Rashi in Vedic literature / Greeks learnt everything from the Indians.

July 9, 2009

Dear Rohini,

Not really. I was telling that Narakasura and Bhagadatta of Pragjyotishpur were

asuras and they were yavanas too. Mayasura was probably from Pragjyotishpur. Do

you know that Varahamihira and his astrologer daughter-in-law Khona were from

the Assam- West Bengal border. It is believed that Khona surpassed Varahamihira

in the knowledge of Jyotish shastra. At one time the Jyotish shastra

flourished in the North-Eastern India.

From my studies I find that the Greeks appear to have learnt everything from

India. Plato came out of Greece for more than a decade in quest of knowledge and

he did visit India in the 5th century BCE. When he returned to Greece he founded

his Academy of higher learning in Greece in the late 5th ventury BCE. His

institute was the first of its kind in the western world.

Now you may ask as to why then Pingree thought that the Indians learnt

everything from the Greeks. It is because of the Jonesian chronology, based on

which Prof. Max Muller proposed the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) and fixed the

earliest date of the Rigveda as the 12th century BCE. All the AIT-followers

believed that Sandracottus was Chandragupta Maurya and automatically the date of

his guru, Vishnugupta (or Kautilya or Chanakya), who was a teaccher at the

Takshashila university, got fixed around 4th century BCE. Being an honest

person (rightly Swami Vivekananda calls him a great saint) Prof. Max Muller

realised that his chronology was suspect and he himself put the first nail in

the coffin of AIT by saying that nobody can tell the date of the Rigveda. He

even indicated that it could even be in the 4th millennium BCE. However the

colonialist historians were in no mood to listen to Max Muller again and they

conveniently ignored Max Muller's revised

opinion. He must now be turning in his grave. Because of this distorted

chronology Dr. David Pingree thought that the date of Plato's academy preceded

that of he Takshashila university, whereas in reality the Takshashila university

preceded Plato's institute by more than a millennium. Plato and his subsequent

followers got all the knowledge freom India and then it went to the entire west.

One can call Pingree a distortionist but in reality he was a victim of the

Jonesian chronology.

--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani wrote:

Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani

[vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

vedic astrology

Thursday, July 9, 2009, 5:07 PM

Chi Chi Dada! Now you are saying that Surya-siddhanta was of greek origin?

Maybe in those very ancient times the world was not as divided as it is today

with silos of cultural, ethnic, racial, national and other types! Maybe back

then nations were principalities with God the ultimate monarch and not the mini

and micro Gods that preside over nations these days! Maybe knowledge and love

flowed more easily and readily across the continents which for all I know may

have been closer, physically, mentally and spiritually!

After all, I have heard that DNA analysis indicates that all human beings

(Caucasians, Mongolian, Australio-african, blah blah blah) are more alike than

different! I don't buy the story of Genesis (Adam and Eve) literally but one

wonders ...!

Rohiniranjan

vedic astrology, Sunil Bhattacharjya

<sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote:

>

> Many a times the words Yavana and Asura were used synonymously. Mayasura was a

yavana too.

>

> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote:

>

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

> vedic astrology

> Thursday, July 9, 2009, 8:24 AM

>

> Sunil Da,

>

> You should not subordinate facts to opinions. Bhagadatta was king of Kamrupa

but was lord of Yavanas in the west too : this is said in MBH and is not my

opinion. But MBh says Yavanas lived in south India as well (see the references

already sent by me). I have not found a single reference of yavanas living in

Kamrup. But I know Yavanas of west were NRI who went out or were expelled by

earlier chakravartins of India due to their nefarious samskaara : it is proven

by Havi to gods and Yajnic karmakaanda by ancestors of Greeks as narrated by

Aristophanes in his drama " The Birds " written around the end of 5th century BCE

(Eurocentricists deliberately neglect such direct evidences). Bhagadatta was the

most illustrious among all kings hailing from outside Ayravarta and came from an

asuric land. Hence, it is not strange that yavanas from Afghanistan accepted his

leadership. I prepared a list of peoples and kings siding with Kauravas and with

Pandavas, and found

>

> that found that it was not a family feud over five villages but a gigantic

Civil War or a World War dividing all peoples on cultural lines : among those

upholding Dharma and Adharma, to put it in simplistic terms. Shalya was related

to Pandavas but fought against them without any grievance against pandavas. The

reason is explained by Karna, who narrates the non-Aryan culture of Madra-desha.

Thus , MBh is about a War between Dharma and Adharma. Seen in this broad

perspective, it is not surprising why yavanas regarded the most Asuric king as

their leader, perhaps before they came to fight this War. Bhagadatta was a great

Tantric. He used Narayanastra against Arjuna, which Lord Krishna took on

himself. MBh mentions many Astras and Shastras which have now vanished.

