Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 Rohini Da, God is not testing me, because now-a-days I am not performing any particular saadhanaa excepting my normal routines of subsisting on one meal of mere havishyaanna (no sals, spices, oils, etc), which is not real saadhanaa as per my abilities. Now-a-days, I do not even get time to meditate properly. Computers and internet are harming me a lot. So are Sanskrit schools, colleges and panchangas managed by me. Should I leave the world or should I get rid of worldliness in my attitude ? You know the answer. I had read the message of Mr Abhijit before you asked me to read. What you perceive as a token of my vindictive nature is really something else. I had decided to leave this forum, because I felt (perhaps wrongly) Mr Raj was being prompted by more than one member to get rid of me. This feeling was caused by total lack of any cause behind his uncivil attacks on me. Had Mr Raj been a not-so-knowledgeable astrologer, I would have ignored his outpourings. But I know he is not an ignorant fool, he acted deliberately. And he can never accept his fault (nor do I need his apology). I am not surprized, I know persons from their language. But I am really surprized at you : you know I tolerated even obscene abuses and never retorted in a hot language to that person. Why do you think me to be impatient and vindictive now ? I know most of the members in some internet fora do not want to test my software. They should never, that is all I can say. I am in no need of popularity and acceptance. I had told you that I did my duty by digitizing the ancient method and that is all. Those who do not value tests by IISc, NASA, etc will never believe in tests by lesser institutions or persons. For three years, my tenth house is going to be very bad, and I expect more and more of abuses & c. But 2nd and 5th houses are excellent and are helping me in my work. My Guruji was much more knowledgeable and influential than me, but he never tried to get his 60 books published. Why should I ??? -VJ ============== == vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Dear Vinay_ji, > > God has this habit, it seems. of sending distractions when the becomes strong! God is neither vindictive, nor out there to TEST all of us mortals, but just sends reminders as to what we should focus on and what we should try to ignore! > > Sometimes silence is golden and a sign of strength and not a weakness! Even for grihasthas like me! And certainly for others who have chosen a more difficult path. > > I would request you to read message # 117884, written by an even-keeled person, and perhaps lot younger than some of us :-) > > Regards, > > Rohiniranjan > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > <<<One must always retort!>>> > > > > I do not always retort, I retort only when I am in a mood to leave a group. As long as I see some meaningful dialogue, I tolerate even abuses from scoundrels. > > > > -VJ > > ================= === > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > One must always retort! As long as we walk through this mayavini reality, Vinay_ji! > > > > > > Like the story about the snake in scriptures reminds us! > > > > > > You see, while people go to Crusades over HOLY scriptures and what the moderators (some fora, this one excepted, so far!) consider as blasphemy and try to control for the sake of face-saving publicly to appease the majority as some sort of effort towards " HEALING " -- we forget that there is only one SOURCE that ALL must arise from and return TO. > > > > > > How else would the CIRCLE be...? > > > > > > ...called a CIRCLE! > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > I do not care for abuses, but sometimes I feel I should retort, and if > > > > need arises I will ask my lawyer to book a few wrong doers who spoil > > > > civilized fora. > > > > > > > > I am not against this label, because " Vedic Astrology " , in my view, is > > > > not the astrology according to the Vedas as some misguided persons want > > > > to stress, but the astrology propagated and practised by those who > > > > believe in Vedas and vedic culture in broad sense. The term " Indian > > > > Astrology " is improper, because the latter includes influences from > > > > outside sources such as Greek, Islamic, Tadjik, etc. At present, Jain > > > > astrology is not a separate trend. Hence, " Vedic Astrology " means > > > > 'indigenous astrology " of India. I, therefore, like to use the term > > > > " Vedic Astrology " myself. > > > > > > > > I used the label " so-called " because of a reason I would not have liked > > > > to explain in public fora. > > > > > > > > I have read many of your articles, but I am not able to live a settled > > > > life for two years. Hence, I have not been able to read all of you. I > > > > liked not only the content, but also the method you use. You are among > > > > the best living writers in this field. > > > > > > > > Recently, Central Govt has approved sufficient financial aid to the > > > > voluntary Sanskrit college controlled by me. I started a Gurukula also > > > > five months ago, and now my financial problems for the survival of this > > > > Gurukula are almost over. I have students who have memorized Panini's > > > > Ashtaadhyaayi by rote and are now learning higher things in Sanskrit and > > > > English. I never tried for any donations from any