Somanatha Mishra on Krishna Mishra's Navamsa

[Guest guest]

Namaste friends,

 

Many months back, Shanmukha defined Krishna Mishra navamsa based on the

teachings of his guru Sri Iranganti Rangacharya. Later, Pt Rath defined the same

chart as " Nadi navamsa " . I took an issue with that chart as it was non-uniform

(some signs appeared 12 times, some signs 9 times and some signs 6 times).

 

Based on my independent interpretation of Krishna Mishra's original Sanskrit

verse, I came up with a different interpretation. In that version, all signs

appear 9 times and yet reckoning is anti-zodiacal in even signs.

 

This interpretation was added to JHora 7.4 as " Uniform Krishna Mishra navamsa " .

Tables for all the 3 versions are given in the enclosed mail below.

 

* * *

 

I was pleasantly surprised today to find out that Somanatha Mishra (11th century

AD) gave an identical interpretation in his commentary " Kalpalata " . Please note

that Somanatha Mishra is the son of Krishna Mishra and probably learnt from his

father directly!

 

I was checking out the Telugu language commentary on BPHS by Sri Madhura

Krishnamurthi Sastri. When discussing Parasara's definition of navamsa, he

discussed " Jaimini " navamsa also. He mentioned Krishna Mishra's verse. It only

says that you count from the 9th sign in the case of fixed signs and go in

reverse for even signs. This can be interpreted differently. For example, to get

navamsas in Ta, Shanmukha counted from Cp (9th from Ta) and went backwards to

get Cp, Sg, Sc, Li, Vi, Le, Cn, Ge and Ta. This results in some signs appearing

too often and some signs appearing less often.

 

Somanatha's commentary called " Kalpalata " apparently leaves no ambiguity and

makes things *explicit*.

 

Somanatha's commentary apparently says [using iTrans notation] " meShasya tu

meShaadi, vR^iShasya tu kanyaadi, mithunasya tu tulaadi, karkiNo mInaadi " (For

Ar, from Ar. For Ta, from Vi. For Ge, from Li. For Cn, from Pi). Then Madhura

Krishnamurthi Sastri gave a full table of 9 navamsas in all 12 signs. That table

perfectly matches the table I independently constructed on 2009 Novemver 5 and

shared with lists:

 

> ---------------

> Uniform Krishna Mishra Navamsa (Narasimha)

> ---------------

> Signs - 9 parts mapped to

> ---------------

> Ar, Le, Sg - Ar, Ta, Ge, Cn, Le, Vi, Li, Sc, Sg

> Ta, Vi, Cp - Vi, Le, Cn, Ge, Ta, Ar, Pi, Aq, Cp

> Ge, Li, Aq - Li, Sc, Sg, Cp, Aq, Pi, Ar, Ta, Ge

> Cn, Sc, Pi - Pi, Aq, Cp, Sg, Sc, Li, Vi, Le, Cn

> ---------------

 

I am glad to know that Krishna Mishra's son thought the same way as I did. This

should resolve any confusion or doubt that may be in anybody's mind! I suggest

that anybody who is interested Krishna Mishra navamsa (aka Jaimini navamsa or

nadi navamsa) should study THIS version instead of the other one taught by

Shanmukha or Pt Rath.

 

This one is logical (all signs uniformly represented) and *explicitly* granted

by Krishna Mishra's son!

 

It is available in JHora as " Uniform Krishna Mishra Navamsa " . Regarding what to

see from this and what to see from Parasara's navamsa, I want to keep quiet for

now! But, please note that research using a correctly defined chart is far more

likely to give some credible results than research using a wrong chart!

 

Best regards,

Narasimha

-

Free Jyotish Software, Free Jyotish Lessons, Jyotish Writings,

" Do It Yourself " ritual manuals for short Homam and Pitri Tarpana:

http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

Films that make a difference: http://SaraswatiFilms.org

Spirituality:

Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings

-

 

JyotishWritings , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr wrote:

>

> Namaste Goel ji,

>

> > As you are updating the JH-hora ,I suggest that Nadi navamsa

> > may also be included. This will help further research which

> > is already initiated by Pt.Rath.

