What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

[Guest guest]

What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

 

Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

 

Shri Jyoti Star 6

Parashara's Light 6.1

Jagannatha Hora 7.3

Gorovani 2.5

 

Calculations of these programs differ a little.

Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

 

Thanks for the help!

[Guest guest]

Parasher Pl 2000  in my observation is the best  jyotish software

 

 

HARESH(HARRY)NATHANI VEDIC ASTROLOGER  CELL +919867214103

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

 

 

 

________________________________

acubens_1 <acubens

vedic astrology

Sunday, 22 March, 2009 2:50:28 PM

[vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

 

 

What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

 

Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

 

Shri Jyoti Star 6

Parashara's Light 6.1

Jagannatha Hora 7.3

Gorovani 2.5

 

Calculations of these programs differ a little.

Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

 

Thanks for the help!

 

 

 

 

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://messenger./invite/

 

 

[Guest guest]

Try www.e.com 's Zodiac7

 

 

G Kumar

www.stockmarketastrology.com

www.e.net

 

 

 

Free Marketing Tips at

http://www.marketingeducate.com

 

-

Haresh (Harry) Nathani

vedic astrology

Sunday, March 22, 2009 2:57 PM

Re: [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

precisely?

 

 

Parasher Pl 2000 in my observation is the best jyotish software

 

 

HARESH(HARRY)NATHANI VEDIC ASTROLOGER CELL +919867214103

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

 

________________________________

acubens_1 <acubens

vedic astrology

Sunday, 22 March, 2009 2:50:28 PM

[vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

 

What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

 

Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

 

Shri Jyoti Star 6

Parashara's Light 6.1

Jagannatha Hora 7.3

Gorovani 2.5

 

Calculations of these programs differ a little.

Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

 

Thanks for the help!

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://messenger./invite/

 

[Guest guest]

||Jai Ramakrishna||

Dear .....

Jagannath Hora 7.5 is the best---if you want only calculation of charts & dasas,

else for some freebies add-on, Parasara 6.1 (better is 7.0) will serve the

purpose.

Thank you,

Gaurav.

http://gauravastro.150m.com

 

vedic astrology , " acubens_1 " <acubens wrote:

>

> What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

>

> Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

>

> Shri Jyoti Star 6

> Parashara's Light 6.1

> Jagannatha Hora 7.3

> Gorovani 2.5

>

> Calculations of these programs differ a little.

> Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

>

> Thanks for the help!

>

[Guest guest]

/*hraum krishnaya namah*/

Dear Member ,

 

Jagannath Hora without iota of doubt.

 

Regards

Rafal Gendarz

SJC Jyotish Guru

--------------

/*Consultations & Pages*

http://rohinaa.com

rafal/

>

> Try www.e. com 's Zodiac7

>

> G Kumar

> www.stockmarketastr ology.com

> www.e. net

>

> Free Marketing Tips at

> http://www.marketin geducate. com <http://www.marketingeducate.com>

>

> -

> Haresh (Harry) Nathani

> vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>

> Sunday, March 22, 2009 2:57 PM

> Re: [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

> precisely?

>

> Parasher Pl 2000 in my observation is the best jyotish software

>

>

> HARESH(HARRY) NATHANI VEDIC ASTROLOGER CELL +919867214103

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

> method=reportRow s & tbl=6

>

</database?method=reportRows & tbl=6\

>

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> acubens_1 <acubens (AT) mail (DOT) ru <acubens%40mail.ru>>

> vedic astrology

> <vedic astrology%40>

> Sunday, 22 March, 2009 2:50:28 PM

> [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

> precisely?

>

> What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

>

> Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

>

> Shri Jyoti Star 6

> Parashara's Light 6.1

> Jagannatha Hora 7.3

> Gorovani 2.5

>

> Calculations of these programs differ a little.

> Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

>

> Thanks for the help!

>

> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.

> / invite/ <http://messenger./invite/>

>

>

[Guest guest]

It is not available any more. Latest version is 7.0 which has some pretty nice

features and a few wrinkles still remaining! Probably it is not unique in that

sense of not being perfect! One can get to know the problems though and work

around those. I find that a better and more practical approach. Software do SAVE

a lot of time, even though some senior astrologers have always pooh-poohed

computer jyotish.

 

RR

 

vedic astrology , " Haresh \(Harry\) Nathani "

<haresh1405 wrote:

>

> Parasher Pl 2000  in my observation is the best  jyotish software

>  

>  

> HARESH(HARRY)NATHANI VEDIC ASTROLOGER  CELL +919867214103

>

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> acubens_1 <acubens

> vedic astrology

> Sunday, 22 March, 2009 2:50:28 PM

> [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

>

>

> What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

>

> Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

>

> Shri Jyoti Star 6

> Parashara's Light 6.1

> Jagannatha Hora 7.3

> Gorovani 2.5

>

> Calculations of these programs differ a little.

> Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

>

> Thanks for the help!

>

>

>

>

>

> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

http://messenger./invite/

>

>

[Guest guest]

I agree with that without any doubt. It is as flexible as the Narayan Dasas.