>

> -VJ

> ============ ========= = ==____________ _________ _________ __

>

> Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:15:39 AM

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> Dear Vinay,

>

> Why did you hold the reasons in the first place? Bhagadatta took the yavanas

along his way and his way was from Kamarupa to Hastinapur. If you know more

reasons please do let us know. Common sense says that the yavanas did not come

to Hastinapur without a leader. So it is difficult for me to understand that the

Yavanas had chosen Bhagadatta as their leader only after they reached

Hastinapur.

>

> Best wishes,

>

> SKB

>

> --- On Wed, 7/8/09, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > wrote:

>

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Wednesday, July 8, 2009, 9:27 AM

>

> Sunil Da,

>

> You should apply your critical faculties to explain the apparent discrepancy

between king of Assam being lord of west, instead of denying the existence of a

verse in an ancient text. Should I give my reasons ? But you dismiss facts cited

by me, how will you admit opinions coming from me ??

>

> -VJ

>

> ============ ========= == ==

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Wednesday, July 8, 2009 11:45:57 AM

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> Dear Vinay,

>

> Please check your book. Even the route is given that Bhagadatta went from

Kamarupa through Bengal and like that. So how can he be a king of the west? He

is known to be a son of Narakasura also.

>

> SKB

>

> --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > wrote:

>

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 10:07 PM

>

> Sunil Da,

>

> MBh is a complex text containing layers added during different periods. It is

a painstaking task to find out the original stratum.

>

> Sabha Parva, chapter-14 of Gitapress edition ( chapter-13 of internet version)

says in verse 14 (verse 13 in internet edition) that Bhagadatta was

" Yavanaadhipati " and was " lord of the West (Prateechya) like Varuna "

>

> Internet edition is not reliable because it is based on the critical edition

which excluded many genuine verses on the basis of an illogical principle :

exclusion of verses not common to all manuscripts. Yet, this edition is a hany

tool for easy references : you can get advantage of search box for locating al

referwences of terms lke " yavana " or " Bhagadatta " or " Pragjyotishapur " .

Pragjyotishapur lirally means " City of the Eastern Lights " . But Bhagadatta is

eulogised as Lord of the West !! Only a complete scanning of MBh can clear which

verses are genuine and which are interpolations. For instance, the term " yavana "

occurs only once in the critical edition's Adi Parva, although terms like

chyavana occurs many times. Hence, sandhi must be taken into account.

>

> Three days ago, I suggested a topic " Astrological concepts in Mahabharata " for

PhD thesis to my friend in Sanskrit department of Vikram University, Ujjain, Dr

Musalgaonkar, a famous Sanskrit scholar, for his student. He has asked me to

provide an outline on whose basis he and his student could prepare the synopsis.

I intend to confine the thesis to theoretical concepts of Jyotisha and leave out

those portions future researchers which do not fit into this theme. for

instance, the statements of Bhishma Pitamaha can be compared with Paitaamaha

Siddhanta of Panchsiddhantikaa of Varaha Mihira, or the computational or

theoretical statements in MBh can be compared with Suryasiddhanta and other

siddhantas.

>

> -VJ

>

> ============ ========= = =====

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Tuesday, July 7, 2009 3:31:31 PM

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> Bhagadatta brought the Yavanas from his land as far as I remember reading

about it.

>

> --- On Tue, 7/7/09, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > wrote:

>

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 12:00 AM

>

> Sunil Da,

>

> Bhagadatta is clearly described as an Asura and not as an Yavana. all yavanas

fought on the side of Kauravas. Bhagadatta was one of leading commanders of

Kauravas. If he led some yavanas too, among others, it does not mean yavanas

came from Kamrupa. Yavana is derived from Ionia, the letter " I " in Ionia carried

a mark which was pronounced as " Ya " in Greek but later influence of Semitic

script for this Aryan language distorted the pronumciation as well and now Ionia

is pronounced according to its Semitic (Roman, derived from Hebrew ) script and

not according to its original pronunciation. There are numerous instances of

Yavana used for Greeks in ancient literature. Read Milinda Panho, in which King

Milinda (Minander) was a yavana. Alexander and Greek ambassadors are called as

yavanas in ancient Indian literature. The Sanskrit term Yavanika was borrowed

from Greek drama which was played not is halls but in open fields and needed

curtains ; indian drama

did

>

> not need curtains originally and has no native term for Yavanika (curtain for

drama).

>

> -VJ

>

> ============ ========= = ==

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Tuesday, July 7, 2009 7:08:22 AM

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> Not only there is no mention of the Greek civilisation in the ancient texts.

there is also no description of their habitat and the ways of their life. Their

very identification as the Yavanas itself is suspect as Bhagadatta, the son of

Narakasura, was the King of Kamrupa and he led a group of yavanas to Hastinapur

and if one goes by this then the yavanas were the residents of Kamarupa. These

Yavanas were not much different from the Danavas as Kamarupa was also the place

of the Danavas along with nthe Asuras. Narakasura had Banasura as a contemporary

king.also near Kamarupa.

