Guest guest Posted June 24, 2007 Report Share Posted June 24, 2007 Twelve is considered to be a sublime number by the mathematicians. In mathematics, a sublime number is a positive integer which has a perfect number of positive divisors (including itself), and whose positive divisors add up to another perfect number. 12 for example is sublime number, because it has a perfect number of positive divisors (6): 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12, and the sum of these is again perfect number: 28. There are only two known sublime numbers, 12 and 608655567023837898967037173424316962265783077335188597052832486051279 16 91264. Just two sublime numbers among the countless and infinite groups of integers.Mind boggling isn't it! All the names of Vishnu in the thousand are by themselves extra ordinary. When Vishnu Himself is far far beyond the ken of even Brahma the progenitor his names cannot but be supraliminal to us mere sentient beings. If we were to ask Parasara Bhattar which of the thousand is the very best name, he would say all and countless more in his patented style. It comes as no surprise that corresponding to the mathematical sublimity of the number, the twelth name Muktaanaam paramaa gatih is sublime. It forced the peerless Bhattar to extend himself when he set about elucidating the esoteric meanings hidden in that name,in his magnum opus Bhagavad guna darpana. In " Vishnu Sahasranama with Bashya of Sri Parasara Bhattar, English translation by Prof. A. Srinivasa Raghavan " published in 1983 by Visishtadvaita Pracharani Sabha fourteen pages, 118 to 131, the maximum among thousand, were needed to explain the import of Muktaanaam paramaa gatih. A sublime explanation on a sublime name of a sublime number by a sublime preceptor in a sublime language translated to a decidedly non sublime tounge: 12. The next name says that He, who is thus the Supreme Seshi; (Master) of all, is the highest goal. Muktaanaam paramaa gatih:— He who is the Supreme goal for all the Released Souls (Muktas). They are called the Released Souls who once for all and completely are free from the enshrouding coverings which are the results of the bondage of the Primordial Matter, nescience, latent impressions of actions and their fruitions. Here are some passages from the scriptures :— " (The upasaka) casts off his merits and sins (Punya and papa). " " Ever as a horse shakes its hair (to get rid of the dust) he casts off his sins. " " Shaking off the merits and sins " . " Then the learned upasaka becomes freed from name and form " " When he realises God, he is released from all bonds. " " The knot binding the heart is cut. " " They cross this Maya (i.e.Samsara)-(Gita). SriNarayanaiya (Mahabharata) teaches :— " Those, who are bereft of the seventeen qualities and actions, give up the fifteen 'Kalas' (or lores.) and become Released Souls. This is certain. " Note : Seventeen qualities—Five Elements, five Gnanendriyas, five Karmendriyas, mind and time. The sixteen parts (Kalas) are mentioned in the Prasnopanishad. It has been established in the Scriptures that those, who have been freed from all the shackles of Samsara attain equality with Paramatma, the Supreme Soul, in regard to the essential nature which is full of unlimited knowledge and Bliss, in regard to the eight qualities beginning with ''being devoid of all sins " and ending with " unfailing will " and also in regard to the enjoyment of Beatitude. " Witnessing the desired objects through his celestial eye and mind, he is happy. " " Becoming devoid of all sins. he attains utmost equality with the Lord. " " They attain a state of equality with me (like Myself in regard to the possession of auspicious qualities). " " Badarayana affirms that there is no contradiction between the two statements that the Mukta's essential nature is knowledge only and that they are endowed with many qualities.This is because of earlier statements according to which the pure soul is bereft of all blemishes, and full of auspicious qualities. " It is further established that the Released Souls attain a similarity with Paramatma even in regard to their bodies which are composed of unmixed and supreme Sattva-guna. (Suddha-Sattva). " He becomes one, (he becomes twofold). " " He eats,plays and enjoys. " " He enjoys whatever he desires, assumes whatever form he wants and follows (The Lord). " " The fragrance of Brahman enters into him " " The taste of Brahman enters Into him. " " The celestial damsels adorn him with the decorations of the Brahman Itself. " " Badarayana holds the view that the Released Souls are in two forms (i.e. with a body or without a body as they like). It is like the Soma Sacrifice, 'Dvadasaaha' by name, which is to be done for twelve days and which is of two kinds (either with one master or many masters) or (either for prosperity or for progeny.) Here the word 'muktaanaam' used in the plural number shows clearly that the Released souls are many and are different from one another. So do the Scriptures declare. " All become free by the grace of the Paramapurusha. " " The worshippers of Paramapurusha become great and attain the Transcendent world of Bliss (Paramapada). " " They attain a state of equality with Me in regard to the possession of auspicious qualities like Myself. " " They attain me. " As it is stated here itself