Guest guest Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Sivacharan Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u want most s/w will give u the same prashant G B Prashant Kumar Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna features check to my ID pkgoteti, Services of this astrologer in the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! ________________________________ sivacharanasastrybulusu <sivacharanasastry vedic astrology Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM [vedic astrology] ayanamsa Dear sir, please clarify my doubt Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. per year how much i have to add to get correct value. thanking you sivacharan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 There is another difference. Yukteshwar Giri ji in his Holy Science book quoted an annual rate of ayanamsha of 54 seconds while Raman used 50.3 seconds. The actual annual rate of precession is not constant but varies slowly over many many years. If you use Yukteshwar's stated ayanamsha and the date given in 1894 and apply an annual rate of 50.33 seconds, you will arrive at the same date of coincidence as used by Raman. RR vedic astrology , Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba Vela <pkgoteti wrote: > > Sivacharan > > Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa > Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa > > the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans > > raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u want > > most s/w will give u the same > > prashant > > G B Prashant Kumar > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna features check to my ID pkgoteti, Services of this astrologer in the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > ________________________________ > sivacharanasastrybulusu <sivacharanasastry > vedic astrology > Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM > [vedic astrology] ayanamsa > > > Dear sir, > > please clarify my doubt > > Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. > > what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. > > per year how much i have to add to get correct value. > > thanking you > > sivacharan > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 dear friends this ayanamsha issue always brings confusion to querents because they have so many things on the platter and dont know which one to choose. but we, astrologers, mostly have done our own homework and follow only one ayanamsha. for querents, in casting a horoscope and to see the birth star and the placement of planets, change in ayanamsha is confusing only when it shifts the lagna or signs. even dashas and periods too change. similarly confusing is the dasha system. one scripture mentions that vimshottari and ashottari dasa are to be reckoned for natives born in krishna paksha and shukla paksha respectively. you apply yogini dasa or rasi and other dasa systems, you get even completely different indications. since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) astrologers, i too follow lahiri but never say that it is the only correct ayanamsha or other ayanamshas or incorrect. similarly since most astrologers follow vimshottari dasa system and some attribute a scriptural mention of it to follow in kaliyuga, i too follow vimshottari dasa calculations but natives are at liberty to apply other dasas too. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com vedic astrology , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani wrote: > > There is another difference. Yukteshwar Giri ji in his Holy Science > book quoted an annual rate of ayanamsha of 54 seconds while Raman > used 50.3 seconds. The actual annual rate of precession is not > constant but varies slowly over many many years. > > If you use Yukteshwar's stated ayanamsha and the date given in 1894 > and apply an annual rate of 50.33 seconds, you will arrive at the > same date of coincidence as used by Raman. > > RR > > > vedic astrology , Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba Vela > <pkgoteti@> wrote: > > > > Sivacharan > > > > Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa > > Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa > > > > the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans > > > > raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig > from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u want > > > > most s/w will give u the same > > > > prashant > > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, > marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna > features check to my ID pkgoteti@, Services of this astrologer in > the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! > Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > sivacharanasastrybulusu <sivacharanasastry@> > > vedic astrology > > Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM > > [vedic astrology] ayanamsa > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > please clarify my doubt > > > > Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. > > > > what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. > > > > per year how much i have to add to get correct value. > > > > thanking you > > > > sivacharan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 Arjunji, Regarding, " > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) > astrologers " , just to be consistent I would like to point out that no such survey has ever been carried out, to the best of my information, hence it would be difficult to say that the 'higher percentage' would be correct. What you probably meant I presume that the small fraction of astrolgy students and astrologers that are on internet and (the even smaller fraction!) that write and speak up and share seem to favor Lahiri ayanamsha! In the same vein, as the point has been made by some (perhaps not you, but I am not certain), that Govt. of India has blessed the Lahiri ayanamsha hence one should follow it, or that several panchaang makers met in poona and chose Lahiri ayanamsha, I have the following questions to those who know: 1. Is Government of India an astrologer? 