Guest guest Posted April 28, 2000 Report Share Posted April 28, 2000 SrI: SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaha SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN SatakOpa - SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESIkAya namaha Dear devotees, namO nArAyaNa. In the book " Philosophy and Theistic Mysticism of Alvars " by SrI SMS Chari, he quotes two pramAnas to the effect that Brahman as a metaphysical entity is different from its divine body (pg 90, on Divine Personality, in the Doctrine of God). They are reproduced here. Saatvata Samhita, Poushkara Samhita and JayAkya Samhita are regarded as the " Ratna Traya " (Three Jewels) in pAncAratra. Saatvata Samhita (2.69-70) states " SAntaha samvit-svarUpastu bhaktAnugraha-kAmyayA anaupamyEna vapushAhy-amUrtO mUrtatAm gataha " ie. " The Ultimate Reality is devoid of a form (amUrta), but it assumes a limited form (mUrtatA) for the sake of devotees and this limited form is incomparable (anupama) " . This implies that the divyAtma svaroopa (ds) of Brahman is not made up of a form, similar to how a jIvAtma's svaroopa doesn't have any form. But, Brahman takes a form for the pleasure of His devotees. Also, the divine body assumed by SrIman nArAyaNa at SrI VaikUNTham is eternal and anAdi. Hence Brahman certainly has a divine body eternally. Another quote is from the JitantE Stotram, a khila sUkta of Rg vEda : " na tE rUpam na ca aakArO na-aayudhAni na ca-aaspadam | tathApi purusha-AkArO bhaktAnAm tvam prakASasE || " " You <in ds> donot have any physical qualities such as white or black (rUpa) ; You <in ds> do not possess any physical organs such as head or legs (aakAra) ; nor are there any weapons or ornaments on You < in ds> (aayudha) ; nor do You have an abode <ie. ds being all pervading, there is no specific abode by which Brahman's presence is limited>; Neverthless out of Your infinite compassion towards devotees <who can't comprehend and reciprocate with You as ds>, You manifest Yourself with a lusturous bodily form bedecked with ornaments and weapons in an abode of Yours < Be it arcAvatAra, vibhava avatAra etc> " . note : This has been explained very well by SrI PuttankOttakam SrInivAsAchArya swAmi ( a great scholar of the last century and well known contemporary of 42nd HH Jeeyar of Ahobila Mutt viz. SrImad InjimEttu Azhagiyasingar ), in his commentry. SrI SMS Chari has followed his explanations. ------------------ There are many more pramAnas in the pAncarAtra on this issue. I will later quote the section from SrI VishNu purANam which explains as to how the bhakti yOgi (upAsaka) in his matured final stages of upAsana is able to meditate on the divyAtma swaroopam of Brahman, with its characteristics as Satyatvam, jn~yAnatvam etc, without the divine body. Please also refer to SrI BhAshyam on adhikaraNAs like AntaradhikaraNa (1.1.21),SarvatraprasiddhyadhikaraNa (1.2.7), AdruSyatvadhikaraNa (1.2.23-24), VaishwAnara-adhikaraNa (1.2.30-31), Dahara-adhikaraNa (1.3.20), PramitadhikaraNa (1.3.24), ........and Ubhayalinga adhikaraNa (3.2.11+). This will give a good picture on the distinction between Brahman and its form, the need of the form taken by Brahman being for the purpose of meditation by bhakti yOgis (upAsakas) etc. adiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, anantapadmanAbhan, KrishNArpaNam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.