Sample Horoscope

December 10, 2009

Dear Punit ji,

Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of instructing which is very easy to follow.

The following link -

http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha has been used here ?

And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for the new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make out where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

regards,

Bhaskar.

December 11, 2009

Dear Bhaskar ji,

It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15 chapters planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to go. As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because without that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa and has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com. For the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart in the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note for the same in the tutorial.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Dear Punit ji,

Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of instructing which is very easy to follow.

The following link -

http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha has been used here ?

And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for the new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make out where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

regards,

Bhaskar.

December 11, 2009

Dear Punit ji,

Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link is

allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in my

software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres the

mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the Table of

Houses or else would have calculated manually.

regards/Bhaskar.

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15 chapters

> planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to go.

> As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because without

> that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

>

> Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa and

> has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com <http://www.mykundali.com/>. For

> the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart in

> the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

>

> Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note for

> the same in the tutorial.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotishwrote:

>

> >

> > Dear Punit ji,

> >

> > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> >

> > The following link -

> >

> > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

> >

> > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha has

> > been used here ?

> >

> > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for the

> > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make out

> > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> >

> > regards,

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

>

December 11, 2009

Dear Bhaskar ji,

Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have used following values -

Latitude 27 : 9 : N Longitude 78 : 0 : E

Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are getting for the following input -

January 13th, 2009

Time: 12:00 Noon

Place: Agra

Latitude 27 : 9 : N Longitude 78 : 0 : E Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Dear Punit ji,Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.regards/Bhaskar. , Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Bhaskar ji,> > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15 chapters

> planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to go.> As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because without> that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa and> has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com <http://www.mykundali.com/>. For > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart in> the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

> > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note for> the same in the tutorial.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotishwrote: > > >> >> > Dear Punit ji,> >> > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> >> > The following link -> >> > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2> >

> > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha has> > been used here ?> >> > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for the> > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make out

> > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> >> > regards,> >> > Bhaskar.> >> > > >>

December 11, 2009

> January 13th, 2009

> Time: 12:00 Noon

> Place: Agra

> Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> Longitude 78 : 0 : E

KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

>

> What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink

> suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have used

> following values -

>

> Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> Longitude 78 : 0 : E

>

> Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> getting for the following input -

>

> January 13th, 2009

> Time: 12:00 Noon

> Place: Agra

> Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> Longitude 78 : 0 : E

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotishwrote:

>

> >

> > Dear Punit ji,

> >

> > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link

> > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in

> > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres

> > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> >

> > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> >

> > regards/Bhaskar.

> >

> > <%40>, Punit

> > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > chapters

> > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to

> > go.

> > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > without

> > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > >

> > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa

> > and

> > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com <http://www.mykundali.com/><

> > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For

> >

> > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart

> > in

> > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

> > >

> > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note

> > for

> > > the same in the tutorial.

> > >

> > > Thanks & Regards,

> > >

> > > Punit Pandey

> > >

> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > >

> > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > >

> > > > The following link -

> > > >

> > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

> > > >

> > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha

> > has

> > > > been used here ?

> > > >

> > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for

> > the

> > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make

> > out

> > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 11, 2009

J.Hora

Aynamsha 23.53.07

78.01E 27.11N

Asc. Aries 01.27.07

In Example Charti

Ayanamsha 23.53.34

78.00E 27.09N

Asc. Aries 01.23.55

Now what among the 3 Factors,

Latitude,Longitude and the Ayanamsha

can bring about such a difference of

about 4 degrees in the Ascendantscalculated by both softwares ?

regards/Bhaskar.

, "TW" <tw853 wrote:>> > January 13th, 2009> > Time: 12:00 Noon> > Place: Agra> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)> Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > > > , Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:> >> > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> > suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have used> > following values -> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> > getting for the following input -> > > > January 13th, 2009> > Time: 12:00 Noon> > Place: Agra> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Dear Punit ji,> > >> > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link> > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres> > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > >> > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> > >> > > regards/Bhaskar.> > >> > >> > > <%40>, Punit> > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > >> > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15> > > chapters> > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > > go.> > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because> > > without> > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > >> > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > > and> > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com <http://www.mykundali.com/><> > > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For> > >> > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > > in> > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> > > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial> > > >> > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note> > > for> > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > >> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > >> > > > Punit Pandey> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > >> > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > >> > > > > The following link -> > > > >> > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2> > > > >> > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > > has> > > > > been used here ?> > > > >> > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for> > > the> > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make> > > out> > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > >> > > > > regards,> > > > >> > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >>

December 11, 2009

Dear Punitji,

In Jhora as per your given data I am getting as :-

Lagana : 1 Ar 24'45.06 the same For First house start point.

Ayanamsa : 23-53-34.73 (KP).

Thanks & regards,

M.S.Bohra

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

>

> What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink

> suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have used

> following values -

>

> Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> Longitude 78 : 0 : E

>

> Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> getting for the following input -

>

> January 13th, 2009

> Time: 12:00 Noon

> Place: Agra

> Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> Longitude 78 : 0 : E

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotishwrote:

>

> >

> > Dear Punit ji,

> >

> > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link

> > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in

> > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres

> > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> >

> > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> >

> > regards/Bhaskar.

> >

> > <%40>, Punit

> > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > chapters

> > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to

> > go.

> > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > without

> > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > >

> > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa

> > and

> > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com <http://www.mykundali.com/><

> > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For

> >

> > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart

> > in

> > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

> > >

> > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note

> > for

> > > the same in the tutorial.

> > >

> > > Thanks & Regards,

> > >

> > > Punit Pandey

> > >

> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > >

> > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > >

> > > > The following link -

> > > >

> > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

> > > >

> > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha

> > has

> > > > been used here ?