2. How many of those panchaang makers were good practical jyotishis? 3. Did the planetary longitudes produced by all those panchaang makers identical, before the Poona conference? Please correct my knowledge if you know otherwise. Rohiniranjan vedic astrology , " panditarjun2004 " <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friends > > this ayanamsha issue always brings confusion to querents because they > have so many things on the platter and dont know which one to > choose. but we, astrologers, mostly have done our own homework and > follow only one ayanamsha. > > for querents, in casting a horoscope and to see the birth star and > the placement of planets, change in ayanamsha is confusing only when > it shifts the lagna or signs. even dashas and periods too change. > > similarly confusing is the dasha system. one scripture mentions that > vimshottari and ashottari dasa are to be reckoned for natives born in > krishna paksha and shukla paksha respectively. you apply yogini dasa > or rasi and other dasa systems, you get even completely different > indications. > > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) > astrologers, i too follow lahiri but never say that it is the only > correct ayanamsha or other ayanamshas or incorrect. > > similarly since most astrologers follow vimshottari dasa system and > some attribute a scriptural mention of it to follow in kaliyuga, i > too follow vimshottari dasa calculations but natives are at liberty > to apply other dasas too. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > vedic astrology , " Rohiniranjan " > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > There is another difference. Yukteshwar Giri ji in his Holy Science > > book quoted an annual rate of ayanamsha of 54 seconds while Raman > > used 50.3 seconds. The actual annual rate of precession is not > > constant but varies slowly over many many years. > > > > If you use Yukteshwar's stated ayanamsha and the date given in 1894 > > and apply an annual rate of 50.33 seconds, you will arrive at the > > same date of coincidence as used by Raman. > > > > RR > > > > > > vedic astrology , Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba > Vela > > <pkgoteti@> wrote: > > > > > > Sivacharan > > > > > > Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa > > > Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa > > > > > > the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans > > > > > > raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig > > from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u want > > > > > > most s/w will give u the same > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > > > > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, > > marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna > > features check to my ID pkgoteti@, Services of this astrologer in > > the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! > > Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > sivacharanasastrybulusu <sivacharanasastry@> > > > vedic astrology > > > Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM > > > [vedic astrology] ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > > > please clarify my doubt > > > > > > Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. > > > > > > what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. > > > > > > per year how much i have to add to get correct value. > > > > > > thanking you > > > > > > sivacharan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 Dear RRji, this is a v valied point u raised the govt had no business to intervene in the areas nots its core competence or need be this National calander was formed to help listing out National holidays for festivals -govt holidays than astrological purpouse as we r a secular Islamic state this itself is a luxury for us any Iman can declare ID, Mohram or any festival in each state and in variance with the Mecca people also and the govt will give both holidays one the central govt chooses and other the statre govt chooses [i mean the local Imans] but Iyangars observe Gokulahtami on a diff date to rest of Hindus in India will they have 2 day holidays no so too many Hindu festivals r left to be observed as Govt wants us to not our scriptural backed ones it may or many not coincide but as said we r not as lucky as our Islamic masters r as left Historians and educationalists, cultural dept r under them and they prefer all the Invaders introductions in our system back to Ayanamsas or pamchangs at the calander review committe headed by Lahiri there were 33 of them to work on but Lahiri felt he wud arrive at one and passed it as the official one without going into the depths of the it as he was not competent to do