>

> SKB

>

> --- On Mon, 7/6/09, Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ > wrote:

>

> Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ >

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Monday, July 6, 2009, 10:29 AM

>

> Sunil Da,

>

> <<< " no such mention of the Greek civilistion is there in the ancient Indian

texts. " >>>

>

> I have found references to Yavanas as barbarians in Mahabharata & c. Yavanas

(Ionian Greeks learnt civilisation much later.

>

> -VJ

>

> ============ ========= == ==

>

> ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> " sunil_bhattacharjy a @ " <sunil_bhattacharjy a @>

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Monday, July 6, 2009 10:51:49 AM

>

> Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> Dear Rohini,

>

> I know that you did not refer to calendar and there is no need to refer to

calendar in the round of present discussions. But Shri Hari Malla took off

tangentially to give it a calendar angle as if to mean that we are following the

Gregorian calendar and that is the only reason for our progress. So to set

things right I broughrt to the notice of the members that we had both the

calendars in the ancient times and without making any comp[romise both the

calendar coexisted. Many people are making noise that the Makar Sankranti

shoiuld be celebrated on the UIttarayana day. I want to ask them whether they

know of any reference which states if the Makar Sankranti was observed when at

the beginning of the Treta Yuga the Uttarayana occurred in the Krittika

Nakshatra.

>

> Plato, the guru of Aristotle, went out of Greece and he is said to have even

visited India and that without him the knowledge of India would not have gone to

the West (of course, obviously at that time). This is given in a Paper in the

journal " Theosophy " , vol.27, No. 10 (August 1939). There is another paper

antitled " Plato in Afghanistan and India " , by W.L.Lorimer in American Journal of

Philology, vol. 53, No. 2, (1932). After returning from India Plato established

an Instiutute of Higher learning in Athens, the first institute of its kind in

the West. The university at Takshashila was established a mellennium before

Plato's institute in Greece. Herodotus also wrote about India even befpre Plato.

However no such mention of the Greek civilistion is there in the ancient Indian

texts.

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

> --- On Sat, 7/4/09, Rohiniranjan wrote:

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

> [vedic astrology] Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> vedic astrology

>

> Saturday, July 4, 2009, 8:24 PM

>

> Dear Sunil-da,

>

> I just posted a fact as it exists now and was not trying to definitively

connect it to any zodiac, calendar or agenda etc :-)

>

> Regardless of how it was perceived, or used by others, here or elsewhere, who

responded to the best of their personal perspectives -- and I am ready to

believe that they all did so transparently for I am convinced that no one who is

posting and sharing on this forum has any ulterior motive or personal sneaky

agenda.

>

> Essentially, we all are at a beach that faces an OCEAN. For example the

Pacific Ocean?

>

> Each of us keep tossing a pebble, a stone into the OCEAN and if we time it

right when an incoming tide SWELLS in, we have a choice:

>

> Did our launch (am talking stones not missiles!) was well planned and

well-timed {Consumer}

>

> Was the launch responsible for the TIDE? {Creator!}

>

> We are back to the original question: Destiny or Free-Will?

>

> RR

>

> vedic astrology, Sunil Bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Dear Rohini,

>

> >

>

> > In the ancient times we had both the Seasonal (Tropical) and the Sidereeal

calendars. The two were existing in side by side without interfering with each

other. The Gregorian calendar is originally based on Vedic Seasonal calendar

taken to the west much before Jesus Christ was born. Julius ceasar ammended it

and then Gregory ammnded it further. Greeks got a lot of knowledge from us. Do

you know that Aristotle studies in Takshashila? It is reported that even Plato

came to Takshashila. Then in the 4th century BCE Megasthenes learnt from India

during his stay in india as the Greek ambassador. Later on Ptolemy sent

ambassador to the court of Samudragupta. All these people learnt a lot from

India.

>

> >

>

> > Best wishes,

>

> >

>

> > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > --- On Sat, 7/4/09, harimalla@ . wrote:

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > harimalla@ .

>

> > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the Relevant

Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> >

>

> > Saturday, July 4, 2009, 7:08 PM

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > Daear Rohiniranjanji,

>

> > I am temptd to say that the reason for the ecocnomic ascension you are

mentioning is not due to vedic calendar reform, but by adopting the corected

sayan Gregorian calendar, which is widely used in India now a days.The true

progress and peace can be guaranted when the vedic calendar itself is reformed.

>

> > Regards,

>

> > Hari Malla

>

> >

>

> > , " Rohiniranjan " wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > Jha Saheb,

>

> > >

>

> > > Nothing cryptic there :-)

>

> > > News is full of stories about how India is moving rapidly towards becoming

a significant marketplace and an economic power, alongside China.

