Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 SrI: Dear Members : For Your Information . V.Sadagopan - " Ram Anbil " <Ramanbil <shalu_holy; <andavan >; <lordsrinivasa >; ; <ramanuja >; Friday, May 30, 2008 12:37 PM RE: doubt on bhudha avataram > > Dear Swamin:It is said " avataaraa: asankhyEya: " meaning that the Avataras > taken by the lord are countless. > Over 48 Avataras have been identified of which 10 are considered to be > major ones (Dasa Avataras) while others are considered auxiliary avataras. > > Paancharaatra Samhita lists 39 avtaras. > Swami Desikan mentions " thirty and odd " in " Tattva Traya Chintana > Adhikaara " of his " Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram " > Most of these avtaras have been described in Paancha Raatra Samhita. > > The Puranic Buddha in question is called " Aadhi Buddha " and is found > described in Matsya PuraaNa (47.247), Bhaaagavta PuraaNa (1.3.24), > Bhavishya PuraaNa ( 3.1.6) and Agni PuraaNa (6). You may have to go > through the stories in the respective PuraaNas and the Paancha Raatra > Samhita, if you need greater details about this Pre-historic " Aadhi > Buddha " > > Thus, he is totally different from the Post-Puranic, " historical " Buddha > known as " Siddhaartha " and " Gautama Buddha " > > Hope this clarifies. > Dasoham > Anbil Ramaswamy > > > andavan ; lordsrinivasa ; > ; ramanuja ; > : shalu_holy: Wed, 28 May > 2008 05:27:16 -0700 doubt on bhudha avataram > > > > > > srimathe ramanujaya namaha > > namo narayana > > ananthakoti dhandangal to all bagavathas .In > srivaishnanavm.org i saw some writings about budha avataram > > In that its been told the budha avataram is not > goutama budha tht people are following now .its some other budha > .Bagavatham and many scriptures talk abt budha avataram.. > > My doubt is If it is not this goutama budha who is > tht budha ?I just dont want the name as mentioned in website . > > .If we are capable of telling he is not the one we > should also be able to tell who is that?? when he lived ??why he is > considered as lord avataram ..what leela's he did ?any pramanams for > telling he is not goutama budha..and also pramanams for the budha > mentioned . > > If we are not able to tell which budha he is ,when > he lived ?,wat he did ?,or any pramanams? ,we should not tell it is not > goutama budha with full confidence . > > I am not challenging anything here ..its my long time > doubt which is disturbing me . > > > adiyen > srisaila ramanuja dasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Namaskaram, Can you please give me the meaning/lyrics/audio link of Sri Srinivasa Gadyam...I have followed the links already given in the thread but coiuld not find the meaning. Hard that it wsa published/mentioned in 1940 by Tirupathi oriental Institute and the names of the raagams were not mentioned in the original txt. Is it correct? Warm regards Sudha --- " Dr. Sadagopan " <yennappan wrote: > SrI: > > Dear Members : For Your Information . > V.Sadagopan > - > " Ram Anbil " <Ramanbil > <shalu_holy; > <andavan >; > <lordsrinivasa >; > ; > <ramanuja >; > > Friday, May 30, 2008 12:37 PM > RE: doubt on bhudha avataram > > > > > > Dear Swamin:It is said " avataaraa: asankhyEya: " > meaning that the Avataras > > taken by the lord are countless. > > Over 48 Avataras have been identified of which 10 > are considered to be > > major ones (Dasa Avataras) while others are > considered auxiliary avataras. > > > > Paancharaatra Samhita lists 39 avtaras. > > Swami Desikan mentions " thirty and odd " in " Tattva > Traya Chintana > > Adhikaara " of his " Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram " > > Most of these avtaras have been described in > Paancha Raatra Samhita. > > > > The Puranic Buddha in question is called " Aadhi > Buddha " and is found > > described in Matsya PuraaNa (47.247), Bhaaagavta > PuraaNa (1.3.24), > > Bhavishya PuraaNa ( 3.1.6) and Agni PuraaNa (6). > You may have to go > > through the stories in the respective PuraaNas and > the Paancha Raatra > > Samhita, if you need greater details about this > Pre-historic " Aadhi > > Buddha " > > > > Thus, he is totally different from the > Post-Puranic, " historical " Buddha > > known as " Siddhaartha " and " Gautama Buddha " > > > > Hope this clarifies. > > Dasoham > > Anbil Ramaswamy > > > > > > andavan ; > lordsrinivasa ; > > ; > ramanuja ; > > : > shalu_holy: Wed, 28 May > > 2008 05:27:16 -0700 doubt on > bhudha avataram > > > > > > > > > > > > srimathe ramanujaya namaha > > > > namo narayana > > > > ananthakoti dhandangal to > all bagavathas .In > > srivaishnanavm.org i saw some writings about > budha avataram > > > > In that its been told the > budha avataram is not > > goutama budha tht people are following now .its > some other budha > > .Bagavatham and many scriptures talk abt budha > avataram.. > > > > My doubt is If it is not > this goutama budha who is > > tht budha ?I just dont want the name as mentioned > in website . > > > > .If we are capable of > telling he is not the one we > > should also be able to tell who is that?? when he > lived ??why he is > > considered as lord avataram ..what leela's he did > ?any pramanams for > > telling he is not goutama budha..and also > pramanams for the budha > > mentioned . > > > > If we are not able to tell > which budha he is ,when > > he lived ?,wat he did ?,or any pramanams? ,we > should not tell it is not > > goutama budha with full confidence . > > > > I am not challenging anything > here ..its my long time > > doubt which is disturbing me . > > > > > > adiyen > > srisaila ramanuja dasan > > " Knowledge increases in proportion to its use - that is, the more we teach the more we learn. " - H. P. Blavatsky, 1831-1891 Best Jokes, Best Friends, Best Food and more. Go to http://in.promos./groups/bestof/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Shall be OBLIGED If all the 39 or 48 avataram of the LORD can be stated for benefit of all of usWe all know of major 10 and a few more like Kapila Dhanvantri Hayagriva Annam etcThanks adiyen dasan On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Dr. Sadagopan <yennappan wrote: SrI: Dear Members : For Your Information . V.Sadagopan - " Ram Anbil " <Ramanbil <shalu_holy; <andavan >; <lordsrinivasa >; ; <ramanuja >; Friday, May 30, 2008 12:37 PM RE: doubt on bhudha avataram > > Dear Swamin:It is said " avataaraa: asankhyEya: " meaning that the Avataras > taken by the lord are countless. > Over 48 Avataras have been identified of which 10 are considered to be > major ones (Dasa Avataras) while others are considered auxiliary avataras. > > Paancharaatra Samhita lists 39 avtaras. > Swami Desikan mentions " thirty and odd " in " Tattva Traya Chintana > Adhikaara " of his " Srimad Rahasya Traya Saaram " > Most of these avtaras have been described in Paancha Raatra Samhita. > > The Puranic Buddha in question is called " Aadhi Buddha " and is found > described in Matsya PuraaNa (47.247), Bhaaagavta PuraaNa (1.3.24), > Bhavishya PuraaNa ( 3.1.6) and Agni PuraaNa (6). You may have to go > through the stories in the respective PuraaNas and the Paancha Raatra > Samhita, if you need greater details about this Pre-historic " Aadhi > Buddha " > > Thus, he is totally different from the Post-Puranic, " historical " Buddha > known as " Siddhaartha " and " Gautama Buddha " > > Hope this clarifies. > Dasoham > Anbil Ramaswamy > > > andavan ; lordsrinivasa ; > ; ramanuja ; > : shalu_holy: Wed, 28 May > 2008 05:27:16 -0700 doubt on bhudha avataram > > > > > > srimathe ramanujaya namaha > > namo narayana > > ananthakoti dhandangal to all bagavathas .In > srivaishnanavm.org i saw some writings about budha avataram > > In that its been told the budha avataram is not > goutama budha tht people are following now .its some other budha > .Bagavatham and many scriptures talk abt budha avataram.. > > My doubt is If it is not this goutama budha who is > tht budha ?I just dont want the name as mentioned in website . > > .If we are capable of telling he is not the one we > should also be able to tell who is that?? when he lived ??why he is > considered as lord avataram ..what leela's he did ?any pramanams for > telling he is not goutama budha..and also pramanams for the budha > mentioned . > > If we are not able to tell which budha he is ,when > he lived ?,wat he did ?,or any pramanams? ,we should not tell it is not > goutama budha with full confidence . > > I am not challenging anything here ..its my long time > doubt which is disturbing me . > > > adiyen > srisaila ramanuja dasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 SrI: Daer Srimathi Janaki: Here are the 39 AvatArams of the Lord : As background , there are 4 VyUha Roopams: VaasudEva , SankarshaNa , Pradhymna and Aniruddha VyUhams . From each of the VyUha Moorthys three avatArams ( UpavyUhams) happen : From VaasudEvan: Kesavan , NaarAyNan and Maadhavan From SankarshaNan : Govindhan , VishNu and Madhusoodhanan From Pradhyumnan : Thrivikraman , Vaamana and Sridharan From Aniruddhan : HrusheekESan , PadhmanAbhan and DhAmOdharan These 12 are invoked in our Panniru Naamams ( Urdhva PuNDrams) : 18th ebook in the Sundara Simham series , (http://www.sundarasimham.org ) Some of the above VyUha and UpavyUha Moorthys are included in the 39 Vibhava avatArams of Para VaasudEvan as revealed by PaancharAtra Agamam : 1) PadhmanAbhan (2) SanathkumAran (3) Dhruvan (4) Anantan (5) SakthyAtmA , (6) Madhusoodhanan (7) Kapilan (8) ViSvaroopan (9) Vihangaman (10) KrODAtmA (11) BadabhAvaktran (12) Dharman (13) Hayagreevan (14) HAMSAN (15) Matsyan (16) Koorman (17) AmrutAharaNan (18) VarAhan (19) Nrusimhan (20) Raahujith (21) KaalanEmignan (22) PaarijAtaharan (23) DattAtrEyan (24) VaDapatra sAyee (25) Vaamanan (26) Trivikraman (27) Nara-NaarAyaNar (28) Hari (29) Naaradhan (30) Bhrudhu (31) Vrushabhan (32) Dhanvantri (33) VyAsan (34) PaatALa sayanan (35) ParasurAman (36) Raaman (37) BalarAman (38) KrishNan and (39) Kalki . Although VibhavaavatArams are many . hte daSaavatrams among them are special because of many mangaLams arose from those ten avatArams ( DasAvatAra StOtram in the Sundara Simham series: 15th ebook , http://www.sundarasimham.org Among these one roopam can transform into another ( Vaamanan into Trivikraman) . Some of them are not PoorNAvatArams like Raama . KrishNa , Nrusimha ; others are amsAvatArams like Kapilar , ParasurAmar et al. ParamaikAnthis do not worship amSAvatara Moothys . NamO Sri VaasudEvAya , V.Sadagopan - janaki janaki1958 Oppiliappan Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:51 AM Re: Fw: doubt on bhudha avataram Shall be OBLIGED If all the 39 or 48 avataram of the LORD can be stated for benefit of all of usWe all know of major 10 and a few more like Kapila Dhanvantri Hayagriva Annam etcThanks adiyen dasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 SrI: Daer Srimathi Janaki: Here are the 39 AvatArams of the Lord : As background , there are 4 VyUha Roopams: VaasudEva , SankarshaNa , Pradhymna and Aniruddha VyUhams . From each of the VyUha Moorthys three avatArams ( UpavyUhams) happen : From VaasudEvan: Kesavan , NaarAyNan and Maadhavan From SankarshaNan : Govindhan , VishNu and Madhusoodhanan From Pradhyumnan : Thrivikraman , Vaamana and Sridharan From Aniruddhan : HrusheekESan , PadhmanAbhan and DhAmOdharan These 12 are invoked in our Panniru Naamams ( Urdhva PuNDrams) : 18th ebook in the Sundara Simham series , (http://www.sundarasimham.org ) Some of the above VyUha and UpavyUha Moorthys are included in the 39 Vibhava avatArams of Para VaasudEvan as revealed by PaancharAtra Agamam : 1) PadhmanAbhan (2) SanathkumAran (3) Dhruvan (4) Anantan (5) SakthyAtmA , (6) Madhusoodhanan (7) Kapilan (8) ViSvaroopan (9) Vihangaman (10) KrODAtmA (11) BadabhAvaktran (12) Dharman (13) Hayagreevan (14) HAMSAN (15) Matsyan (16) Koorman (17) AmrutAharaNan (18) VarAhan (19) Nrusimhan (20) Raahujith (21) KaalanEmignan (22) PaarijAtaharan (23) DattAtrEyan (24) VaDapatra sAyee (25) Vaamanan (26) Trivikraman (27) Nara-NaarAyaNar (28) Hari (29) Naaradhan (30) Bhrudhu (31) Vrushabhan (32) Dhanvantri (33) VyAsan (34) PaatALa sayanan (35) ParasurAman (36) Raaman (37) BalarAman (38) KrishNan and (39) Kalki . Although VibhavaavatArams are many . hte daSaavatrams among them are special because of many mangaLams arose from those ten avatArams ( DasAvatAra StOtram in the Sundara Simham series: 15th ebook , http://www.sundarasimham.org Among these one roopam can transform into another ( Vaamanan into Trivikraman) . Some of them are not PoorNAvatArams like Raama . KrishNa , Nrusimha ; others are amsAvatArams like Kapilar , ParasurAmar et al. ParamaikAnthis do not worship amSAvatara Moorthys . NamO Sri VaasudEvAya , V.Sadagopan - janaki janaki1958 Oppiliappan Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:51 AM Re: Fw: doubt on bhudha avataram Shall be OBLIGED If all the 39 or 48 avataram of the LORD can be stated for benefit of all of usWe all know of major 10 and a few more like Kapila Dhanvantri Hayagriva Annam etcThanks adiyen dasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.