True or Mean?

[Guest guest]

*om namo bhagavate narasimhaya*

Dear Gopal, Namaskar

 

When I am listening to these new node theories I always have in mind one

chart:

 

 

September 18, 1958

Time: 18:10:18

Time Zone: 2:00:00 (East of GMT)

Place: 16 E 39' 00 " , 50 N 27' 00 "

 

 

Person is very spiritual so is Rahu DK in eight or AK in ninth - MKS of

AK,AmK,BK gives spiritual person, compare Visti chart and

His all life is Puja (Ak in ninth) - he is devoted to mission (Amk with

Mo) but the atma sits in dharma not karma bhava. Also his ego issues are

related to Guru only (knowledge ego) not to Ve/Me (which are in kendra).

Finally wife (UL) doesnt share the trait of Rahu but the rahu issue is

problem in marriage (rahu in ninth instead of eight for mean node). Also

AmK must be Shani to give Jupiterian work as its Moon yuti - he is

teacher, whilst for true nodes AmK is Budha which sits with Shukra -

this should give Shani jobs.

His marriage was not sudden as can be deducted from true nodes rahu dk.

There are also many more..like Ra/Gu in 2 from UL gives bad dentition

for wife etc.

 

 

 

I have also few others with Rahu AK in ninth.

 

Here is also Rahu-Ak in ninth - spiritual astrologer.

 

December 4, 1967

Time: 0:20:00

Time Zone: 1:00:00 (East of GMT)

Place: 17 E 02' 00 " , 51 N 06' 00 "

Wroclaw, Poland

 

 

Person devoted to spiritual book distribution, very dedicated member of

Polish Iskcon.

 

May 3, 1963

Time: 21:06:58

Time Zone: 1:00:00 (East of GMT)

Place: 20 E 32' 10 " , 50 N 31' 10 "

 

All them have Rahu AK in ninth.

 

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz

-----------------------------

http://rohinaa.com

rafal