Guest guest Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be visible at 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper newspaper report (Telegraph, January12.) But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at Kolkata Anybody can explain why such difference between astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? Regards Suprakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Respected Members Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another sign on 14 or 15 of the month. Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help us in better udnerstanding the things. In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. With regards Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be visible at 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper newspaper report (Telegraph, January12.) But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at Kolkata Anybody can explain why such difference between astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? Regards Suprakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 /message/20915 /message/20915 (regarding planetary positions) , " VIJAYANAND PATIL " <guide_vijayanand wrote: > > Respected Members > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help us in better udnerstanding the things. > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > With regards > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be visible at > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper newspaper > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > Kolkata > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > Regards > > Suprakash > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 Dear All,all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata Please check and then repply me Thanks, Acharya Shushil Awasthi " Prabhakar " Email: acharyashushil On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL <guide_vijayanand wrote: Respected Members Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another sign on 14 or 15 of the month. Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help us in better udnerstanding the things. In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. With regards Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be visible at 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper newspaper report (Telegraph, January12.) But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at Kolkata Anybody can explain why such difference between astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? Regards Suprakash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2010 Report Share Posted January 14, 2010 What difference is it going to make to the eclipse or the people on Earth with changes in ayanamsha taken for the eclipse timings, pray can anyone explain me ???? (Let us not talk about children being born during eclipse timings). regards/Bhaskar. , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil wrote: > > Dear All, > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata > > Please check and then repply me Thanks, > Acharya Shushil Awasthi " Prabhakar " > Email: acharyashushil > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL < > guide_vijayanand wrote: > > > > > > > Respected Members > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help > > us in better udnerstanding the things. > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > > With regards > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > > > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be > > visible at > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper > > newspaper > > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > > Kolkata > > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Suprakash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatur\ eline.htm@Middle?> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made. (regarding planetary positions) -Albert Einstein http://www.zazzle.com.au/albert_einstein_quote_we_owe_a_lot_to_the_indians_hat-1\ 48368561867891311 http://www.lovequotescollection.com/quotes/albert_einstein.html , " TW " <tw853 wrote: > > /message/20915 > /message/20915 > (regarding planetary positions) > > > > > , " VIJAYANAND PATIL " <guide_vijayanand@> wrote: > > > > Respected Members > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help us in better udnerstanding the things. > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > > With regards > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be visible at > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper newspaper > > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > > Kolkata > > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Suprakash > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 In the 1994 conference of All India Panchanga Makers (almanac makers) was held, out of 48 participants, 39 approved the Chitrapaksha ayanamsha (Lahiri), and 9 were in favor of other ephemeris's like Raman, KP etc. , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil wrote: > > Dear All, > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata > > Please check and then repply me Thanks, > Acharya Shushil Awasthi " Prabhakar " > Email: acharyashushil > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL < > guide_vijayanand wrote: > > > > > > > Respected Members > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help > > us in better udnerstanding the things. > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > > With regards > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > > > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be > > visible at > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper > > newspaper > > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > > Kolkata > > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Suprakash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatur\ eline.htm@Middle?> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 NASA for Kolkata (22n32, 88e21) 1st contact 06:37:15 GMT (12:07:15 PM IST) 4th contact 09:59:05 GMT (03:29:15 PM IST) Maximum eclipse 08:27:34 GMT (01:58:34 PM IST) >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, >starting at 12.07pm and >ending at 3.29pm. >The maximum eclipse will >be visible at 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be >obscured.This is asper newspaper report (Telegraph, January12.) , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil wrote: > > Dear All, > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata > > Please check and then repply me Thanks, > Acharya Shushil Awasthi " Prabhakar " > Email: acharyashushil > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL < > guide_vijayanand wrote: > > > > > > > Respected Members > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help > > us in better udnerstanding the things. > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > > With regards > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > > > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be > > visible at > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper > > newspaper > > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > > Kolkata > > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > > > > Regards > > > > Suprakash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatur\ eline.htm@Middle?> > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 I hope Nasa is correct and we will see the eclipse as per NASA timings. Then what about Software given timing? Is it wrong? If it is wrong, then all planetary position calculations given by the software are wrong. Regards Suprakash - TW Friday, January 15, 2010 9:30 AM Re: Solar eclipse on 15th January NASA for Kolkata (22n32, 88e21)1st contact 06:37:15 GMT (12:07:15 PM IST)4th contact 09:59:05 GMT (03:29:15 PM IST)Maximum eclipse 08:27:34 GMT (01:58:34 PM IST)>Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10,>starting at 12.07pm and >ending at 3.29pm. >The maximum eclipse will >be visible at 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be >obscured.This is asper newspaper report (Telegraph, January12.) , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil wrote:>> Dear All,> all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own> calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP> aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation> a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata> > Please check and then repply me Thanks,> Acharya Shushil Awasthi "Prabhakar"> Email: acharyashushil > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL <> guide_vijayanand wrote:> > >> >> > Respected Members> > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun> > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in> > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know> > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another> > sign on 14 or 15 of the month.> > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help> > us in better udnerstanding the things.> > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun> > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference.> > With regards> > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur> >> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote> >> > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10,> > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be> > visible at> > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper> > newspaper> > report (Telegraph, January12.)> >> > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at> > Kolkata> >> > Anybody can explain why such difference between> > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro?> >> >> > Regards> >> > Suprakash> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>> >> > > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 Desr TW and Friends, One must remember that by and large,in India we respect people in positions of authority to the extent that most of us bend backwards to please such highly placed persons...such servility was common practise in those times... Mr.Lahiri was the appointed as chief of the Almanac Comittee of the Central Govt. But,regardless of our ongrained ways...I must say that Dr.Lahiri was a renowned astronomer of his times and widely considered as an authority on the subject...and his value of Ayanamsa is very close to the KPNA value... Yogesh Lajmi. , " TW " <tw853 wrote: > > In the 1994 conference of All India Panchanga Makers (almanac makers) was held, out of 48 participants, 39 approved the Chitrapaksha ayanamsha (Lahiri), and 9 were in favor of other ephemeris's like Raman, KP etc. > > > > , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil@> wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own > > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP > > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation > > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata > > > > Please check and then repply me Thanks, > > Acharya Shushil Awasthi " Prabhakar " > > Email: acharyashushil@ > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL < > > guide_vijayanand@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Members > > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun > > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in > > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know > > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another > > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help > > > us in better udnerstanding the things. > > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun > > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > > > With regards > > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > > > > > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be > > > visible at > > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper > > > newspaper > > > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > > > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > > > Kolkata > > > > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Suprakash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatur\ eline.htm@Middle?> > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 /message/27411 Comparison of SWs (Cusps).doc (in File section) Comparison of Cusps by 11 SWs COMPARISON OF SWs (PLANETS).doc Comparison of Planets by 11 SWs SW COMPARISON FOR A HORARY CHART.doc (in File section) KPEzine March 2007 Horary No. 46 Chart /messages/16101 /messages/16006 /messages/4218 /messages/3477 /messages/2036 /messages/2875 /message/8074Tutorials/ MANUAL CALCULATION OF A KP CHART.doc Step by Step Manual Calculation , "Suprakash Ghosh" <suprakash.ghosh wrote:>> I hope Nasa is correct and we will see the eclipse as per NASA timings.> > Then what about Software given timing? Is it wrong? If it is wrong, then all planetary position calculations given by the software are wrong.> > Regards> > Suprakash> > > > - > TW > > Friday, January 15, 2010 9:30 AM> Re: Solar eclipse on 15th January> > > > NASA for Kolkata (22n32, 88e21)> 1st contact 06:37:15 GMT (12:07:15 PM IST)> 4th contact 09:59:05 GMT (03:29:15 PM IST)> Maximum eclipse 08:27:34 GMT (01:58:34 PM IST)> > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10,> >starting at 12.07pm and > >ending at 3.29pm. > >The maximum eclipse will >be visible at 1.58pm, > when 76 per cent of the sun will be >obscured.This is asper newspaper report (Telegraph, January12.)> > , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar acharyashushil@ wrote:> >> > Dear All,> > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own> > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP> > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation> > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata> > > > Please check and then repply me Thanks,> > Acharya Shushil Awasthi "Prabhakar"> > Email: acharyashushil@> > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL <> > guide_vijayanand@ wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Respected Members> > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun> > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in> > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know> > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another> > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month.> > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help> > > us in better udnerstanding the things.> > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun> > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference.> > > With regards> > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur> > >> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote> > >> > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10,> > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be> > > visible at> > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper> > > newspaper> > > report (Telegraph, January12.)> > >> > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at> > > Kolkata> > >> > > Anybody can explain why such difference between> > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro?> > >> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > Suprakash> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>> > >> > > > > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 /message/30619?threaded=1 & l=1 , " Yogesh " <yogeshlajmi wrote: > > Desr TW and Friends, > One must remember that by and large,in India we respect people in positions of authority to the extent that most of us bend backwards to please such highly placed persons...such servility was common practise in those times... > Mr.Lahiri was the appointed as chief of the Almanac > Comittee of the Central Govt. > But,regardless of our ongrained ways...I must say that Dr.Lahiri was a renowned astronomer of his times and widely considered as an authority on the subject...and his value of Ayanamsa is very close to the KPNA value... > Yogesh Lajmi. > > , " TW " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > In the 1994 conference of All India Panchanga Makers (almanac makers) was held, out of 48 participants, 39 approved the Chitrapaksha ayanamsha (Lahiri), and 9 were in favor of other ephemeris's like Raman, KP etc. > > > > > > > > , Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear All, > > > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own > > > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP > > > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation > > > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata > > > > > > Please check and then repply me Thanks, > > > Acharya Shushil Awasthi " Prabhakar " > > > Email: acharyashushil@ > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL < > > > guide_vijayanand@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Members > > > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun > > > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in > > > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know > > > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another > > > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month. > > > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help > > > > us in better udnerstanding the things. > > > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun > > > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference. > > > > With regards > > > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote > > > > > > > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10, > > > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be > > > > visible at > > > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper > > > > newspaper > > > > report (Telegraph, January12.) > > > > > > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at > > > > Kolkata > > > > > > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between > > > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Suprakash > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatur\ eline.htm@Middle?> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2010 Report Share Posted January 15, 2010 Dear Friends, In Andhra and particularly East Godavari ,where Traditional astrology is practised,Lahir's ephemeris is discarded..One of them a renowned President's Medal awardee, said some of them walked out hte committtee meetings, when roughshod measures were used to stifle their objections. They use Drik Ganitha in preparing Panchang. There is usually 4-6 months(1 pada) difference in time metre. There is no holy cow when it comes to ephemeris.The market is flooded. This is for your info. Regards, Satish--- On Fri, 1/15/10, Yogesh <yogeshlajmi wrote: Yogesh <yogeshlajmi Re: Solar eclipse on 15th January Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 12:51 PM Desr TW and Friends,One must remember that by and large,in India we respect people in positions of authority to the extent that most of us bend backwards to please such highly placed persons...such servility was common practise in those times...Mr.Lahiri was the appointed as chief of the AlmanacComittee of the Central Govt.But,regardless of our ongrained ways...I must say that Dr.Lahiri was a renowned astronomer of his times and widely considered as an authority on the subject...and his value of Ayanamsa is very close to the KPNA value...Yogesh Lajmi.@gro ups.com, "TW" <tw853 wrote:>> In the 1994 conference of All India Panchanga Makers (almanac makers) was held, out of 48 participants, 39 approved the Chitrapaksha ayanamsha (Lahiri), and 9 were in favor of other ephemeris's like Raman, KP etc. > > > > @gro ups.com, Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil@ > wrote:> >> > Dear All,> > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own> > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP> > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation> > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata> > > > Please check and then repply me Thanks,> > Acharya Shushil Awasthi "Prabhakar"> > Email: acharyashushil@> > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL <> > guide_ vijayanand@ > wrote:> > > > >> > >> > > Respected Members> > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun> > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in> > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know> > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another> > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month.> > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help> > > us in better udnerstanding the things.> > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun> > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference.> > > With regards> > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur> > >> > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote> > >> > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10,> > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be> > > visible at> > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper> > > newspaper> > > report (Telegraph, January12.)> > >> > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at> > > Kolkata> > >> > > Anybody can explain why such difference between> > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro?> > >> > >> > > Regards> > >> > > Suprakash> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > <http://sigads. rediff.com/ RealMedia/ ads/click_ nx.ads/www. rediffmail. com/signaturelin e.htm@Middle?>> > >> > > > > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2010 Report Share Posted January 16, 2010 According to almost all ephemeris, Saturn had gone into retrogression and entered Dhanus (Sagittarius) and again reentered Makara (Capricorn) on 15 December 1990. But according to Vakya Panchanga (ephemeris) followed by Nadi astrologers in South India, Saturn entered Makara on 10 February 1991, that is, a difference of 55 days. Then what is the fate of the children born between 15 Dec 1990 to 10 Feb 1991, whether Saturn is to be placed in Dhanus or Makara. According to Vakya Panchanga, such a situation is common for Saturn whenever it retrogrades or entering the signs, there will be a difference of nearly 90 days, and for Jupiter 15 days and for fast moving planets Budha (Mercury), Sukra (Venus) for 1 to 3 days will be there. How to reconcile this position is for scholars in the science to decide. All Nadi literature was based on Vakya Panchanga and the predictions arrived on such calculations are 80% coming true. In view of the different Graha Gathis (planetary movements) even the horoscope charts prepared through computers are of no use. -June 1991 Grahavani journal (of Hyderabad, AP., India) Meghnad Saha was the Chairman of the Calendar Reform Committee appointed by the Government of India in 1952 under the aegis of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. Other members of the Committee were: A. C. Banerjee, K. K. Daftari, J. S. Karandikar, Gorakh Prasad, R. V. Vaidya and N. C. Lahiri. , R Satish <rsatish1942 wrote:>>  Dear Friends,>  >                       In Andhra and particularly East Godavari ,where Traditional astrology is practised,Lahir's ephemeris is discarded..One of them a renowned President's Medal awardee, said some of them walked out hte committtee meetings, when roughshod measures were used to stifle their objections. They use Drik Ganitha in preparing Panchang. There is usually 4-6 months(1 pada) difference in time metre.>  >                       There is no holy cow when it comes to ephemeris.The market is flooded. This is for your info.>  >                        Regards,>  >                         Satish> > --- On Fri, 1/15/10, Yogesh yogeshlajmi wrote:> > > Yogesh yogeshlajmi Re: Solar eclipse on 15th January> > Friday, January 15, 2010, 12:51 PM> > >  > > > > Desr TW and Friends,> One must remember that by and large,in India we respect people in positions of authority to the extent that most of us bend backwards to please such highly placed persons...such servility was common practise in those times...> Mr.Lahiri was the appointed as chief of the Almanac> Comittee of the Central Govt.> But,regardless of our ongrained ways...I must say that Dr.Lahiri was a renowned astronomer of his times and widely considered as an authority on the subject...and his value of Ayanamsa is very close to the KPNA value...> Yogesh Lajmi.> > @gro ups.com, "TW" tw853@ wrote:> >> > In the 1994 conference of All India Panchanga Makers (almanac makers) was held, out of 48 participants, 39 approved the Chitrapaksha ayanamsha (Lahiri), and 9 were in favor of other ephemeris's like Raman, KP etc. > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, Acharya Shushil Awasthi Prabhakar <acharyashushil@ > wrote:> > >> > > Dear All,> > > all panchang are useing Lahari aynansh because they donot have own> > > calculation they copy with Lahri ephemaries but In KP system we are using KP> > > aynansh which is differnce so these diferences coming. As per my calculation> > > a time of Full eclipse which is around 12:41:29PM at Kolkata> > > > > > Please check and then repply me Thanks,> > > Acharya Shushil Awasthi "Prabhakar"> > > Email: acharyashushil@> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:57 PM, VIJAYANAND PATIL <> > > guide_ vijayanand@ > wrote:> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > Respected Members> > > > Nice query has been put by suprakashji. When we consider transition of Sun> > > > from one sign to other sign on every 14 to 15 of the month. But actually in> > > > sayan position sun will change signs only on 21 of every month. Thus we know> > > > that sun changes sign on 21 but still we follow that sun transits in another> > > > sign on 14 or 15 of the month.> > > > Please give clarification who is having full knowledge of astonomy and help> > > > us in better udnerstanding the things.> > > > In recent eclipses, a data has been put on net by x that actual long.of sun> > > > and long. shown in the ephemaries were having much difference.> > > > With regards> > > > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, Kolhapur> > > >> > > > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:15:01 +0530 wrote> > > >> > > > >Calcutta will witness a partial eclipse on 15 January 10,> > > > starting at 12.07pm and ending at 3.29pm. The maximum eclipse will be> > > > visible at> > > > 1.58pm, when 76 per cent of the sun will be obscured.This is asper> > > > newspaper> > > > report (Telegraph, January12.)> > > >> > > > But KP Astro indicates a time of eclipse which is around 12:36:29PM at> > > > Kolkata> > > >> > > > Anybody can explain why such difference between> > > > astronomical report and Panchang report by KP Astro?> > > >> > > >> > > > Regards> > > >> > > > Suprakash> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > <http://sigads. rediff.com/ RealMedia/ ads/click_ nx.ads/www. rediffmail. com/signaturelin e.htm@Middle?>> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.