> > > >

> > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for

> > the

> > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make

> > out

> > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 12, 2009

With KP Starone I Get ASC Aries 1:22:42Swamynathan--- On Fri, 11/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: Re: Sample Horoscope Date: Friday, 11 December, 2009, 10:14 PM

Dear Bhaskar ji,

Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used following values -

Latitude 27 : 9 : N Longitude 78 : 0 : E

Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are getting for the following input -

January 13th, 2009

Time: 12:00 Noon

Place: Agra

Latitude 27 : 9 : N Longitude 78 : 0 : E Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ .co. in> wrote:

Dear Punit ji,Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.regards/Bhaskar. @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Bhaskar ji,> > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15 chapters

> planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to go.> As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because without> that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa and> has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart in> the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note for> the same in the tutorial.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote: > > >> >> > Dear Punit ji,> >> > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> >> > The following link -> >> > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2> >

> > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha has> > been used here ?> >> > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for the> > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make out

> > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> >> > regards,> >> > Bhaskar.> >> > > >>

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

December 12, 2009

Dear Bhaskar ji,

The difference is not of 4 degree but 4 minutes. Generally some difference can be expected in software that use different calculation. Both JHora and KPStarOne use swiss ephemeris and hence giving almost identical results.

Another reason for the difference you are getting is change in latitude and longitude. The latitude and longitude that you are using is different than mine and collectively it is making difference of 2 minutes. It clubbed with ayanamsa and difference in calculation by the used software resulted in difference of around 4 minutes.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

J.Hora

Aynamsha 23.53.07

78.01E 27.11N

Asc. Aries 01.27.07

In Example Charti

Ayanamsha 23.53.34

78.00E 27.09N

Asc. Aries 01.23.55

Now what among the 3 Factors,

Latitude,Longitude and the Ayanamsha

can bring about such a difference of

about 4 degrees in the Ascendantscalculated by both softwares ?

regards/Bhaskar.

, " TW " <tw853 wrote:>> > January 13th, 2009> > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > Place: Agra> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)> Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > > > , Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:> >> > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> > suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have used

> > following values -> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> > getting for the following input -

> > > > January 13th, 2009> > Time: 12:00 Noon> > Place: Agra> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Dear Punit ji,

> > >> > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link> > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres

> > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > >> > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > >> > > regards/Bhaskar.> > >> > >> > > <%40>, Punit

> > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > >> > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > chapters> > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > > go.> > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > without> > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > >> > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > > and

> > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com <http://www.mykundali.com/><> > > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For

> > >> > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > > in> > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial> > > >> > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note

> > > for> > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > >> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > >> > > > Punit Pandey> > > >

> > > >> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > >> > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > >> > > > > The following link -

> > > > >> > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2> > > > >

> > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > > has> > > > > been used here ?> > > > >> > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for

> > > the> > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make> > > out> > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > >

> > > > > regards,> > > > >> > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >

> > > > > >> >>

December 12, 2009

Dear friends,

In Jyotish Deepika SW

Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates given

Regards,

Satish --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853 wrote:

TW <tw853 Re: Sample Horoscope Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> January 13th, 2009> Time: 12:00 Noon> Place: Agra> Latitude 27 : 9 : N> Longitude 78 : 0 : EKPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Bhaskar ji,> > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.>

> What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used> following values -> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> getting for the following input -> > January 13th, 2009> Time: 12:00 Noon> Place: Agra> Latitude 27 : 9 : N> Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Punit ji,> >> > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your

link> > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres> > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> >> > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> >> > regards/Bhaskar.> >> >> > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit> > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > >> > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15> >

chapters> > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > go.> > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because> > without> > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > >> > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > and> > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><> > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For> >> > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > in> > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user=

kptutorial> > >> > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note> > for> > > the same in the tutorial.> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > >> > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > >> > > > The following link -> > > >> > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/

chapter-2> > > >> > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > has> > > > been used here ?> > > >> > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for> > the> > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make> > out> > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > >> > > > regards,> > > >> > > > Bhaskar.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

December 12, 2009

Yes, even the same SW can give a significant difference.

J.Hora 7.33

Aynamsha 23.53.07.63

78.01E 27.11N

Asc. Aries 01.27.07.63

J.Hora 7.33

Aynamsha 23.53.34

78.00E 27.09N

Asc. Aries 01.24.45.78

, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> J.Hora Aynamsha 23.53.07 78.01E 27.11N Asc. Aries 01.27.07 In> Example Charti Ayanamsha 23.53.34 78.00E 27.09N Asc. Aries 01.23.55 > Now what among the 3 Factors, Latitude,Longitude and the Ayanamsha can> bring about such a difference of about 4 degrees in the Ascendants> calculated by both softwares ? regards/Bhaskar.> > > > , "TW" tw853@ wrote:> >> > > January 13th, 2009> > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > Place: Agra> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)> >> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> >> >> >> > , Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > >> > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > >> > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the> hyperlink> > > suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I> have used> > > following values -> > >> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > >> > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you> are> > > getting for the following input -> > >> > > January 13th, 2009> > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > Place: Agra> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > >> > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in> your link> > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries> 1.28 in> > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6> minutes. Wheres> > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > > >> > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or> the> > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> > > >> > > > regards/Bhaskar.> > > >> > > >> > > > <%40>,> Punit> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > >> > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total> 15> > > > chapters> > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long> way to> > > > go.> > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction> because> > > > without> > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > > >> > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)> ayanamsa> > > > and> > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali.com> <http://www.mykundali.com/><> > > > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For> > > >> > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to> the chart> > > > in> > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled> chart at> > > > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial> > > > >> > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added> a note> > > > for> > > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > >> > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar> <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > > >> > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way> of> > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > > >> > > > > > The following link -> > > > > >> > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2> > > > > >> > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what> ayanamsha> > > > has> > > > > > been used here ?> > > > > >> > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted> Horoscope for> > > > the> > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying> to make> > > > out> > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > > >> > > > > > regards,> > > > > >> > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >>

December 13, 2009

Dear Punti ji,

yes sorry, not degrees, but minutes - A typo error.

