Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 Hello Anando, Please specify if these charts are male or female Thanks and best regards Margarita Anando Banerjee wrote: >Namaskar to all, > >I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help with a >little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth data for 2 >different persons, which person is more likely to have the following event >and why. > >Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same person married >on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast marriage after 6 >years of courtship.) > >Birth Data: >Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. Bhatpara, India >(88E25, 22N53). >Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a difference of less >than an hour from Person 1. > >Please help and guide. > >Anando > > > > >--- >This mail is Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 > >* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 Dear Anando, You have asked an interesting quiz, but we follow an Astrolgers code of Conduct on this list. Such questions can be a mis use of this devine science. Such questions can be asked to find out the " Real " or " Biological " father of a child if that is in question. If you are really interested in learning this system then you can go through the lessons on file section of this list of on http://krushna.sageasita.com and apply this system and check for yourself. In addition you can go through the archives of this list where lots of valuable discussion on child birth have been held incluiding timing of events. Similarly there are lesson on child birth. All the best in your attempt, Cheers !!! Ash ps : Just in case you are unable to find the Astrologer's Code of Conduct here it is. An Astrologer's Code of Conduct by Krushna Jugalkalani 1) I know that astrology is a truth and a Godly science, so a misuse of this science is an insult to my God. 2) I will use this science for social service and as a form of worship to my God. 3) I am aware of the flaws in human beings and will not treat any person with less importance when giving my guidance. 4) I will not misuse this science for the teaching of any religion, social matter or any unlawful act. Giving my guidance in such matters means my involvement in that act. 5) If I do not get an answer from the chart, I will NOT give my guidance! No guidance is better than the wrong guidance and I will accept my limitations about the chart as well as my own limitations as an astrologer. 6) I will not abuse or malign any other astrologer, nor will I take unfair advantage of another person's astrological knowledge by advertising unnecessarily at their expense without proper and due credit. 7) I will try to increase my knowledge and share it sincerely with other people of similar interests. 8) I will behave truthfully and honestly at all times and keep my conduct pure in heart. 9) Any information received from a client, in the course of giving my guidance to that person, shall be kept in strict confidence. 10) I will not use any chart for purposes of public discussion by identifying the native by name, unless I have his or her explicit permission , " Anando Banerjee " <anandobanerjee@h...> wrote: > Namaskar to all, > > I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help with a > little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth data for 2 > different persons, which person is more likely to have the following event > and why. > > Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same person married > on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast marriage after 6 > years of courtship.) > > Birth Data: > Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. Bhatpara, India > (88E25, 22N53). > Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a difference of less > than an hour from Person 1. > > Please help and guide. > > Anando > > > > > --- > This mail is Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 24, 2004 Report Share Posted June 24, 2004 Thanks Margarita, for pointing out the silly ommission of male/female (father/mother) on my part. However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I think it is best that I leave this be for the time being. Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer that " this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate social ethics or codes of conducts " ? If that be the case, then that also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list should not be a public list but restricted to people who have qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such restricted lists on Astrology do exist also. I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr. Ash is trying to point out. Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would also think twice before answering anybody's question, even if I knew the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be " mis-used " by somebody somewhere to misguide somebody. I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on unsuspecting " real " or " fake " parents. Just going through the lessons and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers. I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects that regardless of how senior or junior he may be. Thanks anyway. Anando , margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > > Hello Anando, > Please specify if these charts are male or female > Thanks and best regards > Margarita > Anando Banerjee wrote: > > >Namaskar to all, > > > >I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help with a > >little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth data for 2 > >different persons, which person is more likely to have the following event > >and why. > > > >Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same person married > >on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast marriage after 6 > >years of courtship.) > > > >Birth Data: > >Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. Bhatpara, India > >(88E25, 22N53). > >Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a difference of less > >than an hour from Person 1. > > > >Please help and guide. > > > >Anando > > > > > > > > > >--- > >This mail is Virus Free. > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 > > > >* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2004 Report Share Posted June 25, 2004 Hello Anando, Thanks for your point of view. I fully understand it But as I am interested in the exercice could you tell me if these charts are from male or female, I mean mother or father? I will try to solve this Best regards Margarita anando63 wrote: >Thanks Margarita, > >for pointing out the silly ommission of male/female (father/mother) >on my part. > >However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my >question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I >think it is best that I leave this be for the time being. > >Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but >does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer >that " this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate >social ethics or codes of conducts " ? If that be the case, then that >also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list >should not be a public list but restricted to people who have >qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such >restricted lists on Astrology do exist also. > >I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of >Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's >reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is >quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and >would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to >learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance >on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private >detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr. >Ash is trying to point out. > >Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am >trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes >against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent >question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would >also think twice before answering anybody's question, even if I knew >the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be " mis-used " by >somebody somewhere to misguide somebody. > >I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of >joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation >of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be >accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on >unsuspecting " real " or " fake " parents. Just going through the lessons >and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of >non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers. > >I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not >directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I >hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects >that regardless of how senior or junior he may be. > >Thanks anyway. >Anando > > > > > , margarita lettens ><dmlettens@s...> wrote: > > > > Hello Anando, > > Please specify if these charts are male or female > > Thanks and best regards > > Margarita > > Anando Banerjee wrote: > > > > >Namaskar to all, > > > > > >I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help >with a > > >little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth >data for 2 > > >different persons, which person is more likely to have the >following event > > >and why. > > > > > >Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same >person married > > >on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast >marriage after 6 > > >years of courtship.) > > > > > >Birth Data: > > >Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. >Bhatpara, India > > >(88E25, 22N53). > > >Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a >difference of less > > >than an hour from Person 1. > > > > > >Please help and guide. > > > > > >Anando > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--- > > >This mail is Virus Free. > > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > >Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 > > > > > >* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2004 Report Share Posted June 25, 2004 Dear Ash, Margarita, and other list members, Please note that Mr Anando have asked the same question in so many other list (groups). From that it is clear that he is not having intension only to learn our system. What so ever may be his intension, such questions should not be answered, this is my honest opinion. krushna. margarita lettens <dmlettens wrote: Hello Anando,Thanks for your point of view. I fully understand it But as I am interested in the exercice could you tell me if these charts are from male or female, I mean mother or father?I will try to solve thisBest regardsMargaritaanando63 wrote:>Thanks Margarita,>>for pointing out the silly ommission of male/female (father/mother)>on my part.>>However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my>question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I>think it is best that I leave this be for the time being.>>Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but>does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer>that "this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate>social ethics or codes of conducts"? If that be the case, then that>also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list>should not be a public list but restricted to people who have>qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such>restricted lists on Astrology do exist also.>>I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of>Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's>reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is>quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and>would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to>learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance>on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private>detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr.>Ash is trying to point out.>>Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am>trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes>against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent>question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would>also think twice before answering anybody's question, even if I knew>the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be "mis-used" by>somebody somewhere to misguide somebody.>>I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of>joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation>of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be>accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on>unsuspecting "real" or "fake" parents. Just going through the lessons>and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of>non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers.>>I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not>directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I>hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects>that regardless of how senior or junior he may be.>>Thanks anyway.>Anando>>>>> , margarita lettens><dmlettens@s...> wrote:> >> > Hello Anando,> > Please specify if these charts are male or female> > Thanks and best regards> > Margarita> > Anando Banerjee wrote:> >> > >Namaskar to all,> > >> > >I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help>with a> > >little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth>data for 2> > >different persons, which person is more likely to have the>following event> > >and why.> > >> > >Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same>person married> > >on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast>marriage after 6> > >years of courtship.)> > >> > >Birth Data:> > >Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30.