quarter, and used my > > > > own resources to run this ashrama (I did not save money in banks : God > > > > is helping me, perhaps). > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > =============== ==== > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Without getting entangled in the 'duniyadari' of this thread, Jha_ji, > > > > I have always been somewhat concerned by these labels that Indian > > > > Astrologers have imposed on Jyotish! > > > > > > > > > > Hindu Astrology, Vedic Astrology, Vaidik Astrology, Indian Astrology > > > > ...! > > > > > > > > > > When can we ALL come together and decide that Jyotish should be called > > > > simply JYOTISH! > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps once it finds its original name, all these skirmishes and > > > > confusions decimate! > > > > > > > > > > And they say: What's in a name! > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Concerned : > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Abhijit simply enquired about the " Vedic " way of calculating > > > > > > exaltation. It is a forum of " vedic " astrology, hence he was quite > > > > right > > > > > > in asking such a question. The methods used by so-called " vedic " > > > > > > astrologers are supposed to be vedic methods, whether these methods > > > > are > > > > > > inside or outside the Vedas. Mr Abhijit had not abused anyone to > > > > receive > > > > > > insulting remarks by Mr Raj Bhardwaj. The latter is on an abusing > > > > spree > > > > > > and needs some restraint. There are stringent cyber laws against > > > > abusive > > > > > > emails and there are programs to locate the sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2010 Report Share Posted January 11, 2010 Dear Vinay_jee, You are misunderstanding me! I never thought of you as vindictive or impatient. The message that I requested you to read was not Abhijit's but Atul Bhatia's! PEACE! RR_, vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > Rohini Da, > > God is not testing me, because now-a-days I am not performing any > particular saadhanaa excepting my normal routines of subsisting on one > meal of mere havishyaanna (no sals, spices, oils, etc), which is not > real saadhanaa as per my abilities. Now-a-days, I do not even get time > to meditate properly. Computers and internet are harming me a lot. So > are Sanskrit schools, colleges and panchangas managed by me. Should I > leave the world or should I get rid of worldliness in my attitude ? You > know the answer. > > I had read the message of Mr Abhijit before you asked me to read. What > you perceive as a token of my vindictive nature is really something > else. I had decided to leave this forum, because I felt (perhaps > wrongly) Mr Raj was being prompted by more than one member to get rid of > me. This feeling was caused by total lack of any cause behind his > uncivil attacks on me. Had Mr Raj been a not-so-knowledgeable > astrologer, I would have ignored his outpourings. But I know he is not > an ignorant fool, he acted deliberately. And he can never accept his > fault (nor do I need his apology). I am not surprized, I know persons > from their language. > > But I am really surprized at you : you know I tolerated even obscene > abuses and never retorted in a hot language to that person. Why do you > think me to be impatient and vindictive now ? I know most of the members > in some internet fora do not want to test my software. They should > never, that is all I can say. I am in no need of popularity and > acceptance. I had told you that I did my duty by digitizing the ancient > method and that is all. Those who do not value tests by IISc, NASA, etc > will never believe in tests by lesser institutions or persons. For three > years, my tenth house is going to be very bad, and I expect more and > more of abuses & c. But 2nd and 5th houses are excellent and are helping > me in my work. My Guruji was much more knowledgeable and influential > than me, but he never tried to get his 60 books published. Why should I > ??? > > -VJ > ============== == > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > Dear Vinay_ji, > > > > God has this habit, it seems. of sending distractions when the > becomes strong! God is neither vindictive, nor out there to > TEST all of us mortals, but just sends reminders as to what we should > focus on and what we should try to ignore! > > > > Sometimes silence is golden and a sign of strength and not a weakness! > Even for grihasthas like me! And certainly for others who have chosen a > more difficult path. > > > > I would request you to read message # 117884, written by an > even-keeled person, and perhaps lot younger than some of us :-) > > > > Regards, > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > <<<One must always retort!