>

> > >

>

> > > I was talking from a very mundane (english word, not the astrological

connotation! ) perspective ;-)

>

> > >

>

> > > RR

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > , Vinay Jha wrote:

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Sir,

>

> > > >

>

> > > > I fail to understand your cryptography in spite of my years of training

in linguistics :

>

> > > >

>

> > > > <<< " ... And The Ascension has begun again from what I hear ... " >>>

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Can you write simpler English for lesser folks like us ?

>

> > > >

>

> > > > -Sincerely,

>

> > > >

>

> > > > -Vinay Jha

>

> > > >

>

> > > > ============ ========= ========= = ==

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > Rohiniranjan

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Thursday, July 2, 2009 5:00:41 AM

>

> > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the Relevant

Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Dear Jha Saheb,

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Since you quoted and seemingly responded to the content in my message

inspite of addressing Sunil-Da, it would be impolite of me to not respond to you

directly ;-)

>

> > > >

>

> > > > .... And The Ascension has begun again from what I hear and that is

GREAT NEWS from my Matribhoomi!

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Best wishes as always,

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Rohiniranjan

>

> > > >

>

> > > > , Vinay Jha wrote:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Sunil Da,

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Even for agriculture and related activities, Midini Jyotish does not

prescribe tropical astrology. Nirayana Mesha Samkrannti gives phala of whole

year in all fields , including agriculture and climate. Similarly, mundane

horoscopes for other samkrantis and nakshatra transits yield accurate results

only when sidereal method is followed. Seasons are tropical, but their

regulators are medini (mundane) horoscopes of solar transits into nirayana

Raashis and Nakshatras.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Countries which follow tropical astrology have prospered onlt

recently. During 99% of whole human history, India was far better than Europe in

agriculture & c.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > -VJ

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ============ ======= ============

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > > Rohiniranjan

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Wednesday, July 1, 2009 6:38:50 AM

>

> > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the Relevant

Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Maybe they (Sayan) should be utilized for agriculture because of

seasons and how crops and harvests are connected to the LOCAL seasons in the

different zones all within this world of ours?

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Places where SAYAN ZODIAC has been followed for decades and centuries

or longer -- do seem to have better harvests and more food available for some

strange reason...

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > , Vinay Jha wrote:

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Well said Sunil da. In astrology, Sun is only one of many Grahas,

and not the sole arbiter of everything. Hence, Sayana Raashis cannot be used to

make horoscopes.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Tuesday, June 30, 2009 7:41:55 AM

>

> > > > > > Re: Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Dear members,

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I am really flabbergasted by the following statemenmt :

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Quote

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Thus there is calendar reform proposal to move the rashis too by one

month to match with the original seasons, ie to name the bresent meen rashi as

the new epochal mesh rashi.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Unquote

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > How can the Nirayana Rashis move as contain fixed (non-moving)

Nakshatras? The Sayana rashis are anyway the imitation rashis and they only move

along with the moving Tropical zodiac.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Regards,

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > --- On Mon, 6/29/09, harimalla@rocketmai l.com wrote:

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > harimalla@rocketmai l.com

>

> > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the Relevant

Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Monday, June 29, 2009, 6:53 PM

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Dear Rohiniranjanji,

>

> > > > > > May your wish to keep it a mature forum with a good past and a good

future be fulfilled!

>

> > > > > > To my knowledge,precessio n which is the wobbly motion of the earth

changing the pole stars in the long run, does not influence the eclliptic path

and its shape.This precession is independant although both this motion and the

annual orbit of the earth is carried out by the earth.

>

> > > > > > This precession is caused mainly by the lunar gravitaion on the

earth whereas the earth orbit is cased by the gravitation of the sun on the

earth.Precession does shift the seasons or ayanamsa about one month in 2150

years.thus originally about 1700 years ago mesh sankranti was spring equinox.Due

to precesion, the spring equnox has moved by 24 days in the solar sense, and one

full month in the lunar sense.Thus there is calendar reform proposal to move the

rashis too by one month to match with the original seasons, ie to name the

bresent meen rashi as the new epochal mesh rashi.This is necessary to celebrate

the festivals in their resbective seasons.

>

> > > > > > Regards,

>

> > > > > > Hari Malla

>

> > > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " wrote:

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > Dinesh-ji,

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > Fascinating discussions and it is wonderful to see that other than

good-hearted jibs and jabs -- no abusive outpourings have ensued as has become

the norm in some places :-(

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > Let us maintain the decorum continuingly for this is a mature

forum that was once blessed by none other than Sri K.N. Rao who has done for

Jyotish what an injection of adrenaline would do to a dying person, or one of

those electrical defibrillators, that resuscitate dying people, that are now

being installed in malls and shopping plazas in some developed nations.