so andd many from tamil nadu esp the pambeu panchangam quareled openly and in them too sriranga, madurai, kanchipurum etc have diferent pambeu's [snakes hissing its venow] even if a mistake entered the system it was never corrected so word of mouth decided the vakya panchanga no correction int helped the Lahiri bench with no unity with the rest prashant G B Prashant Kumar Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna features check to my ID pkgoteti, Services of this astrologer in the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! ________________________________ Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani vedic astrology Monday, December 15, 2008 7:06:41 PM [vedic astrology] Re: ayanamsa 14/12 Arjunji, Regarding, " > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) > astrologers " , just to be consistent I would like to point out that no such survey has ever been carried out, to the best of my information, hence it would be difficult to say that the 'higher percentage' would be correct. What you probably meant I presume that the small fraction of astrolgy students and astrologers that are on internet and (the even smaller fraction!) that write and speak up and share seem to favor Lahiri ayanamsha! In the same vein, as the point has been made by some (perhaps not you, but I am not certain), that Govt. of India has blessed the Lahiri ayanamsha hence one should follow it, or that several panchaang makers met in poona and chose Lahiri ayanamsha, I have the following questions to those who know: 1. Is Government of India an astrologer? 2. How many of those panchaang makers were good practical jyotishis? 3. Did the planetary longitudes produced by all those panchaang makers identical, before the Poona conference? Please correct my knowledge if you know otherwise. Rohiniranjan vedic astrology, " panditarjun2004 " <panditarjun2004@ ...> wrote: > > dear friends > > this ayanamsha issue always brings confusion to querents because they > have so many things on the platter and dont know which one to > choose. but we, astrologers, mostly have done our own homework and > follow only one ayanamsha. > > for querents, in casting a horoscope and to see the birth star and > the placement of planets, change in ayanamsha is confusing only when > it shifts the lagna or signs. even dashas and periods too change. > > similarly confusing is the dasha system. one scripture mentions that > vimshottari and ashottari dasa are to be reckoned for natives born in > krishna paksha and shukla paksha respectively. you apply yogini dasa > or rasi and other dasa systems, you get even completely different > indications. > > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) > astrologers, i too follow lahiri but never say that it is the only > correct ayanamsha or other ayanamshas or incorrect. > > similarly since most astrologers follow vimshottari dasa system and > some attribute a scriptural mention of it to follow in kaliyuga, i > too follow vimshottari dasa calculations but natives are at liberty > to apply other dasas too. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy .com > > vedic astrology, " Rohiniranjan " > <jyotish_vani@ > wrote: > > > > There is another difference. Yukteshwar Giri ji in his Holy Science > > book quoted an annual rate of ayanamsha of 54 seconds while Raman > > used 50.3 seconds. The actual annual rate of precession is not > > constant but varies slowly over many many years. > > > > If you use Yukteshwar's stated ayanamsha and the date given in 1894 > > and apply an annual rate of 50.33 seconds, you will arrive at the > > same date of coincidence as used by Raman. > > > > RR > > > > > > vedic astrology, Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba > Vela > > <pkgoteti@> wrote: > > > > > > Sivacharan > > > > > > Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa > > > Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa > > > > > > the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans > > > > > > raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig > > from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u want > > > > > > most s/w will give u the same > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > > > > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, > > marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna > > features check to my ID pkgoteti@, Services of this astrologer in > > the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! > > Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > sivacharanasastrybu lusu <sivacharanasastry@ > > > > vedic astrology > > > Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM > > > [vedic astrology] ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > > > please clarify my doubt > > > > > > Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. > > > > > > what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. > > > > > > per year how much i have to add to get correct value. > > > > > > thanking you > > > > > > sivacharan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 dear RRji your earlier post is not answered as i have nothing to add or disagree with what you have written. as regards lahiri ayanamsha, it has the government official seal of approval of his recommendation. whether he has done his home work right or wrong or simply made averages of all ayanamshas and recommended that average as his recommendation and his ability to do so is for questioning by more learnt people on this subject like those who run astrology teaching schools. similar is the tricky issue of which dasa to apply. some reckon ashtottari dasa for people born in shukla paksha and vimshottari for people born in krishna paksha. few decades ago, one region of india was following vimshottari for all and another opposite region was following ashtottari. you change the dasa system and the predictions are gone for a toss. