Guest guest Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 PVP swami commentry: All acharya commentries are to be respected. I dont buy the statement that all vyakyanams got to revolve about PVP swami's vyakyanams ONLY. But it is not correct to mention an anubhavam without mentioning the vyAkyAtha's name. Madhavakannan swami had mentioned that he always refers to Uthamoor swami. So people who would like to stick only to PVP swami can skip it and there is no chance for them to get mislead. Further, I dont value the statement that PVP swami's commentry is the last authoritative word. There are many instances in chatusloki, Gadya vyakyanams where Swami Desikan and pointed his own difference of opinion with PVP swami. Since both the acharyas are udaiyavar thiruvadis it is not apt to say Swami Desikan's or PVP swami's words are the last. Respective sishyas would take their respective acharyan's vyakyanams. So all we need to do is mention the vyakyatha's name. Uthamoor swami seems to have merely mentioned Appullar and Desikan may be remembered in this instant. Now who has the right to stop Appullar praising Desikan? When there is no apacharam committed to any acharyas it is not correct to unnecessarily break the flow of anubhavams with posts with bad taste. regards, AG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.