>

> Krishna Mishra navamsa or Jaimini navamsa defined by Shanmukha several months

back and Nadi navamsa defined now by Pt Rath are one and the same and already

included in JHora 7.33 as " Krishna Mishra navamsa " .

>

> If your proposal is that I should add MY independent interpretation of Krishna

Mishra navamsa (which I shared below), I can consider it. But please note that

it is different from the Nadi navamsa taught by Pt Rath in his presentation.

Nadi navamsa taught by Pt Rath is *already included* in JHora 7.33 as " Krishna

Mishra navamsa " .

>

> ---------------

> Parasara Navamsa

> ---------------

> Signs - 9 parts mapped to

> ---------------

> Ar, Le, Sg - Ar, Ta, Ge, Cn, Le, Vi, Li, Sc, Sg

> Ta, Vi, Cp - Cp, Aq, Pi, Ar, Ta, Ge, Cn, Le, Vi

> Ge, Li, Aq - Li, Sc, Sg, Cp, Aq, Pi, Ar, Ta, Ge

> Cn, Sc, Pi - Cn, Le, Vi, Li, Sc, Sg, Cp, Aq, Pi

> ---------------

>

> ---------------

> Shanmukha's Krishna Mishra Navamsa

> Rath's Nadi Navamsa

> ---------------

> Signs - 9 parts mapped to

> ---------------

> Ar, Le, Sg - Ar, Ta, Ge, Cn, Le, Vi, Li, Sc, Sg

> Ta, Vi, Cp - Cp, Sg, Sc, Li, Vi, Le, Cn, Ge, Ta

> Ge, Li, Aq - Li, Sc, Sg, Cp, Aq, Pi, Ar, Ta, Ge

> Cn, Sc, Pi - Cn, Ge, Ta, Ar, Pi, Aq, Cp, Sg, Sc

> ---------------

>

> ---------------

> Uniform Krishna Mishra Navamsa (Narasimha)

> ---------------

> Signs - 9 parts mapped to

> ---------------

> Ar, Le, Sg - Ar, Ta, Ge, Cn, Le, Vi, Li, Sc, Sg

> Ta, Vi, Cp - Vi, Le, Cn, Ge, Ta, Ar, Pi, Aq, Cp

> Ge, Li, Aq - Li, Sc, Sg, Cp, Aq, Pi, Ar, Ta, Ge

> Cn, Sc, Pi - Pi, Aq, Cp, Sg, Sc, Li, Vi, Le, Cn

> ---------------

>

> Best regards,

> Narasimha

>

> Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam

> Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana

> Spirituality:

> Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> Jyotish writings: JyotishWritings

> Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org

>

>

> --- On Thu, 11/5/09, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937 wrote:

>

> Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937

> Re:Nadi Navamsa

> JyotishWritings

> Cc: " P.V.R. Narasimha Rao " <pvr108

> Thursday, November 5, 2009, 11:06 AM

>

> Dear Narasimha ,

> I am convinced that you are right.

> BPHS adopts same methodology in D-30

> and D-60 charts.

> The following rules have ti be observed:

> 1, A sign is divided in nine equal parts

> 2. All 12 signs will have 108 navamsa

> 3. In a sign , no navamsa will be repeated

> 4. There will be of nine navamsa of each sign

> As such in even signs the order will be reversed,

> and division will be as under:

> Tauras ,Virgo , Capricorn-6,5,4,3,2,1,12,11,and 10

> Cancer , Scorpio , Pisces-12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,and4

>

> As you are updating the JH-hora ,I suggest that Nadi navamsa

> may also be included. This will help further research which is already

> initiated by Pt.Rath.

> Regards

>

> G.K.GOEL

> Ph: 09350311433

> Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR

> NEW DELHI-110 076

> INDIA

>

> " JyotishWritings " <JyotishWritings >

> JyotishWritings

> Thu, 5 November, 2009 6:54:28 PM

> [JyotishWritings] Digest Number 8

>

> Jyotish writings of P.V.R. Narasimha Rao

> Messages In This Digest (1 Message)

>

> 1.

> Krishna Mishra's Navamsa Verse (Re: Critique on Nadi Navamsa..)

Narasimha PVR Rao

>

> View All Topics | Create New Topic

> Message

>

> 1.