>Bhatpara, India> > >(88E25, 22N53).> > >Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a>difference of less> > >than an hour from Person 1.> > >> > >Please help and guide.> > >> > >Anando> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >---> > >This mail is Virus Free.> > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).> > >Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04> > >> > >* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2004 Report Share Posted June 25, 2004 Dear Krushna, Ash, listmembers Krushna, you say in your mail that even if you do not know the intention of Mr Anando, his question should not be answered !! Ash you served the code of conduct to this mister Anando for his querry. Now I think there is a big misunderstanding or else I’m missing something essential. Therefore I would be grateful to get your “honest” answers. Is the fact that posting to different lists a proof of Mr Anando not wanting to learn Krushna’s system? Why is Mr Anando’s curiosity judged badly ? So many questions are asked on the list of people who only want a free reading and often they are answered because interested members want to learn; let's be honest about that. Without curiosity there can never be interest for learning, so what is wrong with being curious?? Ash served him the ethical code of conduct for asking this question. Why??? Why were his intention interpreted as trying to find out a real father, or trying to misuse the system? I wonder !! Anyway these things never come up into my mind so I don’t think other people ask questions with those intentions. Perhaps he just tries to find out which system works, who knows? Ash tried to solve the question anyway. So is it more ethical to solve the question behind the back instead of doing it on the list? Is trying to solve an unethical question ethical? I just wonder about ethics. I think the intention behind everything, question or action counts. It’s not more ethical to cheat behind somebody’s back than to do it openly, it’s less hurtful for the one who is cheated, that’s all, but the act remains the same. Some time ago there was a similar question raised on a list were somebody asked to predict the sex of twin babies yet to be born. It was a female chart and Ash submitted it to Krushna. Krushna solved it and Ash posted the answer on the list (don’t remember which one), but the answer turned out to be wrong so we did a whole chat on that to correct it. Now why was the code of ethics not raised on that occasion ???? Was the intention behind this question more “noble” that the intention of Mr Anando?? Who can judge that ? I can only agree with Mr Anando’s comments. I don’t know anything about him, but I feel he got treated wrongly. This is the first message he posted on our list I think. The answer he got is surely not going to give him courage to learn the system, if that is the purpose of our list. If questions are asked on the list, why not answer them gracefully or otherwise just ignore them if we don’t feel like answering? Attributing bad intentions to people who ask questions, even if they ask them on other lists, is not the way to act. If you know that Mr Anando posted his question on other lists, so members of other lists also read the answers people get on our list and I wonder what they think of the answer Mr Anando got on our list? Our list has be spared from inimical exchanges compared to other lists. I think we should all try to keep it like that. Mr Anando's question surely was not a reason to start an argument, unless you are aware and sure of his bad intentions. Best regards Margarita krushna jugalkalani wrote: Dear Ash, Margarita, and other list members, Please note that Mr Anando have asked the same question in so many other list (groups). From that it is clear that he is not having intension only to learn our system. What so ever may be his intension, such questions should not be answered, this is my honest opinion. krushna. margarita lettens <dmlettens wrote: Hello Anando, Thanks for your point of view. I fully understand it But as I am interested in the exercice could you tell me if these charts are from male or female, I mean mother or father? I will try to solve this Best regards Margarita anando63 wrote: Thanks Margarita, for pointing out the silly ommission of male/female (father/mother) on my part. However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I think it is best that I leave this be for the time being. Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer that "this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate social ethics or codes of conducts"? If that be the case, then that also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list should not be a public list but restricted to people who have qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such restricted lists on Astrology do exist also. I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr. Ash is trying to point out. Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would also think twice before answering anybody's question, even if I knew the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be "mis-used" by somebody somewhere to misguide somebody. I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on unsuspecting "real" or "fake" parents. Just going through the lessons and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers. I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects that regardless of how senior or junior he may be. Thanks anyway. Anando , margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: Hello Anando, Please specify if these charts are male or female Thanks and best regards Margarita Anando Banerjee wrote: Namaskar to all, I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help with a little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth data for 2 different persons, which person is more likely to have the following event and why. Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same person married on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast marriage after 6 years of courtship.) Birth Data: Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. Bhatpara, India (88E25, 22N53). Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a difference of less than an hour from Person 1. Please help and guide. Anando --- This mail is Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2004 Report Share Posted June 25, 2004 Dear Anando, Margarita and List Members, Have you Anando and Margarita read my mail carefully ? No where have I insinuated Anando nor have I question his intent. I suggest Margarita and Anando please read my mail carefully before jumping to any conclusions. I have written in my mail that " We follow an astrologers code of conduct " as Anando might not have have been aware of an existance of such a code. That is given even before the Preface in Donnas website in the Lesson in English section. So just in case Anando was still unable to locate it from the search from file section I copied and pasted it so that it could be read rather than spending time doing searches. Also in the past someone had made some insinuations to Dadhi and had asked me to paste the Astrologers code of Conduct in a mail rather than just telling them to look up the archives. I have then gone on to say that " SUCH QUESTIONS " giving 2 dates of certain people and with data of marrriage, courtship and then finding out the birth of child, without giving the " Intent " CAN BE USED TO FIND OUT THE " REAL OR BIOLOGICAL " FATHER if that is in question. I quote " CAN BE " . This part is also acknowledged by Anando in his mail that the " intent was not given " . I have then gone on to say that if Anando was really intersted in learning this system then to go to the file section and download the lessons and also directed him to Donnas Web Site and the archives giving Anando proper guidance on " How to learn KAS " . I also did solve his chart and send it to Krushnaji and Margarita in private as I DID NOT FEEL that I should be GIVING THE TECHNIQUE unless Anando would make an attempt on his own first. In the first line itself I have acknowledged that its an Interesting Quiz. I have always tried to help one and all on this list in whatever way I could and with my limited resources. In any case, I feel saddned that I had to EXPLAIN my entire mail. I hope its clear now. If I have offened anyone that was not my intention so kindly forgive me. Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash , margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Dear Krushna, Ash, listmembers > > Krushna, you say in your mail that even if you do not know the intention > of Mr Anando, his question should not be answered !! > > Ash you served the code of conduct to this mister Anando for his querry. > > Now I think there is a big misunderstanding or else I'm missing > something essential. Therefore I would be grateful to get your " honest " > answers. > > 1. Is the fact that posting to different lists a proof of Mr Anando > not wanting to learn Krushna's system? > 2. Why is Mr Anando's curiosity judged badly ? So many questions are > asked on the list of people who only want a free reading and often > they are answered because interested members want to learn; let's > be honest about that. Without curiosity there can never be > interest for learning, so what is wrong with being curious?? > 3. Ash served him the ethical code of conduct for asking this > question. Why??? Why were his intention interpreted as trying to > find out a real father, or trying to misuse the system? I wonder > !! Anyway these things never come up into my mind so I don't think > other people ask questions with those intentions. Perhaps he just > tries to find out which system works, who knows? > 4. Ash tried to solve the question anyway. So is it more ethical to > solve the question behind the back instead of doing it on the > list? Is trying to solve an unethical question ethical? I just > wonder about ethics. I think the intention behind everything, > question or action counts. It's not more ethical to cheat behind > somebody's back than to do it openly, it's less hurtful for the > one who is cheated, that's all, but the act remains the same. > 5. Some time ago there was a similar question raised on a list were > somebody asked to predict the sex of twin babies yet to be born. > It was a female chart and Ash submitted it to Krushna. Krushna > solved it and Ash posted the answer on the list (don't remember > which one), but the answer turned out to be wrong so we did a > whole chat on that to correct it. Now why was the code of ethics > not raised on that occasion ???? Was the intention behind this > question more " noble " that the intention of Mr Anando?? Who can > judge that ? > > I can only agree with Mr Anando's comments. I don't know anything about > him, but I feel he got treated wrongly. This is the first message he > posted on our list I think. The answer he got is surely not going to > give him courage to learn the system, if that is the purpose of our list. > > If questions are asked on the list, why not answer them gracefully or > otherwise just ignore them if we don't feel like answering? Attributing > bad intentions to people who ask questions, even if they ask them on > other lists, is not the way to act. If you know that Mr Anando posted > his question on other lists, so members of other lists also read the > answers people get on our list and I wonder what they think of the > answer Mr Anando got on our list? > > Our list has be spared from inimical exchanges compared to other lists. > I think we should all try to keep it like that. Mr Anando's question > surely was not a reason to start an argument, unless you are aware and > sure of his bad intentions. > > Best regards > > Margarita > krushna jugalkalani wrote: > > >Dear Ash, Margarita, and other list members, > > Please note that Mr Anando have asked the same question in so many other list (groups). From that it is clear that he is not having intension only to learn our system. What so ever may be his intension, such questions should not be answered, this is my honest opinion. > >krushna. > > > > > >margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > >Hello Anando, > >Thanks for your point of view. I fully understand it But as I am > >interested in the exercice could you tell me if these charts are from > >male or female, I mean mother or father? > >I will try to solve this > >Best regards > >Margarita > > > >anando63 wrote: > > > > > > > >>Thanks Margarita, > >> > >>for pointing out the silly ommission of male/female (father/mother) > >>on my part. > >> > >>However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my > >>question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I > >>think it is best that I leave this be for the time being. > >> > >>Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but > >>does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer > >>that " this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate > >>social ethics or codes of conducts " ? If that be the case, then that > >>also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list > >>should not be a public list but restricted to people who have > >>qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such > >>restricted lists on Astrology do exist also. > >> > >>I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of > >>Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's > >>reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is > >>quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and > >>would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to > >>learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance > >>on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private > >>detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr. > >>Ash is trying to point out. > >> > >>Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am > >>trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes > >>against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent > >>question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would > >>also think twice before answering anybody's question, even if I knew > >>the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be " mis-used " by > >>somebody somewhere to misguide somebody. > >> > >>I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of > >>joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation > >>of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be > >>accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on > >>unsuspecting " real " or " fake " parents. Just going through the lessons > >>and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of > >>non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers. > >> > >>I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not > >>directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I > >>hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects > >>that regardless of how senior or junior he may be. > >> > >>Thanks anyway. > >>Anando > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> , margarita lettens > >><dmlettens@s...> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hello Anando, > >>>Please specify if these charts are male or female > >>>Thanks and best regards > >>>Margarita > >>>Anando Banerjee wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Namaskar to all, > >>>> > >>>>I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help > >>>> > >>>> > >>with a > >> > >> > >>>>little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth > >>>> > >>>> > >>data for 2 > >> > >> > >>>>different persons, which person is more likely to have the > >>>> > >>>> > >>following event > >> > >> > >>>>and why. > >>>> > >>>>Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same > >>>> > >>>> > >>person married > >> > >> > >>>>on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast > >>>> > >>>> > >>marriage after 6 > >> > >> > >>>>years of courtship.) > >>>> > >>>>Birth Data: > >>>>Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. > >>>> > >>>> > >>Bhatpara, India > >> > >> > >>>>(88E25, 22N53). > >>>>Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a > >>>> > >>>> > >>difference of less > >> > >> > >>>>than an hour from Person 1. > >>>> > >>>>Please help and guide. > >>>> > >>>>Anando > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>--- > >>>>This mail is Virus Free. > >>>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >>>>Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 > >>>> > >>>>* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2004 Report Share Posted June 25, 2004 Dear Margarita and List Members, I shall answer your Questions in CAPS. , margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Dear Krushna, Ash, listmembers > > Krushna, you say in your mail that even if you do not know the intention > of Mr Anando, his question should not be answered !! > > Ash you served the code of conduct to this mister Anando for his querry. ASH : I HAVE NOT SERVED ANY CODE OF CONDUCT. I HAVE COPIED AND PASTED THE CODE OF CONDUCT SO THAT IT CAN BE READ IN 1 MAIL. I HAD DONE THIS AS IN THE PAST I WAS TOLD IN A MAIL TO PLUG IN THE CODE OF CONDUCT SO THAT ONE DID NOT SPEND TIME FINDING IT. I BELEIVE MARGARITA YOU WERE A PART OF THAT DISUSSION THAT HAPPENED ON THIS LIST. > > Now I think there is a big misunderstanding or else I'm missing > something essential. Therefore I would be grateful to get your " honest " > answers. > > 1. Is the fact that posting to different lists a proof of Mr Anando > not wanting to learn Krushna's system? ASH : IN FACT IF YOU READ MY MAIL, I HAD GUIDED ANANDO TO THE LESSONS AND DONNAS WEBSITE APART FROM ARCHIVES. SO THAT HE CAN LEARN KAS. > 2. Why is Mr Anando's curiosity judged badly ? So many questions are > asked on the list of people who only want a free reading and often > they are answered because interested members want to learn; let's > be honest about that. Without curiosity there can never be > interest for learning, so what is wrong with being curious?? ASH : THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING CURIOUS. THAT IS COMMON SENSE. THE PART ABOUT JUDGING ANANDOS QUESTION AS BEING BAD IS YOURS AND ANANDOS ASSUMPTION. I SUGGEST YOU PLEASE READ MY MAIL CAREFULLY AND ALSO MY PREVIOUS REPLY BEFORE MAKING ANY ASSUMPTIONS. INFACT IN MY MAIL I HAVE GUIDED ANANDO TO PROPER CHANNELS I.E. FILE SECTION, LESSONS, DONNAS SITE AND ARCHIVES SO THAT HIS CURIOSITY CAN BE SATISIFED BY PROPER LEARNING. IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THAT ? > 3. Ash served him the ethical code of conduct for asking this question. Why??? Why were his intention interpreted as trying to > find out a real father, or trying to misuse the system? I wonder > !! Anyway these things never come up into my mind so I don't think > other people ask questions with those intentions. Perhaps he just > tries to find out which system works, who knows? ASH : PLEASE REFER TO MY PREVIOUS MAIL. I HAVE EXPALINED THIS. > 4. Ash tried to solve the question anyway. So is it more ethical to > solve the question behind the back instead of doing it on the > list? Is trying to solve an unethical question ethical? I just > wonder about ethics. I think the intention behind everything, > question or action counts. It's not more ethical to cheat behind > somebody's back than to do it openly, it's less hurtful for the > one who is cheated, that's all, but the act remains the same. ASH : I HAVE SOLVED THIS QUESTION AND SEND IT IN PRIVATE MAIL TO YOU AND KRUSHNAJI. I DID WANT TO POST THE TECHNIQUE TO THE LIST BEFORE ANANDO ANSWERED OR MADE AN ATTEMPT FIRST. WHAT IS SO UNETHICAL IN THAT. INFACT I HAVE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THIS IS AN INTERESTING QUIZ. ANANDO HIMSELF HAS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE HAS NOT MENTIONED THE INTENT. YOU HAVE USED VERY STRONG WORDS LIKE CHEAT WHICH IS NOT APPRECIATED. IF I HAD ANY QUESTION ABOUT THE INTENTION OF ANANDOS THE I WOULD NOT HAVE SOLVED THE CHART. HAS THAT THOUGHT OCCURED TO YOU OR SUCH THINGS ALSO DONT COME TO YOUR MIND ? WHY WOULD I SPEND MY TIME TO SOLVED IN DETAIL A CHART AND NOT PUT IT TO THE LIST ? I BELEIVE TOO MANY ASSUMPTIONS ARE HAPPENING HERE SO LET ME CLARIFY MY INTENT. MY INTENT WAS TO SOLVE THE CHART AND NOT GIVE THE TECHNIQUE UNLESS ANANDO MADE AN ATTEMPT FIRST. IN ANY CASE I FEEL SADDENED YOUR ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT ME. > 5. Some time ago there was a similar question raised on a list were > somebody asked to predict the sex of twin babies yet to be born. > It was a female chart and Ash submitted it to Krushna. Krushna > solved it and Ash posted the answer on the list (don't remember > which one), but the answer turned out to be wrong so we did a > whole chat on that to correct it. Now why was the code of ethics > not raised on that occasion ???? Was the intention behind this > question more " noble " that the intention of Mr Anando?? Who