>>> > > > > > > I do not always retort, I retort only when I am in a mood to leave a > group. As long as I see some meaningful dialogue, I tolerate even abuses > from scoundrels. > > > > > > -VJ > > > ================= === > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > One must always retort! As long as we walk through this mayavini > reality, Vinay_ji! > > > > > > > > Like the story about the snake in scriptures reminds us! > > > > > > > > You see, while people go to Crusades over HOLY scriptures and what > the moderators (some fora, this one excepted, so far!) consider as > blasphemy and try to control for the sake of face-saving publicly to > appease the majority as some sort of effort towards " HEALING " -- we > forget that there is only one SOURCE that ALL must arise from and return > TO. > > > > > > > > How else would the CIRCLE be...? > > > > > > > > ...called a CIRCLE! > > > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > > > I do not care for abuses, but sometimes I feel I should retort, > and if > > > > > need arises I will ask my lawyer to book a few wrong doers who > spoil > > > > > civilized fora. > > > > > > > > > > I am not against this label, because " Vedic Astrology " , in my > view, is > > > > > not the astrology according to the Vedas as some misguided > persons want > > > > > to stress, but the astrology propagated and practised by those > who > > > > > believe in Vedas and vedic culture in broad sense. The term > " Indian > > > > > Astrology " is improper, because the latter includes influences > from > > > > > outside sources such as Greek, Islamic, Tadjik, etc. At present, > Jain > > > > > astrology is not a separate trend. Hence, " Vedic Astrology " > means > > > > > 'indigenous astrology " of India. I, therefore, like to use the > term > > > > > " Vedic Astrology " myself. > > > > > > > > > > I used the label " so-called " because of a reason I would not > have liked > > > > > to explain in public fora. > > > > > > > > > > I have read many of your articles, but I am not able to live a > settled > > > > > life for two years. Hence, I have not been able to read all of > you. I > > > > > liked not only the content, but also the method you use. You are > among > > > > > the best living writers in this field. > > > > > > > > > > Recently, Central Govt has approved sufficient financial aid to > the > > > > > voluntary Sanskrit college controlled by me. I started a > Gurukula also > > > > > five months ago, and now my financial problems for the survival > of this > > > > > Gurukula are almost over. I have students who have memorized > Panini's > > > > > Ashtaadhyaayi by rote and are now learning higher things in > Sanskrit and > > > > > English. I never tried for any donations from any quarter, and > used my > > > > > own resources to run this ashrama (I did not save money in banks > : God > > > > > is helping me, perhaps). > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > =============== ==== > > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Without getting entangled in the 'duniyadari' of this thread, > Jha_ji, > > > > > I have always been somewhat concerned by these labels that > Indian > > > > > Astrologers have imposed on Jyotish! > > > > > > > > > > > > Hindu Astrology, Vedic Astrology, Vaidik Astrology, Indian > Astrology > > > > > ...! > > > > > > > > > > > > When can we ALL come together and decide that Jyotish should > be called > > > > > simply JYOTISH! > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps once it finds its original name, all these skirmishes > and > > > > > confusions decimate! > > > > > > > > > > > > And they say: What's in a name! > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Concerned : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Abhijit simply enquired about the " Vedic " way of > calculating > > > > > > > exaltation. It is a forum of " vedic " astrology, hence he was > quite > > > > > right > > > > > > > in asking such a question. The methods used by so-called > " vedic " > > > > > > > astrologers are supposed to be vedic methods, whether these > methods > > > > > are > > > > > > > inside or outside the Vedas. Mr Abhijit had not abused > anyone to > > > > > receive > > > > > > > insulting remarks by Mr Raj Bhardwaj. The latter is on an > abusing > > > > > spree > > > > > > > and needs some restraint. There are stringent cyber laws > against > > > > > abusive > > > > > > > emails and there are programs to locate the sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 RR Da, Sorry. Om Shanti ! I am gradually gaining my former state of tranquility by getting out of internet fora one by one. -vj ======================= ====== vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Dear Vinay_jee, > > You are misunderstanding me! I never thought of you as vindictive or impatient. The message that I requested you to read was not Abhijit's but Atul Bhatia's! > > PEACE! > > RR_, > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> wrote: > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > God is not testing me, because now-a-days I am not performing any > > particular saadhanaa excepting my normal routines of subsisting on one > > meal of mere havishyaanna (no sals, spices, oils, etc), which is not > > real saadhanaa as per my abilities. Now-a-days, I do not even get time > > to meditate properly. Computers and internet are harming me a lot. So > > are Sanskrit schools, colleges and panchangas managed by me. Should I > > leave the world or should I get rid of worldliness in my attitude ? You > > know the answer. > > > > I had read the message of Mr Abhijit before you asked me to read. What > > you perceive as a token of my vindictive nature is really something > > else. I had decided to leave this forum, because I felt (perhaps > > wrongly) Mr Raj was being prompted by more than one member to get rid of > > me. This feeling was caused by total lack of any cause behind his > > uncivil attacks on me. Had Mr Raj been a not-so-knowledgeable > > astrologer, I would have ignored his outpourings. But I know he is not > > an ignorant fool, he acted deliberately. And he can never accept his > > fault (nor do I need his apology). I am not surprized, I know persons > > from their language. > > > > But I am really surprized at you : you know I tolerated even obscene > > abuses and never retorted in a hot language to that person. Why do you > > think me to be impatient and vindictive now ? I know most of the members > > in some internet fora do not want to test my software. They should > > never, that is all I can say. I am in no need of popularity and > > acceptance. I had told you that I did my duty by digitizing the ancient > > method and that is all. Those who do not value tests by IISc, NASA, etc > > will never believe in tests by lesser institutions or persons. For three > > years, my tenth house is going to be very bad, and I expect more and > > more of abuses & c. But 2nd and 5th houses are excellent and are helping > > me in my work. My Guruji was much more knowledgeable and influential > > than me, but he never tried to get his 60 books published. Why should I > > ??? > > > > -VJ > > ============== == > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vinay_ji, > > > > > > God has this habit, it seems. of sending distractions when the > > becomes strong! God is neither vindictive, nor out there to > > TEST all of us mortals, but just sends reminders as to what we should > > focus on and what we should try to ignore! > > > > > > Sometimes silence is golden and a sign of strength and not a weakness! > > Even for grihasthas like me! And certainly for others who have chosen a > > more difficult path. > > > > > > I would request you to read message # 117884, written by an > > even-keeled person, and perhaps lot younger than some of us :-) > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > <<<One must always retort!>>> > > > > > > > > I do not always retort, I retort only when I am in a mood to leave a > > group. As long as I see some meaningful dialogue, I tolerate even abuses > > from scoundrels. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > ================= === > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > One must always retort! As long as we walk through this mayavini > > reality, Vinay_ji! > > > > > > > > > > Like the story about the snake in scriptures reminds us! > > > > > > > > > > You see, while people go to Crusades over HOLY scriptures and what > > the moderators (some fora, this one excepted, so far!) consider as > > blasphemy and try to control for the sake of face-saving publicly to > > appease the majority as some sort of effort towards " HEALING " -- we > > forget that there is only one SOURCE that ALL must arise from and return > > TO. > > > > > > > > > > How else would the CIRCLE be...? > > > > > > > > > > ...called a CIRCLE! > > > > > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not care for abuses, but sometimes I feel I should retort, > > and if > > > > > > need arises I will ask my lawyer to book a few wrong doers who > > spoil > > > > > > civilized fora. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not against this label, because " Vedic Astrology " , in my > > view, is > > > > > > not the astrology according to the Vedas as some misguided > > persons want > > > > > > to stress, but the astrology propagated and practised by those > > who > > > > > > believe in Vedas and vedic culture in broad sense. The term > > " Indian > > > > > > Astrology " is improper, because the latter includes influences > > from > > > > > > outside sources such as Greek, Islamic, Tadjik, etc. At present, > > Jain > > > > > > astrology is not a separate trend. Hence, " Vedic Astrology " > > means > > > > > > 'indigenous astrology " of India. I, therefore, like to use the > > term > > > > > > " Vedic Astrology " myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > I used the label " so-called " because of a reason I would not > > have liked > > > > > > to explain in public fora. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have read many of your articles, but I am not able to live a > > settled > > > > > > life for two years. Hence, I have not been able to read all of > > you. I > > > > > > liked not only the content, but also the method you use. You are > > among > > > > > > the best living writers in this field. > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently, Central Govt has approved sufficient financial aid to > > the > > > > > > voluntary Sanskrit college controlled by me. I started a > > Gurukula also > > > > > > five months ago, and now my financial problems for the survival > > of this > > > > > > Gurukula are almost over. I have students who have memorized > > Panini's > > > > > > Ashtaadhyaayi by rote and are now learning higher things in > > Sanskrit and > > > > > > English. I never tried for any donations from any quarter, and > > used my > > > > > > own resources to run this ashrama (I did not save money in banks > > : God > > > > > > is helping me, perhaps). > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > =============== ==== > > > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without getting entangled in the 'duniyadari' of this thread, > > Jha_ji, > > > > > > I have always been somewhat concerned by these labels that > > Indian > > > > > > Astrologers have imposed on Jyotish! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hindu Astrology, Vedic Astrology, Vaidik Astrology, Indian > > Astrology > > > > > > ...! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When can we ALL come together and decide that Jyotish should > > be called > > > > > > simply JYOTISH! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps once it finds its original name, all these skirmishes > > and > > > > > > confusions decimate! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And they say: What's in a name! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Concerned : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Abhijit simply enquired about the " Vedic " way of > > calculating > > > > > > > > exaltation. It is a forum of " vedic " astrology, hence he was > > quite > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > in asking such a question. The methods used by so-called > > " vedic " > > > > > > > > astrologers are supposed to be vedic methods, whether these > > methods > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > inside or outside the Vedas. Mr Abhijit had not abused > > anyone to > > > > > > receive > > > > > > > > insulting remarks by Mr Raj Bhardwaj. The latter is on an > > abusing > > > > > > spree > > > > > > > > and needs some restraint. There are stringent cyber laws > > against > > > > > > abusive > > > > > > > > emails and there are programs to locate the sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Dear Vinay_ji, Please do not take this message as an attempt on my part to provoke you or challenge you or anything aggressive like that. You know that I am harmless as an ant (a peaceful ant!). One does not have to " leave " internet because that would be palayan, that psychologists call " denial " . Let us make our role model, The Lotus! You are a lot wiser and spiritually advanced than I can ever be, and way more intelligent! I will, therefore, not waste your time in elaborating further, ad nauseum! What I write is really not all that layered or complex, at least never felt that way when writing it. But then, I do not really know myself, being an ordinary worldly creature. Kind regards, Rohiniranjan vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > RR Da, > > Sorry. > > Om Shanti ! > > I am gradually gaining my former state of tranquility by getting out of internet fora one by one. > > -vj > ======================= ====== > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > Dear Vinay_jee, > > > > You are misunderstanding me! I never thought of you as vindictive or impatient. The message that I requested you to read was not Abhijit's but Atul Bhatia's! > > > > PEACE! > > > > RR_, > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> wrote: > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > God is not testing me, because now-a-days I am not performing any > > > particular saadhanaa excepting my normal routines of subsisting on one > > > meal of mere havishyaanna (no sals, spices, oils, etc), which is not > > > real saadhanaa as per my abilities. Now-a-days, I do not even get time > > > to meditate properly. Computers and internet are harming me a lot. So > > > are Sanskrit schools, colleges and panchangas managed by me. Should I > > > leave the world or should I get rid of worldliness in my attitude ? You > > > know the answer. > > > > > > I had read the message of Mr Abhijit before you asked me to read. What > > > you perceive as a token of my vindictive nature is really something > > > else. I had decided to leave this forum, because I felt (perhaps > > > wrongly) Mr Raj was being prompted by more than one member to get rid of > > > me. This feeling was caused by total lack of any cause behind his > > > uncivil attacks on me. Had Mr Raj been a not-so-knowledgeable > > > astrologer, I would have ignored his outpourings. But I know he is not > > > an ignorant fool, he acted deliberately. And he can never accept his > > > fault (nor do I need his apology). I am not surprized, I know persons > > > from their language. > > > > > > But I am really surprized at you : you know I tolerated even obscene > > > abuses and never retorted in a hot language to that person. Why do you > > > think me to be impatient and vindictive now ? I know most of the members > > > in some internet fora do not want to test my software. They should > > > never, that is all I can say. I am in no need of popularity and > > > acceptance. I had told you that I did my duty by digitizing the ancient > > > method and that is all. Those who do not value tests by IISc, NASA, etc > > > will never believe in tests by lesser institutions or persons. For three > > > years, my tenth house is going to be very bad, and I expect more and > > > more of abuses & c. But 2nd and 5th houses are excellent and are helping > > > me in my work. My Guruji was much more knowledgeable and influential > > > than me, but he never tried to get his 60 books published. Why should I > > > ??? > > > > > > -VJ > > > ============== == > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Vinay_ji, > > > > > > > > God has this habit, it seems. of sending distractions when the > > > becomes strong! God is neither vindictive, nor out there to > > > TEST all of us mortals, but just sends reminders as to what we should > > > focus on and what we should try to ignore! > > > > > > > > Sometimes silence is golden and a sign of strength and not a weakness! > > > Even for grihasthas like me! And certainly for others who have chosen a > > > more difficult path. > > > > > > > > I would request you to read message # 117884, written by an > > > even-keeled person, and perhaps lot younger than some of us :-) > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > > > <<<One must always retort!