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com vedic astrology , Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba Vela <pkgoteti wrote: > > Dear RRji, > > this is a v valied point u raised > > the govt had no business to intervene in the areas nots its core competence or need be > > this National calander was formed to help listing out National holidays for festivals -govt holidays than astrological purpouse > > as we r a secular Islamic state this itself is a luxury for us > > any Iman can declare ID, Mohram or any festival in each state and in variance with the Mecca people also and the govt will give both holidays one the central govt chooses and other the statre govt chooses [i mean the local Imans] > > but Iyangars observe Gokulahtami on a diff date to rest of Hindus in India will they have 2 day holidays no > > so too many Hindu festivals r left to be observed as Govt wants us to not our scriptural backed ones it may or many not coincide but as said we r not as lucky as our Islamic masters r as left Historians and educationalists, cultural dept r under them and they prefer all the Invaders introductions in our system > > back to Ayanamsas or pamchangs at the calander review committe headed by Lahiri there were 33 of them to work on but Lahiri felt he wud arrive at one and passed it as the official one without going into the depths of the it as he was not competent to do so andd many from tamil nadu esp the pambeu panchangam quareled openly and in them too sriranga, madurai, kanchipurum etc have diferent pambeu's [snakes hissing its venow] even if a mistake entered the system it was never corrected so word of mouth decided the vakya panchanga no correction int helped the Lahiri bench > with no unity with the rest > prashant > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna features check to my ID pkgoteti, Services of this astrologer in the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > ________________________________ > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani > vedic astrology > Monday, December 15, 2008 7:06:41 PM > [vedic astrology] Re: ayanamsa 14/12 > > > Arjunji, > > Regarding, " > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in > percentage terms) > > astrologers " , > > just to be consistent I would like to point out that no such survey > has ever been carried out, to the best of my information, hence it > would be difficult to say that the 'higher percentage' would be > correct. What you probably meant I presume that the small fraction of > astrolgy students and astrologers that are on internet and (the even > smaller fraction!) that write and speak up and share seem to favor > Lahiri ayanamsha! > > In the same vein, as the point has been made by some (perhaps not > you, but I am not certain), that Govt. of India has blessed the > Lahiri ayanamsha hence one should follow it, or that several > panchaang makers met in poona and chose Lahiri ayanamsha, I have the > following questions to those who know: > > 1. Is Government of India an astrologer? > 2. How many of those panchaang makers were good practical jyotishis? > 3. Did the planetary longitudes produced by all those panchaang > makers identical, before the Poona conference? > > Please correct my knowledge if you know otherwise. > > Rohiniranjan > > vedic astrology, " panditarjun2004 " > <panditarjun2004@ ...> wrote: > > > > dear friends > > > > this ayanamsha issue always brings confusion to querents because > they > > have so many things on the platter and dont know which one to > > choose. but we, astrologers, mostly have done our own homework and > > follow only one ayanamsha. > > > > for querents, in casting a horoscope and to see the birth star and > > the placement of planets, change in ayanamsha is confusing only > when > > it shifts the lagna or signs. even dashas and periods too change. > > > > similarly confusing is the dasha system. one scripture mentions > that > > vimshottari and ashottari dasa are to be reckoned for natives born > in > > krishna paksha and shukla paksha respectively. you apply yogini > dasa > > or rasi and other dasa systems, you get even completely different > > indications. > > > > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) > > astrologers, i too follow lahiri but never say that it is the only > > correct ayanamsha or other ayanamshas or incorrect. > > > > similarly since most astrologers follow vimshottari dasa system and > > some attribute a scriptural mention of it to follow in kaliyuga, i > > too follow vimshottari dasa calculations but natives are at liberty > > to apply other dasas too. > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > pandit arjun > > www.rudraksharemedy .com > > > > vedic astrology, " Rohiniranjan " > > <jyotish_vani@ > wrote: > > > > > > There is another difference. Yukteshwar Giri ji in his Holy > Science > > > book quoted an annual rate of ayanamsha of 54 seconds while Raman > > > used 50.3 seconds. The actual annual rate of