Guest guest Posted May 27, 2008 Report Share Posted May 27, 2008 DWARAKANATHAN R 112, HABIBULLAH ROAD, TNAGAR, CHENNAI 17 27.5.2008 THIS EVENING I GOT A CALL FROM TATASKY BANGALORE, IN RESPONSE TO MY LETTER, A COPY OF WHICH I HAD SENT YOU AND TO ALL OTHER GROUPS. THE TATASKY MAN FIRST SAID THAT THE INDIVDUAL SUBSCRIBERS HAD BEEN INFORMED.OF THE DELINKING OF PODHIGAI. I SAID THAT IT IS A LIE SINCE NO SUBSCRIBER TO MY KNOWLEDGE HAS RECEIVED ANY INTIMATION. AND IF SO HE COULD HAVE SAID SO TO MY FIRST MAIL SENT DAY BEFORE YESTERDAY.IT IS THEREFORE AN AFTER THOUGHT. HE THEN SAID IT WAS PUBLISHED IN THE DAILIES. I SAID THIS WAS ALSO A LIE.. I SAID TATASKY HAD A SYSTEM OF INTIMATION TO SUBSCRIBERS BY MEANS OF " ALERT " IN THEIR DISHNET AND WHY WAS IT NOT ADOPTED.ON SUCH AN IMPORTANT CHANGE? HE HAD NO ANSWER. I TOLD HIM NOT TO EXPLAIN OR SAY ON PHONE BUT THAT HE MAY PUT EVERYTHING IN WRITING AND SEND IT TO ME UNDER HIS SIGNATURE BY POST, SINCE I INEND TO TAKE HIM TO COURT FOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, IF NOT CHEATING. HE ASKED ME IF HE COULD SEND AN E-MAIL. I SAID I WANTED A WRITTEN LETTER DULY SIGNED BY POST I TOLD HIM NOT TO TALK ANY FURTHER BUT INFORMED HIM THAT MORE THAN 5OOO MEMBERS OF OUR GROUPS ARE LYING IN WAIT GUNNING FOR HIS SCALP. I HAVE RECD A MAIL FROM ANOTHER MEMBER POINTING OUT THAT DD MUST BE INCLUDED IN ANY CABLE TV OPERATION AND IF IT IS TAKEN OUT WE MAY COMPLAIN TO THE GOVERNMENT FOR ACTION.BUT THAT WILL BE ONLY SECOND LINE OF DEFENCE. WE MAY HAVE TO SEEK REDRESS IN CONSUMER COURT AND/OR A CIVIL COURT. I FELT I SHOULD KEEP ALL OF YOU INFORMED. REGARDS YOURS SINCERELY DWARAKANATHAN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.