Guest guest Posted January 29, 2010 Report Share Posted January 29, 2010 Jai Srimannarayana! (Contd.....) “My dear friend, your talk has some truth in it and more falsehood in it.” The atheist got irritated. He seriously said,“All I said is truth! You yourself accepted that you have not sensed either the God or the individual soul (Jeevatman) using sense organs. How is that you say that my talk has falsehood?”. I replied, “No one can sense and thus know the God or the individual soul using the sense organs. In that manner, your argument is having truth. My answer to your questions regarding “Have you sensed God/individual soul using sense organs?” was “No” in this context of only. By saying “No” I never meant that “God and Jeevatman” cannot be known at all. They cannot be known by application of sense organs like eyes, ears etc. but can be known by other authorities. The atheist on hearing my counter-argument said with a giggle, “What else could be considered as authority other than the Pratyaksha Pramanam (application of sense organs and thus getting knowledge)? Why cannot we accept that there is no God or no Jeevaatman (individual soul) as they are not sensed by sense organs?” I spoke to the atheist and asked him to commit one thing – which is “Are you atheist committing that any entity that cannot be sensed by application of sense organs is not existing?” The atheist repeated that he commits the same and only Pratyaksha pramanam is valid. I said to the atheist – “Have you not come across ‘Ultrasonic sound” in science which cannot be heard by our ears but still proved by science as existing entity? Have you not come across “Ultra Violet light” which cannot be seen by our eyes but still proved by science as existing entity? Have you ever seen the structure of atom which science has proved to be composed of certain constituents? Have you touched it? Have you tasted it? Have you smelt it? How is that you comprehend the dual nature of light? It is also natural that two individuals may get different knowledge about the same object using their sense organs in different ways because of the effectiveness of each individual’s sense organs. Further each sense organ has its own limitations in its applications”. On hearing my counter-arguments in the form of questions, the atheist was silent for a minute and then the atheist asked me “See this my friend, you have wonderfully argued and made my commitment to be null and void. But this does not prove the presence of God or individual soul. Science has proved those entities that you mentioned like ultra violet rays, ultrasonic sound etc by experimenting, observation, and inferences. There is scientific scriptural authority for it given by scientists.” I saw the face of the atheist when he was saying this to me – it was pale and he has totally stopped his laughter and giggle. He has become totally serious. I now addressed the atheist as follows: “Your own words prove that you accept the reality/presence/existence of certain entities which cannot be comprehended by application of our senses organs”. The atheist now said, “Yes”. I then took him with me to meet another person who called himself as a “Believer” in God. Andal Tiruvadigale Saranam Madhava Ramanuja dasan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.