can > judge that ? ASH : YOU ARE WRONG IN YOUR ASSUMPTION. IT WAS NOT A SIMILAR QUESTION. THIS WAS AND THE IS FROM THE MAIL. AND THIS QUESTION WAS ASKED TO YOU. " > , " Anurag Agnihotri " > <agneyastra> wrote: > > Dear Margarita and List Members, > > Birth details of a lady who is expected to give birth to twins next > > month are give below : > > > > DOB : 11th March 1971; Time : 2:58 p.m. ; Place: 27N24/79E37 India > > > > Kindly help analyse factors in her chart for birth of twins and > also > > attemp to predict male/female child(ren). > > > > With best regards, > > > > - Anurag " > > I can only agree with Mr Anando's comments. I don't know anything about > him, but I feel he got treated wrongly. This is the first message he > posted on our list I think. The answer he got is surely not going to > give him courage to learn the system, if that is the purpose of our list. ASH : PLEASE REFER TO THE EXPLANATION OF MY MAIL WHICH I THINK YOU HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD. PROPER GUIDANCE WAS GIVEN TO ANANDO IN MY MAIL TO HELP HIM LEARN THE SYSTEM. > > If questions are asked on the list, why not answer them gracefully or > otherwise just ignore them if we don't feel like answering? Attributing > bad intentions to people who ask questions, even if they ask them on > other lists, is not the way to act. If you know that Mr Anando posted > his question on other lists, so members of other lists also read the > answers people get on our list and I wonder what they think of the > answer Mr Anando got on our list? ASH : YOUR ASSUMPTION IS WRONG THAT ANY BAD INTENTIONS WERE ATTRIBUTED. PLEASE REFER TO THE EXPLANATION OF MY MAIL POST. > > Our list has be spared from inimical exchanges compared to other lists. > I think we should all try to keep it like that. Mr Anando's question > surely was not a reason to start an argument, unless you are aware and > sure of his bad intentions. ASH : AGAIN THIS IS YOURS AND ANANDOS ASSUMPTION WHICH IS NOT RIGHT. PLEASE REFER TO MY PREVIOUS MAIL. > > Best regards > > Margarita > krushna jugalkalani wrote: > > >Dear Ash, Margarita, and other list members, > > Please note that Mr Anando have asked the same question in so many other list (groups). From that it is clear that he is not having intension only to learn our system. What so ever may be his intension, such questions should not be answered, this is my honest opinion. > >krushna. > > > > > >margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > >Hello Anando, > >Thanks for your point of view. I fully understand it But as I am > >interested in the exercice could you tell me if these charts are from > >male or female, I mean mother or father? > >I will try to solve this > >Best regards > >Margarita > > > >anando63 wrote: > > > > > > > >>Thanks Margarita, > >> > >>for pointing out the silly ommission of male/female (father/mother) > >>on my part. > >> > >>However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my > >>question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I > >>think it is best that I leave this be for the time being. > >> > >>Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but > >>does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer > >>that " this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate > >>social ethics or codes of conducts " ? If that be the case, then that > >>also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list > >>should not be a public list but restricted to people who have > >>qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such > >>restricted lists on Astrology do exist also. > >> > >>I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of > >>Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's > >>reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is > >>quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and > >>would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to > >>learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance > >>on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private > >>detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr. > >>Ash is trying to point out. > >> > >>Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am > >>trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes > >>against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent > >>question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would > >>also think twice before answering anybody's question, even if I knew > >>the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be " mis-used " by > >>somebody somewhere to misguide somebody. > >> > >>I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of > >>joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation > >>of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be > >>accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on > >>unsuspecting " real " or " fake " parents. Just going through the lessons > >>and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of > >>non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers. > >> > >>I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not > >>directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I > >>hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects > >>that regardless of how senior or junior he may be. > >> > >>Thanks anyway. > >>Anando > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> , margarita lettens > >><dmlettens@s...> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hello Anando, > >>>Please specify if these charts are male or female > >>>Thanks and best regards > >>>Margarita > >>>Anando Banerjee wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Namaskar to all, > >>>> > >>>>I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help > >>>> > >>>> > >>with a > >> > >> > >>>>little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth > >>>> > >>>> > >>data for 2 > >> > >> > >>>>different persons, which person is more likely to have the > >>>> > >>>> > >>following event > >> > >> > >>>>and why. > >>>> > >>>>Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same > >>>> > >>>> > >>person married > >> > >> > >>>>on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast > >>>> > >>>> > >>marriage after 6 > >> > >> > >>>>years of courtship.) > >>>> > >>>>Birth Data: > >>>>Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. > >>>> > >>>> > >>Bhatpara, India > >> > >> > >>>>(88E25, 22N53). > >>>>Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a > >>>> > >>>> > >>difference of less > >> > >> > >>>>than an hour from Person 1. > >>>> > >>>>Please help and guide. > >>>> > >>>>Anando > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>--- > >>>>This mail is Virus Free. > >>>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >>>>Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 > >>>> > >>>>* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2004 Report Share Posted June 25, 2004 Dear Margarita, Ash, and other list members, why some persons are thinking that this