Sri rAmanujar vis-a-vis Adi Sankarar

[Guest guest]

SrI:

SrImathE rAmAnujAya namaH

SrImathE vEdAnta guravE namaH

 

Dear SrI anantapadmanAbhan swAmi,

 

Thanks for dEvarIr's clarification. although it might

have been written for rasAnubhavam, aDiyEn must tell

that, those very thought, instead of giving a rasA to

him, jarred upon the feelings of him. aDiyEn feels

that " comparing the smallest demi-god to be equal to

the Supreme Lord " (the greatest demigod himself is

infinitesimally smaller than the Supreme Who is

infinite) would have inflicted a lesser pain to him

than this comparison.

 

" vundO ethirAsarukku oppu oruvar?

vundO SrI bhAsyathukku oppu?

perumpoothoorukku undO? ippAr thanilokkum oor? "

 

Is there an equal to Sri rAmAnuja, who is the king of

Yatis? Is there any comparison to " SrI " BAShyam? Is

there a divya kshetra equal to " SrI " perumpoothoor?

 

NO NO NO

 

" lipse lakshmanayOgina: padayugam ratyA parAgacchatA-

rakshArOpaNa danyasoori parishatsImanta sImAntikam

|

bhikshA paryatanakshaNeshu bibharAm chakrae

galatkilbisha

yadvinyAsamisheNa patra makarI mudrAm samudrAmbarA

|| "

 

yatirAja Saptati (64)

 

 

aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan,

laksmikumAr.

srimad azhagiya singar thiruvadigalE saranam!

-------

 

> I happened to read from a book that " Adi Sankarar

came

> as Sri rAmAnujar again to this world " .

>

> Could learned bAgavAthAs clarify this please?

 

Well, aDiyEn feels that it has been read by me also.

Our PUrvAchAryas haven't d to that view and

the

current AchAryas also do not accept that view which

aDiyEn

got it clarified few months back.

 

But, the author's intention is more in terms of

puttingforth

a rasAnubhavam, than to make a doctrine or fact out

of it.

The author's intent is that while SrI Adi Sa~nkarar

incorporated

ViSishTAdvaita in his vyavahArika-Satya {which can

be found after

deep scrutiny, as established by " PaNDitarAja " SrI

DT TAtAchArya

SwAmi in his ViSishTAdvaita Siddhi}, he couldn't

make it as the

ultimate siddhAnta due to lack of time. Hence it

appears that

he incarnated again as Bhagavad RAmAnuja {same

thirunakshatram }

to establish what was left unfulfilled earlier. The

statement has

to be taken in a lighter vain only and not as a

fact. Ofcourse,

its quite mis-leading for sure, to all the readers.

 

It is quite well known that SrI Adi Sa~nkarar is

regarded as the

avatAra of Lord Siva to propagate mAyAvAda

{mOha-SAstras} under

the directions of PerumAL {ref RTS}.

 

> " nAm manni vAzha solluvOm irAmAnusan nAmangalE "

>

> " May we chant the names of our lord Sri rAmAnujar

and

> have our lives proper! "

 

aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan,

anantapadmanAbhan.

 

 

 

 

Get email at your own domain with Mail.

http://personal.mail./