 

RishiRahul

 

vedic astrology

starsuponme

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:08:34 +0100

Re: [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

precisely?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/*hraum krishnaya namah*/

 

Dear Member ,

 

 

 

Jagannath Hora without iota of doubt.

 

 

 

Regards

 

Rafal Gendarz

 

SJC Jyotish Guru

 

--------------

 

/*Consultations & Pages*

 

http://rohinaa.com

 

rafal/

 

>

 

> Try www.e. com 's Zodiac7

 

>

 

> G Kumar

 

> www.stockmarketastr ology.com

 

> www.e. net

 

>

 

> Free Marketing Tips at

 

> http://www.marketin geducate. com <http://www.marketingeducate.com>

 

>

 

> -

 

> Haresh (Harry) Nathani

 

> vedic astrology

 

> <vedic astrology%40>

 

> Sunday, March 22, 2009 2:57 PM

 

> Re: [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

 

> precisely?

 

>

 

> Parasher Pl 2000 in my observation is the best jyotish software

 

>

 

>

 

> HARESH(HARRY) NATHANI VEDIC ASTROLOGER CELL +919867214103

 

> http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

 

> method=reportRow s & tbl=6

 

>

</database?method=reportRows & tbl=6\

>

 

>

 

> ____________ _________ _________ __

 

> acubens_1 <acubens (AT) mail (DOT) ru <acubens%40mail.ru>>

 

> vedic astrology

 

> <vedic astrology%40>

 

> Sunday, 22 March, 2009 2:50:28 PM

 

> [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

 

> precisely?

 

>

 

> What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

 

>

 

> Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

 

>

 

> Shri Jyoti Star 6

 

> Parashara's Light 6.1

 

> Jagannatha Hora 7.3

 

> Gorovani 2.5

 

>

 

> Calculations of these programs differ a little.

 

> Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

 

>

 

> Thanks for the help!

 

>

 

> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.

 

> / invite/ <http://messenger./invite/>

 

>

 

>

[Guest guest]

The incomparable JHora

 

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:21 PM, RishiRahul <rishirahul1961wrote:

 

>

> I agree with that without any doubt. It is as flexible as the Narayan

> Dasas.

>

> RishiRahul

>

>

> vedic astrology <vedic astrology%40>

> starsuponme <starsuponme%40wp.pl>

> Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:08:34 +0100

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

> precisely?

>

> /*hraum krishnaya namah*/

>

> Dear Member ,

>

> Jagannath Hora without iota of doubt.

>

> Regards

>

> Rafal Gendarz

>

> SJC Jyotish Guru

>

> --------------

>

> /*Consultations & Pages*

>

> http://rohinaa.com

>

> rafal <rafal%40rohinaa.com>/

>

> >

>

> > Try www.e. com 's Zodiac7

>

> >

>

> > G Kumar

>

> > www.stockmarketastr ology.com

>

> > www.e. net

>

> >

>

> > Free Marketing Tips at

>

> > http://www.marketin geducate. com <http://www.marketingeducate.com>

>

> >

>

> > -

>

> > Haresh (Harry) Nathani

>

> > vedic astrology

>

> >

<vedic astrology%40<vedic astrology%2540>

> >

>

> > Sunday, March 22, 2009 2:57 PM

>

> > Re: [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

>

> > precisely?

>

> >

>

> > Parasher Pl 2000 in my observation is the best jyotish software

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > HARESH(HARRY) NATHANI VEDIC ASTROLOGER CELL +919867214103

>

> > http://groups. / group/Jyotish_ Remedies/ database?

>

> > method=reportRow s & tbl=6

>

> > <

>

/database?method=reportRows & tbl=6

> >

>

> >

>

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > acubens_1 <acubens (AT) mail (DOT) ru

<acubens%40mail.ru<acubens%2540mail.ru>

> >>

>

> > vedic astrology

>

> >

<vedic astrology%40<vedic astrology%2540>

> >

>

> > Sunday, 22 March, 2009 2:50:28 PM

>

> > [vedic astrology] What Jyotish the program considers more

>

> > precisely?

>

> >

>

> > What Jyotish the program considers more precisely?

>

> >

>

> > Prompt please what of these programs considers more precisely?

>

> >

>

> > Shri Jyoti Star 6

>

> > Parashara's Light 6.1

>

> > Jagannatha Hora 7.3

>

> > Gorovani 2.5

>

> >

>

> > Calculations of these programs differ a little.

>

> > Therefore I wish to define the most exact.

>

> >

>

> > Thanks for the help!

>

> >

>

> > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.

>

> > / invite/ <http://messenger./invite/>

>

> >

>

> >

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

 

I am using Das Goravani's astrology program for many years. I asked

him about the precision of astrology computer programs,

as discussed in the forum, here is what he wrote and he would like me

to share his answer with all of you:

 

My dear Jyotish friends,

 

Hi, Das Goravani here. Author of Goravani Jyotish. I wish to

address briefly the discussion regarding softwares.

