Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Small Doubt on DashavatAra.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Sri Malolan Cadambi:

 

I am delighted to hear that HH Srimath Azhagiyasingar

was at your house for a dhOlOthsavam for KaNNan.

 

I will try to provide some answers to your

two questions (Listed at the end of this posting.

Please refer to them first before browsing this posting

for context):

 

(1) Question 1: Sri BalarAmA avathAram is 8th in

the series of DasAvathArams .Sri KrishNA's is 9th .

Hence KrishNAvatharam is recognized in our

sampradhAyam as the one following Sri BalarAmAvathaaram.

You can find support ofr this hierarchy in Swamy Desikan's

DasAvathaara Sthothram . Pakkathkourava pattaNa prabhruthaya:

( salutation to Sri BalarAmAvathAram ) precedes

NaathAyaiva nama: padham ( salutation to Sri KrishNA ).

 

Whether Shri BalarAmAvathAram is an amsAvathAram

like ParasurAmAvathAram is some thing other BhakthAs

would like to comment.It must be pointed out

that ParasurAmAvatharam is one in which the Lord

infused His divine powers in a pious Brahmin for

performing some miracles .During the AyOdhyA-

RaamAvathAram , the Lord pulled back all

the divine powers from ParusurAmaan. Thus,

ParasurAmAvathAram is not considered a direct

avathArAm of Sriman NaarAyaNA , although AzhwArs

and AchAryAs have paid their tributes to ParasurAman

inview of His traditional inclusion in the DasAvathArams.

 

Another point is that ParasurAman and Sri Raaman

(Chakravarthi Thirumahan ) coexisted upto a point in time.

In other words , there was an overlap of two avathArams

in time scale. Same is true for BalarAma-KrishNAvathArams.

Sriman NaarAyaNA took on the avathAram of BalarAman

to enact the role of the elder brother of KaNNan .

BalarAman was never away from KaNNan (apruthakbhUthan

in Swamy Desikan's mangaLAsAsanam). Swamy Desikan goes on

to salute the inseperable aspect of BalarAman and

KaNNan from boyhood as sugar and milk mixed together

for enhanced enjoyment of the BhakthAs (Ksheram sarkkarayEva).

Further, Swamy Desikan points out that the joint

leelais of BalarAmAn and KrishNan enriched and multiplied

the quality of our anubhavams and made that anubhavam

delectable thru such union ( thaa keLaya: prabhUthai:

guNai: jagathE asvadhantha). It is thus difficult to

separate BalarAmAvathAram from that of KrishNaa from

the enjoyment point of view. Thus we can not replace

BalarAma avathAram by BuddhAvathAram , which will leave

a jolting void . There are however more serious

objections to include BuddhAvathAram among the ten

avathArams of the Lord.Prior to discussing the

latter, let us enjoy the second half of the majestic

slOkam of Swamy Desikan to pay his salute to

BalarAman in the SaardhUla VikrIditham meter:

 

These key words on BalarAmAvathAram in Swamy Desikan's

salutation are worthy of our attention :

 

" Ksheeram sakkarayEva yaabhi: apruthaghbhUthA: prabhUthairguNai:

aakoumArakam asvadhantha jagathE KrishNasya thaa kELaya: "

 

 

(2) Question 2: In our sampradhAyam , Buddhism

and Jainism are considered as mathams that do not

accept Vedham ( Vedha Baahya Mathams)and hence are rejected

at the first step of consideration . Hence , there will

be no way to accept the founder of Buddhism , Gauthama BuddhA

as an avthAram of Sriman NaarAyaNA. The views of BuddhA

are considered nihilistic and for a fuller study of

Sri VisishtAdhvatin's objections to the views of BuddhA

and the variations thereof developed by his followers ,

Swamy Desikan's terse and brilliant monograph,

" SarvArtha Siddhi " is a must to read. Thus,

BuddhA can never be included as an avathAram of

Sriman NaarAyaNA in our sampradhAyam .

 

Best wishes,

V.Sadagopan

 

At 03:27 AM 4/28/00 +0530, you wrote:

Sri:

Srimathe Malola NarasimhAya Namaha

-------------------------

 

>Dear Bhaktas,

>I have a small doubt. Please help me by clearing my doubt.

>

>In the line of the Dasha AvatAram, Balarama comes after Krishna. But

>during the end of the MahabharatA, Balarama goes back into the Ocean in

>>the form of a serpent. I was told the Balarama as well as Lakshmana are

>>the incarnations of Adi Sesha. If this is true, then how can the 9th

>>Avatar ( Balarama) be of Lord Vishnu's AvatarA. Some texts say the 9th

>>Avatara after Krishna-vatara is the Buddha-vatara.

>>

>>NamO Narayana,

>>

>>Malolan Cadambi

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>------

>>Now the best and coolest websites come right to you based on your

>>unique interests. eTour.com is surfing without searching.

>>And, it's FREE!

>>http://click./1/3013/2/_/716111/_/956878908/

>>------

>>

>>-----------------------------

>> - SrImate rAmAnujAya namaH -

>>To Post a message, send it to: bhakti-list (AT) eGroups (DOT) com

>>Visit http://www.ramanuja.org/sv/bhakti/ for more information

>>

>>

>>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...