Guest guest Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 Dear Padmanaban swamin, It is well known that one of the reasons for Udaiyavar not giving a vyakyanam for Azhwar srisookthis is that people usually dont comment on a moolam which Udaiyavar already had commented. Thus Udaiyavar did not want to stop the divyanubhavams of his sishyas from pouring out as vyakyanams. If PVP swamin's commentary has to be the only commentary and all anubhavams should be revolving about it then it would mean that Swami Desikan had committed apacharam by writing Nigama Parimalam. Coming to the parrot episode. Swami Desikan in Sampradaya prakriya bhaagam of Srimad Rahasya Traya Saram mentions that he is a mere parrot who was taught to speak by Appullar. Appullar and Swami Desikan are Acharya purushaas belong to our Emperumaanaar Darsanam. So it is apt to mention the anubhavam of Uthamoor swami alluding to Desikan and Appullar. When Madhavakannan swami clearly mentions that he is giving us the divyanubhavams of Uthamoor swami, there is no reason for confusion. Those who feel that Uthamoor swami's vyakyanams are saampradayic would relish others would skip it. Dasan, Aravindalochanadasanudasan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.