But still a good difference which can at times change sublords. I was just

trying to bring home a important point that even minor difference in RAMC could

create major differences in statistics at the 10th Cusp and the Asc. degrees.

regards/Bhaskar.

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> The difference is not of 4 degree but 4 minutes. Generally some difference

> can be expected in software that use different calculation. Both JHora and

> KPStarOne use swiss ephemeris and hence giving almost identical results.

>

> Another reason for the difference you are getting is change in latitude and

> longitude. The latitude and longitude that you are using is different than

> mine and collectively it is making difference of 2 minutes. It clubbed with

> ayanamsa and difference in calculation by the used software resulted in

> difference of around 4 minutes.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotishwrote:

>

> >

> > J.Hora

> > Aynamsha 23.53.07

> > 78.01E 27.11N

> > Asc. Aries 01.27.07

> >

> > In Example Charti

> > Ayanamsha 23.53.34

> > 78.00E 27.09N

> > Asc. Aries 01.23.55

> >

> > Now what among the 3 Factors,

> > Latitude,Longitude and the Ayanamsha

> > can bring about such a difference of

> > about 4 degrees in the Ascendants

> > calculated by both softwares ?

> >

> > regards/Bhaskar.

> >

> > , " TW " <tw853@> wrote:

> > >

> > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > Place: Agra

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

> > >

> > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > >

> > > , Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > >

> > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > > >

> > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the

> > hyperlink

> > > > suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have

> > used

> > > > following values -

> > > >

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > >

> > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> > > > getting for the following input -

> > > >

> > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > Place: Agra

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > >

> > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Punit Pandey

> > > >

> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your

> > link

> > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries

> > 1.28 in

> > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes.

> > Wheres

> > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or

> > the

> > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > > > <%40>,

> > Punit

> > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > > chapters

> > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long

> > way to

> > > > > go.

> > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > > without

> > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)

> > ayanamsa

> > > > > and

> > > > > > has been caclulated using

www.MyKundali.com<http://www.mykundali.com/><

> > http://www.mykundali.com/><

> > > > > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For

> > > > >

> > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the

> > chart

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart

> > at

> > > > > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a

> > note

> > > > > for

> > > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

> > ayanamsha

> > > > > has

> > > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted

> > Horoscope for

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to

> > make

> > > > > out

> > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 13, 2009

Check/compare the sidereal time calculation there must be some difference. Basically the Ascendant calculation is the function of Latitude,obliquity & sidereal time (function of local longitude)

GOOD LUCK!

D.Senthil

--- On Fri, 12/11/09, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Re: Sample Horoscope Date: Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:17 AM

J.Hora

Aynamsha 23.53.07

78.01E 27.11N

Asc. Aries 01.27.07

In Example Charti

Ayanamsha 23.53.34

78.00E 27.09N

Asc. Aries 01.23.55

Now what among the 3 Factors,

Latitude,Longitude and the Ayanamsha

can bring about such a difference of

about 4 degrees in the Ascendantscalculated by both softwares ?

regards/Bhaskar.

@gro ups.com, "TW" <tw853 wrote:>> > January 13th, 2009> > Time: 12:00 Noon> > Place: Agra> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www. astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www. astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:> >> > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> > suggests (http://www. astrosage. com/chart. asp?user=

kptutorial) , I have used> > following values -> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> > getting for the following input -> > > > January 13th, 2009> > Time: 12:00 Noon> > Place: Agra> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Dear Punit ji,> > >> > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link> > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > > my

software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres> > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > >> > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> > >> > > regards/Bhaskar.> > >> > >> > > @gro ups.com <%40g roups.com>, Punit> > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > >> > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15> > > chapters> > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > > go.> > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all

direction because> > > without> > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > >> > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > > and> > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><> > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For> > >> > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > > in> > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial> > > >> > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note> > > for> > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > >> > > > Thanks &

Regards,> > > >> > > > Punit Pandey> > > >> > > >> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > >> > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > >> > > > > The following link -> > > > >> > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2> > > > >> > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > > has> > > > > been used here ?> > > > >>

> > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for> > > the> > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make> > > out> > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > >> > > > > regards,> > > > >> > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> >>

December 13, 2009

Dear Friends,

In a borderline case, one second difference can change the sub position. But any

commonly used SW generally gives the same up to sub lord for KP analysis, except

in borderline cases.

Thanks and regards,

TW

/message/27411

Comparison of SWs (Cusps).doc (in File section)

Comparison of Cusps by 11 SWs

COMPARISON OF SWs (PLANETS).doc

Comparison of Planets by 11 SWs

SW COMPARISON FOR A HORARY CHART.doc (in File section)

KPEzine March 2007 Horary No. 46 Chart

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Dear Punti ji,

>

> yes sorry, not degrees, but minutes - A typo error.

>

> But still a good difference which can at times change sublords. I was just

trying to bring home a important point that even minor difference in RAMC could

create major differences in statistics at the 10th Cusp and the Asc. degrees.

>

> regards/Bhaskar.

>

> , Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> >

> > The difference is not of 4 degree but 4 minutes. Generally some difference

> > can be expected in software that use different calculation. Both JHora and

> > KPStarOne use swiss ephemeris and hence giving almost identical results.

> >

> > Another reason for the difference you are getting is change in latitude and

> > longitude. The latitude and longitude that you are using is different than

> > mine and collectively it is making difference of 2 minutes. It clubbed with

> > ayanamsa and difference in calculation by the used software resulted in

> > difference of around 4 minutes.

