Re :Sthir dasa

[Guest guest]

Om Namah Sivaya

 

Namaste Goel Ji,

 

I fear you missed my point. My point was not to say whatever Sri Narasimha wrote

wrong. Yet, the point is if he doesn't read what ancient commentators had to say

and comment on their caliber and efficacy, that itself is not a scholar's

approach. I hope I never said his teachings were wrong. I only said time will

prove his findings.

 

By the way Sri Narasimha didn't wrote something which is drastically different

from what is existing.

 

I know SJC promotes the view that Parasara and Jaimini wrote the same science,

which I differ. Why Sri Narasimha names this variation of sthira dasa as " A

Sthira Dasa of Parasara " , when both Sages writes the same science? Is it not he

contradicting himself?

 

I request you to kindly clarify my points, before asking me to still give a try.

 

Thank you very much for your advice. Yet, I have a Guru, who wrote wonderful

commentary on Jaimini. If I want to learn I will learn from my Guru and he has

45 years of experience in Jaimini. He is my best resource and he doesn't mix

up Parasara's mathematical model with Jaimini to decide the winner. As a matter

of fact, Jaimini drastically differs from Parasara. In my humble opinion, we

must have at least a decade of experience in pronouncing anything on a rasi

dasa.

 

I seek your blessings.

 

Regards,

Shanmukha

 

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote:

 

 

Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937

Re :Sthir dasa

teli_sha2002

Cc: " sohamsa " <sohamsa >

Sunday, 2 August, 2009, 4:32 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEAR  SHANMUKH JI,

NO BODY IS LAYING.

 Sill kindly give a try what Mr. Narshinha Rao says.

You will get the results.

Regards.

G.K.GOEL

 G.K.GOEL

Ph: 09350311433

Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR

NEW DELHI-110 076

INDIA

 

 

 

Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click

here.

 

 

Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more.

Click here http://cricket.