that''He is a witness (Saak- shee— names 15 and 517) and that He is the object of attain- ment by the Muktas (Released Souls), it is clear that there is difference between Bhagavan and Released Souls. So do the Scriptures declare. " When the upasaka sees the Lord as being pleased with him and also realises His greatness, he becomes bereft of all sorrow. " " When he understands that the Atma (Individual Soul) (which is driven about) and He Paramatma, (who drives him) are different. " " The Released Soul attains the Paramapurusha. " " The Released Soul enjoys all bliss along with the omni- scient Brahman. " " He attains ths Lord of Supreme Effulgence. " " It is stated that Paramatma is attained by the Released Soul. " It is also clearly stated in Mokshadharma (Mahabharata): " He is Lord Narayana and He must be known as the Supreme Purusha and the Inner Soul of all beings. Just as the lotus leaf is not tainted by water, He is not tainted by any dirt (i.e. blemish). He, who is the other, is known as Karmatma and is the victim of bondage and release. He becomes associated with all the seventeen (qualities). Note:—The seventeen qualities are: Five Karmendriyas, five gnanendriyas, five bhutas, mind and time. From all these, this theory is dispelled by the Sastras themselves, theory viz, that Brahman Itself, circumscribed by a real or unreal upadhi (i. e. a limiting adjunct) becomes a prey to the worldly miseries like the ether circumscribed in a vessel and that there is absolutely no difference in the State of Release between the Supreme Brahman and the released souls. Because of this absolute similarity between the Paramatma and the Jivatmas, statements like, " He who knows Brahman becomes Brahman Itself " which speak of non-difference between the two are reconciled with the other view that those two are different. This is in analogy with the statement " This is a cow " in regard to those which have broken horns or without horns. All the cows under the genus of cows are, called as such though there is an external difference- some having broken horns and some not so.In the case of those who say that there is non-difference, statements which affirm non-difference and which affirm similarity between Brahman and Jivas in the state of Release will contradict each other. Aupaadhika-bheda-vaadins (I.e. those who hold the view that non-difference is the truth and difference is caused by limiting adjuncts) accept that there is an end to the entity of the Mukta or Released Souls. In that case the state of Release will cease to be an object to be desired or longed for; again it will be against the statements that declare the existence of difference in the state of Release. The supreme similarity (between the Paramatma and the Mukta) which we have delineated has been described as non-difference. So (Abheda) the non-difference delineated in the Upanishads refers only to the similarity of the qualities and not to the non-existence of the entity of Mukta as such.) The Vishnupurana explains this as follows : " Tad-bhaava-bhaavam aapannah tadaa asau Paramaatmanaa Bhavati abhedee ... " tasya- pertaining to Paramatma; bhaavah— qualities like knowledge, strength etc, teshaam bhaavah - their manifestation; i.e,similarity of qualities. In the interpretation given by others, the second word 'Bhaava' would be purposeless. " This Mukta (Released soul) attains a nature which is similar to that of Paramatma. Then he becomes non-different from Paramatma. " The prohibition of difference in the state of Release has been indicated to be with reference to the adventitious conditions as gods and the like (by the same Vishnu Purana as follows)— There is no longer the difference in the form of gods and the like; that shroud (i. e. Karma, which has been concealing the similarity between the Jiva and the Paramatma) has been dispelled. This word 'gati' (in the name " Muktaanaam paramaa gatih " ) has at its end the suffix 'Ktin' in the sense of-the passive. 'Gatih means attainment. A word in the Accu- sative case (i.e. objective case) refers to an object which is most desired; and that is the goal of attainment. By this it is shown that the relationship between the Released Soul and Paramatma, the object of attainment, is that of servant and master The Vedic Mantras say: " Having attained the Supreme Soul (Paramatma) full of bliss. " " (The Mukta) follows Him " " By that path by which Paramatama moves, by the same path the Mukta goes with Him. This is similar to a young cow going after its calf or a calf following its mother-cow. " " Like the shadow of an object that goes with the object wherever it goes, " In the same manner (does the Mukta follow the Paramatma). It is from the Scriptures that we know about the existence of JiVatma and Paramatma. The same scriptures reveal that theJivatmais'sesha' or subordinate to Paramatma and that tills subjection is natural to him like knowledge and other qualities of his; and in the state of Release this attribute of subjection is not negatived. On the other hand because of the removal of obstruction, it becomes manifest. He becomes endowed with the form natural to him (which was concealed till now) " says (the Chandogya Upa nishad). Vishnu dharma also states : " Just as the radiance of a gem is not newly created (but only made manifest) when the dirt on the gem