> >

> > Thanks & Regards,

> >

> > Punit Pandey

> >

> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > J.Hora

> > > Aynamsha 23.53.07

> > > 78.01E 27.11N

> > > Asc. Aries 01.27.07

> > >

> > > In Example Charti

> > > Ayanamsha 23.53.34

> > > 78.00E 27.09N

> > > Asc. Aries 01.23.55

> > >

> > > Now what among the 3 Factors,

> > > Latitude,Longitude and the Ayanamsha

> > > can bring about such a difference of

> > > about 4 degrees in the Ascendants

> > > calculated by both softwares ?

> > >

> > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > , " TW " <tw853@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > > Place: Agra

> > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

> > > >

> > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial)

> > > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > > >

> > > > , Punit Pandey punitp@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > > > >

> > > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the

> > > hyperlink

> > > > > suggests (http://www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial), I have

> > > used

> > > > > following values -

> > > > >

> > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you

are

> > > > > getting for the following input -

> > > > >

> > > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > > Place: Agra

> > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > >

> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish@wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your

> > > link

> > > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries

> > > 1.28 in

> > > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6

minutes.

> > > Wheres

> > > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or

> > > the

> > > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > <%40>,

> > > Punit

> > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > > > chapters

> > > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long

> > > way to

> > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > > > without

> > > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)

> > > ayanamsa

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > has been caclulated using

www.MyKundali.com<http://www.mykundali.com/><

> > > http://www.mykundali.com/><

> > > > > > http://www.mykundali.com/>. For

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the

> > > chart

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled

chart

> > > at

> > > > > > > www.astrosage.com/chart.asp?user=kptutorial

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a

> > > note

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way

of

> > > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/Home/tutorial/chapter-2

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

> > > ayanamsha

> > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted

> > > Horoscope for

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying

to

> > > make

> > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 13, 2009

Dear Friends,

To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it

gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

.. Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

.. Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

Regards,

TW

, R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:

>

> Â Dear friends,

> Â

> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In Jyotish Deepika SW

> Â

> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates

given

> Â

> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,

> Â

> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SatishÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â

>

> --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853 wrote:

>

> TW <tw853

> Re: Sample Horoscope

>

> Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

>

> Â

>

> > January 13th, 2009

> > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > Place: Agra

> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

>

> Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

>

> @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> >

> > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> >

> > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink

> > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have

used

> > following values -

> >

> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> >

> > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> > getting for the following input -

> >

> > January 13th, 2009

> > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > Place: Agra

> > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> >

> > Thanks & Regards,

> >

> > Punit Pandey

> >

> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:

> >

> > >

> > > Dear Punit ji,

> > >

> > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link

> > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in

> > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes.

Wheres

> > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > >

> > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > >

> > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit

> > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > >

> > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > chapters

> > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to

> > > go.

> > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > without

> > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > >

> > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa

> > > and

> > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal

i.com/><

> > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > >

> > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart

> > > in

> > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > >

> > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note

> > > for

> > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Punit Pandey

> > > >

> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > >

> > > > > The following link -

> > > > >

> > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > >

> > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

ayanamsha

> > > has

> > > > > been used here ?

> > > > >

> > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for

> > > the

> > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make

> > > out

> > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 15, 2009

Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,

It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using some

other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33 Version. I

get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30

Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ?

J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to

the desired one.

Please suggest above .

Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well written

by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the same.

But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to be

changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested.

Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is given,but

would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for Indian

Births.

If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the same

so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader.

warm regards,

Bhaskar.

, " TW " <tw853 wrote:

>

> Dear Friends,

> To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34,

it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

> . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

> Regards,

> TW

>

> , R Satish <rsatish1942@> wrote:

> >

> > Â Dear friends,

> > Â

> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In Jyotish Deepika SW

> > Â

> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge

coordinates given

> > Â

> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,

> > Â

> > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SatishÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â

> >

> > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:

> >

> > TW <tw853@>

> > Re: Sample Horoscope

> >

> > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> >

> > Â

> >

> > > January 13th, 2009

> > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > Place: Agra

> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> >

> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> >

> > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > >

> > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the

hyperlink

> > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have

used

> > > following values -

> > >

> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > >

> > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> > > getting for the following input -

> > >

> > > January 13th, 2009

> > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > Place: Agra

> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > >

> > > Thanks & Regards,

> > >

> > > Punit Pandey

> > >

> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your

link

> > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28

in

> > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes.

Wheres

> > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > >

> > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > >

> > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>,

Punit

> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > chapters

> > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way

to

> > > > go.

> > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > without

> > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > >

> > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)

ayanamsa

> > > > and

> > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal

i.com/><

> > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > > >

> > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the

chart

> > > > in

> > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > > >

> > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a

note

> > > > for

> > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > >

> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

ayanamsha

> > > > has

> > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope

for

> > > > the

> > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to

make

> > > > out

> > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 15, 2009

Dear Friend,Jhora is not a SW, allotted for KP.Although there is some description of KP,it is only for the Vedic use, as Sri Jagannath Center is propergating only Vedic system, Jayamini.But to make you happy, I'll give you the way of getting NKPA from Jhora. Follow these pl.Open Jhora.Click PreferencesSelect AyanamsaIn the Ayanamsa Window- Select "Krishnamoorthy(KP)"Tick the box "Apply the correct..........................."Select AddEnter the amount as ..Deg.0 Min. 0 Sec. 21.4308click OK.Close the SW and reopenedToday's correct NKPA is 23-54-19 as per MyKundali New KP Ayanamsa Calculator.In Jhora you may get

23-54-19.77RegadsKalyanBhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 3:06:02 PM Re: Sample Horoscope

Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,

It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33 Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30

Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to the desired one.

Please suggest above .

Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the same.

But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested.

Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for Indian Births.

If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader.

warm regards,

Bhaskar.

