

> > > > > > > > they

> > > > > > > > > > never

> > > > > > > > > > > > get

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >themselves from other people.

The

> > person

> > > > must

> > > > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > > lessons

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >people represented with AK.

Ch /

> > mother, Sy

> > > > /

> > > > > > > > > > father

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everything those

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >grahas represent.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Take few examples of people

you know

> > and

> > > > see

> > > > > > > > it in

> > > > > > > > > > > > praxix.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wishes,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Bojan

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hari Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ >

wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hraum namah adityaya

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Su,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Person should use a lot of

glass and

> > > > sing/hum

> > > > > > > > > > > > melodies.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > email: rafal@

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > v reality napisaÅ,(a): Dear

> > > > Rafalji/Members

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is an interesting

discussion.

> > Could

> > > > we

> > > > > > > > > > discuss

> > > > > > > > > > > > other

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AKs

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > too. I read

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in an article that natives

with Moon

> > as AK

> > > > > > > > need to

> > > > > > > > > > > > learn

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >caring

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and loving to others. But I

know of a

> > > > chart

> > > > > > > > where

> > > > > > > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > native

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > already

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >by

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nature very caring, loving

and

> > concerned

> > > > > > > > about

> > > > > > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > since

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > young. So

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >what

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is the lesson to be learnt?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Su

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

<starsuponme@

> > wp.pl>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >sohamsa@ .com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Re:

Jupiter as AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Wed, 22 Aug 2007

10:24:14 +0200

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *hraum namah adityaya*

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Dear LN Kumar,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With Ju AK person should

learn to

> > respect

> > > > > > > > others

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > knowledge

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >tradition,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >should be ready to learn

from others.

> > > > When

> > > > > > > > Ju

> > > > > > > > > > is in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > kendra to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK or is

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >himself then native thinks

that he

> > knows

> > > > > > > > > > everything

> > > > > > > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > now

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can share

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >His knowledge with

everybody. Good

> > > > teachers

> > > > > > > > of

> > > > > > > > > > > > course

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > comes

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >AK-Jupiter- Natives, as

this graha

> > will

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > naturally in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Karakamsa.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >With MA AK person should

learn to

> > > > catalyze

> > > > > > > > > > energies

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > through

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ZEN, TAI-CHI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >or

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >other techniques, while

with JU AK

> > person

> > > > > > > > should

> > > > > > > > > > > > learn to

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more humble

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >regarding knowledge. Of

course person

> > can

> > > > be

> > > > > > > > > > > > focused on

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jupiter-

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > karakas

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >like kids, spirituality,

law, luck

> > etc.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Mahadasa of AK brings

lesson to us so

> > its

> > > > > > > > not so

> > > > > > > > > > > > easy

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > materially but

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >inspiring spiritually, so

if Surya is

> > in

> > > > > > > > good

> > > > > > > > > > > > placement

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AK

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > then it

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >be not so bad as person is

spiritual.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Rafal Gendarz

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa.

com

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >narender kumar napisa?(a):

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Dear Gurujans,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Kindly throw some light on

Jupiter

> > as

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Atmakaraka and having

Jupiter as

> > > > mahadasha.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Respectful Regards,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>LN Kumar

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>__________ __ _________

_________

> > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________ _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Take the Internet to Go:

Go

> > puts

> > > > the

> > > > > > > > > > > > Internet in

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > your

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > pocket:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >mail,

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>news, photos & more.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>http://mobile.

 

<http://mobile./

> > > > > > > > > > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >><http://mobile.

 

<http://mobile./

> > > > > > > > > > <http://mobile./>>

/

> > > > > > > > > > > > go?refer= 1GNXIC>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________

_________

> > _________

> > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Advertisement: It's simple!

Sell your

> > car

> > > > > > > > for just

> > > > > > > > > > > > $30 at

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CarPoint.com.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >au

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://a.ninemsn.

 

<http://a.ninemsn./

> > > > > > > > > > <http://a.ninemsn./>> com.au/b.

> > > > > > > > > > > > aspx?URL= http%3A%2F%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fsecure%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2Dau%2Eimrworldw ide%2Ecom%

> > 2Fcgi%2Dbin%

> > > > 2Fa%

> > > > > > > > 2Fci%

> > > > > > > > > > > > 5F450304%

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2Fet%

> > > > > ...[Message clipped]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...