system work and can be learned only if the question at present is in discussion will be solved. When code of conduct is given here, i think every body should follow that. For the prestige of this science every member and all astrologer should follow. When one person posts his question on other lists also, how serious he is learn this system. In my opinion all the systems are equally good. Every system might be having some plus or minus points. If he wants to compare two systems, I would suggest him not to do that. I my self have learned so many other systems, and cant say that this is best or that is worst. yes if the same question would have produced in different way, that this is the data of a person, and he got child birth on such and such date, how it can be justified in our system. That would have not created doubt in any person's mind. Lastly I don't think that this is a very big issue. Yes answering any question is a obligatory part on members and moderators. If for any Question if a member/ moderator shows his frank opinion, that answering this question is against the ethics of this group. It is not wrong. It happened only when some persons were trying to answer, and if any body pointed out that answering such question may be against the ethics of the astrologers. On the contrary it is good thing. I don't think any body should make it a question of prestige. I request all honorable members to stop this issue here and here it self. I also request Ash, not to keep himself aloof from the list. margarita lettens <dmlettens wrote: Dear Krushna, Ash, listmembers Krushna, you say in your mail that even if you do not know the intention of Mr Anando, his question should not be answered !! Ash you served the code of conduct to this mister Anando for his querry. Now I think there is a big misunderstanding or else I’m missing something essential. Therefore I would be grateful to get your “honest” answers. Is the fact that posting to different lists a proof of Mr Anando not wanting to learn Krushna’s system? Why is Mr Anando’s curiosity judged badly ? So many questions are asked on the list of people who only want a free reading and often they are answered because interested members want to learn; let's be honest about that. Without curiosity there can never be interest for learning, so what is wrong with being curious?? Ash served him the ethical code of conduct for asking this question. Why??? Why were his intention interpreted as trying to find out a real father, or trying to misuse the system? I wonder !! Anyway these things never come up into my mind so I don’t think other people ask questions with those intentions. Perhaps he just tries to find out which system works, who knows? Ash tried to solve the question anyway. So is it more ethical to solve the question behind the back instead of doing it on the list? Is trying to solve an unethical question ethical? I just wonder about ethics. I think the intention behind everything, question or action counts. It’s not more ethical to cheat behind somebody’s back than to do it openly, it’s less hurtful for the one who is cheated, that’s all, but the act remains the same. Some time ago there was a similar question raised on a list were somebody asked to predict the sex of twin babies yet to be born. It was a female chart and Ash submitted it to Krushna. Krushna solved it and Ash posted the answer on the list (don’t remember which one), but the answer turned out to be wrong so we did a whole chat on that to correct it. Now why was the code of ethics not raised on that occasion ???? Was the intention behind this question more “noble” that the intention of Mr Anando?? Who can judge that ? <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> I can only agree with Mr Anando’s comments. I don’t know anything about him, but I feel he got treated wrongly. This is the first message he posted on our list I think. The answer he got is surely not going to give him courage to learn the system, if that is the purpose of our list. <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> If questions are asked on the list, why not answer them gracefully or otherwise just ignore them if we don’t feel like answering? Attributing bad intentions to people who ask questions, even if they ask them on other lists, is not the way to act. If you know that Mr Anando posted his question on other lists, so members of other lists also read the answers people get on our list and I wonder what they think of the answer Mr Anando got on our list? <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--> Our list has be spared from inimical exchanges compared to other lists. I think we should all try to keep it like that. Mr Anando's question surely was not a reason to start an argument, unless you are aware and sure of his bad intentions. Best regards Margarita <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--> <!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]-->krushna jugalkalani wrote: Dear Ash, Margarita, and other list members, Please note that Mr Anando have asked the same question in so many other list (groups). From that it is clear that he is not having intension only to learn our system. What so ever may be his intension, such questions should not be answered, this is my honest opinion. krushna. margarita lettens <dmlettens wrote: Hello Anando, Thanks for your point of view. I fully understand it But as I am interested in the exercise could you tell me if these charts are from male or female, I mean mother or father? I will try to solve this Best regards Margarita anando63 wrote: Thanks Margarita, for pointing out the silly omission of male/female (father/mother) on my part. However, since Mr. Ash has raised a Code of Conduct issue on my question without knowing me or my reason for asking my question, I think it is best that I leave this be for the time being. Granted that I did not specify my reason for asking my question, but does every posting to this list have to come with a disclaimer that "this question is for learning purposes only and not to violate social ethics or codes of conducts"? If that be the case, then that also should be specified boldly in the Code of Conduct and the list should not be a public list but restricted to people who have qualified in some way. For everyone's kind information, such restricted lists on Astrology do exist also. I would request list members, moderators et al to review the Code of Conduct points supplied by Mr. Ash and apply the same to Mr. Ash's reply. I think that the point raised by Mr. Ash about my question is quite far-fetched in the present-day world, on a list like this, and would not count anywhere, except for the student who is trying to learn by experimenting with different charts and asking for guidance on individual events from a knowledge-group for the same. Private detectives, courts, lawyers etc. would be more pertinent for what Mr. Ash is trying to point out. Mr. Ash's suggestion or hint or accusation or whatever, that I am trying to mis-use