@gro ups.com, "TW" <tw853 wrote:

>

> Dear Friends,

> To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

> . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

> Regards,

> TW

>

> @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

> >

> > Ã‚ Dear friends,

> > Ã‚

> > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ In Jyotish Deepika SW

> > Ã‚

> > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates given

> > Ã‚

> > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Regards,

> > Ã‚

> > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ SatishÃ‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚

> >

> > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:

> >

> > TW <tw853@>

> > Re: Sample Horoscope

> > @gro ups.com

> > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> >

> > Ã‚

> >

> > > January 13th, 2009

> > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > Place: Agra

> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> >

> > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> >

> > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > >

> > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink

> > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used

> > > following values -

> > >

> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > >

> > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> > > getting for the following input -

> > >

> > > January 13th, 2009

> > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > Place: Agra

> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > >

> > > Thanks & Regards,

> > >

> > > Punit Pandey

> > >

> > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link

> > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in

> > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres

> > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > >

> > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > >

> > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit

> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > chapters

> > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to

> > > > go.

> > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > without

> > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > >

> > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa

> > > > and

> > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><

> > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > > >

> > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart

> > > > in

> > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > > >

> > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note

> > > > for

> > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > >

> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > > >

> > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha

> > > > has

> > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for

> > > > the

> > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make

> > > > out

> > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 15, 2009

Dear Kalyan ji,

Thanks for the practical inputs which are required, and which you have kindly given.

About J.Hora , I am aware that it is made for a vedic traditional Astrologer, but am also aware that any good KP Astrologer can make use of it without spending more than 5 minutes extra, had he used any specific KP Software. we must always be ready to accept the good positive points of any endevaour, and not negate it without reason. I have already explained in my previous mails, that all it takes is just a change of two settongs to get the Placidus House division and the Placidus Bhava placement of the planets. the significators chart can be prepared in not more than 2 minutes. is that asking for much ? And the students must also know how to prepare the Significators chart manually.

In any case I am not recommending this for those who have Online access for our own software which Shri Punitji has so generously allowed us to access on his websites. This is for those who do not have Online access 24 hours, who can download J.hora and make charts whenever they do not even have Online access. Should we not allow them this knowledge that this can be done, instead of being rigid in our claims that it does not support KP Charts and totally negating its use, without any efforts by anyone to even try making a KP Chart through same ?

Thanks for the inputs you have provided for necessary additions in J.hora.My Query was put for general good of all members desiring to make use of J.Hora.

regards,

Bhaskar.

Sunaparantha Kalyan <sunaparanthaRe: Re: Sample Horoscope Cc: "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotishTuesday, 15 December, 2009, 10:09 PM

Dear Friend,Jhora is not a SW, allotted for KP.Although there is some description of KP,it is only for the Vedic use, as Sri Jagannath Center is propergating only Vedic system, Jayamini.But to make you happy, I'll give you the way of getting NKPA from Jhora. Follow these pl.Open Jhora.Click PreferencesSelect AyanamsaIn the Ayanamsa Window- Select "Krishnamoorthy(KP)"Tick the box "Apply the correct..........................."Select AddEnter the amount as ..Deg.0 Min. 0 Sec. 21.4308click OK.Close the SW and reopenedToday's correct NKPA is 23-54-19 as per MyKundali New KP Ayanamsa Calculator.In Jhora you may get 23-54-19.77RegadsKalyan

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 3:06:02 PM Re: Sample Horoscope

Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33 Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to the desired one.Please suggest above .Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the same. But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested. Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for Indian Births.If

the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader. warm regards,Bhaskar. @gro ups.com, "TW" <tw853 wrote:>> Dear Friends,> To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34, > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)> . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)>

Regards,> TW> > > @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:> >> > Ã‚ Dear friends,> > Ã‚ > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ In Jyotish Deepika SW> > Ã‚ > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates given> > Ã‚ > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Regards,> > Ã‚ > >

Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ SatishÃ‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ > > > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > > > TW <tw853@>> > Re: Sample Horoscope> > @gro ups.com> > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM> > > > > > Ã‚ > > > > > > > > > January 13th, 2009> > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > Place: Agra> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > KPNA

23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > > > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used> > > following values -> > > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> > > getting for the following input -> > > > > > January 13th, 2009> > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > Place: Agra> > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > >> > >

> Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link> > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres> > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > > >> > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> > > >> > > > regards/Bhaskar.> > > >> > > >> > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > >> > > > > It is it

encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15> > > > chapters> > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > > > go.> > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because> > > > without> > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > > >> > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > > > and> > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><> > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For> > > >>

> > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > > > in> > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial> > > > >> > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note> > > > for> > > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > >> > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:> > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Punit

ji,> > > > > >> > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > > >> > > > > > The following link -> > > > > >> > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2> > > > > >> > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > > > has> > > > > > been used here ?> > > > > >> > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for> > > > the> > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped

trying to make> > > > out> > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > > >> > > > > > regards,> > > > > >> > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

December 15, 2009

Dear Friend,

I've been using J Hora 7.33 by adding the KPNA to the tropical positions.

Regards,

TW

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,

>

> It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using

some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33

Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30

>

> Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ?

J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to

the desired one.

>

> Please suggest above .

>

> Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well

written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the

same.

>

> But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to

be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested.

>

> Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is

given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for

Indian Births.

>

> If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the

same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader.

>

> warm regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

> , " TW " <tw853@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Friends,

> > To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA

23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

> > . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

> > Regards,

> > TW

> >

> > , R Satish <rsatish1942@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Â Dear friends,

> > > Â

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In Jyotish Deepika SW

> > > Â

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge

coordinates given

> > > Â

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,

> > > Â

> > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SatishÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â

> > >

> > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:

> > >

> > > TW <tw853@>

> > > Re: Sample Horoscope

> > >

> > > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> > >

> > > Â

> > >

> > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > Place: Agra

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > >

> > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > >

> > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > >

> > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > > >

> > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the

hyperlink

> > > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have

used

> > > > following values -

> > > >

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > >

> > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> > > > getting for the following input -

> > > >

> > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > Place: Agra

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > >

> > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Punit Pandey

> > > >

> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your

link

> > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries

1.28 in

> > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes.