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > This matter about the ecliptic belt, which I was told is really

created by the projected travel-path of the earth around the sun (creating the

apparent movement of sun, the ayanas, the seasons and what not) -- although SUN

has its slower true motion too (galactic) --- I am curious to find out if the

notion of " ecliptic " and what it is is at all influenced by the slow polar

wobble of the earth which makes it point towards a different pole star over the

long cycle of ayanamsha as the S.V.P. shifts?

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > RR

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > , Dinesh Dheengra wrote:

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Dear Respected Sunilji, Mallaji and Jhaaji,

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > My work is just to show that how constellations' s star are

scattered around the ecliptic.

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > i will comeup with document and ppl will see it and will bear in

mind what Sunilji and Mallaji were saying.

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Mallaji said that stars which are away from ecliptic should also

affect on earth like other stars affect us.

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Sunilji said that all constellation' s star are on ecliptic so

only those can affect and others can not.

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > But my point was that stars which formed the consteallation

itself are scattered -9 to +9 degrees from ecliptic so in the same way stars

which are more away from ecliptic should also affect it.Many planets even dont

go to partcular constellation and we say it is in that Rashi( as SBji has siad

that Rashis came up with animal shaped constellation) .

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Give me some time i will show that to all of you the reality.

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Till that time LOVE TO ALL....

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Love you all

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Dinesh Dheengra

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 28/6/09, Sunil Bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > Re: Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Sunday, 28 June, 2009, 8:59 AM

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Dear Dheengraji,

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > I am waiting for your reply to my mail No. 23743. For your ready

reference I am repeating the contents of that mail below:

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Quote

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Shri Harimallaji thinks that the constellations (Nakshatras) in

the ecliptic

>

> > > > > > > > band were chosen arbitrarilily and that they are also of no use

if other

>

> > > > > > > > constellations outside the ecliptic band are not considered to

be of having any

>

> > > > > > > > effect on man. This is his assertion and subsequently he

reasserted that.

>

> > > > > > > > Assertions and reassertions are after all assertions. He never

cared to

>

> > > > > > > > understand why the constellations in the ecliptic band was

chosen in the first

>

> > > > > > > > place in preference to the constallationa outside the ecliptic

band. Do you

>

> > > > > > > > think he is right in ignoring the reasons for the preferential

choice of the

>

> > > > > > > > constallation in theecliptic band? Or should we assume that he

is ignorant of

>

> > > > > > > > the same?

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > He admits that he does not believe in astrology. It appears to

me that he

>

> > > > > > > > is trying to mean that if the constellations outside the

ecliptic band have no

>

> > > > > > > > effect on man then the constellations within the ecliptic band

also would not

>

> > > > > > > > have any effect on man and therefore the astrology, which

involves these useless

>

> > > > > > > > constellations is also of no use to man. He says so because he

does not know in

>

> > > > > > > > the first place why the constallations in the ecliptic band were

chosen

>

> > > > > > > > preferentially. Do you think that his assertions has any merit?

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Do you think this assessment of mine holds any truth?

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Unquote

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Awaiting your reply.

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Sincerely,

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > --- On Sat, 6/27/09, harimalla@rocketmai l.com wrote:

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > harimalla@rocketmai l.com

>

> > > > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Saturday, June 27, 2009, 8:54 PM

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > Dear Dhreengraji, Jhaaji and Bhattacharjyaji,

>

> > > > > > > > The discussion is taking a interesting turn.I think truth is

truth, old or new. Jhaaji is saying it is a age old thing, but there is no

problem in being age old.Many times the older, the more truer. Thus let us

concentrate in what Dheengraji is saying.

>

> > > > > > > > He is saying, the signs of the zodiacs is not on the ecliptic

exactly, it is say, plus minus eight or nine degrees on the ecliptic.If it

should be true for plus minus eight( or 9) then why it should not be true when

it is plus minus forty five degrees? He says we are also marking as on the

rashis when actually it is not.

>

> > > > > > > > Thus according to Dhreengraji, it should be true for 45 degreees

if true for 8 (or 9)degrees.Am I right Dhreengraji? what would Jhaaji and

Bhattachrjyaji say? Please give reasons why Dhreengraji is not right? Thank you,

>

> > > > > > > > Regards,

>

> > > > > > > > HAri Malla

>

> > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Mr Dinesh Dheengra Ji ,

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Your statement about " age-old point " reveals your hatred for

ancient wisdom just because it is ancient. Moreover, your statement about

correspondence of raashis with constellations shows that you are neither a

scientist nor an astrologer. If you are a scientist, how can you prove that

physical stars or planets can have astrological effects ? If you are a supporter

of astrology, why you do not test astrology on the basis of its standard

( " age-old " ) principles before discarding them, which are " age-old " (ie,

outdated) for you ?

