Fw: Fw: RE: Fwd: Introduction to Vedic Calendar

[Guest guest]

----- Forwarded Message ----

Hari Malla <harimalla

 

Friday, April 24, 2009 3:09:11 PM

Re: Re: Fw: RE: Fwd: Introduction

to Vedic Calendar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Hari Malla <harimalla

 

Friday, April 24, 2009 1:52:20 PM

Re: Re: Fw: RE: Fwd: Introduction

to Vedic Calendar

 

 

Dear Sreenadhji,

Please check if this extract is not from 'Introduction to vedic calender'.I am

surprised when you say Sunil Nairji never said so.You have said it was unethical

on my part to have said so.After checking can I know if I was correct or not in

saying so? Have I ben unethical or lacked sincereity? Thank you.

Hari Malla

 

" In Vedic times, the measurement of

month didn't owe either to rotation or revolution of the Earth but it

owed to the Moon's revolution round the Earth. The following statement

of ÿgvedic ÿ–i is noteworthy:

aru‡o mÈsak‚d v‚kaÌ ( RV . 1.105.18)

Moon is the maker of months.

Yaska's commentary is noteworthy here.

aru‡aÌ Èrocano mÈsak‚n mÈsÈnÈŠ cÈrdha

mÈsÈnÈŠ ca kartÈ bhavati candramÈ v‚kaÌ

That is, Moon is the maker of months and fortnights.

In fact, the term mÈsa is formed from -mas of Candra-mas itself.

MÈsa means to measure - mÈsÈ mÈnÈt ( Nirukta , 4 "

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Sreenadh <sreesog

 

Thursday, April 23, 2009 6:32:27 PM

Re: Fw: RE: Fwd: Introduction to

Vedic Calendar

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Hari Malla ji,

   You said -

//Sunil Nairji was right in quoting the vedas that, months came from the

moon.//

  Don't make a fool of yourself!  Sunil Nari ji never stated so.  His opinion

was that - //,so always solar and saura calender's can happen first // and then

only Lunar months came into existence.  Please don't twist the statemets by

scholars like Sunil Nair ji, to fit your wish and will. That is not only

unethical, but also shows your lack of sincerety. 

Regards,

Sreenadh

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, Hari Malla <harimalla@.. .>

wrote:

>

> Dear Sanjaya Rathji and Sunil nairji,

> Sunil Nairji was right in quoting the vedas that, months came from

the moon.It is also important that the year comes from the sun and the months

come from the moon.Thus both are equally important for us in the vedas.Thus the

system of coordinating the sun and the moon by the adhimas system.that is our

original system, to coordinate both. Taking only one is not our system.It is

only the system of christians to take only the sun and the moslem to take only

the moon.We take both at the same time.Thus by coordinating both the sun and the

moon our soli-lunar system only is capable to produce world peace.They

have to adopt our coordinating system after some time, if they want world peace.

> About the 12 Adityas, please note that they are not solar months.The adityas

are the centre of the luanr months.We should understand that even the lunar

months are 12 every year and no more.The lunar months are natural because, the

moon makes one circle every month around the earth.The centre we are told is the

earth, which isnot eactly the truth. In the exact sense the centre of the luner

orbit is the aditya,encircled every month.Thus  at the centre of each lunar

month we have one aditya.It also comes from the lunar months.Taht is why inthe

religiosu festvals we have to take by lunar month,not by soalr month..Also

please note that out of th five parts of our panchangas, the solar month is

not listed.Thus the solar months is not part of our culture.But the solar year

is part of our culture.Thank you,

> sincerely yours,

> Hari Malla

 

> ____________ _________ _________ __

> sunil nair astro_tellerkerala@ ...

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:13:40 PM

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Re: Fw: RE: Fwd: Introduction

to Vedic Calendar

>

>

>

>

>

>  

> dear sanjay rath ji

> ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* *

> The question is to the statement of Mr Sunil Nair that Lunar months precede

the solar months, which even if we think logically

>  ##### 

>  my personal opinion is i always is a civilisation when devlps frm a

wandering tribes to settled agricultural soceity ( here i am even agreeing

Marxian thoughts )  and  for farming  and agriculture  as it is 

river civilisations  the seasons and then the question of flooding of rivers

and tides etc will happens ,so without solar and lunar concepts ( later one ) it

is not possible ,so always solar and saura calender's can happen first ,even

rasi concepts is month of ( 12 ) the total year ,may b later got defenite

meanings and characteristics and even adhipathya etc

> here i am thinking logicaly than sticking some thing religiously and quoting

like a parrot

> so if the article has givn such meaning sorry for it where as its

meantioned  in first para itself abt ayanas and soltice ,equinox etc

>  

> with personal regrds sunil nair