Wheres

> > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>,

Punit

> > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > > chapters

> > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way

to

> > > > > go.

> > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > > without

> > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)

ayanamsa

> > > > > and

> > > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal

i.com/><

> > > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > > > >

> > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the

chart

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart

at

> > > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a

note

> > > > > for

> > > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

ayanamsha

> > > > > has

> > > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope

for

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to

make

> > > > > out

> > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 16, 2009

Message #29983 of 30024

< Prev

|

Next >

Re: Sample Horoscope

Dear Friends,

To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it

gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

.. Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

.. Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

Regards,

TW , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,> > It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33 Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30> > Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to the desired one.> > Please suggest above .> > Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the same. > > But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested. > > Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for Indian Births.> > If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader. > > warm regards,> Bhaskar. > > > > , "TW" tw853@ wrote:> >> > Dear Friends,> > To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34, > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)> > . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)> > Regards,> > TW> > > > > > , R Satish <rsatish1942@> wrote:> > >> > > Â Dear friends,> > > Â > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â In Jyotish Deepika SW> > > Â > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates given> > > Â > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Regards,> > > Â > > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â SatishÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â > > > > > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > TW <tw853@>> > > Re: Sample Horoscope> > > > > > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM> > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > January 13th, 2009> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > > Place: Agra> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > > > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > > > > > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> > > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used> > > > following values -> > > > > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > > > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> > > > getting for the following input -> > > > > > > > January 13th, 2009> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > > Place: Agra> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > >> > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link> > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres> > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > > > >> > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> > > > >> > > > > regards/Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit> > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > > >> > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15> > > > > chapters> > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > > > > go.> > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because> > > > > without> > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > > > >> > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > > > > and> > > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><> > > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For> > > > >> > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > > > > in> > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> > > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial> > > > > >> > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note> > > > > for> > > > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > >> > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The following link -> > > > > > >> > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2> > > > > > >> > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > > > > has> > > > > > > been used here ?> > > > > > >> > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for> > > > > the> > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make> > > > > out> > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>

December 16, 2009

Namaskar,Dear Sir,Can u kindly explain the difference of those two, KPNA and Tropical in Jhora, and do you recommend for us to follow the Tropical?With Due regardsSunaparanthaTW <tw853 Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 2:02:40 AMSubject:

Re: Sample Horoscope

Dear Friend,

I've been using J Hora 7.33 by adding the KPNA to the tropical positions.

Regards,

TW

@gro ups.com, "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,

>

> It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33 Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30

>

> Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to the desired one.

>

> Please suggest above .

>

> Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the same.

>

> But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested.

>

> Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for Indian Births.

>

> If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader.

>

> warm regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

> @gro ups.com, "TW" <tw853@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Friends,

> > To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

> > . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

> > Regards,

> > TW

> >

> > @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

> > >

> > > Ã‚ Dear friends,

> > > Ã‚

> > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ In Jyotish Deepika SW

> > > Ã‚

> > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates given

> > > Ã‚

> > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Regards,

> > > Ã‚

> > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ SatishÃ‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚

> > >

> > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:

> > >

> > > TW <tw853@>

> > > Re: Sample Horoscope

> > > @gro ups.com

> > > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> > >

> > > Ã‚

> > >

> > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > Place: Agra

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > >

> > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > >

> > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > >

> > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > > >

> > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink

> > > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used

> > > > following values -

> > > >

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > >

> > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are

> > > > getting for the following input -

> > > >

> > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > Place: Agra

> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > >

> > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > >

> > > > Punit Pandey

> > > >

> > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link

> > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in

> > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres

> > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the

> > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit

> > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > > chapters

> > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to

> > > > > go.

> > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > > without

> > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa

> > > > > and

> > > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><

> > > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > > > >

> > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart

> > > > > in

> > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at

> > > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note

> > > > > for

> > > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of

> > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha

> > > > > has

> > > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for

> > > > > the

> > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make

> > > > > out

> > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 17, 2009

It is meant to enter KPNA into J Hora 7,33 directly by adding to zero " Tropical

(sayana) " as follows:

In the Ayanamsa Window of J Hora 7.33,

Select " Tropical (sayana) "

Tick the box " Apply the correct.. "

Select " Add "

Enter " KPNA " calculated from satrosage.com or available table

Then click " OK "

, Sunaparantha Kalyan <sunaparantha wrote:

>

> Namaskar,

> Dear Sir,

>

> Can u kindly explain the difference of those two, KPNA and Tropical in Jhora,

and do you recommend for us to follow the Tropical?

>

> With Due regards

>

> Sunaparantha

>

> ________________________________

> TW <tw853

>

> Wed, December 16, 2009 2:02:40 AM

> Re: Sample Horoscope

>

> Dear Friend,

> I've been using J Hora 7.33 by adding the KPNA to the tropical positions.

> Regards,

> TW

>

> @gro ups.com, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,

> >

> > It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using

some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33

Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30

> >

> > Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha

? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to

the desired one.

> >

> > Please suggest above .

> >

> > Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well

written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the

same.

> >

> > But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values

to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested.

> >

> > Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is

given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for

Indian Births.

> >

> > If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the

same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader.