 

The question was accuracy, I believe. To that end let me say the

following:

 

I entered this field assuming that the calculational part of

astrology was already nailed down fully. I researched and found that

to be the case. In other words, the astronomy portion of it was

already settled. In fact, anyone can get ahold of the complete code

for Jyotish. It takes a little effort, there is no one stop shop for

it, but it can be gathered, as I did it, so I know.

 

The main planetary algorithms used these days by most or all of the

programs is the code that comes from NASA, the American Space

program, as they do share their planetary code freely. Haven taken

this code, it has been then reworked by many in the field, and resold

by them individually as THEIR Planetary code. In fact, planetary

code is a complex mathematical encyclopedia, and is really locked

down, with occasional tweaks coming out of observations.

 

OK, then, it gets to you via a programmer who packages it into a

useable Jyotish package by adding the Hindu calculations themselves,

on top of the planetary code.

 

There are two parts that are questionable to some degree, and that is

the lagna and ayanamsa. Those are harder, and stranger, due to the

shape of the earth, and the latitude issue and how that affects the

tilt of the birth against the zodiac. People born in the North or

far South (more rare by far), are " slanted " to the zodiac at birth.

That's a real issue nobody talks about.

 

The major programs all calculate close to each other. Why not

exact? Because of the life course of the code each of us has in our

hands. Mine came from a certain source, and was in basic at the

time. It was remade into C for me. My ascendent calc I did myself

from a known source book. My ayanamsa code I got from logic (for

straight line) and from a source for the type that tapes the wobble

into account, not just the tilt, of the earth.

 

The major programs all calculate closely.

 

Nobody present is capable of telling you which is more accurate in

terms of calculations.

 

The only person(s) who could tell you which is more accurate in terms

of planetary longitude on the zodiac is someone who is a genuine

highly educated and accurate in that area of knowledge FOR SURE RIGHT

NOW and that would be a live ASTRONOMER. No astrologer can speak to

that.

 

Next, in terms of ayanamsa and ascendent, to really discuss that, you

would again need an ASTRONOMER. They hate astrologers, generally.

 

As for the Hindu calculations in our programs, those are so fixed,

there should be little variation, except in Shad Bala and a few other

areas where interpretation of classical texts comes into play moreso,

and there are some variations of that interpretation. NONE of the

current lot of us programmers are ALSO Sanskrit scholars, so, we rely

on the translations that come at us from BV Raman and others, who

themselves are not perhaps either, the full scholar.

 

I really wish to urge everyone to admit who/where they are in the

knowledge of exactness when we do raise issues of exactness.

 

At this point, the programs simply are different, slightly, in

minutes and seconds of arc on the Lagna, planets, ayanamsas, because

of the little things that happen to code as it goes through it's

language journey. You know, the handling of fine decimal numbers,

there are issues there, that cause computers and languages to

calculate slightly differently. Math, with floating point numbers,

is not quite as fixed as we would like. There have been chips in

computers that did things wrong, and languages round differently.

 

By and by, slowly over time, and this has happened in the base of

this field, in the core codes in these programs, that things get

shifted ever so slightly, and so, over time, this occurs. Another

way to put it is that some core codes have suffered more in their

lifetimes than others, become more rounded off, and it shows up as

minutes and second of arc difference.

 

I do not think any of the current lot of programmers actually has a

telescope or actually knows astro physics to any degree, astronomy,

etc. Mostly we are entreprenuers who love Hindu/Vedic stuff, got the

code from the astronomy to astrology group that preceded us, put it

into a program, struggle to keep it going, and I don't think any of

us are rich either. PL had a huge cash rich partner in India for

awhile, but that's over from what I heard though it advanced that

program by leaps during that period. Money does that. I passed on

the guy, he came to me first, due to dharmic reasons surrounding the

use of gems.

 

I think you're barking up the wrong tree. I smell " investing " when I

here " accuracy " to a great degree, and I have to say, what is fixed

is, and you will win or not, so keep going, in your karma, because

there are so many things you cannot control, just add this to the

pile, because your interpretations are gonna be, by human reality, so

widely wrong from the truth, that harping on accuracy now is silly.

 

This same applies to people readers. You don't need total accuracy.

To think so is very skewed.

 

Trust me, when I or any other programs, NONE of us TRY to be sloppy.

In fact, we TRY hard to be accurate, as could be, WITH THE MATERIAL

WE ARE SOURCING FROM

 

All in all, my conclusion, keep the right perspective. This is a non

exact science, one of half heart and half logic.

 

We cannot do this fully, as that would be to know ALL. It's

impossible. ALL is in the ONE and we are in it and it is all there

is here, and it is all inter twined, which is why we can read it, but

ALL of it is readable, not just the planets on the zodiac, but that

is what we've nailed so far, or been given, as you believe, as you

like. That's where we are.

 

Keep perspective.

 

Ciao

 

Hari Om

 

Das Goravani

 

distribute this freely

 

 

 

 

 

 

Signed,

 

Das Goravani

 

http://www.Goravani.com

http://YouTube.com/DasGoravani

 

 

................................

http://pbase.com/stetsa

................................

 

We dont see things as they are, we see things as we are.

Anais Nin