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > <<< " Vinayji is saying it is age old point:- i think Vinay ji

himself has not checked the position of conestellation on ecliptic... " . >>>

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > I studied these things since 1973. You may read the following

:

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > http://jyotirvidya. wetpaint. com/page/ NASA%27s_ Report%3B_

%26_my_Paper_ accepted_ by_CAOS%2C_ IISc

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Ignorance can be cured, but there is no cure for prejudice.

One who is biased against " age-old " things should keep away from astrology,

because it is an age-old thing.

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > I gave a more detailed answer to Mt Hari Malla about this

point, but you do not desrve such an answer, because you have already written me

off as an outdated person.

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > -VJ

>

> > > > > > > > > ============ ========= = =========

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > > > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Saturday, June 27, 2009 4:58:17 PM

>

> > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Dheengraji,

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Shri Harimallaji thinks that the constellations (Nakshatras)

in the ecliptic band were chosen arbitrarilily and that they are also of no use

if other constellations outside the ecliptic band are not considered to be of

having any effect on man. This is his assertion and subsequently he reasserted

that. Assertions and reassertions are after all assertions. He never cared to

understand why the constellations in the ecliptic band was chosen in the first

place in preference to the constallationa outside the ecliptic band. Do you

think he is right in ignoring the reasons for the preferential choice of the

constallation in theecliptic band? Or should we assume that he is ignorant of

the same?

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > He admits that he does not believe in astrology. It appears to

me that he is trying to mean that if the constellations outside the ecliptic

band have no effect on man then the constellations within the ecliptic band also

would not have any effect on man and therefore the astrology, which involves

these useless constellations is also of no use to man. He says so because he

does not know in the first place why the constallations in the ecliptic band

were chosen preferentially. Do you think that his assertions has any merit?

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Do you think this assessment of mine holds any truth?

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Sincerely,

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 6/26/09, dineshdheengra wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > dineshdheengra

>

> > > > > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Friday, June 26, 2009, 5:01 AM

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Dear Vinayji, Sunilji and HariMallaji,

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > I have some eyeopener ideas for this mail chain, those are as

below:-

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Constellations like Libra, Leo , aries etc etc... are 8 to 9

degrees away from ecliptic plane(anybody may check from wikipedia or anything)

means those are away from ecliptic and are affecting us so what we should think

about the stars which could be 45 degrees away from ecliptic

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > sometimes some planets dont even transit in specific

constellation and we say those are in that specific constellation. like in below

example:-

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > some time moon transits in Ar constellation but we say it is

in Pisces because we have restricted us to 30-30 degree partition

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > So sunilji's statement doent not hold any truth

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Vinayji is saying it is age old point:- i think Vinay ji

himself has not checked the position of conestellation on ecliptic...

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Sunilji himself told that Rashis are animal shaped creations

but those are away from ecliptic(8 to 9 degrees from ecliptic on both side means

+8 to -8) so it means those stars(by which constellations are made) are

affecting us than insimilar fashion stars which are 45 degrees away from

ecliptic will affect in same way

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > because age old point also give same clue and we have so many

works present between us

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > Thank you Sirs

>

> > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > , Vinay Jha wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > Only a person totally ignorat of or opposed to astrology

will raise such doubts. Mr SKB has made an age old point. All astrologers use

zodiacal region and none uses the fringes of skies.

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > -VJ========= ========= ====== ==

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __

>

> > > > > > > > > > " harimalla@ .. "

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:41:47 PM

>

> > > > > > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > Dear Dembiji,

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > How are you? May I request you to ask the gentleman, who

wrote the following, as to the scientific and logical reasoning for his claims.

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > Please evaluate for yourself when his reply comes.ThanK you,

>

> > > > > > > > > > sincerely yours,

>

> > > > > > > > > > HAri Malla

>

> > > > > > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya

wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dembiji,

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > It is insanity to claim that the constellations outside

that plane of the solar system will have the same effect on the Earth as the

constellations on the plane of the solar system ie. the ecliptic. Has any

theoretical astrophysicist done any such work on that and reported the findings

in scientific literature? Secondly the costellations on the ecliptic alone are

useful for astronomical dating of past events.

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes,

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > --- On Wed, 6/24/09, harimalla@ . wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > harimalla@ .

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature, the

Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 12:48 AM

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sidharthji,

>

> > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Your question is irrelevant here because we on earth are

at the receiving end and not the stars about each other.The light we receive

from the different stars are known to us only and it is possible to compare

their effects on us. Their effects would be similar, other things remaining the

same..

>

> > > > > > > > > > > My assertion remains that if some of the stars effect us

then the other stars too will effect us in the same way.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Do you have some comments on this opinion.Please comment

if you want to say that some stars are priviledged to effect us whereas other

stars do not have the priviledge, instead of bringing irrelevant questions.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Regards,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > Hari Malla

>

> > > > > > > > > > > , Sidharth Dembi

wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Why are you side tracking the questions that I raised

since you are showing off so much as a scientific mind. I have not made any

assertions, only you have. I am too small to make assertions. I only raised some

questions. Once your scientific knowledge finds answers raised by questions, I

assure you that I will start learning from you.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Any instead of answering my questions, you are raising

more!! And in fact reading my mind too - u even know what i think! I will

appreciate if you could find answers to my questions with your scientific

knowledge and enlighten me also. Then we could take our discussion forward.