> Krishna Mishra's Navamsa Verse (Re: Critique on Nadi Navamsa..)

> Posted by: " Narasimha PVR Rao " pvr pvr108

> Wed Nov 4, 2009 9:05 am (PST)

>

>

> Namaste Souvik and others,

>

> > For those you are interested to read more, may refer to his articles

in his (Shanmukha's) blog.

> > http://sutramritam. blogspot. com/

> >

> > It is true that this is the same Navamsa referred to by Pt. Rath as

" Nadi Navamsa " .

>

> Absolutely. Though defined in slightly different language, both are

identical. The Krishna Mishra navamsa (or Jaimini navamsa) chart defined in the

articles of Shanmukha is absolutely *identical* to what Pt Rath introduced as

" Nadi navamsa " .

>

> * * *

>

> As I said, this is an asymmetric chart with different signs

represented unequally in it. Some signs appear 12 times, some 9 times and some 6

times, instead of all signs appearing 9 times overall. THAT makes no sense

whatsoever and is quite illogical, irrespective of the caliber of the scholars

who taught it. It tells you something is amiss.

>

> * * *

>

> It is possible that Krishna Mishra's verse quoted by Shanmukha is

misunderstood. As a Sanskrit scholar, I can certainly see it meaning the

following, which is slightly different from how Shanmukha interpreted it. But

that slight difference in detail changes the complexion completely and makes it

logical.

>

> My independent interpretation of Krishna Mishra's verse is as follows:

>

> " The nine parts of a movable/fixed/ dual sign are mapped to nine signs

starting from the 1st/9th/5th sign from it, respectively. The nine parts of the

sign are considered in zodiacal/anti- zodiacal order in odd/even signs,

respectively. "

>

> This is subtly different from the standard interpretation that

Shanmukha went with, but note how it changtes the equation. The second Krishna

Mishra verse given by Shanmukha also says that amsas in even rasis are reckoned

anti-zodiacally, but it does not say the mapped signs are reckoned

anti-zodiacally. So my interpretation fits with both the verses.

>

> Let me show how this changes the mapping, using an example:

>

> The nine parts of Ar reckoned zodiacally go into the nine signs

starting from Ar, i.e. Ar, Ta, .., Sc, Sg.

>

> The nine parts of Ta reckoned anti-zodiacally within Ta go into the

nine signs starting from Cp, i.e. Cp, Aq, ..., Le, Vi. In other words,

26Ta40-30Ta00 goes to Cp, 23Ta20-26Ta40 goes to Aq, 20Ta00-23Ta20 goes to Pi,

...., 3Ta20-6Ta40 goes to Le and 0ta0-3Ta20 goes to Vi.

>

> Then the nine parts of Ge are reckoned zodiacally again and mapped to

the nine signs starting Li, i.e. Li, Sc, ..., Ta, Ge.

>

> The nine parts of Cn reckoned anti-zodiacally within Cn go into the

nine signs starting from Cn, i.e. Cn, Le, ..., Aq, Pi. In other words,

26Cn40-30TCn00 goes to Cn, 23Cn20-26Cn40 goes to Le, 20Cn00-23Cn20 goes to Vi,

...., 3Cn20-6Cn40 goes to Aq and 0Cn0-3Cn20 goes to Pi.

>

> And so on.

>

> * * *

>

> Such an interpretation of Krishna Mishra's Sanskrit verse is certainly

tenable. And, it does not *bias* the chart towards some signs like the standard

interpretation. All signs appear exactly 9 times in the list of 108 navamsas.

THAT would be logical.

>

> To find amsas in Ta in standard interpretation, we are starting from

Cp and going in reverse and mapping the nine parts of Ta (0Ta0-3Ta20,

3Ta20-6Ta40, 6ta40-10Ta0 etc) to Cp, Sg, Sc etc. It results in some signs

repeated too many times and some signs missing out.

>

> In my interpretation, the signs mapped to are Cp, Aq, Pi etc as in

Pararsara's navamsa, but the parts within the sign that are mapped to these

signs are reversed in order (26Ta40-30Ta0, 23Ta20-26Ta40, 20Ta0-23Ta20 etc).

