Guest guest Posted September 22, 2000 Report Share Posted September 22, 2000 ===================================================================== Part 5 - SwAmi SrI DESika Prabandam - " artha panchakam " ===================================================================== SrImAn vEnkata nAthArya: kavitArkika kEsarI | VedAnthAchArya varyOmE sannidhaththAm sadA hrudi || ===================================================================== rAmAnuja dayA pAtram jgnyAna vairAgya bhUshaNam | SrImath vEnkata nAthAryam vandE vEdAntha dESikam || ===================================================================== SrImathE vEdAntha mahA dESikAya nama: ===================================================================== In the previous postings, we enjoyed the first two pAsurams of SrI DESika Prabandam - " artha panchakam " and had the anubhavam of PrApya-swarUpam. Now we take up the next two pAsurams, which discusses the prAptA-swarUpam. PrAptA is the jIvAthman, who attains the goal (prApyam). BhUthavudal pulankaNmanam pullAvi pundhiyenum YAdumala nAyilagi yAnenumin nuNNaRivAich ChEthananA yadimaiyumA muyirkkellAn thNNuyirAith ThIdilinRth thigazhunChI raththigiri thirumAlE The jIvAthman is eternal, imperishable and is different from the body (sarIram), senses (indriyas), mind (manas), vital-airs (prANa-vAyus), jgnyAnam (attribute-knowledge). He is swayam-prakAsa, meaning he realizes himself as " I " , self-illumines. He is finite (aNu), jgnyAna-Ananda (knowledge-bliss)-swarUpa. He has jgnyAna as attribute and it is called dharma-bhUtha-jgnyAna. There are innumerable such jIvAthamans. The jIvAthman in a body and the jIvAthman in another body are different individuals but each of them has same nature as told above. The swarUpam of jIvAthman is Seshatvam, that is, the jIvAthman is identified as the property of SrIman NArAyaNa: owned by SrIman NArAyaNa:, and the jIvAthman exists for the purpose of SrIman NArAyaNa: The jIvAthman is the " DAsa: " (servant) of SrIman NArAyaNa: SrIman NArAyaNa: who is having the jIvAthman as his body and SrIman NArAyaNa: being the antaryAmi of the jIvAthman, shines at the top of the elephant-hill " aththigiri " (Satya-vratha-kshetram - KanchIpuram). ThAnadaitha guNankaruvi thankirisai vazhiyozhukki YUneduththuN dumizhnduzhalu muirkkellA muyirAgik KAnadaththik kamalayudan kaNdugandu viLayAdun ThEnEduththa chOlaigaLshUzh tiruvaththi yUrAnE The jIvAthman utilizes his attributes, indriyAs etc., (which are given to him by SrIman NArAyaNa: as per the jIvAthman's karma) under the full control of SrIman NArAyaNa's sankalpam (wish). The jIvAthman, being inside his body, enjoys and suffers in the mundane world. This samsAra-cycle, which has no beginning, goes on and on. SrIman NArAyaNa: being the antaryAmi of the jIvAthman, enjoys the LIla-rasam (sport) by making the jIvAthman to experience his (jIvAthman's) karma. Before we proceed to enjoy the above pAsurams in detail, let me explain the concept of lakshaNam and lakshyam. When an object (lakshyam) is identified by its lakshaNam (characteristic), the lakshaNam has to be perfectly suitable to the lakshyam such that the lakshyam is clearly identified uniquely. At this point, we have to note that the lakshaNam should be the " hethu " (reason) in anumAna-prayOgam (inference-logic) and should clearly distinguish the lakshyam from other objects. I think this will be slightly difficult to follow for beginners. Let me explain it using a famous example. Let us consider " cow " as lakshyam. In the context, let me say " Gow: itharabhinnA SAsnAdimathvAth " , which is the anumAna-prayOgam. The " SAsnA " is a bunch of skin hanging in the neck portion of the cow. The lakshaNam " possessing SAsnA " is the hethu in the anumAna-prayOga and identifies the animal as " cow " and also differentiates it from other animals like buffalo. In such cases, the hethu must be free from three types of errors namely 1. avyApthi 2. athivyApthi 3. asambhavam If any of the error(s) is/are present in the hethu, then it will be inadequate to establish the individuality of the lakshyam. avyApthi-dOsham: ================ " lakshyaikadEsE avruthithvam " - " being inadequate to identify some individual objects of the same kind " . If suppose it is said " cow is that which are black (nIla-rUpathvam) " , being black in form becomes the lakshaNam in the lakshya cow. But a white cow is also existing. Therefore, the " blackness " is inadequate to identify the entity " cow " . athivyApthi-dOsham: =================== " lakshyEtharE vruthithvam " - " being common across different objects " If suppose it is said " cow is that which has horn (srungithvam) " , then " possessing horn " is also common in deer, buffalo etc., which are different from cow. Therefore, this is also not appropriate to identify the entity " cow " . asambhava-dOsham: ================= " lakshaNa-asambhavam " - " non-existing characteristic of the object " If suppose it is said " cow is that which has single foot-division (kuLambu) (Ekachapavathvam) " , then this is non-existing in " cow " because the cow has two foot-divisions in each of its four legs. When the jIvAthman's swarUpam is told, swAmi NigamAntha MahA DESika (in jIva-parichchEda:, nyAya sidhdAnjanam) says " atha: jIva: alpaparimANathvE sathi jgnyAthruthvam, SEshatvE sathi jgnyAthruthvam ithyAdi thallakshaNam " . From the artham (meaning) conveyed by the terms " ithyAdi " , " aNuthvE sathi jgnyAthruthvam " is also considered. Here it has to be noted that the term before " sathi " is called " viSEshaNa daLam " (attribute) and the term after " sathi " is called " viSeshya daLam " (attributed). " alpaparimANathvE sathi jgnyAthruthvam " : jgnyAthruthvam is common to jIvAthman and Iswara. But, " alpaparimANathvam " differentiates the jIvAthman from Iswara: because " alpaparimANathvam " is not applicable to Iswara: as Iswara: is " vibhu: " . " alpaparimANathvE sathi jgnyAthruthvam " has to be understood as " alpaparimANathva visishta jgnyAthruthvam " . If suppose only " alpaparimANathvam " is considered as jIva-lakshaNam, then it is very well known that " alpaparimANathvam " is applicable to insentient entities like pot, chair etc. Therefore, the athivyApthi-dOsham arises. To eliminate this error, " alpaparimANathvE sathi jgnyAthruthvam " is considered. That is, " jgnyAthruthvam " is not in insentient entities like pot, chair etc. Therefore, jIvAthman gets differentiated from insentient (achit) thathvas. ===================================================================== To be continued… ===================================================================== ===================================================================== kavitArkika-simhAya kalyANa guNa SAlinE | SrImathE VEnkatESAya VEdAntha guravE nama: || ===================================================================== Thanks & Regards M.S.HARI Ramanuja Daasan (mshari) ===================================================================== __________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.