Guest guest Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Dear Shanmukha Jee, Shri K N Rao and Dr BV Raman' calculate Arudha for lagna lord's placement in 4th house = Arudha Lagna goes to 7th house. Shri Sanjay Rath's view is in favour of Arudha lagna remaining in 4th house itself. What is your experience with it ? Regards, Mrutyunjay Tripathy sohamsa , " Shanmukha " <teli_sha2002 wrote: > > Om Namah Sivaya > > Namaste Sri Tripathy, > > I dont know whether I am misunderstood or I am not able to communicate correctly. The point is I never said fresh thinking / research is unnecessary. I welcomed it manytimes in this list itself, for example Chara Karaka, Drigdasa articles by Narasimha. The point I differ is to state / doubt the caliber and efficacy of other commentators of Jaimin, when you never read them. If a person like Sri Narasimha writes that way many students here will definitely be influenced and the necessary research into Jaimini will be lost. People will always read the all-in-one books, forgetting the references, which will be detrimental in the long run. This is been done for centuries and at least shall we try to bring out those works to light. > > Sri Narasimha based his paper only on BPHS, not all the available resources. > > By the way, I admitted on AIA list, that there are contradicting points in 3rd and 4th chapter only, which somehow surfaced this century by the efforts of gaints like Sri S.K.Kar, Sri Ghosh etc. > > Hope I am understood. > > Warm Regards, > Shanmukha > > sohamsa , " Mrutyunjay Tripathy " <astrologer_mrutyunjay@> wrote: > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > Shree Shanmukha Jee. > > > > When you have already admitted in other jyotish(AIA) groups that > > > > you have the same four chapters of Jaimin Upadesha Sutra (predictive part) available with you...and suggest the need for research... > > > > > > So at the end you came to the same point ... > > > > the need for fresh thinking and research...on > > > > the basis of available resources... > > > > the points origianlly echoed in the Sthira Dasa paper by PVR. > > > > Hope you will come up with some contributions on Jaimini Upadesa Sutra. > > > > Regards, > > > > Mrutyunjay Tripathy > > > > > > Jaimini Sutras.sohamsa , teli Shanmukha <teli_sha2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 5/8/09, As Th wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi shanmukh > > > > > > > > > I am trying to post this message to you in sohmasa for last 3 days.My post is not published by sohmasa group > > > > > > > > > The stand of SJC is very clear in the books they write > > > > > > > > > 1.Crux of vedic astrology > > > 2.Vedic Astrology-Integrated approach > > > > > > > > > Both books area vailable as free download in scribd.com > > > > > > > > > They both have ample references by the author stating that Jaimini and parashara system are same with only minor differences as it is possible among different authors > > > > > > > > > The details are given in the first few pages of both books > > > > > > > > > The statements made by Sarbani ratha and other members of SJC are really stupid > > > > > > > > > regardss > > > > > > > > > vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8. http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 Om Namah Sivaya Dear All, Sage Jaimini was clear on this. If LL is in 4th , AL will be in 4th. Saste Darah. Sutaste Janma. Much need to be probe on thse two sutras. Raghava Bhatta used these sutras for dasa calculation and which was followed by K.N.Rao in his Mandooka Dasa (???). Warm Regards, Shanmukha sohamsa , " Mrutyunjay Tripathy " <astrologer_mrutyunjay wrote: > > Dear Shanmukha Jee, > > Shri K N Rao and Dr BV Raman' > > calculate Arudha for lagna lord's placement in 4th house > > = Arudha Lagna goes to 7th house. > > Shri Sanjay Rath's view is in favour of Arudha lagna > > remaining in 4th house itself. > > What is your experience with it ? > > Regards, > > Mrutyunjay Tripathy > > sohamsa , " Shanmukha " <teli_sha2002@> wrote: > > > > Om Namah Sivaya > > > > Namaste Sri Tripathy, > > > > I dont know whether I am misunderstood or I am not able to communicate correctly. The point is I never said fresh thinking / research is unnecessary. I welcomed it manytimes in this list itself, for example Chara Karaka, Drigdasa articles by Narasimha. The point I differ is to state / doubt the caliber and efficacy of other commentators of Jaimin, when you never read them. If a person like Sri Narasimha writes that way many students here will definitely be influenced and the necessary research into Jaimini will be lost. People will always read the all-in-one books, forgetting the references, which will be detrimental in the long run. This is been done for centuries and at least shall we try to bring out those works to light. > > > > Sri Narasimha based his paper only on BPHS, not all the available resources. > > > > By the way, I admitted on AIA list, that there are contradicting points in 3rd and 4th chapter only, which somehow surfaced this century by the efforts of gaints like Sri S.K.Kar, Sri Ghosh etc. > > > > Hope I am understood. > > > > Warm Regards, > > Shanmukha > > > > sohamsa , " Mrutyunjay Tripathy " <astrologer_mrutyunjay@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear friend, > > > > > > > > > Shree Shanmukha Jee. > > > > > > When you have already admitted in other jyotish(AIA) groups that > > > > > > you have the same four chapters of Jaimin Upadesha Sutra (predictive part) available with you...and suggest the need for research... > > > > > > > > > So at the end you came to the same point ... > > > > > > the need for fresh thinking and research...on > > > > > > the basis of available resources... > > > > > > the points origianlly echoed in the Sthira Dasa paper by PVR. > > > > > > Hope you will come up with some contributions on Jaimini Upadesa Sutra. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Mrutyunjay Tripathy > > > > > > > > > Jaimini Sutras.sohamsa , teli Shanmukha <teli_sha2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 5/8/09, As Th wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi shanmukh > > > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to post this message to you in sohmasa for last 3 days.My post is not published by sohmasa group > > > > > > > > > > > > The stand of SJC is very clear in the books they write > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.Crux of vedic astrology > > > > 2.Vedic Astrology-Integrated approach > > > > > > > > > > > > Both books area vailable as free download in scribd.com > > > > > > > > > > > > They both have ample references by the author stating that Jaimini and parashara system are same with only minor differences as it is possible among different authors > > > > > > > > > > > > The details are given in the first few pages of both books > > > > > > > > > > > > The statements made by Sarbani ratha and other members of SJC are really stupid > > > > > > > > > > > > regardss > > > > > > > > > > > > vishnu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8. http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.