>

> This small twist, which is perfectly tenable with Krishna Mishra's

language, makes things far more logical. You do not want a navamsa chart in

which not all signs appear 9 times in the list of 108 navamsas!

>

> * * *

>

> I wasn't sure why I felt compelled to write a critique on this topic.

I just followed my inner inspiration faithfully, even without understanding why

that action was required. NOW, I think I understand why I was inspired to get

into this. The inner inspiration now tells me that my dharma with topic is

finally fulfilled and I can move on...

>

> Best regards,

> Narasimha

> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam

> Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana

> Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom

> Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net

> Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org

> Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings

> Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org

> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

>

> ---- Souvik Dutta <explore_vulcan@ > wrote:

> > Dear PVNR=ji,

> >

> > Thanks for sharing.

> >

> > The young talent and the co-author of JHora from the last version,

Shanmukha has written a beautiful article on this Navamsa (aka Krishna Mishra

Navamsa, Jamini Navamsa by Sri Irangati Ranganacharya) .

> >

> > Provided below are the links to his articles published in SA.

> >

> > http://www.scribd. com/doc/19874893 /Jaimini- Navamsa-Part- 1-NI

> > http://www.scribd. com/doc/19183735 /30True-Jaimini-

Navamsa-Revealed -2

> >

> > For those you are interested to read more, may refer to his articles

in his (Shanmukha's) blog.

> > http://sutramritam. blogspot. com/

> >

> > It is true that this is the same Navamsa referred to by Pt. Rath as

" Nadi Navamsa " .

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> > jhora , Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Namaste,

> > >

> > > > In other words, some signs come more than some other signs in

this

> > > > chart. In all the divisional charts defined by rishis and

classics,

> > > > we see all signs getting equal coverage overall. In D-9

sequence,

> > > > all signs appear 9 times; in D-10 sequence, all signs appear 10

> > > > times; and so on. Pt Rath's D-9 sequence is illogical.

> > > >

> > > > Krishna Mishra Navamsa also has jumps in it, but it is better

> > > > structured with logical jumps in such a way that all signs get

> > > > equal coverage overall.

> > >

> > > I had in mind " Kaalachakra navamsa " , which has a few specific

kinds of jumps, but ended up mis-typing " Krishna Mishra Navamsa " . My apologies.

> > >

> > > In fact, the new navamsa chart christened by Pt Rath as " Nadi

Navamsa " is nothing but Krishna Mishra navamsa already available in Jagannatha

Hora software!

> > >

> > > BTW, my assertion about " all the divisional charts defined by

rishis " has two exceptions - hora chart that has only Cn and Le and trimsamsa

chart that skips Cn and Le. Even in those charts, all the signs *appearing* in

the chart have an equal probability. It is only in this new navamsa chart

defined by Pt Rath that some signs are more likely than others. For example, a

planet is twice as likely to be in Sg or Ge than in Vi or Pi.

> > >

> > > Best regards,

> > > Narasimha

> > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam

> > > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/

tarpana

> > > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom

> > > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net

> > > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org

> > > Jyotish writings: http://groups. / group/JyotishWri tings

> > > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org

> > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> > >

> > > ---- Narasimha PVR Rao <pvr@> wrote:

> > > > Namaste,

> > > >

> > > > Someone sent me a link to Pt Sanjay Rath's multimedia

presentation on " Nadi Navamsa " and asked for my comments. You can access the

presentation at:

> > > >

> > > > http://www.sohamsa. com/dbc/nadinava msha/

> > > >

> > > > I will share my critique on it.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Definition

> > > >

> > > > Chandra Kala Nadi verse 5753 in book 3 defines navamsa as

follows: " In Ar, Le and Sg, start from Ar. In Cp, Ta and Vi, start from Cp. In

Li, Aq and Ge, start from Li. In Cn, Sc and Pi, start from Cn. "

> > > >

> > > > There is absolutely no indication in the verse of going

anti-zodiacally in any of the above cases and only the start sign is mentioned.

So, by default, it must mean we start from the given sign and go zodiacally.

This is just the regular Parasara navamsa! In other words, the nadi verse quoted

by Pt Rath merely defines Parasara's navamsa. In fact, Santhanam's translation

interprets it the same way, i.e. consistent with Parasara's navamsa!

