Guest guest Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Om Namah ShivayaDear Sanjay ji, NamasteAs much as we all look forward to reading your comments, your fonts mess up the flow. I understand your desire for accuracy in line with Sanskritic phonemes, but the way your fonts appear in the mail, they squarely fail to achieve your intent. E.g., your "nav€ ¢Ä’¡á¹’¡Å’»a" from no angle resembles the simple "navamsa" or "navamsha", both of which help us easily associate with its referent. I thank you for your consideration. Best regards,Patheya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009 Thank you Patheya I need to find a way in which Outlook wil not use the dictionary I use for Word. Any ideas as to how to configure this? Regards Sanjay sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Patheya Goyal 06 October 2009 18:50 sohamsa Sanjay Rath ji, re: fonts Om Namah Shivaya Dear Sanjay ji, Namaste As much as we all look forward to reading your comments, your fonts mess up the flow. I understand your desire for accuracy in line with Sanskritic phonemes, but the way your fonts appear in the mail, they squarely fail to achieve your intent. E.g., your " nav€ ¢Ä’¡á¹’¡Å’»a " from no angle resembles the simple " navamsa " or " navamsha " , both of which help us easily associate with its referent. I thank you for your consideration. Best regards, Patheya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2009 Report Share Posted October 10, 2009  Sanjayji, Pranaam. For this go to Tools> Option>Mail Format Tab. Uncheck `use word as editor' box if checked. Then again Tools> Option> Spelling tab. Uncheck all boxes in in `General' I think this should do the trick Regards jk sohamsa [sohamsa ]On Behalf Of Sanjay Rath10 October 2009 18:10sohamsa Subject: RE: Sanjay Rath ji, re: fonts Thank you Patheya I need to find a way in which Outlook wil not use the dictionary I use for Word. Any ideas as to how to configure this? Regards Sanjay sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Patheya Goyal06 October 2009 18:50sohamsa Subject: Sanjay Rath ji, re: fonts Om Namah ShivayaDear Sanjay ji, NamasteAs much as we all look forward to reading your comments, your fonts mess up the flow. I understand your desire for accuracy in line with Sanskritic phonemes, but the way your fonts appear in the mail, they squarely fail to achieve your intent. E.g., your "nav€ ¢Ä’¡á¹’¡Å’»a" from no angle resembles the simple "navamsa" or "navamsha", both of which help us easily associate with its referent. I thank you for your consideration. Best regards,Patheya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Om Namah Shivaya Namaste Sanjay ji, I wish I knew Outlook that well, and I'm not sure if I entirely understand your problem, nor am I sure if you use 2003 or 2007 version. You may try JK Dasgupta ji's advice, if you have the 2003 version; 2007 I don't think has what he suggests. You may simply try choosing the option of composing your mail in plain text [Tools --> Options --> Mail Format --> Message Format]. I also googled this page, which seems to have some relevance to the dictionary issues, although I am not sure if that is what's involved here. Hopefully, something/someone will show the way out. Best regards, Patheya sohamsa , " Sanjay Rath " <sanjayrath wrote: > > Thank you Patheya > > I need to find a way in which Outlook wil not use the dictionary I use for Word. Any ideas as to how to configure this? > > Regards > > Sanjay > > > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Patheya Goyal > 06 October 2009 18:50 > sohamsa > Sanjay Rath ji, re: fonts > > > > > > Om Namah Shivaya > > Dear Sanjay ji, Namaste > > As much as we all look forward to reading your comments, your fonts mess up the flow. I understand your desire for accuracy in line with Sanskritic phonemes, but the way your fonts appear in the mail, they squarely fail to achieve your intent. E.g., your " nav€ ¢Ä’¡á¹’¡Å’»a " from no angle resembles the simple " navamsa " or " navamsha " , both of which help us easily associate with its referent. I thank you for your consideration. Best regards, > > Patheya > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 Om Namah Shivaya Sorry Sanjay ji, Hit the button too soon. The page I googled is this: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA101747901033.aspx Best regards, PG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.