> >

> > warm regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> > @gro ups.com, " TW " <tw853@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Friends,

> > > To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA

23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > > . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

> > > . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

> > > Regards,

> > > TW

> > >

> > > @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Ã‚ Dear friends,

> > > > Ã‚

> > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ In Jyotish

Deepika SW

> > > > Ã‚

> > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using

rge coordinates given

> > > > Ã‚

> > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Regards,

> > > > Ã‚

> > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ SatishÃ‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚

Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚

> > > >

> > > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > TW <tw853@>

> > > > Re: Sample Horoscope

> > > > @gro ups.com

> > > > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> > > >

> > > > Ã‚

> > > >

> > > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > > Place: Agra

> > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > >

> > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > > >

> > > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > > > >

> > > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the

hyperlink

> > > > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I

have used

> > > > > following values -

> > > > >

> > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you

are

> > > > > getting for the following input -

> > > > >

> > > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > > Place: Agra

> > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > >

> > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > >

> > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your

link

> > > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries

1.28 in

> > > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6

minutes. Wheres

> > > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or

the

> > > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>,

Punit

> > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15

> > > > > > chapters

> > > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long

way to

> > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because

> > > > > > without

> > > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)

ayanamsa

> > > > > > and

> > > > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal

i.com/><

> > > > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the

chart

> > > > > > in

> > > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled

chart at

> > > > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a

note

> > > > > > for

> > > > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@

>wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way

of

> > > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

ayanamsha

> > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted

Horoscope for

> > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying

to make

> > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

December 17, 2009

Such calculated KPNA will differ more from real KPNA for years far from 2010 backward and forward.

Year

KPNA

JHKPNA*

Diff:Sec

1000

09-50-25

09-49-43

+42

1800

20-58-33

20-58-26

+7

1850

21-40-24

21-40-19

+5

1900

22-22 16

22-22 12

+4

1950

23-04-08

23-04-05

+3

2000

23-46-01

23-45-59

+2

2010

23-54-23

23-54-22

+1

3000

37-45-33

37-45-56

-23

KPNA as per formula of 2003

JHKPNA* as per Sec. 21.4308 difference from J Hora 7.33 KPA

, Sunaparantha Kalyan <sunaparantha wrote:>> Dear Friend,> > Jhora is not a SW, allotted for KP.Although there is some description of KP,it is only for the Vedic use, as Sri Jagannath Center is propergating only Vedic system, Jayamini.> But to make you happy, I'll give you the way of getting NKPA from Jhora. > Follow these pl.> > Open Jhora.> Click Preferences> Select Ayanamsa> In the Ayanamsa Window-> Select "Krishnamoorthy(KP)"> Tick the box "Apply the correct..........................."> Select Add> Enter the amount as ..Deg.0 Min. 0 Sec. 21.4308> click OK.> > Close the SW and reopened> > Today's correct NKPA is 23-54-19 as per MyKundali New KP Ayanamsa Calculator.> In Jhora you may get 23-54-19.77> > Regads> > Kalyan> > > > > ________________________________> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish > Tue, December 15, 2009 3:06:02 PM> Re: Sample Horoscope> > > Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,> > It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33 Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30> > Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP Ayanamsha ? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to bring it to the desired one.> > Please suggest above .> > Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the same. > > But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested. > > Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for Indian Births.> > If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do the same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader. > > warm regards,> Bhaskar. > > @gro ups.com, "TW" tw853@ wrote:> >> > Dear Friends,> > To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA 23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34, > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)> > . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)> > Regards,> > TW> > > > > > @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:> > >> > > Ã‚ Dear friends,> > > Ã‚ > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ In Jyotish Deepika SW> > > Ã‚ > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using rge coordinates given> > > Ã‚ > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Regards,> > > Ã‚ > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ SatishÃ‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ > > > > > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > TW <tw853@>> > > Re: Sample Horoscope> > > @gro ups.com> > > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM> > > > > > > > > Ã‚ > > > > > > > > > > > > > January 13th, 2009> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > > Place: Agra> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)> > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)> > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > > > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after> > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.> > > > > > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the hyperlink> > > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I have used> > > > following values -> > > > > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > > > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you are> > > > getting for the following input -> > > > > > > > January 13th, 2009> > > > Time: 12:00 Noon> > > > Place: Agra> > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N> > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...>wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > >> > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in your link> > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries 1.28 in> > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6 minutes. Wheres> > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.> > > > >> > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or the> > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.> > > > >> > > > > regards/Bhaskar.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40. com>, Punit> > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,> > > > > >> > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total 15> > > > > chapters> > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long way to> > > > > go.> > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction because> > > > > without> > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.> > > > > >> > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New) ayanamsa> > > > > and> > > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com <http://www.mykundal i.com/><> > > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For> > > > >> > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to the chart> > > > > in> > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled chart at> > > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial> > > > > >> > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added a note> > > > > for> > > > > > the same in the tutorial.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > >> > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@ >wrote:> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way of> > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The following link -> > > > > > >> > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2> > > > > > >> > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what ayanamsha> > > > > has> > > > > > > been used here ?> > > > > > >> > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted Horoscope for> > > > > the> > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying to make> > > > > out> > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > regards,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Bhaskar.> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>

December 17, 2009

Dear Punit ji and other members,

In the software so generously allowed by your goodself for public accessibility,

when we make the Horary Charts, do we have the facility of rotating the chart

from the house we require , in such a manner so that the significators Table

changes alongwith the rotation?

Do we have this facility in any other KP Softwares available for Paid or Free

Versions ?

I mean suppose Father is asking for his son and gives a Horary Number, in that

case the 5th house will be treated as ascendant, so can we rotate the chart to

make the 5th house , as the first house and simultaneously will the software

make changes in the significator Table accordingly ?

regards,

Bhaskar.

December 17, 2009

Sir,

Would it be add or Substract ?

regards/Bhaskar.

, " TW " <tw853 wrote:

>

> It is meant to enter KPNA into J Hora 7,33 directly by adding to zero

" Tropical (sayana) " as follows:

> In the Ayanamsa Window of J Hora 7.33,

> Select " Tropical (sayana) "

> Tick the box " Apply the correct.. "

> Select " Add "

> Enter " KPNA " calculated from satrosage.com or available table

> Then click " OK "

>

> , Sunaparantha Kalyan <sunaparantha@> wrote:

> >

> > Namaskar,

> > Dear Sir,

> >

> > Can u kindly explain the difference of those two, KPNA and Tropical in

Jhora, and do you recommend for us to follow the Tropical?