> > > >

> > > > Now, Pt Rath says that you go anti-zodiacally for even signs

because they have female energy. That is not mentioned by Nadi. That is his own

extrapolation. Moreover, this sequence is quite oddly constructed:

> > > >

> > > > Ar Ta Ge Cn Le Vi Li Sc Sg : Cp Sg Sc Li Vi Le Cn Ge Ta : Li Sc

Sg Cp Aq Pi Ar Ta Ge : Cn Ge Ta Ar Pi Aq Cp Sg Sc : Ar Ta Ge ...

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Badly Structured

> > > >

> > > > Unlike other navamsa variations (and various other divisional

charts for that matter), the distribution across the twelve signs is *unequal*

in Pt Rath's " Nadi Navamsa " mapping:

> > > >

> > > > Ar - 9 times, Ta - 12 times, Ge - 12 times, Cn - 9 times,

> > > > Le - 6 times, Vi - 6 times, Li - 9 times, Sc - 12 times,

> > > > Sg - 12 times, Cp - 9 times, Aq - 6 times, Pi - 6 times

> > > >

> > > > In other words, some signs come more than some other signs in

this chart. In all the divisional charts defined by rishis and classics, we see

all signs getting equal coverage overall. In D-9 sequence, all signs appear 9

times; in D-10 sequence, all signs appear 10 times; and so on. Pt Rath's D-9

sequence is illogical.

> > > >

> > > > If navamsas go from Ar to Sg in Ar and they pretty much cover

the same signs backwards in Ta, what is the need to go just one sign up to Cp

and then start coming backwards? What is the jump from Ta to Li? Krishna Mishra

Navamsa also has jumps in it, but it is better structured with logical jumps in

such a way that all signs get equal coverage overall.

> > > >

> > > > The chart invented by Pt Rath is essentially a badly structured

chart that is NOT granted by any classic. Pt Rath seems to have come up with it,

in order to solve a mystery that simply does not exist in my view. It is

structurally very weak and illogical and not in the same league as the other

charts we have seen before.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Motivation

> > > >

> > > > The whole research is motivated by a verse in Chandra Kala Nadi.

Verse 2115 in book 1 can litereally be translated as: " if Sun is in debilitated

amsa and Taurus, the second dasa will give thread ceremony. "

> > > >

> > > > Pt Rath notes that a planet in Taurus cannot be in Libra navamsa

and comes up with a new navamsa chart calculation to allow that. However, there

are several possible interpretations of the verse without having to design a new

chart:

> > > >

> > > > (1) Amsa does not mean navamsa, but a different divisional chart

(e.g. dwadasamsa, vimsamsa etc).

> > > > (2) The verse means that Sun in Li amsa and Sun in Ta amsa, give

thread ceremony in the 2nd dasa. In other words, Sun has to be in a Venusian

amsa. This is certainly a tenable interpretation.

> > > > (3) Kalachakra navamsa, which can be derived from the Kalachakra

dasa tables given by Parasara, allows Li navamsa in Ta! As you go across the

zodiac from Ar to Pi and take 9 navamsas in each, the 12x9=108 navamsas go as

Ar, Ta, ..., Aq, Pi; Sc, Li, ..., Cp, Sg; Ar, Ta, ..., Aq, Pi; Sc, Li, ..., Cp,

Sg; and so on. Thre nakshatras give navamsas (3x4=12) in the savya chakra

(zodiacal cycle) and three nakshatras give navamsas in apasavya chakra

(anto-zodiacal cycle) and so on. This way, navamsas in Ta will be Cp, Aq, Pi,

Sc, Li, Vi, Cn, Le, Ge. So Li navamsa comes in Ta!

> > > > (4) There is an error in the manuscripts as Santhanam suspected.

> > > >

> > > > Given different ways in which the verse can be explained, there

is no real motivation to come up with whole new calculations just to explain it.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Example - Abraham Lincoln

> > > >

> > > > He died in Saturn-Saturn antardasa. Pt Rath questions how Saturn

in navamsa lagna could have killed him.