>>> > > > > > > > > > > I do not always retort, I retort only when I am in a mood to leave a > > > group. As long as I see some meaningful dialogue, I tolerate even abuses > > > from scoundrels. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > ================= === > > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > One must always retort! As long as we walk through this mayavini > > > reality, Vinay_ji! > > > > > > > > > > > > Like the story about the snake in scriptures reminds us! > > > > > > > > > > > > You see, while people go to Crusades over HOLY scriptures and what > > > the moderators (some fora, this one excepted, so far!) consider as > > > blasphemy and try to control for the sake of face-saving publicly to > > > appease the majority as some sort of effort towards " HEALING " -- we > > > forget that there is only one SOURCE that ALL must arise from and return > > > TO. > > > > > > > > > > > > How else would the CIRCLE be...? > > > > > > > > > > > > ...called a CIRCLE! > > > > > > > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not care for abuses, but sometimes I feel I should retort, > > > and if > > > > > > > need arises I will ask my lawyer to book a few wrong doers who > > > spoil > > > > > > > civilized fora. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not against this label, because " Vedic Astrology " , in my > > > view, is > > > > > > > not the astrology according to the Vedas as some misguided > > > persons want > > > > > > > to stress, but the astrology propagated and practised by those > > > who > > > > > > > believe in Vedas and vedic culture in broad sense. The term > > > " Indian > > > > > > > Astrology " is improper, because the latter includes influences > > > from > > > > > > > outside sources such as Greek, Islamic, Tadjik, etc. At present, > > > Jain > > > > > > > astrology is not a separate trend. Hence, " Vedic Astrology " > > > means > > > > > > > 'indigenous astrology " of India. I, therefore, like to use the > > > term > > > > > > > " Vedic Astrology " myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I used the label " so-called " because of a reason I would not > > > have liked > > > > > > > to explain in public fora. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have read many of your articles, but I am not able to live a > > > settled > > > > > > > life for two years. Hence, I have not been able to read all of > > > you. I > > > > > > > liked not only the content, but also the method you use. You are > > > among > > > > > > > the best living writers in this field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently, Central Govt has approved sufficient financial aid to > > > the > > > > > > > voluntary Sanskrit college controlled by me. I started a > > > Gurukula also > > > > > > > five months ago, and now my financial problems for the survival > > > of this > > > > > > > Gurukula are almost over. I have students who have memorized > > > Panini's > > > > > > > Ashtaadhyaayi by rote and are now learning higher things in > > > Sanskrit and > > > > > > > English. I never tried for any donations from any quarter, and > > > used my > > > > > > > own resources to run this ashrama (I did not save money in banks > > > : God > > > > > > > is helping me, perhaps). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > =============== ==== > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without getting entangled in the 'duniyadari' of this thread, > > > Jha_ji, > > > > > > > I have always been somewhat concerned by these labels that > > > Indian > > > > > > > Astrologers have imposed on Jyotish! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hindu Astrology, Vedic Astrology, Vaidik Astrology, Indian > > > Astrology > > > > > > > ...! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When can we ALL come together and decide that Jyotish should > > > be called > > > > > > > simply JYOTISH! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps once it finds its original name, all these skirmishes > > > and > > > > > > > confusions decimate! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And they say: What's in a name! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Concerned : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Abhijit simply enquired about the " Vedic " way of > > > calculating > > > > > > > > > exaltation. It is a forum of " vedic " astrology, hence he was > > > quite > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > in asking such a question. The methods used by so-called > > > " vedic " > > > > > > > > > astrologers are supposed to be vedic methods, whether these > > > methods > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > inside or outside the Vedas. Mr Abhijit had not abused > > > anyone to > > > > > > > receive > > > > > > > > > insulting remarks by Mr Raj Bhardwaj. The latter is on an > > > abusing > > > > > > > spree > > > > > > > > > and needs some restraint. There are stringent cyber laws > > > against > > > > > > > abusive > > > > > > > > > emails and there are programs to locate the sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Rohini Da, I do not care for dishonest philistine shopkeepers masquerading as Jyotishis, as well as for half baked astrologers who may be honest but are useless because they are satisfied with what they already know. A handful of sincere Jyotishis on internet prevents me from leaving it at once. It is another matter these sincere persons do not test my work, whatever be the reasons. I am still unable to make an all-platform version of Kundalee software, mainly because I have almost no time at present. -VJ ================= === vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani wrote: > > Dear Vinay_ji, > > Please do not take this message as an attempt on my part to provoke you or challenge you or anything aggressive like that. You know that I am harmless as an ant (a peaceful ant!). > > One does not have to " leave " internet because that would be palayan, that psychologists call " denial " . > > Let us make our role model, The Lotus! > > You are a lot wiser and spiritually advanced than I can ever be, and way more intelligent! I will, therefore, not waste your time in elaborating further, ad nauseum! > > What I write is really not all that layered or complex, at least never felt that way when writing it. But then, I do not really know myself, being an ordinary worldly creature. > > Kind regards, > > Rohiniranjan > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > RR Da, > > > > Sorry. > > > > Om Shanti ! > > > > I am gradually gaining my former state of tranquility by getting out of internet fora one by one. > > > > -vj > > ======================= ====== > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Vinay_jee, > > > > > > You are misunderstanding me! I never thought of you as vindictive or impatient. The message that I requested you to read was not Abhijit's but Atul Bhatia's! > > > > > > PEACE! > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > God is not testing me, because now-a-days I am not performing any > > > > particular saadhanaa excepting my normal routines of subsisting on one > > > > meal of mere havishyaanna (no sals, spices, oils, etc), which is not > > > > real saadhanaa as per my abilities. Now-a-days, I do not even get time > > > > to meditate properly. Computers and internet are harming me a lot. So > > > > are Sanskrit schools, colleges and panchangas managed by me. Should I > > > > leave the world or should I get rid of worldliness in my attitude ? You > > > > know the answer. > > > > > > > > I had read the message of Mr Abhijit before you asked me to read. What > > > > you perceive as a token of my vindictive nature is really something > > > > else. I had decided to leave this forum, because I felt (perhaps > > > > wrongly) Mr Raj was being prompted by more than one member to get rid of > > > > me. This feeling was caused by total lack of any cause behind his > > > > uncivil attacks on me. Had Mr Raj been a not-so-knowledgeable > > > > astrologer, I would have ignored his outpourings. But I know he is not > > > > an ignorant fool, he acted deliberately. And he can never accept his > > > > fault (nor do I need his apology). I am not surprized, I know persons > > > > from their language. > > > > > > > > But I am really surprized at you : you know I tolerated even obscene > > > > abuses and never retorted in a hot language to that person. Why do you > > > > think me to be impatient and vindictive now ? I know most of the members > > > > in some internet fora do not want to test my software. They should > > > > never, that is all I can say. I am in no need of popularity and > > > > acceptance. I had told you that I did my duty by digitizing the ancient > > > > method and that is all. Those who do not value tests by IISc, NASA, etc > > > > will never believe in tests by lesser institutions or persons. For three > > > > years, my tenth house is going to be very bad, and I expect more and > > > > more of abuses & c. But 2nd and 5th houses are excellent and are helping > > > > me in my work. My Guruji was much more knowledgeable and influential > > > > than me, but he never tried to get his 60 books published. Why should I > > > > ??? > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > ============== == > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Vinay_ji, > > > > > > > > > > God has this habit, it seems. of sending distractions when the > > > > becomes strong! God is neither vindictive, nor out there to > > > > TEST all of us mortals, but just sends reminders as to what we should > > > > focus on and what we should try to ignore! > > > > > > > > > > Sometimes silence is golden and a sign of strength and not a weakness! > > > > Even for grihasthas like me! And certainly for others who have chosen a > > > > more difficult path. > > > > > > > > > > I would request you to read message # 117884, written by an > > > > even-keeled person, and perhaps lot younger than some of us :-) > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > > > > > <<<One must always retort!>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not always retort, I retort only when I am in a mood to leave a > > > > group. As long as I see some meaningful dialogue, I tolerate even abuses > > > > from scoundrels. > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > ================= === > > > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One must always retort! As long as we walk through this mayavini > > > > reality, Vinay_ji! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like the story about the snake in scriptures reminds us! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You see, while people go to Crusades over HOLY scriptures and what > > > > the moderators (some fora, this one excepted, so far!) consider as > > > > blasphemy and try to control for the sake of face-saving publicly to > > > > appease the majority as some sort of effort towards " HEALING " -- we > > > > forget that there is only one SOURCE that ALL must arise from and return > > > > TO. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How else would the CIRCLE be...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...called a CIRCLE! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RR_, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini Da, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not care for abuses, but sometimes I feel I should retort, > > > > and if > > > > > > > > need arises I will ask my lawyer to book a few wrong doers who > > > > spoil > > > > > > > > civilized fora. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am not against this label, because " Vedic Astrology " , in my > > > > view, is > > > > > > > > not the astrology according to the Vedas as some misguided > > > > persons want > > > > > > > > to stress, but the astrology propagated and practised by those > > > > who > > > > > > > > believe in Vedas and vedic culture in broad sense. The term > > > > " Indian > > > > > > > > Astrology " is improper, because the latter includes influences > > > > from > > > > > > > > outside sources such as Greek, Islamic, Tadjik, etc. At present, > > > > Jain > > > > > > > > astrology is not a separate trend. Hence, " Vedic Astrology " > > > > means > > > > > > > > 'indigenous astrology " of India. I, therefore, like to use the > > > > term > > > > > > > > " Vedic Astrology " myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I used the label " so-called " because of a reason I would not > > > > have liked > > > > > > > > to explain in public fora. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have read many of your articles, but I am not able to live a > > > > settled > > > > > > > > life for two years. Hence, I have not been able to read all of > > > > you. I > > > > > > > > liked not only the content, but also the method you use. You are > > > > among > > > > > > > > the best living writers in this field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently, Central Govt has approved sufficient financial aid to > > > > the > > > > > > > > voluntary Sanskrit college controlled by me. I started a > > > > Gurukula also > > > > > > > > five months ago, and now my financial problems for the survival > > > > of this > > > > > > > > Gurukula are almost over. I have students who have memorized > > > > Panini's > > > > > > > > Ashtaadhyaayi by rote and are now learning higher things in > > > > Sanskrit and > > > > > > > > English. I never tried for any donations from any quarter, and > > > > used my > > > > > > > > own resources to run this ashrama (I did not save money in banks > > > > : God > > > > > > > > is helping me, perhaps). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > =============== ==== > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " rohinicrystal " > > > > > > > > <jyotish_vani@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without getting entangled in the 'duniyadari' of this thread, > > > > Jha_ji, > > > > > > > > I have always been somewhat concerned by these labels that > > > > Indian > > > > > > > > Astrologers have imposed on Jyotish! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hindu Astrology, Vedic Astrology, Vaidik Astrology, Indian > > > > Astrology > > > > > > > > ...! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When can we ALL come together and decide that Jyotish should > > > > be called > > > > > > > > simply JYOTISH! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps once it finds its original name, all these skirmishes > > > > and > > > > > > > > confusions decimate! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And they say: What's in a name! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " VJha " vinayjhaa16@ > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All Concerned : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Abhijit simply enquired about the " Vedic " way of > > > > calculating > > > > > > > > > > exaltation. It is a forum of " vedic " astrology, hence he was > > > > quite > > > > > > > > right > > > > > > > > > > in asking such a question. The methods used by so-called > > > > " vedic " > > > > > > > > > > astrologers are supposed to be vedic methods, whether these > > > > methods > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > inside or outside the Vedas. Mr Abhijit had not abused > > > > anyone to > > > > > > > > receive > > > > > > > > > > insulting remarks by Mr Raj Bhardwaj. The latter is on an > > > > abusing > > > > > > > > spree > > > > > > > > > > and needs some restraint. There are stringent cyber laws > > > > against > > > > > > > > abusive > > > > > > > > > > emails and there are programs to locate the sender. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.