Otherwise we are just engaging in useless discussions.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > My sincere regards and

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Best of Luck

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 23/6/09, harimalla@ . wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > harimalla@ .

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Tuesday, 23 June, 2009, 4:45 PM

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sidhartha Dembiji,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > So you think only some stars effect the creatures on

earth whereas others are not capable of effecting.Is that what you intend to

say? If so can you give some reason, why this should be so.Also what type of

effect these stars have on us? Let us have your scientific outlook.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > Hari Malla

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > , Sidharth Dembi

wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sunil ji,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice reply to him.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no knowledge of the Shastras, but have studied

science. He is commenting on the effects of starts on us.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > He says -

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > My understanding is that if 12 groups effects us, then

the other 76

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > groups should also have effected us.What do you think?

Does this not

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > show that actually none of the stars effect us

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > If he is so enamored by Science, let him understand

the basic two-slit experiment in quantum physics (infact the first basic step in

understanding quantum physics) which no scientist has been able to understand

and explain. How can two electrons millions of light years away influence each

other? How do they know about each other? He should read about it and then he

should just shut up, and not comment based on his so-called scientific

knowledge. And he should wait for science to come up with an explanation (which

it never can) and then comment on anything!!

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sun, 21/6/09, Sunil Bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Re: Rashi in Vedic

literature, the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunday, 21 June, 2009, 12:19 AM

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Shri Harimalla,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please stop your nonsensical talk. You don,t know the

Shastras and waste everybody's time. Go and teach Kaul first.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > You have mentioned Bhagavatam, Dharmasindhu and

Kalamadhav without giving any reference. None of these has said that Uttarayana

will, for ever, occur when the Sun comes to the Makar Rashi Since the 3rd

century CE the Uttarayana does not occur in the Makar rashi. due to precession.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedas have mentioned about the animal forms in the sky

(Satapatha Brahmana 10.2.1). Mesh (Ram) is the symbol of the Mesh Rashi, Vrshabh

(Bull) has become the symbol of the Vrshabh Rashi. We need not think that these

have come from the west.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Further you do not know that there are 27 groups of

stars in the ecliptic and that each group of star is named after the main star

called Yoga Tara. For example, the Krittika nakshatra is a group of 6 stars.

This is the astronomical fact. In Astrology these 27 Nakshatras are divided into

12 Rashis or Asterisms or Lunar mansions.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no need of trying to educate me with your

fake knowledge.. However, in future if any or all of the the hundreds of the

members of all the astrology groups request you to teach them, then of course

you can start your teaching program. In that case please address your mail to

them and not to me. Is that clear? BTW, why don't you educate your idol Kaul and

his cronies first.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > S.K.Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, harimalla@rocketmai l.com wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > harimalla@rocketmai l.com

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: Rashi in Vedic literature,

the Relevant Chronology and the Sidereal

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Saturday, June 20, 2009, 11:10 AM

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sunil Bhattacharjyaji,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > No problem if you would like to avoid discussiong

about calendar reform.But since I have not been able to impart certain technical

knowledge to you, I shall repeat here so that if you can please try to

grasp,since you have failed to do, so far, inspite of my repetetions.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > I quote the definition given by The world Book

Encyclopaedia of Constellations. It runs as follows, " Astronomer s have divided

the sky into 88 constellations. ..the ancient people named these groups of stars

after animals and mythological characters.For example, the contellations Leo was

named after lion, Pisces after two fish,and Taurus after a bull " .Do you

understand that the scientists recognise each rashi as one constellations. The

27 constellations of which you have mentioned, are not the scientist's

categorisaion but of the eastern daily lunar constellations, we call as

nakshyatras. The scientist are not used to that.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Please do not misquote me and say " also that instead

of 12 constellations 88 constellations should be considered in astrology and

that it is in the interest of Dharma, even though you yourself do not believe in

Phalita Jyotisha. You don't even know that the ecliptic has 27 constellations

and not 12. I made you admit that nothing like consideration of 88

constellations is mentioned in the ancient texts and that these are your own

wild ideas. "

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Plese listen carefully what I have said and do not

misquote me for what I have not said.I have never said 88 constellations should

be considered in astrology.I have said only 12 constellations are used in

astrology out of total of 88, existing in the sky.I have also said,since only a

few constellations (only 12)are taken out of total of 88 as known to be in the

sky, it proves that the stars do not effect us directly.I have found you

incapable to understand the meaning of this sentence. Is my expression in

English so weak that you are not able to understand its logic? I hope that you

do not believe some stars effect us and others do not.Do you think only 12

groups of stars effect us and the remaining 76 groups categorised by science are

incapable to effect us? My understanding is that if 12 groups effects us, then

the other 76 groups should also have effected us.What do you think? Does this

not show that actually none of the

stars

>

> > effect

>

> > > > > us?

