Sushilji Pls. respond Learner Question to Sushilji

[Guest guest]

Dear Kiran Rama,

I feel your question may be reworded.

The lord of the house does not becomes malefic or banefic to its own house , and try to uplift its signification depending upon

its strength,association ,placement ,avastha etc.Each planet acts according to its inherent or accrued nature.

Lets take few examples,

1. If lord of the house is with strength and associated with a banefic , and aspects or occupies its own house , banefic results concerning the house will accrue;

in the similar conditions a malefic is associated with house lord , the results accrued will give lot of problems ,e.g. in case of progeny ,ill health etc. may result.

2. If house lord is week and associated with banefic , the results will accrue after delays.

In similar conditions ,if malefic is associated , the results will accrue after lot of efforts and delays , and of inferior quality and problematic in nature.

These matters are explained in detail :

a. Jatak Desa Marg , chapter 8.

b. Jatak Parijat , chapter 11

c. Phal Deepka chapter 15

Regards,

 

 

G.K.GOELPh: 09350311433Add: L-409, SARITA VIHARNEW DELHI-110 076INDIA

kiran.rama <kiran.rama Sent: Tuesday, 27 November, 2007 9:05:11 AM Sushilji Pls. respond Re: Learner Question to Sushilji

 

vedic_astrology_ classes@gro ups.com, "kiran.rama"<kiran.rama@ ...> wrote:>> Sushilji,> > Given that it is an accepted principle that:> "Significance of a house manifests through the lord of the house as> one of the factors", how does this change, when the lord is functional> benefic/malefic?> > If lord of a house is a functional malefic does it signify bad for the> things specified by the house?> Given that functional benefic signifies good for things specified by> the house, can we say that:> 1. Good if dustana lord is malefic> 2. Good if other house lords are benefic> > Regards> kiran>

Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how.