precession is not > > > constant but varies slowly over many many years. > > > > > > If you use Yukteshwar's stated ayanamsha and the date given in > 1894 > > > and apply an annual rate of 50.33 seconds, you will arrive at the > > > same date of coincidence as used by Raman. > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba > > Vela > > > <pkgoteti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Sivacharan > > > > > > > > Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa > > > > Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa > > > > > > > > the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans > > > > > > > > raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig > > > from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u > want > > > > > > > > most s/w will give u the same > > > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > > > > > > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, > > > marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna > > > features check to my ID pkgoteti@, Services of this astrologer in > > > the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! > > > Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > sivacharanasastrybu lusu <sivacharanasastry@ > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM > > > > [vedic astrology] ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > > > > > please clarify my doubt > > > > > > > > Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. > > > > > > > > what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. > > > > > > > > per year how much i have to add to get correct value. > > > > > > > > thanking you > > > > > > > > sivacharan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 Arjunji, Yes Sir -- dasas like other aspects of jyotish (such as ayanamsha) have gone through these fads and fashions and popularity polls with the pendulum of choices sometimes steadily reverberating on one or few dasas and at times swinging wildly. Ashtottari in particular at least by Sharmaji's reckoning or reporting shall we say, has been associated with the three conditions: One related to rahu placement vis a vis the lagnesh, the paksha condition that you mention as do several others as well as the association with daybirth in krishna and nightbirth in shukla etc. My main reason for responding to your post was that I do not believe a sufficiently robust survey has been conducted that would enable one to say that jyotishis in this world utilize Lahiri ayanamsha (or within a few minutes of the value) predominantly. That's all. As they say, to each his or her own! RR vedic astrology , " panditarjun2004 " <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear RRji > > your earlier post is not answered as i have nothing to add or > disagree with what you have written. > > as regards lahiri ayanamsha, it has the government official seal of > approval of his recommendation. whether he has done his home work > right or wrong or simply made averages of all ayanamshas and > recommended that average as his recommendation and his ability to do > so is for questioning by more learnt people on this subject like > those who run astrology teaching schools. > > similar is the tricky issue of which dasa to apply. some reckon > ashtottari dasa for people born in shukla paksha and vimshottari for > people born in krishna paksha. few decades ago, one region of india > was following vimshottari for all and another opposite region was > following ashtottari. you change the dasa system and the predictions > are gone for a toss. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > vedic astrology , Prashant kumar-Mee Shuba Vela > <pkgoteti@> wrote: > > > > Dear RRji, > > > > this is a v valied point u raised > > > > the govt had no business to intervene in the areas nots its core > competence or need be > > > > this National calander was formed to help listing out National > holidays for festivals -govt holidays than astrological purpouse > > > > as we r a secular Islamic state this itself is a luxury for us > > > > any Iman can declare ID, Mohram or any festival in each state and > in variance with the Mecca people also and the govt will give both > holidays one the central govt chooses and other the statre govt > chooses [i mean the local Imans] > > > > but Iyangars observe Gokulahtami on a diff date to rest of Hindus > in India will they have 2 day holidays no > > > > so too many Hindu festivals r left to be observed as Govt wants us > to not our scriptural backed ones it may or many not coincide but as > said we r not as lucky as our Islamic masters r as left Historians > and educationalists, cultural dept r under them and they prefer all > the Invaders introductions in our system > > > > back to Ayanamsas or pamchangs at the calander review committe > headed by Lahiri there were 33 of them to work on but Lahiri felt he > wud arrive at one and passed it as the official one without going > into the depths of the it as he was not competent to do so andd many > from tamil nadu esp the pambeu panchangam quareled openly and in them > too sriranga, madurai, kanchipurum etc have diferent pambeu's [snakes > hissing its venow] even if a mistake entered the system it was never > corrected so word of mouth decided the vakya panchanga no correction > int helped the Lahiri bench > > with no unity with the rest > > prashant > > > > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, > marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna > features check to my ID pkgoteti@, Services of this astrologer in > the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! > Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@> > > vedic astrology > > Monday, December 15, 2008 7:06:41 PM > > [vedic astrology] Re: ayanamsa 14/12 > > > > > > Arjunji, > > > > Regarding, " > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in > > percentage terms) > > > astrologers " , > > > > just to be consistent I would like to point out that no such survey > > has ever been carried out, to the best of my information, hence it > > would be difficult to say that the 'higher percentage' would be > > correct. What you probably meant I presume that the small fraction > of > > astrolgy students and astrologers that are on internet and (the > even > > smaller fraction!) that write and speak up and share seem to favor > > Lahiri ayanamsha! > > > > In the same vein, as the point has been made by some (perhaps not > > you, but I am not certain), that Govt. of India has blessed the > > Lahiri ayanamsha hence one should follow it, or that several > > panchaang makers met in poona and chose Lahiri ayanamsha, I have > the > > following questions to those who know: > > > > 1. Is Government of India an astrologer? > > 2. How many of those panchaang makers were good practical jyotishis? > > 3. Did the planetary longitudes produced by all those panchaang > > makers identical, before the Poona conference? > > > > Please correct my knowledge if you know otherwise. > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > vedic astrology, " panditarjun2004 " > > <panditarjun2004@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > dear friends > > > > > > this ayanamsha issue always brings confusion to querents because > > they > > > have so many things on the platter and dont know which one to > > > choose. but we, astrologers, mostly have done our own homework > and > > > follow only one ayanamsha. > > > > > > for querents, in casting a horoscope and to see the birth star > and > > > the placement of planets, change in ayanamsha is confusing only > > when > > > it shifts the lagna or signs. even dashas and periods too change. > > > > > > similarly confusing is the dasha system. one scripture mentions > > that > > > vimshottari and ashottari dasa are to be reckoned for natives > born > > in > > > krishna paksha and shukla paksha respectively. you apply yogini > > dasa > > > or rasi and other dasa systems, you get even completely different > > > indications. > > > > > > since lahiri ayanamsha is followed by most (in percentage terms) > > > astrologers, i too follow lahiri but never say that it is the > only > > > correct ayanamsha or other ayanamshas or incorrect. > > > > > > similarly since most astrologers follow vimshottari dasa system > and > > > some attribute a scriptural mention of it to follow in kaliyuga, > i > > > too follow vimshottari dasa calculations but natives are at > liberty > > > to apply other dasas too. > > > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > > pandit arjun > > > www.rudraksharemedy .com > > > > > > vedic astrology, " Rohiniranjan " > > > <jyotish_vani@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > There is another difference. Yukteshwar Giri ji in his Holy > > Science > > > > book quoted an annual rate of ayanamsha of 54 seconds while > Raman > > > > used 50.3 seconds. The actual annual rate of precession is not > > > > constant but varies slowly over many many years. > > > > > > > > If you use Yukteshwar's stated ayanamsha and the date given in > > 1894 > > > > and apply an annual rate of 50.33 seconds, you will arrive at > the > > > > same date of coincidence as used by Raman. > > > > > > > > RR > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology, Prashant kumar-Mee > Shuba > > > Vela > > > > <pkgoteti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sivacharan > > > > > > > > > > Revathi Paksha is raman's ayanamsa > > > > > Surya siddhanta is Yuktheswar ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > > the diff is approx 13 Min less to ramans > > > > > > > > > > raman's is 1 D 26' 26 " ahead of Lahiri so deduct the fig > > > > from Lahiri u get ramans and again 13 to get yukteswar any yr u > > want > > > > > > > > > > most s/w will give u the same > > > > > > > > > > prashant > > > > > > > > > > G B Prashant Kumar > > > > > > > > > > Pl give personal data with verifable life event dates=jobs, > > > > marriage, family, kids, high/low times. Picture or 2 for Lagna > > > > features check to my ID pkgoteti@, Services of this astrologer > in > > > > the group only are FREE! personal consultations ARE CHARGEABLE! > > > > Mobile 09840051861 Chennai, India Me Shuba Vela! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > > > > sivacharanasastrybu lusu <sivacharanasastry@ > > > > > > vedic astrology > > > > > Saturday, December 13, 2008 8:00:41 PM > > > > > [vedic astrology] ayanamsa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear sir, > > > > > > > > > > please clarify my doubt > > > > > > > > > > Revati ayanamsa and sri yukteswar are same or different. > > > > > > > > > > what is the aynamsa component of this two, in present year. > > > > > > > > > > per year how much i have to add to get correct value. > > > > > > > > > > thanking you > > > > > > > > > > sivacharan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.