> > > >

> > > > One wonders why he is seeing death from navamsa. He says death

is an internal thing and not an external thing. Because of his theory that

internal things are seen from nadi navamsa (i.e. his newly created chart) and

external things are seen from Pararsara navamsa and because he wants to justify

death in Saturn dasa based on nadi navamsa but not Parasara navamsa, he makes

death into an internal thing and not an external thing.

> > > >

> > > > But death is internal *as well as* external. After all, it's not

like the world does not know it when one dies!!

> > > >

> > > > Actually, forget navamsa, which is not really the chart of

death. Take rasi chart, the chart of physical body. It must surely show death.

Saturn is lagna lord in a quadrant. Why did he kill? It makes no sense.

> > > >

> > > > Lincoln has two planets in lagna, while Moon is in an inimical

sign in 12th. Lagna is much stronger than Moon. Thus, Vimsottari dasa from lagna

is far more appropriate for him. Parasara never said dasas are only from Moon's

star. They can be from the star of Moon or lagna. Based on lagna Vimsottari,

which is far far more appropriate here, Mercury dasa started in 1965 February

and he died 2 months later. Mercury is the 8th lord in lagna with 7th lord. He

is a maraka using classical rules of Parasara. So Lincoln died as soon as a

classical maraka dasa started.

> > > >

> > > > Instead of making lagna lord of rasi chart (Saturn) a maraka

simply because he is in the 7th house in a newly constructed chart, let us stick

to simple principles and accept 8th lord in lagna with 7th lord (Mercury) as a

maraka, irrespective of navamsa.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Example - A.R. Rahman ( " Jai ho " composer)

> > > >

> > > > Indian composer A.R. Rahman became popular in the Dwisaptati

sama dasa of Mars (1998-2007). Pt Rath asked why Mars made him so successful

despite being in the 8th house in navamsa. He pointed out that Mars in 10th

house in nadi navamsa and said that explains his " siddhi " .

> > > >

> > > > Questions arise: What does he mean by siddhi, which he says is

" internal " and hence seen in nadi navamsa? How does Pt Rath know that Rahman got

this siddhi in Mars dasa? If he is concluding it by externally looking at the

quality of his compositions or their success, isn't then this " siddhi " an

external thing? Why is it only internal? Why is this " siddhi " seen in navamsa

and not siddhamsa (D-24) or some other chart?

> > > >

> > > > Moreover, he is composing as well in Mercury dasa (since 2007).

In fact, his international fame (e.g. Jai ho from " Slumdog Millionnaire " ) came

in Mercury dasa. Mercury is 8th lord in 7th in both Parasara navamsa and " nadi

navamsa " . Why does he continue to maintain " siddhi " , compose well and increase

fame in this dasa?

> > > >

> > > > Now, let us simply address the basic question - why this success

in Mars dasa?

> > > >

> > > > Though Mars is in 8th in Parasara navamsa, he is lagna lord.

Lagna lord in 8th can give sudden rise. Navamsa is the chart of poorvapunya.

Lagna lord is always beneficial. So his poorvapunya gives him sudden and

unexpected rise. In rasi, Mars is the 6th lord in 8th with 12th lord. This is

VRY and shows rising to great heights after suffering. VRY does not necessarily

show getting " undeserved " success after someone dies as Pt Rath said in the

presentation. It shows rising to great and unexpected heights after suffering.

> > > >

> > > > In any case, dasamsa is the real chart for this. In D-10, Mars

is 10th and 5th lord and a yogakaraka. He is in keertipada (A5). Though he is in

8th, yogakaraka in 8th gives sudden fame and sudden rise.

> > > >

> > > > Success in Mars dasa makes sense without resorting to nadi

navamsa.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Example - Rabindranath Tagore

> > > >

> > > > He questions how Jupiter can kill, because he is lagna lord in

12th in navamsa. With his " nadi navamsa " , Jupiter is 2nd and 5th lord in 2nd. He

says that explains death in Jupiter-Jupiter dasa.

> > > >

> > > > However, death cannot be justified just based on navamsa. Rasi

chart must show it. Jupiter is the lagna lord exalted in 5th. How can his dasa

and antardasa give death? Obviously, he is using a wrong dasa to see death.

> > > >

> > > > Pt Rath used Dwisaptati sama dasa for Rahman and not Vimsottari.