is removed by polishing, so too knowledge and other qualities of the soul become bereft of Karma. For knowledge and other such qualities are indeed quite natural to him (and are always there though latent at some times (i.e. in Samsara). " " Oh! the Ruler of Men! Knowledge and non-attachment riches and virtue all these fourqualities are eternally present in the Jivatma who is like Brahman Itself because of his similarity. " The Brahma Sutra also confirms this; " When the Mukta attains the Brahman, there is the manifestation of his essential nature which is his own. This is revealed by the use of the word 'svena' (his own) as an adjective qualifying the noun 'roopena' (his essential nature or form) " Here an objection is raised: " He attains independence " ; " He becomes a sovereign " , After quoting these texts, the independent status of a Mukta is established by the following Brahma Sutra; " For that very reason he has none as (his) lord. " Against all this how can it be said that he exists for the benefit of another and how can the undesirable state of a dependent be predicated about him ? Dunce! Don't become an object of ridicule. Here the import of the word 'ananya-adhipatitvam' (he, being without another master) is that He is under the control of Bhagavan only, who is His own Master. The domination of other things like distress and karma over the Mukta has been removed. This does not mean that he is an 'anaatha' (i. e. one without a master to save him). If that were the case, the word'anadhipathi' (which means 'without a master " ) would have been used,and not 'ananya-adhipatih (which means 'without another master'). In the case of a wife, being subiect to a greatlyloving husband is not loathsome to her; for we see that even kings and others are eagerly served and subserved by their sweet hearts and others when they do what is most pleasing to them. Again and again it has been indicated that it is the qualities that occupy a place of importance (and not any thing else). It has been established in the Brahma Sutras that the equality between the Paramatma and the Jivatma is only with reference to the enjoyment of Bliss and excludes the state of being the ruler on the one hand and the ruled on the other. " The Jivatma is like the Paramatma Himself except with reference to the activities regarding the Universe, viz. its creation, destruction etc " " There are clear indications to show that the equality of the Jivatma and Paramatma is only in the enjoyment of Supreme Bliss. " Here are the other texts in support of this view:- Sri Vishnu Tattva:—1. " The Mukta attains complete subjection to Paramapurusha. He gets rid of all bondage and attains unparalleled freedom. He enjoys all Bliss along with the Paramapurusha. " " With the Jivatma the state of being a property (that is possessed) rests and the state of being the owner or possessor rests with Paramatma. This is the relationship between the two. Nothing else appeals to me. " Sri Narayaniya (Mahabharata) " At the end of the observance of our vow, we saw men with highly auspicious qualities, white, bright like the moon and endowed with all lovely features. Their hands were joined in prayer at all times, and they were meditating upon the Brahman with their faces turned towards north east. " " With their hands joined in prayer thay are always happy and are always repeating the word 'namah' (which means salutations unto Thee) " . " They have Controlled the sense-organs, and remain without food. They do not perspire and are always sweet- smelling. " These and other such texts describe the residents of Sveta-dvipa (the Holy White Island) and say that they are endowed with divine features and the like, and they derive great pleasure in being the Servants of the Lord and in doing unceasing service to Him. The same is said to be the state and occupation of the Muktas or Released Souls. This is reiterated by the following text: " The best among the Bharatas! Those men who are released from here have the same characteristics as those who are the residents of Sveta-dvipa (The Holy White Island). By the use of the word 'paramaa' (highest) as an adjective qualifying 'gatih' (goal) (in the phrase 'paramaa gatih) it should be understood that there are some for whom the goal is of a lower order. Such a goal, which goes by the name of Kaivalya, is resorted to by those souls who are free from old age, death etc. (Sri Krishna says in the Gita)- ''They resort to me and make efforts to be devoid of old age and death, " It is stated that such a place of theirs (Kaivalya by name) is somewhere between samsara (material world) and Parama- pada (Transcendental word)- " That is the eternal world of those yogins who are satis- fied with enjoyment of the Bliss of their own individual soul. " ; . Such is the Supreme Goal of the Muktas. " He is the Highest means; He is the Supreme Goal. " " He who is the inner Soul of the universe and the highest goal " . " (They attain) Me, the unsurpassed Goal. " " He reaches the end of the road (i.e. Paramatma). " " There is nothing greater than the attainment of the(Supreme) Atman " . Texts like these can be easily got. This exposition on the sublime 12th name nearly covers the whole gamut of Visishtaadvaiata. -Dr. S.Sundar Rajan, Trichy , 24-06-07. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.