[SoHamsa] Re:Srikrishna (Nadi )Navamsha

[Guest guest]

 

om gurave namah

Dear Goel ji

If you have to follow only that logic then you have to reject Parashari HorÄ and Trimsamsa and prefer Kashinath HorÄ and Vaidyanath Trimsamsha. J

Perhaps what you are suggesting is the Somanatha Navamsha…but then that is for another purpose.

Look at the Nadi Navamsha carefully and you will find more maaraka powers in some signs while others have less maaraka power

Best Wishes

Sanjay Rath

15B Gangaram Hospital Road, New Delhi 110060, India; +91 (011) 4504 8762

Readings: www.srath.com; Courses: www.sohamsa.com; Books: www.sagittariuspublications.com; Community: www..org

 

 

 

Gopal Goel

Wednesday, January 27, 2010 12:06 PM

sohamsa

Cc: kashyapagotraja

[soHamsa] Re:Srikrishna (Nadi )Navamsha

 

Dear Rao ji ,I had a good luck that I attended the class ofour guru ji Pt. Sanjay Rath in which he taughtSri Krishna Navamsa in his usual scholarly manner.Somehow , I am not convinced . This does not mean that I am raising finger on such a great authority like Sri krishna.In my understanding any Navamsha division should have nine navamsa of each sign , this method fails this test.Regards,

G.K.GOELPh: 09350311433Add: L-409, SARITA VIHARNEW DELHI-110 076INDIA

 

Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.