Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 || OM TAT SAT || Dear list and Visti, The article " tattva2 " at your site, refers to using Kunda in trines/7th to D-1 lagna/lagna lord to cause creation. In the case of 8 babies born in L.A. in 5 minutes, Kunda moves from 3degPi to 28degCn in 5 minutes from 10:43-10:48 am, thus coming in trines to lagna/lagna lord only for 2 minutes out of 5. So, Kunda remains in trines to Aries lagna for 1 minute and 7th from Mars for 1 minute. This example shows the D-1 usage of Kunda for BT Rectification as " plain wrong " . It seems that the only way to reconcile the differences with the BT data is by checking Kunda Sign in trines/7th to D-60 lagna sign, where the lagna moves almost as fast as Kunda, thereby remaining in trines to it for much longer duration compared to D-1. Also, as far as D-1 lagna is concerned, the creation has already happened as the body of the baby is very much in place, so Kunda has nothing to do with the creation of Physical body. All that Kunda can refer to is timing the event of umbilical cord cutting, and thereby fix the D-60 lagna. Note that using Kunda to fix D-60 lagna is a method much grosser than using Pranapada lagna as illustrated in my earlier posts. With this, I think some serious work should be done on BT rectification on this list. Anybody interested could mail me. Regards, Nitish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 20, 2009 Report Share Posted February 20, 2009 Hare Rama Krsna ||Dear Nitish,Nice to have you back.>With an abrupt realization - that this forum >is actually for people doing jyotish and not Yoga - I take my leave.Warm regards,Michalyeeahoo_99 <nitish.aryasohamsa Sent: Friday, 20 February, 2009 7:54:44 PM On Kunda Correction - to Visti || OM TAT SAT || Dear list and Visti, The article "tattva2" at your site, refers to using Kunda in trines/7th to D-1 lagna/lagna lord to cause creation. In the case of 8 babies born in L.A. in 5 minutes, Kunda moves from 3degPi to 28degCn in 5 minutes from 10:43-10:48 am, thus coming in trines to lagna/lagna lord only for 2 minutes out of 5. So, Kunda remains in trines to Aries lagna for 1 minute and 7th from Mars for 1 minute. This example shows the D-1 usage of Kunda for BT Rectification as "plain wrong". It seems that the only way to reconcile the differences with the BT data is by checking Kunda Sign in trines/7th to D-60 lagna sign, where the lagna moves almost as fast as Kunda, thereby remaining in trines to it for much longer duration compared to D-1. Also, as far as D-1 lagna is concerned, the creation has already happened as the body of the baby is very much in place, so Kunda has nothing to do with the creation of Physical body. All that Kunda can refer to is timing the event of umbilical cord cutting, and thereby fix the D-60 lagna. Note that using Kunda to fix D-60 lagna is a method much grosser than using Pranapada lagna as illustrated in my earlier posts. With this, I think some serious work should be done on BT rectification on this list. Anybody interested could mail me. Regards, Nitish Get the world's best email - Xtra Mail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 हरे राम कृष्ण Dear Nitish, Namaskar. Please don't invent new methods to compensate for what you don't understand. If everyone did this then we would really be at loss. Better is to study the slokas related to rectification and then try to understand what the Rishis wanted you to know... that way you won't have to invent new principles, which people are very susceptible to during this current Guru transit. References: Last chapter of Nashta Jataka by Mukunda Daivagya (make sure to read the Hindi and Sanskrit). Also Sarvartha Chintamani has a detailed exposition on all the rectification techniques used in Prasna and Natal charts in its first chapter (i believe), just before it speaks of Pachakadi Sambandha. It may not be easy to translate, but thats much better than reinventing Jyotish. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti yeeahoo_99 skrev: || OM TAT SAT || Dear list and Visti, The article "tattva2" at your site, refers to using Kunda in trines/7th to D-1 lagna/lagna lord to cause creation. In the case of 8 babies born in L.A. in 5 minutes, Kunda moves from 3degPi to 28degCn in 5 minutes from 10:43-10:48 am, thus coming in trines to lagna/lagna lord only for 2 minutes out of 5. So, Kunda remains in trines to Aries lagna for 1 minute and 7th from Mars for 1 minute. This example shows the D-1 usage of Kunda for BT Rectification as "plain wrong". It seems that the only way to reconcile the differences with the BT data is by checking Kunda Sign in trines/7th to D-60 lagna sign, where the lagna moves almost as fast as Kunda, thereby remaining in trines to it for much longer duration compared to D-1. Also, as far as D-1 lagna is concerned, the creation has already happened as the body of the baby is very much in place, so Kunda has nothing to do with the creation of Physical body. All that Kunda can refer to is timing the event of umbilical cord cutting, and thereby fix the D-60 lagna. Note that using Kunda to fix D-60 lagna is a method much grosser than using Pranapada lagna as illustrated in my earlier posts. With this, I think some serious work should be done on BT rectification on this list. Anybody interested could mail me. Regards, Nitish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2009 Report Share Posted February 23, 2009 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Visti, Well