> >

> > With Due regards

> >

> > Sunaparantha

> >

> > ________________________________

> > TW <tw853@>

> >

> > Wed, December 16, 2009 2:02:40 AM

> > Re: Sample Horoscope

> >

> > Dear Friend,

> > I've been using J Hora 7.33 by adding the KPNA to the tropical positions.

> > Regards,

> > TW

> >

> > @gro ups.com, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish@ ...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Punit ji, Tinwin ji and friends,

> > >

> > > It seems that you were using some other version of J.Hora, and I was using

some other.And all have different values. Now I have downloaded the 7.33

Version. I get the KP ayanamsha value for today (Dec 15th 2009) as 23.53.58.30

> > >

> > > Now what corrections must be made in this to arrive at the New KP

Ayanamsha ? J.Hora has a setting where one can add or substract the values to

bring it to the desired one.

> > >

> > > Please suggest above .

> > >

> > > Apart from this I have read the Tutorial on ayanamsha which is very well

written by Shri Tinwinji and educative enough for one who can understand the

same.

> > >

> > > But for simple beginners in astrology it would be worthwhile if the values

to be changed as per Lahiris, and KP is suggested.

> > >

> > > Also the formula is to get the right values as per New KP Ayanamsa is

given,but would become more meaningful if 2-3 examples are given alongwith, for

Indian Births.

> > >

> > > If the suggestion is worthwhile and can be incorporated, then kindly do

the same so that the article can become meaningful for any level of reader.

> > >

> > > warm regards,

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > @gro ups.com, " TW " <tw853@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Friends,

> > > > To be comparable, if KPNA 23-53-38 of J Deepika is adjusted to KPNA

23-53-34, it gives Asc Aries 1-24-46, then for KPNA 23-53-34,

> > > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > > > . Ar 1-24-46 (J Deepika)

> > > > . Ar 1-24-44 (Astraura)

> > > > Regards,

> > > > TW

> > > >

> > > > @gro ups.com, R Satish <rsatish1942@ > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Ã‚ Dear friends,

> > > > > Ã‚

> > > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ In Jyotish

Deepika SW

> > > > > Ã‚

> > > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Asc Aries 1-24-42 KP ayanamsa new23-53-38 using

rge coordinates given

> > > > > Ã‚

> > > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Regards,

> > > > > Ã‚

> > > > > Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ SatishÃ‚ Ã‚ Ã‚

Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚ Ã‚

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Fri, 12/11/09, TW <tw853@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > TW <tw853@>

> > > > > Re: Sample Horoscope

> > > > > @gro ups.com

> > > > > Friday, December 11, 2009, 10:59 PM

> > > > >

> > > > > Ã‚

> > > > >

> > > > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > > > Place: Agra

> > > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > > KPNA 23-53-34 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > > >

> > > > > Ar 1-23-55 (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial)

> > > > > Ar 1-24-45.78 (J Hora 7.33)

> > > > > Ar 1-24-46 (KP StarOne 6.6)

> > > > >

> > > > > @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Something seems incorrect somewhere. JHora gives Aries 1-24-54 after

> > > > > > adjusting for KP (New) ayamasa. Aries 1-28 seems far to me.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > What is the latitude of Agra you are using for calculation? As the

hyperlink

> > > > > > suggests (http://www.astrosag e.com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial), I

have used

> > > > > > following values -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Members, can anybody confirm what is the ascendant degrees you

are

> > > > > > getting for the following input -

> > > > > >

> > > > > > January 13th, 2009

> > > > > > Time: 12:00 Noon

> > > > > > Place: Agra

> > > > > > Latitude 27 : 9 : N

> > > > > > Longitude 78 : 0 : E

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@

....>wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. But I am confused. The ayanamsha shown in

your link

> > > > > > > is allright, but the Ascendant degrees are different.. I get Aries

1.28 in

> > > > > > > my software whereas in your example theres a difference of 6

minutes. Wheres

> > > > > > > the mistake ? Is the mistake in my software ? Please confirm.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I am in jaipur right now and do not have the Rapheals Ephemeris or

the

> > > > > > > Table of Houses or else would have calculated manually.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards/Bhaskar.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > @gro ups.com <% 40.

com>, Punit

> > > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > It is it encouraging to know that you liked it. There are total

15

> > > > > > > chapters

> > > > > > > > planned and only one chapter is finished yet, so there is a long

way to

> > > > > > > go.

> > > > > > > > As always, I am looking for the support from all direction

because

> > > > > > > without

> > > > > > > > that, it is not easy to achieve that objective.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Anyways, coming back to your question, the chart uses KP (New)

ayanamsa

> > > > > > > and

> > > > > > > > has been caclulated using www.MyKundali. com

<http://www.mykundal i.com/><

> > > > > > > http://www.mykundal i.com/>. For

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > the convenience of the readers, I have also added hyperlink to

the chart

> > > > > > > in

> > > > > > > > the tutorial so that they will straight away get the deatiled

chart at

> > > > > > > > www.astrosage. com/chart. asp?user= kptutorial

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Appreciate your suggestion on the intercepted sign. I have added

a note

> > > > > > > for

> > > > > > > > the same in the tutorial.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@

>wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Dear Punit ji,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Had been to the Tutorials once more and enjoyed the simple way

of

> > > > > > > > > instructing which is very easy to follow.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > The following link -

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/Home/ tutorial/ chapter-2

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > which shows the Sample horoscope. Can You please specify what

ayanamsha

> > > > > > > has

> > > > > > > > > been used here ?

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > And I wish it had been mentioned that its an Intercepted

Horoscope for

> > > > > > > the

> > > > > > > > > new comers who may not be aware of this, may get zapped trying

to make

> > > > > > > out

> > > > > > > > > where did two signs get lost ? HaHa.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

Sample Horoscope

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Support the Ashram

Join Groups