Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Unique Thoughts of PeriyAzvAr 41

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

THE IMPLICIT EXCLUSION

kulam pAzh paduthu

 

 

Sri PeriyAzvAr describes the killing of the rAvanA and his clan as

'decimating the clan'.'kulam pAzh paduthu..' 4-2-1 of PeriyAzvAr thirumozhi

 

If that is so, what will happen to the likes of Sri VibhIshanAzvan and his kins?They were not slain.

 

So the words should have been 'kulam pAzh paduthu-except Sri VibhEshnAzvAn'.

 

The commenator's role is not to just go on translate the meanings but also analyse the meanings thereon.

 

Sri VibhishanAzvan'a good nature and honest thinking made Him to surrender at the feet of PerumAL, withering off all his relations.

 

Therefore, he is never considred as the clan of rAkshasAs.

 

As Sri ANDAL says 'pollA arakkanai kiLLik kiLaindhAnai', Sri VibhIshanAzvAn though born of asura-yOni is a good demon.

 

Here, AzvAr mentions decimating the clan of bad natured arakkar-s. Sri PrahlAdhAzvAn and Sri VibhishanAzvAn are good arakkar-s.

 

Sri Nam AzvAr also spefies this as 'ilangai arakkar kulam murud thErtha pirAn'.

 

'PerumAL kai koNDu aruLinapOdhEa andha janmam mARip pOnadhiREA.' This is PeriyA jEyar vyAkyanam.

The instant Sri Chakravarhtith Thriumagan took him into His fold, the antecedence vanished.

 

'konRu thiriyum arakkarai kulam pAzh paduthu..' 4-2-1;

 

AdhalAl ivvidathil sonna arakkar rAvanAdhigaLu avaragaLaic chEarndhavargaLum. AdhalAl kulam pAzh paduthu ennak kuRai illai

Sri mAmunikaL

 

Therefore, here the word 'arakkar' includes rAvanan and his people (and not Sri VibhishanAzvan and his people)and so decimating the clan, despite Sri VibishanAzvan survival, is appropriate.This is the implicit exclusion.

 

Sri PeriyAzvAr thiruvadigaLEa charaNam.

Sri Periya JEyar ThiruvadigaLEa charanam

 

dasan

vanamamalai padmanabhan

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Mr.N.S.Padmanabhan,

I want to make an important

correction in this mail of yours.You have mentioned

that Ravana as Asura which is wrong.ASURAAS are

different from RAAKSHASAAS.ASURAAS are born of

PRAJAPATI MAHARSHI KAASYAPA , like DAITHYAS and

DAANAVAS.On the other hand, RAAKSHASAAS are born of

HETI and PRAHETI.Example: HIRANYAKASIPU was a ASURAA ,

and RAAVANA was a BRAHMARAAKSHASAA.

B.C.VENKATAKRISHNAN.

--- Padmanabhan Ns <aazhwar wrote:

 

> *THE IMPLICIT EXCLUSION*

> *kulam pAzh paduthu*

> **

> **

> *Sri PeriyAzvAr describes the killing of the rAvanA

> and his clan as *

> *'decimating the clan'.'kulam pAzh paduthu..' 4-2-1

> of PeriyAzvAr thirumozhi

> *

> **

> *If that is so, what will happen to the likes of Sri

> VibhIshanAzvan and his

> kins?They were not slain.*

> **

> *So the words should have been 'kulam pAzh

> paduthu-except Sri VibhEshnAzvAn

> '.*

> **

> *The commenator's role is not to just go on

> translate the meanings but also

> analyse the meanings thereon.*

> **

> *Sri VibhishanAzvan'a good nature and honest

> thinking made Him to surrender

> at the feet of PerumAL, withering off all his

> relations.*

> **

> *Therefore, he is never considred as the clan of

> rAkshasAs.*

> **

> *As Sri ANDAL says 'pollA arakkanai kiLLik

> kiLaindhAnai', Sri VibhIshanAzvAn

> though born of asura-yOni is a good demon.*

> **

> *Here, AzvAr mentions decimating the clan of bad

> natured arakkar-s. Sri

> PrahlAdhAzvAn and Sri VibhishanAzvAn are good

> arakkar-s.*

> **

> *Sri Nam AzvAr also spefies this as 'ilangai arakkar

> kulam murud thErtha

> pirAn'.*

> **

> *'PerumAL kai koNDu aruLinapOdhEa andha janmam mARip

> pOnadhiREA.' This is

> PeriyA jEyar vyAkyanam.*

> *The instant Sri Chakravarhtith Thriumagan took him

> into His fold, the

> antecedence vanished.*

> **

> *'konRu thiriyum arakkarai kulam pAzh paduthu..'

> 4-2-1;*

> **

> *AdhalAl ivvidathil sonna arakkar rAvanAdhigaLu

> avaragaLaic

> chEarndhavargaLum. AdhalAl kulam pAzh paduthu ennak

> kuRai illai*

> *Sri mAmunikaL*

> **

> *Therefore, here the word 'arakkar' includes rAvanan

> and his people (and not

> Sri VibhishanAzvan and his people)and so decimating

> the clan, despite Sri

> VibishanAzvan survival, is appropriate.This is the

> implicit exclusion.*

> **

> *Sri PeriyAzvAr thiruvadigaLEa charaNam.*

> *Sri Periya JEyar ThiruvadigaLEa charanam*

> **

> *dasan*

> *vanamamalai padmanabhan*

> **

> **

>

 

 

 

______________________________\

____

Be a better friend, newshound, and

know-it-all with Mobile. Try it now.

http://mobile./;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...