Guest guest Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Arudha is what people think you are. Obviously, you image changes with time. Hence, Arudha is something that changes with time (though AL does not change) The changes of Arudha (ie what people think of you) depends upon your own dasa and the transitory aspects like the nakstra, tithi and the transits. However, not much work is done on this aspect. I welcome comments. Kishore patnaik On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:15 AM, vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent wrote: Dear all, I recall reading an old message on one of these forums (I forget which), and I remember a post by Sanjayji which said something like Aurobindo " renounced his arudha " after 1908 (or 1909) after being imprisoned for some bombing. His birthtime as I have it is: August 15, 1872, 5:00am, 88E22, 22N32, +5:53GMT, Cancer Lagna. He has Rahu in AL in 11th house Taurus which has 42 bindus. He was running Scorpio Narayana Dasa with Ketu in it at that time. The events obviously show that he went through a major transformation, but astrologically, I dont comprehend the statement " renounced his arudha " . The only other time I saw a related statement about Arudha was when someone's AK is in AL and Sanjayji had mentioned (in a completely separate post and topic) something like " the AK will throw up the falsity of the Arudha " . While I can understand the falsity of the Arudha being understood by the individual, is this " renouncing the arudha " the same, or does the AL actually change to something else, or have I completely misunderstood something? Thanks in advance, Sundeep -- Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within the reach of every hand.~:~ Mother Theresa ~:~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Dear Kishore, As you note, AL does not change. So are you saying that Sanjayji was pointing out nothing more than " image changes with time " ? I doubt it.. I wish I could locate the post now, but I wonder if there was some implication that instead of Rahu being the AL, Ketu would replace it.. My memory fails me, and I'm probably wrong, but I think there was some implication like that.. Sounds kind of correct in Aurobindo's case, wouldnt you say? From a revolutionary who is actually into bombing and hurting people to a deeply spiritual being? Thanks for your comments, awaiting more.. Sundeep sohamsa , " kishore patnaik " <kishorepatnaik09 wrote: > > Arudha is what people think you are. Obviously, you image changes with time. > Hence, Arudha is something that changes with time (though AL does not > change) > > The changes of Arudha (ie what people think of you) depends upon your own > dasa and the transitory aspects like the nakstra, tithi and the transits. > > However, not much work is done on this aspect. I welcome comments. > > Kishore patnaik > > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:15 AM, vedicastrostudent < > vedicastrostudent wrote: > > > Dear all, > > I recall reading an old message on one of these forums (I forget > > which), and I remember a post by Sanjayji which said something like > > Aurobindo " renounced his arudha " after 1908 (or 1909) after being > > imprisoned for some bombing. His birthtime as I have it is: > > > > August 15, 1872, 5:00am, 88E22, 22N32, +5:53GMT, Cancer Lagna. > > > > He has Rahu in AL in 11th house Taurus which has 42 bindus. He was > > running Scorpio Narayana Dasa with Ketu in it at that time. The > > events obviously show that he went through a major transformation, > > but astrologically, I dont comprehend the statement " renounced his > > arudha " . The only other time I saw a related statement about Arudha > > was when someone's AK is in AL and Sanjayji had mentioned (in a > > completely separate post and topic) something like " the AK will > > throw up the falsity of the Arudha " . While I can understand the > > falsity of the Arudha being understood by the individual, is > > this " renouncing the arudha " the same, or does the AL actually > > change to something else, or have I completely misunderstood > > something? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > -- > Love is a fruit in season at all times, > and within the reach of every hand. > ~:~ Mother Theresa ~:~ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 It is possible. While the Siddhis can change the course of Karma, they would not do it, as a matter of principle. On the other hand, Aurobindo could not have changed his image unless he had that siddhi, which he must have any way lacked before really becoming a sadhu. Hence, we can not any thing more than the image changes with time. It is not that Aurobindo has " changed his AL or the way it behaves " with his yogic powers. Kishore patnaik On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:55 AM, vedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudent wrote: Dear Kishore, As you note, AL does not change. So are you saying that Sanjayji was pointing out nothing more than " image changes with time " ? I doubt it.. I wish I could locate the post now, but I wonder if there was some implication that instead of Rahu being the AL, Ketu would replace it.. My memory fails me, and I'm probably wrong, but I think there was some implication like that.. Sounds kind of correct in Aurobindo's case, wouldnt you say? From a