So he does use conditional dasas when they are applicable? Why doesn't he then

use Sataabdika dasa here, as lagna is in vargottama??

> > > >

> > > > If we use Lagna Sataabdika dasa for vargottama lagna, we see

that Saturn-Venus antardasa killed him. Saturn is a malefic in an inimical sign

aspecting 8th house and 3rd house, while Venus is the 8th lord in 2nd and

aspecting 8th. This fits Parasara's criteria for marakatwa very well.

> > > >

> > > > Let us not ignore the true marakas associated with the 8th house

and convert lagna lord of rasi chart exalted in the 5th house into a maraka,

simply because he is in the 2nd house in a new chart.

> > > >

> > > > Even wife's death is clear. Jupiter is the 7th lord from the

arudha pada of 7th lord and his Sataabdika dasa killed wife. Antardasa was that

of Sun, who is a malefic in 3rd with Rahu.

> > > >

> > > > As for his Nobel prize, Mars-Saturn gave it as per lagna

Sataabdika dasa. In D-10, Mars is yogakaraka in 11th aspecting 5th. Saturn is

7th lord with 5th lord Jupiter and exchanges results. So both the planets are

associated with 5th. If we do not insist on seeing the events from navamsa and

use the correct chart (D-10), it makes good sense. In any case, Pt Rath did not

really have any convincing logic using nadi navamsa.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Nadi navamsa, Nadis and Chakras

> > > >

> > > > Simply because he " sees " a mystery in a " nadi " text and " solves "

it by defining a new chart, he seems to jump to the conclusion that this chart

shows internal " nadis and chakras " and death. He never justifies why this chart

should show " nadis and chakras " , though he makes that assertion several times.

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Internal vs External

> > > >

> > > > After saying that Parasara navamsa shows external things and

nadi navamsa shows internal things, he shows how Parasara navamsa does not

explain Knighthood and Nobel prize in Tagore's chart and how nadi navamsa shows

it. He explains it saying " you get recognition for what *you* do and not what

somebody else does " and thus makes recognition into an internal thing. This

blurs the distinction between internal and external. On one hand, he says

" manifestation of the entire external world is from Parasara's navamsa " and yet

says Knighthood and Nobel cannot be seen in it because they are internal siddhis

and nadi navamsa shows them better.

> > > >

> > > > To put it bluntly, he is all over the place and really offers no

clarity on what constitutes internal things and what constitutes external

things, what should be seen in which navamsa chart.

> > > >

> > > > Even his assertion that apamrityu is not death but death like

suffering and his effort to divide mrityu and apamrityu as internal and external

things and separate them out into the 2 charts is illogical. Apamrityu can mean

either death like suffering or an unnatural death. Whether someone had an

apamrityu or mrityu, it is an internal *and* external event. World sees it, it

affects how one interacts with the world and it affects one internally. The

effort to these classify things into internal vs external things is illogical.

> > > >

> > > > When trying to see Tagore's external recognition in nadi

navamsa, because Pt Rath somehow considers it an " internal " event, he explains

why the antardasa of Venus - 12th lord in 12th - gave the recognition, saying

that the recognition was " from abroad " . He then goes on to say, " from now

onwards remember that 12th house is not bad. It can give recognition " . The 12th

lord in 12th is a good combination, but nowhere did rishis say that it gives

recognition! With this kind of logic, anything can be justified. Contrast this

explanation with what I gave above based on D-10 and Sataabdika dasa!

> > > >

> > > > * * *

> > > >

> > > > Pt Rath is all over the place and inconsistent in his

characterization of internal vs external (his idea of things to be seen in

Parasara's navamsa vs his navamsa). He theorizes a lot in a very inconsistent

fashion. Above all, the chart constructed by him has some signs occurring too

often and some signs occurring less often. It is structurally very weak and does

not pass a sanity check of constructional stability. Such a structurally weak

chart that is not sanctioned by any classic can almost be ruled out from being

genuine.

> > > >

> > > > In my view, one has a higher chance of arriving at some genuine

knowledge, if one sticks to calculations given by a rishi and tries to figure

out the purpose of those calculations.

> > > >

> > > > Best regards,

> > > > Narasimha