(ishta devata) JAI SRIKRISHNA TO ALL

[Guest guest]

Dear Nitish,

 

> Your logic is flawed. First, get your axioms correct.

> Duality implies, there cannot be multiplicity, always a

duality.

 

There are no axioms to get correct here, simply an appreciation of

the *level* at which the observation was made. If I have a white

pixel and a black pixel, that's a duality, no? However, aggregate

millions of them together and you can create anything you want -

pictures of hundreds of people bathing in a river, for e.g. So,

you've achieved a multiplicity using duality as a base. The path

from non-duality to duality is infinitely long, and the path from

duality to multiplicity is a short one. In fact, that's what

manifestation is all about - get some duality going first, and

everything else follows. The finer your observations, the closer you

witness the true duality(ies). The coarser your observations, the

more you witness multiplicities. They are not very different..

 

 

> And the duality cannot be shared. If Su-Mo is a duality, Mo-Ra

cannot

> be yet another duality as Tijana tried to project.

> Everything non-dualistic in Prakriti is Brahman.

> Action doesn't have a dualistic association with it in --

> BrahmaKarmaSamadhina (4:24).

 

I look, but I dont see. Where does it define action at all? And

nowhere do I see the *unambiguous* mention of action being non-dual.

Please give, in your own words, what is meant by a non-dual action.

Do not simply give pointers to non-karma-accruing actions, but bite

the bullet and define a non-dual action. Who is the doer of the

action, what does the doer operate upon, and how exactly does the

non-dual doer witness something other than itself? If it does, how

does the non-duality of the doer remain intact?

 

IMHO, your perception of non-duality is simply something for which

an opposite doesnt exist. But that non-dual entity swims in a world

of opposites (prakriti), right? To me, that is not non-duality. Non-

duality is *transcending* the opposites. No opposites *exist*

in " its " world! That is why I said " electric current effectuates the

video game, not motivates it " . Electric current is a non-participant

in the video game even though it is it's effectuator. It has no

motive in the video game, much like Brahman doesnt in this " world "

 

 

Sundeep