Guest guest Posted February 27, 2010 Report Share Posted February 27, 2010 Dear Narshima Ji,I am not in a position to decide Who - Lomasa or Parasara is correct.Parasara says that Sun should be in Lagna. Lomasa says that Lagna Lord should be Sun.Why LOMASA did not say when Sign Leo was rising . It seems to me that some thing is missing in original instruction given by Lomasa.Under the situation we may follow Parasara,Laghu Parasari clearly says that the rules of Vimsottari Nakshatra dasa should not be made applicable to Astottari dasa.The method of calculating Shatayaani dasa is similar as Astotari and thusto be accessed on same basis.THIS DASA IS PREDICTED BASED ON SARVOTABHADRA CHAKRA.IN THE NATIVITY OF SWAMIJI IT LOOKS THAT HE WAS BORN IN 'UTTARASADA IST PADA WITH AK SUN ' CONJOINED WITH DEBILITATED VENUSIN 4TH PADA I.E. ABHIJIT NAKSHATRA.MERCURY IS IN SHARVANA. IN BHAVA CHARTSUN AND VENUS ARE IN CONJUNCTION AND MERCURY MAY BE IN SAME BHAVA OR BHAVA SANDHI.IF YOU APPLY PLANETARY TRANSITS ON HIS DEATH IN SARVOTOBHADRA CHAKRA (DASA OF SUN/MARS WAS OPERATING - ALSO CONSIDER ENTRY CHARTS) THE AFFLICTION SAW CLEARLY VISIBLE AND STILL RAHU IS NOT INFLUENCING ANY VITAL PARAMETRES. HE HAD LEFT THE WORLD AND ACHIEVED SALVATION.HIS BIRTH HAD TAKEN PLACE IN 1ST OR 2ND PADA DOES NOT ALTER THE ANALYSIS.HOWEVER IT IS MORE AKIN TO 1ST PADA.WITH ALL THE CONTROVERSY ON AYANAMSA ONE CAN NOT BE SURE.WITH KIND REGARDS,G. K. Goel address: L-409 Sarita Vihar, New Delhi - 110076 tel: 011-26943689, 011-41403352, mobile: 09350311433 The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.