FW: [detroit_gita] Forensic Evidence for Reincarnation

[Guest guest]

Forwarded for information

Moderator

 

vlaxmananTo: sonyskipdonna; mahadevan; jmahadevan; jvanah66; chirams; lakshmiparuchuri; lsateesh55; smurthy48187; vijaygari; ramanbilSubject: FW: [detroit_gita] Forensic Evidence for ReincarnationFri, 20 Nov 2009 17:15:05 +0000

detroit_gita ; detroit-rudhram (AT) googl (DOT) com; detroit_iskcon_devotees ; tmi-world (AT) googl (DOT) com; detroit_desi (AT) googl (DOT) comFrom: vlaxmananDate: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:11:03 +0000[detroit_gita] Forensic Evidence for Reincarnation

 

Dear All:If you follow some of the links given with the article on Darwin's theory, you find an interesting story about a doctor in India who is claiming that he has found Forensic evidence for reincarnation. I was able to copy and paste it. There is no date given here, expect what is in the article - circa 1992.http://www.hknet.org.nz/DarwinTheoryGoneApe.html#ForensicEvidenceofReincarnationVery sincerelyV. LaxmananP. S. Using this "logical" and "rigorous scientific" reasoning, if you are looking for your soulmate, check the handwriting. ***********************************************************************************Forensic Evidence of ReincarnationIs there a scientific basis for reincarnation? Indian forensic scientist Vikram Raj Singh Chauhan is trying to prove reincarnation is real. He has presented his findings at the National Conference of Forensic Scientists in India. www.unknowncountry.com Chauhan has discovered a six-year-old boy named Taranjijt Singh who says he remembers his previous life. According to his parents, he’s been talking about this since he was two years old and used to run away from home. The boy knew the village he lived in during his former life, as well as his and his father’s names. He knew the name of the school he attended as well. On September 10, 1992, he was riding his bike home when he was hit by a motor scooter. He received head injuries and died the next day. His present father, Ranjit Singh, says as the boy became more and more insistent, so he and his wife went to the village where he claimed to have lived in the past. At first, they couldn’t find anyone who resembled the descriptions of his former parents. Then someone told him to go to another nearby village, where they met a teacher at the local school who confirmed the story of the motor scooter accident. They found out where the boy had lived and went there to meet the parents. When they told the family their story, Ranjit Singh mentioned that his son claimed the books he was carrying when the accident occurred had gotten blood on them. He also described how much money he had in his wallet. When the woman heard this, she began to cry and said she had saved the blood-stain books and the money in memory of her dead child. Taranjit Singh’s parents and siblings from his former life soon came to his new home to meet him. The boy recognized a wedding picture his former parents brought with him. At first, Vikram Chauhan refused to believe this story but he eventually became curious and decided to investigate. He visited both villages and found the boy and both sets of parents repeated the same story. He spoke to a shopkeeper who told him that the boy had owed him the money that was in his wallet when he was hit, and was probably bringing it to him to pay for a notebook he’d gotten on credit. Chauhan took samples of both boys’ handwriting and compared them. He found they were identical. It’s a basic tenet of forensic science that no two handwriting styles can be identical, because each person’s handwriting has specific characteristics. Experts can usually spot even expertly forged handwriting. A person’s handwriting style is dictated by individual personality traits. Chauhan’s theory is that if the soul is transferred from one person to another, then the mind – and thus the handwriting - will remain the same. A number of other forensic experts examined the handwriting samples and agreed they were identical. "I have some scientific basis to claim rebirth is possible", says Chauhan, "but I wish to do more research on the subject and am closely monitoring the development of the child." Singh’s former parents wanted him to move back with them, but his current family still claims him, even though they are poor. Chauhan says, "In his present birth, Taranjit has never gone to school as he belongs to a poor family, but yet when I told him to write the English and Punjabi alphabet, he wrote them correctly."

 

vlaxmanan (AT) hotmail (DOT) comTo: detroit_gita ; detroit-rudhram (AT) googl (DOT) com; detroit_iskcon_devotees ; tmi-world (AT) googl (DOT) comSubject: Om Namasivaya- RE: [detroit_gita] Prabhupada on Darwin's TheoryFri, 20 Nov 2009 16:42:08 +0000Dear All:Here's the link to the full article on Darwin's theory and why it is inconsistent with Vedic scriptures. http://www.hknet.org.nz/DarwinTheoryGoneApe.html [evolution.jpg] 2005 The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International, on the web at http://www.krishna.com. Used with permission. Very sincerelyV. Laxmanan

 

detroit_gita From: vlaxmanan (AT) hotmail (DOT) comDate: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:37:29 +0000[detroit_gita] Prabhupada on Darwin's Theory

 

Dear All:I remember we have talked about this evolution stuff. Here's an article by Prabhupada. He dismisses Darwin by stating a simple fact from the scriptures. We Accept Evolution, but Not Darwin's Theory It is confirmed in Padma Purana that the species of life evolved from aquatics to plants, vegetables, trees; thereafter insects, reptiles, flies, birds, then beasts, and then human kind. This is the gradual process of evolution of species of life.His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada Los Angeles 9 March, 1970 Columbus, Ohio My Dear Hayagriva, Please accept my blessings. I beg to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 4 March, 1970, along with the edited copy of the Foreword to KRSNA. Thank you very much. The few alterations of dates is approved by me, so it is alright. Regarding your question do the Vedic histories refer to this planet only. No. Vedic history means of this universe. Our history begins from the beginning of the creation because the creation takes place with the birth of Brahma from the abdomen lotus flower of Lord Visnu. Then Brahma gradually creates. He begets so many sons known as Prajapatis who are supposed to be the generators of living entities, and therefore the history begins from Brahma. In the Bhagavad-gita this is confirmed in the 15th chapter. It is said there that the root of this big universal banyan tree is on the top; therefore history begins from the top. Yes. This planet comes later on. We can take the idea from the tree--the tree grows gradually, and the different fruits, branches, and twigs gradually appear. Therefore it is to be understood that this planet has grown later on. Besides this we understand that although the planet was later on grown up, it was covered with water--pralaya payodhi jalemerged into the water after devastation. Then gradually it emerges from water. That we can experience, that gradually land is coming out of the oceans. Because of its being merged into water, it is natural to conclude that the beginning of life was aquatic. This is confirmed in Padma Purana that the species of life evolved from aquatics to plants, vegetables, trees; thereafter insects, reptiles, flies, birds, then beasts, and then human kind. This is the gradual process of evolution of species of life. But we do not accept Darwin's theory. According to Darwin's theory, homo sapiens came later on, but we see that the most intelligent personality, Brahma, is born first. So according to Vedic knowledge, Darwin or similar mental speculators are rejected so far the fact is concerned. Very sincerely V. Laxmanan

--You received this message because you are d to the Google Groups "Detroit Rudhram" group.To post to this group, send email to detroit-rudhram (AT) googl (DOT) com.