revolutionary who is actually into bombing and hurting people to a deeply spiritual being? Thanks for your comments, awaiting more.. Sundeep sohamsa , " kishore patnaik " <kishorepatnaik09 wrote: > > Arudha is what people think you are. Obviously, you image changes with time. > Hence, Arudha is something that changes with time (though AL does not > change) > > The changes of Arudha (ie what people think of you) depends upon your own > dasa and the transitory aspects like the nakstra, tithi and the transits. > > However, not much work is done on this aspect. I welcome comments. > > Kishore patnaik > > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:15 AM, vedicastrostudent < > vedicastrostudent wrote: > > > Dear all, > > I recall reading an old message on one of these forums (I forget > > which), and I remember a post by Sanjayji which said something like > > Aurobindo " renounced his arudha " after 1908 (or 1909) after being > > imprisoned for some bombing. His birthtime as I have it is: > > > > August 15, 1872, 5:00am, 88E22, 22N32, +5:53GMT, Cancer Lagna. > > > > He has Rahu in AL in 11th house Taurus which has 42 bindus. He was > > running Scorpio Narayana Dasa with Ketu in it at that time. The > > events obviously show that he went through a major transformation, > > but astrologically, I dont comprehend the statement " renounced his > > arudha " . The only other time I saw a related statement about Arudha > > was when someone's AK is in AL and Sanjayji had mentioned (in a > > completely separate post and topic) something like " the AK will > > throw up the falsity of the Arudha " . While I can understand the > > falsity of the Arudha being understood by the individual, is > > this " renouncing the arudha " the same, or does the AL actually > > change to something else, or have I completely misunderstood > > something? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > -- > Love is a fruit in season at all times, > and within the reach of every hand. > ~:~ Mother Theresa ~:~ > -- Love is a fruit in season at all times, and within the reach of every hand.~:~ Mother Theresa ~:~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Hare Rama Krsna ||Dear Sundeep,There are many instances where we see the stronger of the 1st or 7th houses to fix a point of reference. It may not be different in the case of Arudha Lagna especially when occupied by the nodes who are notorious for reversal. I recall an SJC Atri lecture where Sanjayji explicitly stated that the 7th from AL is more important than the AL itself - this is the door to the world and if this door opens for a person then certainly that person will become known for the same - right?Respectfully,Michalvedicastrostudent <vedicastrostudentsohamsa Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 4:25:38 PM Re: Did Aurobindo "renounce his arudha"?Dear Kishore, As you note, AL does not change. So are you saying that Sanjayji was pointing out nothing more than "image changes with time"? I doubt it.. I wish I could locate the post now, but I wonder if there was some implication that instead of Rahu being the AL, Ketu would replace it.. My memory fails me, and I'm probably wrong, but I think there was some implication like that.. Sounds kind of correct in Aurobindo's case, wouldnt you say? From a revolutionary who is actually into bombing and hurting people to a deeply spiritual being? Thanks for your comments, awaiting more.. Sundeep sohamsa@ .com, "kishore patnaik" <kishorepatnaik09@ ...> wrote: > > Arudha is what people think you are. Obviously, you image changes with time. > Hence, Arudha is something that changes with time (though AL does not > change) > > The changes of Arudha (ie what people think of you) depends upon your own > dasa and the transitory aspects like the nakstra, tithi and the transits. > > However, not much work is done on this aspect. I welcome comments. > > Kishore patnaik > > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 3:15 AM, vedicastrostudent < > vedicastrostudent@ ...> wrote: > > > Dear all, > > I recall reading an old message on one of these forums (I forget > > which), and I remember a post by Sanjayji which said something like > > Aurobindo "renounced his arudha" after 1908 (or 1909) after being > > imprisoned for some bombing. His birthtime as I have it is: > > > > August 15, 1872, 5:00am, 88E22, 22N32, +5:53GMT, Cancer Lagna. > > > > He has Rahu in AL in 11th house Taurus which has 42 bindus. He was > > running Scorpio Narayana Dasa with Ketu in it at that time. The > > events obviously show that he went through a major transformation, > > but astrologically, I dont comprehend the statement "renounced his > > arudha". The only other time I saw a related statement about Arudha > > was when someone's AK is in AL and Sanjayji had mentioned (in a > > completely separate post and topic) something like "the AK will > > throw up the falsity of the Arudha". While I can understand the > > falsity of the Arudha being understood by the individual, is > > this "renouncing the arudha" the same, or does the AL actually > > change to something else, or have I completely misunderstood > > something? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > > > > > -- > Love is a fruit in season at all times, > and within the reach of every hand. > ~:~ Mother Theresa ~:~ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.