Guest guest Posted September 19, 2000 Report Share Posted September 19, 2000 Dear SrI Srinath Chakravarty, You have written: >Regarding the possible affiliations of these rishis to >later vedantic interpretations of Advaita and VisistAdvaita, >the answer is no. Advaita is a personal interpretaion. But VisistAdvaita is the purport of VedAnta-GIta and Brahma SUtra. This the reason why our matham is called as " parama-vaidika-matham " . Its siddhAntham and anushtAnam are both " parama-vaidikam " . You have written: >But the fact remains that bAdarAyaNa precedes advaita/visistAdvaita >by at least a couple of thousand years! As for valmeeki, he >preceded even vyAsa in chronology - which certainly eliminates >any possiblity of his affiliation with these philosophies. If it is understood clearly that neither SrIman NAthamuni nor Bhagavath Ramanuja founded VisishtAdvaita SrI VaisNava philosophy and practice, and it is the eternal philosophy and practice of apowrusheya Sruthi, then your reply becomes a personal opinion. Thanks & Regards M.S.HARI Ramanuja Daasan. __________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.