Drig Dasa sanskrit question Sanjay Rath please read this

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

Dear Shanmukha,

I was also waiting to see the answers you would get!

Several things..

1) I think at this point in time MOST people are

confused which Drig Dasa is right or this or

that,,,,,, geez Ive even lost track of which version

is in which JH!

2) I would love to see the answers to your questions,

But once and for all,

I would like someone to clearly SPELL out the

1)The formula Sanjays is currently recommending for

DASAs not just Drig Dasa. Please If he can add it to

his web site for reference it would help us all. (as

personally , I like to follow his path)

 

2) Narasimhas final formula and conclusions-IS

everything now in that paper he gave.?

 

THis is one BIG problem when there are various

versions.It cast doubt on things. People get confused.

Research is research and I dont mind to play around

and see what works best.. But personally I need them

clearly defined, and defined as " research " .

I hope that the great minds can come to a common

conclusion.

 

3) I heard Shri Jyoti Star ? has Sanjays version of

Drig Dasa and others but it is costly.

 

I feel grateful that Narasimha has given his software

for free.

Now if I can only figure out whats happening with each

version of these Dasas///

Best wishes

Lakshmi

 

 

 

 

--- Shanmukha <teli_sha2002 wrote:

 

>

> Om Namah Sivaya

>

> Namaste All,

>

>

>

> I am writing this mail with a very frustrated heart.

> Let me explain a

> bit. I have given a mail regarding the calculation

> of Drig Dasa. I have

> waited almost a week for someone, at least one, to

> respond. It is really

> frustrating to daily and go to one of the computers

> that are connected

> to internet in our Dept. and check if somebody

> responded. I hope if not

> others, at least Narasimha to respond since he

> brought an article on

> that dasa. I know that everybody here is very busy

> and may not respond

> to each and every message that crops up, but I

> *feel* my message

> contains a sustance to discuss.

>

>

>

> I am just summarizing below the points I raised.

>

>

>

> 1. I have shown on how to calculate the successive

> dasas in Drig dasa

> which contradicts Sri Sanjay and Sri Narasimha Rao.

>

>

>

> 2. I have shown on why 7, 8, and 9 years

> respectively be allotted to

> Movable, Fixed and Dual signs, and why not 9 years

> to each signs, which

> is connectd to dasa progression.

>

>

>

> 3. I have shown why BPHS can't be followed to

> interpret Rasi dasas and I

> can show how may places BPHS slokas just resembles

> Vriddha karkika

> slokas. I strongly feel, if you don't have vriddha

> karika slokas and try

> to interpret Jaimini is like sailing without

> compass. I can show a no.

> of scholars tried to translate Jaimini Sutras

> without consulting Vriddha

> Karikas and how they are wrong.

>

>

>

> 4. In fact, Narasimha was complaining that the

> critique that printed in

> Jyotish Digest didn't touched the important concepts

> like dasa years and

> dasa progression, and I responded to the same. But

> he didn't turn up.

>

>

>

> 5. I have been associated with SJC Hyderabad since

> 2002 and I tried to

> be passive all these years, but when it comes to

> Jaimini I wanted to

> share my understanding, yet nobody tried to even

> care the important

> issue I raised. Since there are a no. of Gurus on

> this forum and they

> can at least prove me wrong which may benefit me and

> others as well.

>

>

>

> Well, I know my absence doen't affect this forum or

> anybody. Yet, I want

> to again go quiet on these forums. I will bring out

> the other side of

> Jaimini teaching which has been not brought light on

> my first blog site.

> Interested readers may kindly visit

> http://sutramritam.blogspot.com

> <http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/> to view my views

> on important

> aspects of Jaimini.

>

>

>

> In the mail I am referring, I raised the points how

> dasa progresses, and

> I have not touched how to know the first dasa. Well,

> the first dasa is

> always 9th house, but there are a couple of views on

> 9th house, same as

> vriddha karika method of 8th house. I thought I

> would bring it too, but

> since nobody interested here, instead I will show

> that on my blog very

> soon. There I will show how BPHS sloka that

> Narasimha used will be

> useful.

>

>

>

> This looks like I am boasting. Let it be. Yet I

> sincerely tell you what

> I am write on this topic is not my research or

> findings but based on

> ancient commentaries, which were suppressed for the

> years.

>

>

>

> Seeking Blessings,

> Shanmukha.

>

>

>

> sohamsa , " Shanmukha "

> <teli_sha2002 wrote:

> >

> >

> > Om Namah Sivaya

> >

> >

> >

> > Namaste Sri Narasimha,

> >

> >

> >

> > Narasimha : I know that that is a

> misrepresentation of tradition.

> Sanjay

> > ji clearly told me privately in the past that it

> was *his* innovative

> > idea and *not* from his elders.

> >

> >

> >

> > Your words above create a lot of confusion and

> distress in the minds

> of

> > the students like me. In fact, these words

> question the very root of

> > Sanjayji's teachings. You made similar

> allegations/comments in your

> > earlier mails also. I request you not to voice

> these comments in

> public

> > forums since he is your Guru and he is not ready

> to respond. I request

> > you to continue to bring your independent research

> as you have been

> > doing. Else, you will be wasting a lot of your

> Tapas Sakti and that is

> > detrimental to the astrological fraternity.

> >

> >

> >

> > Coming back to Drig Dasa again, I request you to

> see the other side of

> > the coin as well. Drig dasa was not only dealt

> with in BPHS, but in a

> > number of other Jaimini works. Please, kindly

> refer to them also

> before

> > fixing up your mind on this dasa. As the taste of

> pudding lies in

> > eating, we shall experiment on the other

> variations of this dasa

> system

> > as well as you have done on BPHS version.

> >

> >

> >

> > If you agree on that your interpretation of Drig

> dasa must be

> reconciled

> > with Jaimini, then I would like to point some more

> points. The other

> > readers may ponder.

> >

> >

> >

> > 1. Jaimini says *Trikoota* in the adhikara sutra.

> As per your

> > interpretation, for example, Aries Lagna, the Dasa

> signs are Sg, Pi,

> Ge,

> > Vi, Cp, ….. etc. So, the first group signs are all

> Dual signs.

> > Aren't they? Then, where does that Trikoota

> Padakrama fit in your

> > interpretation?

>

=== message truncated ===