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Another point you have not understood although

universally accepted is as follows.I again quote the same enclyclopaedia on the

definition of Aries.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > " Aries is traditionally known as the first

constellation of the zodiac.Aries is symbolized by a ram. In mythology,it

represents the ram with the golden fleece that was sought by Jason and the

Argonauts... .Technically, Aries is no longer the first zodiacal sign because

the vernal equinox has moved on into the Pisces, due to the effect of the

precession of the equinoxes. "

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > You see the western people have their own story or

purana about the Aries constellations 'Jason and the Argonauts'.Whereas in the

hindu mythology, we have no such story.This also proves that it was not

originally ours.In their concept, Aries is also equivalent to vernal

equinox.Your fixed Aries concept without relationship with the vernal equinox is

not only unacceptable from their concept, but also from the concept of our own

puranas like the Bhagvatam about mesh rashi.Our Bhagvatam repeats again again

that makar sankranti represents uttrayan.Not only that our dharmas shastra like

Dharma sindhu also says so. But you being ignorant about dharma shastra like

Dharma sindhu, kala madhav etc talk like a unread and non religious person.. You

also do not take the trouble to read them. You know only how to stick to your

limited knowledge and say if we have to celebrate uttarayan then we can join

Christmas parties.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Well why do you not become a christian to do so rather

than recommend such a silly propopsal to fellow hindus.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Saying mesh is free from the spring equinox or that

makar sankranti is free from uttarayan, you people have shown the ignorance of

the century.I can understand you have not read dharma shastras as mentioned

above.But what I cannot understand is why do you not purchase a book and

read.They are not costly books. Or go to a library and read them.But do not make

the jokes of the century by saying mesh sankranti is not linked to vernal

equinox and makar sankranti is not linked to winter solstice.Bhagvatam itself is

full of these assertions.I have quoted the description of the Sishumar chakra

too.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > OK then good bye for today.Take care.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hari Malla

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > , Sunil

Bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shri Harimalla,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1)

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Go and discuss calendar reform in calendar group and

not here. In future please do not talk to me about Calendar reform. You have

harassed me enough in the AIA group with your nonsensical ideas such as need for

renaming the Rashis and Nakshatras and also that instead of 12 constellations 88

constellations should be considered in astrology and that it is in the interest

of Dharma even though you yourself do not believe in Phalita Jyotisha. You don't

even know that the ecliptic has 27 constellations and not 12.. I made you admit

that nothing like consideration of 88 constellations is mentioned in the ancient

texts and that these are your own wild ideas. If you want to create a new form

of Jyotish shastra please go and do it yourself and publish a book and get the

recognition yourself. But don't try to involve me in your absurd ideas. Please

do not try your usual trick to do useless emotional tricks like saying that you

are very

>

> > concerned

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > about

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Dharma.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2)

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you say as follows?

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you phalit people panic to learn that the

rashis were not treated in the Vedas when all agree that it wasdealt with in the

puranas?

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unquote

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't you understand the English language. I have

already given reference to the verses, where the Rashis appear in the Vedas,

Vedanga Jyotisha and Purana. So why should we panic? It is people like you, who

are against the Jyotish Shasta, are panicking. What an anti-astrology man like

you is doing here?

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tell AKK and Sathaye and others that Sayanacharya

said in the foreword in his work on Rig Veda that the Vedas should be

supplemented with the Itihasa and the Puranas. Sathaye could not find the

Vedanga jyotisha. I told him where to find the Vedanga Jyotisha, published by

INSA. Any Vedic scholar will understand that the verses I gave show the presence

of Rashi in Veda. Also tell them that all the nine grahas are also in the Veda.

Sometimes the terminologies are different. For example, Rahu and Ketu are called

Svarabhanu in Veda. The Sun, the Moon and Brihaspati are of course in the same

name. I already told AKK that Manu had told that the Kings should consult

Astrologers. thereby approving the use of Astrology. If AKK cannot find a copy

of the Manu smriti you can tell him that it is in the Internet. If you people

want to remain in your own self-imposed darkness I have no objection.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I repeat. Please do not address any mail to me in

connection with Calendar. If you find any other member of the group interested

in discussing calendar with you then you can discuss calendar with him provided

the Modearorji approves such discussions here.

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerley,

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > S.K.Bhattacharjya

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Sat, 6/20/09, harimalla@ . wrote:

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

>

> > > > > >%2

>

Sign In

Rashi in Vedic literature / Greeks learnt everything from the Indians.

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Support the Ashram

Join Groups

Top Downloads