Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Oru Mithuname Uththesyam - 4 - PBA Swami

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Sri:Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama: oru mithunamE uththEsyamBy Sri U Ve P.B. Annangarachariar Swami1963 An abridged translation by TCA Venkatesan 14. Even though Vedanta Desika, who is Kavitarkika Kesari, has made this so clear, there are some who either are confused that Piratti too can be the means or even when their confusionis removed, due to old habits, keep writing "mithunamE upAyam".Not stopping at that, they also said that it is this idea thatmade an acharya write "upAya vELaiyOdu bhOga vELaiyOdu vAsiyaRaoru mithunamE uththEsyam". 15. It becomes our duty to explain the truth to those who don't understand it. The divya sUkti "AshrayaNa vELaiyOdu bhOga vELaiyOdu vAsiyaRa oru mithunamE uththEsyam ennumidam solliRRAyiRRu" is present in Idu 36000padi Mahapravesham. The phrase used here is 'AshrayaNa

vELai' and not 'upAya vELai'. It has already been made clear in the passages above, how the divine couple are seeked during the time of surrender and howthey are seeked during the time of service. Vedanta Desikan'sdivine words have shown these very clearly. During the time ofsurrender, it is appropriate that She is seeked - not as the means but as the one who will mediate - where is the confusionhere? 16. Just as the divine couple are the target for service, as said in the second part of Dvayam, where is the issue in sayingthat they are the target when being seeked as well, as said in the first part. However, there is a difference. Seeking the Lord is done with Him as the means. Seeking Sri is done with Her as the mediator. This difference has been shown clearly byall acharyas including Desikan. To evade all that and to incorrectly use the Sri Sukti of Idu is unfair. -- The rest of the book has some additional comments and points outerrors in certain works of his time. A scanned copy of the original Tamil text is at:http://www.acharya.org/books/PBA/OruMithunam-PBA.pdf Concluded Azhvar Emberumanar Jeeyar Thiruvadigale Sharanam adiyEn madhurakavi dAsanhttp://www.acharya.org

Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thank YOu TCA svami, for taking up your time to enlighten us.

HOpe this crystal clear documetnation for posterity by the great doyen, the verstaile genius, the mahAvidhVAn, mAhamahOpAdhyAy, Sri PBA KAnchi svAmi,

removes once and for all the doubts in the minds of one and all

 

dasan

vanamamalai padmanabhan

On 7/15/07, TCA Venkatesan <vtca wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sri:Srimathe Ramanujaya Nama:

 

oru mithunamE uththEsyamBy Sri U Ve P.B. Annangarachariar Swami1963

 

An abridged translation by TCA Venkatesan

 

14. Even though Vedanta Desika, who is Kavitarkika Kesari, has made this so clear, there are some who either are confused that Piratti too can be the means or even when their confusionis removed, due to old habits, keep writing " mithunamE upAyam " . Not stopping at that, they also said that it is this idea thatmade an acharya write " upAya vELaiyOdu bhOga vELaiyOdu vAsiyaRaoru mithunamE uththEsyam " .

 

15. It becomes our duty to explain the truth to those who don't understand it. The divya sUkti " AshrayaNa vELaiyOdu bhOga vELaiyOdu vAsiyaRa oru mithunamE uththEsyam ennumidam solliRRAyiRRu " is present in Idu 36000padi Mahapravesham. The phrase used here is 'AshrayaNa vELai' and not 'upAya vELai'. It has already been made clear in the passages above, how the divine couple are seeked during the time of surrender and howthey are seeked during the time of service. Vedanta Desikan's divine words have shown these very clearly. During the time ofsurrender, it is appropriate that She is seeked - not as the means but as the one who will mediate - where is the confusionhere?

 

16. Just as the divine couple are the target for service, as said in the second part of Dvayam, where is the issue in sayingthat they are the target when being seeked as well, as said in the first part. However, there is a difference. Seeking the Lord is done with Him as the means. Seeking Sri is done with Her as the mediator. This difference has been shown clearly byall acharyas including Desikan. To evade all that and to incorrectly use the Sri Sukti of Idu is unfair.

 

--

 

The rest of the book has some additional comments and points outerrors in certain works of his time.

 

A scanned copy of the original Tamil text is at:http://www.acharya.org/books/PBA/OruMithunam-PBA.pdf

 

Concluded

Azhvar Emberumanar Jeeyar Thiruvadigale Sharanam

 

adiyEn madhurakavi dAsanhttp://www.acharya.org

 

 

Building a website is a piece of cake. Small Business gives you

all the tools to get online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...