Astrological knowledge, is an outrage and goes against the spirit of all new learners who may ask an innocent question on this list. In fact, if I were a learned member, I would also think twice before answering any body's question, even if I knew the answer perfectly, since such an answer may be "mis-used" by somebody somewhere to misguide somebody. I doubt that a confidence trickster would really go the long haul of joining this list to learn an in-depth and quite rigorous variation of Ashtakavarga Astrology, become proficient enough at it to be accepted as a master, and then mis-use the same on unsuspecting "real" or "fake" parents. Just going through the lessons and archives and trying to figure things out is enough to get rid of non-serious students, forget the quick-fix schemers. I personally do not know Mr. Ash, and hence my comments are not directed to Mr. Ash as a person but rather to his reply to my post. I hope Mr. Ash and his interpretation of the Code of Conduct respects that regardless of how senior or junior he may be. Thanks anyway. Anando , margarita lettens <dmlettens@s...> wrote: Hello Anando, Please specify if these charts are male or female Thanks and best regards Margarita Anando Banerjee wrote: Namaskar to all, I would be highly obliged if learned members and gurus could help with a little guidance in my learning process. Given the following birth data for 2 different persons, which person is more likely to have the following event and why. Event: April 30, 1995 Morning. Birth of daughter. (This same person married on January 17, 1994 Evening and this was a Hindu inter-cast marriage after 6 years of courtship.) Birth Data: Person 1. August 14, 1963. 00:30am (13th/14th). GMT+5:30. Bhatpara, India (88E25, 22N53). Person 2. Same as above but TOB is 01:24am. That means a difference of less than an hour from Person 1. Please help and guide. Anando --- This mail is Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.709 / Virus Database: 465 - Release 6/23/04 * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 /*klim krishna klim*/ Dear Ravi Lagnesh with Shani makes one lazy/inactive (Jataka Tattva 214/Prakeerna Tattva) When Lagna and ninth has benefics Chamara yoga is born. The condition is that lagnesh must be strong (BPHS 38.11) but still it will give some effects and Chamara is the attribute of royalty giving also eloquence and scholarship. This is confirmed by the Mo+Ve in Lagna which is Vaitanika Yoga but in papakartari. Jupiter is very strong in the chart which shows good luck (navamsa uccha) and per Saravali this makes one minister (influential position related to advicing others). AmK connected to Surya gives buisnessman but this is denied due to Al/A7 in 2/12 relation. Main doshas and negation of fruits are coming from Budha with MKS Surya in twelfth house. This is serious as Budha lords Arudha pada and its in vyaya from Atmakaraka Budha. This surely gives serious setbacks to finances and careerlife and Parasundari is the remedy. Otherwise it gives innovative person with very original ideas (Sankha yoga = 5L+6L). Partial Kusuma yoga is present: Movable Lagna, Venus in Kendra and Mo in trikona with benefic! It gives very influential position, hapiness and makes one prime among family! Family related part of this reading will be denied due to Moon being in neecha navamsa. All (except Guru) planets are between tenth and forth - this makes middle part of life challenging (Chapa Yoga - Brhat Jataka 12.16). You have yogas for success both in foreign and birth countries. Ninth lord in ninth gives success in home country (Saravali 32.4). Worst direction is West and North West - avoid these, whilst South West and East are best for you. This is based on planets from Arudhapada and Dig-bala. Current period from 2005 to 2011 should give a lot of money but also a lot of expenses. Especially 2005/2006 (Taurus ad) and 2008 (Libra). You should start worshippingDevi as curse in second house is disposited by Shukra yuti Chandra and Budha being neecha shows many blessing coming from Parasundari. Get the initation and you will see a lot of change! Good luck! Regards, Rafal Gendarz SJC Jyotish Guru -------------- /*Consultations & Pages* /http://rohinaa.com/ /*Jyotish Tutorials */www.youtube.com/user/RafalGendarz <http://www.youtube.com/user/RafalGendarz> /*Mail:*/ /rgendarz rgendarz/ Suresh Babu.A.G pisze: > > > Dear Ravi sharan, > > You are heading towards a change within a years time, by which the > present phase will mostly come to an end. > > >From May-2010 you may have to face some more changes or tensions as > well. However, After dec-2010 you will find the time be far better. > > Your 4th lord moon in the lagna does not much Varga Bala. So also the > venus with neecha navamsa. Though you may have the charishma due to > Venus + moon in the Lagna, Mars+Saturn reduces its goodness due to > agni-Maruthy yoga in the second. Check how you communicate with > others. This will help you in the long run. > > For the above reasons, propitiate Kala Bhairava by doing poojas, > naivedya, offerings of dhana etc. similarly Kamakshi devi also. > Regular recitation of Durga devi stotra, & Shiva Saharanama & Vishnu > Saharanama shall help you in a long way. > A.G.Suresh Babu Shenoy > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > Ravi Saran <ravisaran_aakash@ > <ravisaran_aakash%40>> > > <%40> > Mon, December 21, 2009 11:35:25 AM > please guide > > > Sir, > My Birth Details are as follows > > Ravi Saran > 19-Mar-1972 > 8.37AM > GORAKHPUR, UP > > I am in trouble as the current job situation is very bad because the > company is in the sink. Should i be getting a good job and when will i > be out of financial crunch. > > regards > Ravi > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2010 Report Share Posted April 22, 2010 Respected Pt. Bhooshan Priya Ji, Sadaar charah sparsh, Guruji, my birth details are 12-July-1983; 02:20:00am; Aligarh (UP). I work as a freelance writer ( entered this profession as writing had been my passion ) but nor am I getting ample good writing projects neither am I able to make a decent bare amount of regular income out of it. I am planning to enter into some business to achieve financial independence from it (as financially I am in a tight situation) so that I can pursue my passion of writing without any financial pressures. Guruji, I shall be highly obliged to you for your guidance in this aspect. Please, help me so that my writing career gets more satisfying. Also, please suggest me the field in which I should start the business venture and remedies for attaining financial stability. I apologize for extending yet another question but I request you to please guide me with some remedies so that I can have an early marriage settlement with a good matrimonial alliance. I thank you from the bottom of my heart for your kind guidance. May the Almighty always bless you with all the happiness and good health. Saadar Pranaam, Yours sincerely, Shweta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.