said. Rather leave it to the Gaja himself, until realise those “dangerous watery creatures “ in beautiful lakes. Most of us  need real life experience to learn. Hope you all well. Karu sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Visti Larsen Sunday, 22 February 2009 6:25 PM sohamsa Re: On Kunda Correction - to Visti हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Nitish, Namaskar. Please don't invent new methods to compensate for what you don't understand. If everyone did this then we would really be at loss. Better is to study the slokas related to rectification and then try to understand what the Rishis wanted you to know... that way you won't have to invent new principles, which people are very susceptible to during this current Guru transit. References: Last chapter of Nashta Jataka by Mukunda Daivagya (make sure to read the Hindi and Sanskrit). Also Sarvartha Chintamani has a detailed exposition on all the rectification techniques used in Prasna and Natal charts in its first chapter (i believe), just before it speaks of Pachakadi Sambandha. It may not be easy to translate, but thats much better than reinventing Jyotish. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti yeeahoo_99 skrev: || OM TAT SAT || Dear list and Visti, The article " tattva2 " at your site, refers to using Kunda in trines/7th to D-1 lagna/lagna lord to cause creation. In the case of 8 babies born in L.A. in 5 minutes, Kunda moves from 3degPi to 28degCn in 5 minutes from 10:43-10:48 am, thus coming in trines to lagna/lagna lord only for 2 minutes out of 5. So, Kunda remains in trines to Aries lagna for 1 minute and 7th from Mars for 1 minute. This example shows the D-1 usage of Kunda for BT Rectification as " plain wrong " . It seems that the only way to reconcile the differences with the BT data is by checking Kunda Sign in trines/7th to D-60 lagna sign, where the lagna moves almost as fast as Kunda, thereby remaining in trines to it for much longer duration compared to D-1. Also, as far as D-1 lagna is concerned, the creation has already happened as the body of the baby is very much in place, so Kunda has nothing to do with the creation of Physical body. All that Kunda can refer to is timing the event of umbilical cord cutting, and thereby fix the D-60 lagna. Note that using Kunda to fix D-60 lagna is a method much grosser than using Pranapada lagna as illustrated in my earlier posts. With this, I think some serious work should be done on BT rectification on this list. Anybody interested could mail me. Regards, Nitish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 respected Vistiji my d-81 lagna does not fall in trines/7th to lagna without at least 2 mins of time correction. lagna lord is not in parivartana. d-81 is in gemini and rasi lagna is leo with current time. (sun in capri). does this necessarily mean that rectification is required or are there some exceptions. thanks & regards namita sohamsa , Visti Larsen <visti wrote: > > ??? ??? ????? > Dear Nitish, Namaskar. > Please don't invent new methods to compensate for what you don't > understand. If everyone did this then we would really be at loss. > Better is to study the slokas related to rectification and then try to > understand what the Rishis wanted you to know... that way you won't have > to invent new principles, which people are very susceptible to during > this current Guru transit. > References: Last chapter of Nashta Jataka by Mukunda Daivagya (make sure > to read the Hindi and Sanskrit). Also Sarvartha Chintamani has a > detailed exposition on all the rectification techniques used in Prasna > and Natal charts in its first chapter (i believe), just before it speaks > of Pachakadi Sambandha. It may not be easy to translate, but thats much > better than reinventing Jyotish. > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > ---------- > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > www: http://srigaruda.com > @: visti > > yeeahoo_99 skrev: > > > > || OM TAT SAT || > > Dear list and Visti, > > The article " tattva2 " at your site, refers to using Kunda in > > trines/7th to D-1 lagna/lagna lord to cause creation. In the case of > > 8 babies born in L.A. in 5 minutes, Kunda moves from 3degPi to > > 28degCn in 5 minutes from 10:43-10:48 am, thus coming in trines to > > lagna/lagna lord only for 2 minutes out of 5. So, Kunda remains in > > trines to Aries lagna for 1 minute and 7th from Mars for 1 minute. > > > > This example shows the D-1 usage of Kunda for BT Rectification as > > " plain wrong " . It seems that the only way to reconcile the > > differences with the BT data is by checking Kunda Sign in trines/7th > > to D-60 lagna sign, where the lagna moves almost as fast as Kunda, > > thereby remaining in trines to it for much longer duration compared > > to D-1. > > > > Also, as far as D-1 lagna is concerned, the creation has already > > happened as the body of the baby is very much in place, so Kunda has > > nothing to do with the creation of Physical body. All that Kunda can > > refer to is timing the event of umbilical cord cutting, and thereby > > fix the D-60 lagna. > > > > Note that using Kunda to fix D-60 lagna is a method much grosser > > than using Pranapada lagna as illustrated in my earlier posts. With > > this, I think some serious work should be done on BT rectification on > > this list. Anybody interested could mail me. > > > > Regards, > > Nitish > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.